Who is GOD.......?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

pickles

Senior Member
Apr 20, 2009
14,479
182
63
Ive been reading corr. reciently, again. Mostly because of all the debate over the law.
What I understand and what I believe in Jesus is that we no longer live under the law but by grace. That does not mean ignore the law but that we no longer need the law.
As Paul said I am dead to the Law.
One can and should be able to walk in grace, thus free from condemnation.
If one cannot walk without the law because their own condemnation should cause them to stumble then one must live in the law.
But if you are able to walk in grace, free of the law by that where you do not stumble because of condemnation, but of good contience in Jesus.
I guess simply said is if you do not condem yourself, because self condemnation keeps you from walking fully in Jesus, not sin.
Paul did warn of overconfidence, but we are free of the law because of grace. Thus because of love being the greatest comandment we can walk free of the law.
There is only one judgement and that is of Our lord God. Thats where the fear of the lord comes in.
I know many ether debate or are not sure of this. But the more I read the more is revieled through the Holy Spirit on this.
It seems to me that the main thing that tries to separate us from God is the accusser. Eather judgement by satan or ourselves.
That this is often what gets in the way.
Look at Adam and Eve, the sin was to eat of the fruit of knowladge of good and evil. Their eyes were open and they saw their shame thus they covered themselves. They judged themselves.
Jesus came to save the world not to judge it.
It seems to me that our true enemy in the world is judgement, that is what had and we still allow to separate us from God.
Judgement is mine says the Lord.This is the only judgement we are under, and again Jesus took all of our sins for us.
Scripture says we should be like children to sin. That not only means innocent of sin but innocent to sin.
Keeping our eyes of Jesus so that we do not condem ourselves or others.
If we live by the greatest comandment we will then meet all that is asked.
God bless, pickles

Ok this was on these two comandments and somehow jumped to here. Can anyone tell me how to move it to that thread?
God bless, pickles
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
I GIVE SCRIPTURE REFERENCE BEFORE I PREECH

I ALSO TELL THEM
TO GO HOME READ FOR YOURSELVES AND IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ASK
YOU WILL NOT AGREE EVER WITH ME 100% I TELL THEM

WHAT I DO EMPHASIZE
WE MUST FIND A COMMON GROUND
BY WHICH WE AS BELIEVER CAN COME TOGETHER
AND WORSHIP GOD TOGETHER
IF
YOU CANNOT WORSHIP SIDE BY SIDE
WITH THOSE WHO DISAGREE WITH YOU OR YOU DISAGREE WITH THEM
2 THINGS WILL NEVER HAPPEN

1. WE WILL NEVER BE IN ONE ACCORD

2. IF YOU CANNOT WORSHIP TOGETHER ON EARTH
YOU WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO WORSHIP TOGETHER IN HEAVEN

UNTIL YOU GET PAST WHAT THEIR DOCTRINE IS
AND SEE THEM AS BROTHERS / STSTERS AND BELIEVERS IN CHRIST
THEN GOD
WILL NEVER SEE YOU AS CHILDREN OF HIM

BY THE WAY I INHERITED A SMALL CHURCH WHEN WE FIRST STARTED
WE ARE ABOUT 700 NOW
AND NOT EVERYONE EXCEPTS ALL THAT I SAY OR PREECH
BUT WHAT THEY DO RESPECT AND LOVE
I SEE THEM AS EQUALS AND JOINT-HEIRS OF GOD
BECAUSE THEY ARE..........
Does that mean you also accept JW's and mormons as equals and joint-heirs of God?
 
Dec 21, 2009
538
1
0
55
Does that mean you also accept JW's and mormons as equals and joint-heirs of God?

