F
Abraham was not saved by obeying a patriarchal law. From moses to Christ. no one was saved by obeying the law of moses. and from Christ till today, no one is saved by obeying the new testamnt law. thus your whole argument is fruitless.
Rom_10:16 But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Esaias saith, Lord, who hath believed our report?
Gal_3:1 O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you?
Gal_5:7 Ye did run well; who did hinder you that ye should not obey the truth?
Yea we will not be saved if we believe we must obey,
your argument is just plain foolishness.
Thats why you keep posting acting as if you have not already been proven wrong, condtridiced yourself, and have shown the inconsisenty in your argument.
You mean like this?
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19 because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, 21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools,
Notice here. Paul is talking about ALL TIME SINCE CREATION. BEFORE THE LAW WAS GIVEN! This includes the time of Abraham. Abraham chose not to be foolish, and took what God showed, and believed, and because of it, he was saved. NO ONE HAS EXCUSE. do you understand what that means? No one since creation. LONG before the law was given!
Notice here. Paul is talking about ALL TIME SINCE CREATION. BEFORE THE LAW WAS GIVEN! This includes the time of Abraham. Abraham chose not to be foolish, and took what God showed, and believed, and because of it, he was saved. NO ONE HAS EXCUSE. do you understand what that means? No one since creation. LONG before the law was given!
James?? you mean zero works = zero salvation?
That is what the bible teaches. To say you must obay God is to put yourself under law. Plain and simple.
lol. again you twist things. Your arguing against the licentious. the same people James fought against. And if that were our topic. I would agree with you 100 %, because I would fight a licentious gospel as hard as I fight a legalistic gospel. The thing is, there are very few licentious people I know who teach this.
A person who is truly saved (has faith) would not even think of not obeying. why? Because they know they are guilty, and they know God wants them to change. and they will change out of gratitude for what God did for them.
A person who is truly saved (has faith) would not even think of not obeying. why? Because they know they are guilty, and they know God wants them to change. and they will change out of gratitude for what God did for them.
Hebrews was written to jewish (hebrew) Christians. and refuting what other jews were doing. Trying to add law to grace. You can't see this. that is your problem.
You said Hebrews was not written to the church, but now you say it was written to Christians.
Please explain to me how that can be?
I am not going to overlook your wishy washy statements anymore, please tells me how someone can write a group of Christians, but not be writing the church.
The things of God are foolishness. You think it is easy. It is not as easy as you want it to be. It is NOT saying what you are saying, period!
It is easy to understand, it's when the messengers of Satan come and "vain words and fair speeches decieve the hearts of the simple".
You interpretation are a perfect example of this in action.
yeah he is, if your trying animal sacrifice top seek forgiveness and sin willingly. Your wasting your time. Why do you thinki the author went over and over about animal sacrifice?
In fact none of them were trying to sacrifice animals, they were Christians.
In fact he showing them in Ch. 10 how the law was a "shadow" of the thing to come in the NT.
This does not mean any of them were trying to use animal sacrifice.
COntext COntext Context
For the sake of others?
You said that since it said to the church it was written to them. It also said it was written to Christ and to the sprinkling of blood. I used yourt example and reasoning. and it is not ok?? That is called hypocracy.
ps.. why do you never respond to the james vs paul arguments? is it because you know you have no argument against what I said?
You said that since it said to the church it was written to them. It also said it was written to Christ and to the sprinkling of blood. I used yourt example and reasoning. and it is not ok?? That is called hypocracy.
ps.. why do you never respond to the james vs paul arguments? is it because you know you have no argument against what I said?
Im sick of the flip flop, above you say written to Christians, before you not written to the church but those under the law??????
I have responded to James and Paul, multiple times, I even in an earlier post broke down the entire ch.2 of Eph, you just dont care, you are mad because I have cornered you, you have no way out and you believe in a works salvation. This angers you so you keep posting hoping no one will notice you have been shut down in you arguments.