THERE IS A CLEAR DEFINITION BETWEEN DOCTRINAL DIFFERENCES
AND
OCCULTIC PRACTICES


WHAT DOCTRINAL DIFFERENCES I AM REFERING TO IS

ONE CLAIMS
FATHER - WORD - HOLY GHOST TO BE
3 GODS AS SEPARATE BEINGS
OTHERS
VIEW IT AS
ONE GOD WITH TITLES


JEUS IS
BROTHER OF SATAN TO MORMONS
AND
ARCH ANGEL MICHAEL TO JW'S
THIS IS OCCULTIC
 
Last edited:
M

miktre

Guest
That's right.

Spurgeon says, in his sermon His Name, the Everlasting Father (1866)

His Name--The Everlasting Father It is necessary at the outset to observe that the Messiah is not here called “Father,” by way of any confusion with him who is pre- eminently called “THE FATHER.” Our Lord’s proper name, so far as Godhead is concerned, is not the Father, but the Son. Let us beware of confusion. The Son is not the Father, neither is the Father the Son; and though they be one God, essentially and eternally, being for evermore one and indivisible, yet still the distinction of persons is to be carefully believed and observed. For the mere word “Persons” we do not contend; it is but a make- shift word, although we know not what better term to use; but the fact is all- important that the Father is not the Son, and the Son is not the Father. Our text has no bearing upon the position and titles of the three Persons with regard to each other; it does not indicate the relation of Deity to itself, but the relation of Jesus Christ to us. He is to us “the everlasting Father.”

Couldn't agree with more on this one, Snail. I believe in the Oneness of God and yet also the Holy Trinity. Now not everyone has the same definition of Trinity, so those that lump everyone in the same boat is done in ignorance. The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, three that are one=Trinity. One God.
 
M

miktre

Guest
I would beware, those who come in here saying that His children that believe in The Father , the Son, and the Holy Spirit and call it a Trinity are pagan worshipping. Beware and you better treat this very subject with a little more respect, that's all I'll say.
 

VW

Banned
Dec 22, 2009
4,579
9
0
THERE IS A CLEAR DEFINITION BETWEEN DOCTRINAL DIFFERENCES
AND
OCCULTIC PRACTICES


WHAT DOCTRINAL DIFFERENCES I AM REFERING TO IS

ONE CLAIMS
FATHER - WORD - HOLY GHOST TO BE
3 GODS AS SEPARATE BEINGS
OTHERS
VIEW IT AS
ONE GOD WITH TITLES


JEUS IS
BROTHER OF SATAN TO MORMONS
AND
ARCH ANGEL MICHAEL TO JW'S
THIS IS OCCULTIC
How about one God with three separate beings?

I don't read that JW stuff. It is pretty well off the beaten path. (Nicest words I can come up with for that.)

vic
 
S

shad

Guest
-they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so-
.
Concerning your signature. You speak of the Bereans in Berea who Paul preached to. There is a common misunderstanding about the Bereans searching the scriptures daily, whether those things were so. They were Jewish unbelievers and many others were Greek women and men. Paul preached to them the word of God concerning Christ. They went to the scriptures to make sure they understood what Paul was teaching and many of them believed. They did this daily to make sure they had the right understanding and the more they checked it out the more of them believed. They were not checking to see if Paul was preaching the truth because that would indicate they had the truth. If they had the truth why did they not believe until after Paul preached? Paul was sent to preach the word that they had not heard and they received it with a ready mind. God had prepared them to receive the word and become believers in Christ. As soon as some of the Jews in Thessalonica heard about Paul preaching the word and their conversions, they went over to stir up the people against what they heard. Paul was sent away but Silas and Timothy stayed with the people. I don't know what you think but that is what happened.
 
M

miktre

Guest
Concerning your signature. You speak of the Bereans in Berea who Paul preached to. There is a common misunderstanding about the Bereans searching the scriptures daily, whether those things were so. They were Jewish unbelievers and many others were Greek women and men. Paul preached to them the word of God concerning Christ. They went to the scriptures to make sure they understood what Paul was teaching and many of them believed. They did this daily to make sure they had the right understanding and the more they checked it out the more of them believed. They were not checking to see if Paul was preaching the truth because that would indicate they had the truth. If they had the truth why did they not believe until after Paul preached? Paul was sent to preach the word that they had not heard and they received it with a ready mind. God had prepared them to receive the word and become believers in Christ. As soon as some of the Jews in Thessalonica heard about Paul preaching the word and their conversions, they went over to stir up the people against what they heard. Paul was sent away but Silas and Timothy stayed with the people. I don't know what you think but that is what happened.
Paul fled in the night from Thessalonica to Berea (Acts 17:10) and taught in the synagogue there (during the Second Mission Journey). In the synagogue he found people who were eager to receive the Gospel and compare it with the Old Testament Scriptures. The Berean search of the Scriptures daily became an example to early Christians, and the name was carried to later churches everywhere. Luke notes that many believed, and includes that "honorable women which were Greeks, and of men, not a few" (Acts 17:12) came to Jesus, didn't anything about jews coming to Jesus. Get your story straight.
 
Dec 21, 2009
538
1
0
55
How about one God with three separate beings?

I don't read that JW stuff. It is pretty well off the beaten path. (Nicest words I can come up with for that.)

vic

FROM MIKTRE

I would beware, those who come in here saying that His children that believe in The Father , the Son, and the Holy Spirit and call it a Trinity are pagan worshipping. Beware and you better treat this very subject with a little more respect, that's all I'll say.



FROM JOINT-HEIR

ONENESS IS ABOUT THE PRESENCE OF ONE ALMIGHTY GOD ALONE SECOND TO NONE.
IT IS WITHIN THIS ONE GOD
WE HAVE CLEAR AND DISTINCT EVIDENCE OF SPECIFIC ROLES
BUT THE ROLE ..........OF ..........THE FATHER - WORD - HOLY GHOST
IS NO DIFFERENT
THAN THE ROLE OF
OMNIPOTENT - OMNIPRESENCE - OMNISCIENT - GRACE - LOVE - PEACE -
MIGHTY GOD - EVERLASTING FATHER - PRINCE OF PEACE - KING OF KINGS -
LORD OF LORDS - COUNSELOUR - WONDERFUL - MESSIAH - IMMANUEL -
EMMANUEL - JEHOVA - ELOIHIM - ALPHA AND OMEGA - THE GREAT I AM -
I AM THAT I AM - FIRST AND LAST - BEGINNING AND THE END - FRIEND -
LILLY OF THE VALLEY - ROSE OF SHARON - THE LAMB - SACRIFICE - MERCY -
CREATOR - HIGH PRIEST - MEDIATOR - AUTHOR AND FINISHER - GODHEAD -
GOOD - RIGHTEOUSNESS - VICTORY - POWER - JESUS CHRIST

EACH AND EVERY NAME I LISTED INCLUDING .......FATHER - WORD - HOLY GHOST
ARE NAMES AND ROLES
THAT DESCRIBE THE ONE AND ALMIGHTY GOD

ONENESS IS NOT A CLAIM THAT NONE OF THESE EXIST
ONENESS IS A CLAIM THAT THEY ONLY EXIST IN ONE PERSON OF GOD
AND THIS ONE PERSON WHO IS ALMIGHTY GOD
IS NOT LIMITED AND HAS NO LACK OF CAPABILITIES TO PERFORM
EVERY ROLE THAT CLASSIFIES AND REPRESENTS GOD ALMIGHTY

WE DO NOT BELIEVE THAT GOD IS LIMITED
SO THAT IT TAKES 3 SEPARATE PERSONS TO FULFILL THESE ROLES
WE CLEARLY UNDERSTAND
THAT GOD ALONE
CAN DO ANYTHING AND ALL THINGS AS HE SO CHOOSES TO DO THEM
WE UNDERSTAND THAT
EZEKIEL 1:26...
ONE THRONE WITH ONE GOD WHO IN THE LIKENESS OF MAN FULFILLS THIS ROLE

THIS IS WHAT IT IS TO BE ONENESS
 
Last edited:
Dec 21, 2009
538
1
0
55
FROM MIKTRE

I would beware, those who come in here saying that His children that believe in The Father , the Son, and the Holy Spirit and call it a Trinity are pagan worshipping. Beware and you better treat this very subject with a little more respect, that's all I'll say.



FROM JOINT-HEIR

ONENESS IS ABOUT THE PRESENCE OF ONE ALMIGHTY GOD ALONE SECOND TO NONE.
IT IS WITHIN THIS ONE GOD
WE HAVE CLEAR AND DISTINCT EVIDENCE OF SPECIFIC ROLES
BUT THE ROLE ..........OF ..........THE FATHER - WORD - HOLY GHOST
IS NO DIFFERENT
THAN THE ROLE OF
OMNIPOTENT - OMNIPRESENCE - OMNISCIENT - GRACE - LOVE - PEACE -
MIGHTY GOD - EVERLASTING FATHER - PRINCE OF PEACE - KING OF KINGS -
LORD OF LORDS - COUNSELOUR - WONDERFUL - MESSIAH - IMMANUEL -
EMMANUEL - JEHOVA - ELOIHIM - ALPHA AND OMEGA - THE GREAT I AM -
I AM THAT I AM - FIRST AND LAST - BEGINNING AND THE END - FRIEND -
LILLY OF THE VALLEY - ROSE OF SHARON - THE LAMB - SACRIFICE - MERCY -
CREATOR - HIGH PRIEST - MEDIATOR - AUTHOR AND FINISHER - GODHEAD -
GOOD - RIGHTEOUSNESS - VICTORY - POWER - JESUS CHRIST

EACH AND EVERY NAME I LISTED INCLUDING .......FATHER - WORD - HOLY GHOST
ARE NAMES AND ROLES
THAT DESCRIBE THE ONE AND ALMIGHTY GOD

ONENESS IS NOT A CLAIM THAT NONE OF THESE EXIST
ONENESS IS A CLAIM THAT THEY ONLY EXIST IN ONE PERSON OF GOD
AND THIS ONE PERSON WHO IS ALMIGHTY GOD
IS NOT LIMITED AND HAS NO LACK OF CAPABILITIES TO PERFORM
EVERY ROLE THAT CLASSIFIES AND REPRESENTS GOD ALMIGHTY

WE DO NOT BELIEVE THAT GOD IS LIMITED
SO THAT IT TAKES 3 SEPARATE PERSONS TO FULFILL THESE ROLES
WE CLEARLY UNDERSTAND
THAT GOD ALONE
CAN DO ANYTHING AND ALL THINGS AS HE SO CHOOSES TO DO THEM
WE UNDERSTAND THAT
EZEKIEL 1:26...
ONE THRONE WITH ONE GOD WHO IN THE LIKENESS OF MAN FULFILLS THIS ROLE

THIS IS WHAT IT IS TO BE ONENESS

ONENESS AND TRINITY ARE VERY SIMILAR
BOTTOM LINE DIFFERENCE
IS
TRINITY BELIEVES IN 3 EQUAL GODS ACTING AS ONE
AND
ONENESS EQUALS ONE GOD IN MANY MANEFESTATIONS (TITLES ONLY)
BUT
JUST ABOUT EVERYTHING ELSE CONCERNING THE BIBLE
WITH ONE MAJOR EXCEPTION
THE ROLE OF GRACE
AND
ONCE SAVED ALWAYS SAVED
ONENESS AND TRINITY VIEWS
ARE BASICALLY AND EQUALLY MIRRORED
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
JUST ABOUT EVERYTHING ELSE CONCERNING THE BIBLE
WITH ONE MAJOR EXCEPTION
THE ROLE OF GRACE
AND
ONCE SAVED ALWAYS SAVED
ONENESS AND TRINITY VIEWS
ARE BASICALLY AND EQUALLY MIRRORED
Joint-heir, the two largest denominations in the world, catholic and anglican, do not believe in once saved always saved, and also believe in the Trinity.

TRINITY BELIEVES IN 3 EQUAL GODS ACTING AS ONE
Correction, Trinity believes in 3 persons of God acting as One. Look up any basic trinity definition.
 
Dec 21, 2009
538
1
0
55
Joint-heir, the two largest denominations in the world, catholic and anglican, do not believe in once saved always saved, and also believe in the Trinity.



Correction, Trinity believes in 3 persons of God acting as One. Look up any basic trinity definition.

ONCE SAVED ONLY SAVED IS ONLY PRACTICED IN THE TRINITY CHURCHES

THE ACT OF 3 SEPARATE ENTITY PERSONS SEPARATE ACTING AS ONE GOD
IS AS I DESCRIBED
3 SEPARATE BUT EQUAL GODS
THIS IS EXACTLY THE TRINITARIAN VIEW
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
ONCE SAVED ONLY SAVED IS ONLY PRACTICED IN THE TRINITY CHURCHES
Well yes because your oneness churches are only relatively young, since 1918. I also know that oneness churches tend towards salvation by works, such as believing you must be baptised in the right way, to be saved...and speak in tongues. Still, the majority of Trinitarians are not once saved always saved.


THE ACT OF 3 SEPARATE ENTITY PERSONS SEPARATE ACTING AS ONE GOD
IS AS I DESCRIBED
3 SEPARATE BUT EQUAL GODS
THIS IS EXACTLY THE TRINITARIAN VIEW
No, it is three separate and equal persons of God. God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit..each individually are not referred to as a god as if there were 3, but as a person.
 
Dec 21, 2009
538
1
0
55
Well yes because your oneness churches are only relatively young, since 1918. I also know that oneness churches tend towards salvation by works, such as believing you must be baptised in the right way, to be saved...and speak in tongues. Still, the majority of Trinitarians are not once saved always saved.


NO BROTHER
BECAUSE
WE HAVE TOOK ENOUGH TIME TO LOOK WELL INTO THIS SUBJECT
AND UNDERSTOOD
THIS IS THE BIGGEST LIE SATAN HAS EVER TRICKED MAN INTO ACCEPTING
SO WE PREACH AGAINST IT




No, it is three separate and equal persons of God. God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit..each individually are not referred to as a god as if there were 3, but as a person.

YES
AND THIS IS WHY ONENESS
CLASSIFIES THIS AS TITLES OR MANEFESTATIONS
BECAUSE
ALL FUNCTIONS AND DIRECTIONS
ARE BASED UPON THE ONLY ONE AND TRUE WILL OF GOD ALMIGHTY
 
S

shad

Guest
ONENESS AND TRINITY ARE VERY SIMILAR
BOTTOM LINE DIFFERENCE
IS
TRINITY BELIEVES IN 3 EQUAL GODS ACTING AS ONE
AND
ONENESS EQUALS ONE GOD IN MANY MANEFESTATIONS (TITLES ONLY)
BUT
JUST ABOUT EVERYTHING ELSE CONCERNING THE BIBLE
WITH ONE MAJOR EXCEPTION
THE ROLE OF GRACE
AND
ONCE SAVED ALWAYS SAVED
ONENESS AND TRINITY VIEWS
ARE BASICALLY AND EQUALLY MIRRORED
You believe that if it were possible to destroy the Father, then the Son and the Spirit would be destroyed as well. But you also believe if the Son was destroyed, the Father and the Spirit would remain and be exercise as one God. And you also believe that if the Holy Spirit could be destroyed, the Father and the Son would have a work to do without the Spirit. Lastly, you believe that the Father is efficient in and of Himself and could operate without the Son and the Spirit. Isn't that the oneness doctrine that you believe? Oneness meaning that one is not dependent upon the other but the Father is All Mighty and without the Father their would be no Son and no Spirit? This would make only the Father uncreated life and the Son and Spirit created manifestations of the Father. Is that what you believe by making claim that the Trinity or Godhead is three Gods acting as one?
 
P

paulnsilas

Guest
oh what a tangled web of semanitics we weave when we practice to......
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
YES
AND THIS IS WHY ONENESS
CLASSIFIES THIS AS TITLES OR MANEFESTATIONS
BECAUSE
ALL FUNCTIONS AND DIRECTIONS
ARE BASED UPON THE ONLY ONE AND TRUE WILL OF GOD ALMIGHTY
We both agree there is one God, and we both agree there are three manifestations (what we call persons).

We both agree that the three can manifest at the same time, I think? Although strictly speaking, modalism and similar variants of oneness declare that only one is manifest at the one time. I notice that you explain the three existing at the same time, by substituting the references to father and son with spirit and flesh.
 
Dec 21, 2009
538
1
0
55
You believe that if it were possible to destroy the Father, then the Son and the Spirit would be destroyed as well. But you also believe if the Son was destroyed, the Father and the Spirit would remain and be exercise as one God. And you also believe that if the Holy Spirit could be destroyed, the Father and the Son would have a work to do without the Spirit. Lastly, you believe that the Father is efficient in and of Himself and could operate without the Son and the Spirit. Isn't that the oneness doctrine that you believe? Oneness meaning that one is not dependent upon the other but the Father is All Mighty and without the Father their would be no Son and no Spirit? This would make only the Father uncreated life and the Son and Spirit created manifestations of the Father. Is that what you believe by making claim that the Trinity or Godhead is three Gods acting as one?


THAT IS YOUR LIMITATION
YOU SEE THAT JESUS WAS DESTROYED
THE BODY OF FLESH WAS SACRIFICED FOR ALL SINS OF MAN
BUT IN ALL REALITY
HIS SPIRIT IN HIM WHICH IS GOD WHO SPOKE HIM INTO EXISTENCE
AKA : THE WORD
NEVER DIED

SO WHEN I FACE THIS ISSUE
AND I HEAR THIS SAME COMMENT OVER AND OVER
IT IS REVEALED MORE SO THAN ANY OTHER SUBJECT
YOUR LACK OF UNDERSTANDING OF WHO GOD IS
BECAUSE
IN YOUR MIND HE DIED
BUT IN THE ACTUALITY OF ALL THINGS
HE LIVED SO WE MIGHT HAVE LIFE AND HAVE IT MORE ABUNDANTLY

STOP LIMITING GOD
AND TRY DOING HIS WILL FOR ONCE
RATHER
THAN TEARING HIM DOWN
TO YOUR EYE LEVEL
SO YOU THINK YOU CAN UNDERSTAND HIM
 
Dec 21, 2009
538
1
0
55
We both agree there is one God, and we both agree there are three manifestations (what we call persons).

We both agree that the three can manifest at the same time, I think? Although strictly speaking, modalism and similar variants of oneness declare that only one is manifest at the one time. I notice that you explain the three existing at the same time, by substituting the references to father and son with spirit and flesh.

WHAT I AM SAYING IT IS TERMONOLOGY

ITS ALL ONE GOD

AND THAT ONE GOD IS DISPEARSED IN MANY FACETS

SO YES
I FEEL WE DO BELIEVE VERY CLOSE AND SIMILAR
WE JUST SEE THE SPECIFIC DISPENSATIONS DIFFERENTLY IS ALL
 
Dec 21, 2009
538
1
0
55
oh what a tangled web of semanitics we weave when we practice to......

WEBS ARE ONLY CREATED WHEN WE SEE GOD ACCORDING TO OUR OWN THINKING
WHICH
IS OBVIOUSLY LIMITED AND SUBJECT TO TRUTH