Donald Trump Jr Suspended By Twitter, For His Opinions Concerning Covid19

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Truth7t7

Well-known member
May 19, 2020
7,708
2,496
113
#21
What's scary is the number of people who get their news from YouTube videos!
All the major networks record and air their news, that's where I get caught up and compare.

Good place to find real news, (Fox) Tucker Carlson
 

soggykitten

Well-known member
Jul 3, 2020
2,322
1,362
113
#25
Donald Trump Jr. was suspended from the Twitter platform for giving opinions on the recent doctors suspended on YouTube opposing the Covid19 narrative

In the attached 7 min Fox clip, Tucker Carlson interviews Donald Trump Jr, in this clip Donald Jr shows (Twitter Responses) that deal with the items seen below?

China can speared disinformation, but Doctors can't share their opinions in twitters claims of disinformation?

Jake Tapper can give his opinions on hydroquinone but Donald Trump Jr can't?

(Twitter, Direct bias in preferential treatment)

1.) Twitter stated Chinese Disinformation on COVID19 isn't a violation of the Twitter rules?

2.) CNN (Jake Tapper) stated that hydroquinone has positive effects, suggesting it is a positive treatment?
My best friend had their account suspended due to their very vocal conservative political views. She joined before Twitter required a contact phone number with the registration.
They suspended the account and posted a note that they suspected she was a Spam-Bot. After she'd had the account for five years! Little slow on the uptake in identifying a Bot there Tweety bird? :LOL: That would be funnier if Twitter hadn't actually sold out to the deep state years ago. :oops:
 

soggykitten

Well-known member
Jul 3, 2020
2,322
1,362
113
#27
Donald Trump Jr. was suspended from the Twitter platform for giving opinions on the recent doctors suspended on YouTube opposing the Covid19 narrative

In the attached 7 min Fox clip, Tucker Carlson interviews Donald Trump Jr, in this clip Donald Jr shows (Twitter Responses) that deal with the items seen below?

China can speared disinformation, but Doctors can't share their opinions in twitters claims of disinformation?

Jake Tapper can give his opinions on hydroquinone but Donald Trump Jr can't?

(Twitter, Direct bias in preferential treatment)

1.) Twitter stated Chinese Disinformation on COVID19 isn't a violation of the Twitter rules?

2.) CNN (Jake Tapper) stated that hydroquinone has positive effects, suggesting it is a positive treatment?
Maybe the Alphabet company, that owns Twitter, also owns China's equivalent of Twitter, Sina Weibo .

Back in June Twitter did delete a lot of Chinese disinformation surrounding Covid 19.
Twitter deletes over 170,000 accounts tied to Chinese propaganda efforts
 

Truth7t7

Well-known member
May 19, 2020
7,708
2,496
113
#28
Maybe the Alphabet company, that owns Twitter, also owns China's equivalent of Twitter, Sina Weibo .

Back in June Twitter did delete a lot of Chinese disinformation surrounding Covid 19.
Twitter deletes over 170,000 accounts tied to Chinese propaganda efforts
The article clearly shows Twitter is regulating speech, and biased regulation at that.

I can't wait to see these tech giants lose their liability exclusions, and be classified as (Publishers) the lawsuits and loss of revenue will bring the "Goliath's" to the ground!

Sorta like a big bully running around behind a fence, while his victims are waiting to get a piece of his hide.
 

soggykitten

Well-known member
Jul 3, 2020
2,322
1,362
113
#29
The article clearly shows Twitter is regulating speech, and biased regulation at that.

I can't wait to see these tech giants lose their liability exclusions, and be classified as (Publishers) the lawsuits and loss of revenue will bring the "Goliath's" to the ground!

Sorta like a big bully running around behind a fence, while his victims are waiting to get a piece of his hide.
I think it shows how full of themselves Twitter is when they thought they were going to close the real Donald Trump Twitter account.
You're going to close the first amendment right opportunity forum for the POTUS?
Really?
It is censorship. And I don't think Twitter cares one iota. They're another propaganda resource for the extreme Left.
 

Truth7t7

Well-known member
May 19, 2020
7,708
2,496
113
#30
I think it shows how full of themselves Twitter is when they thought they were going to close the real Donald Trump Twitter account.
You're going to close the first amendment right opportunity forum for the POTUS?
Really?
It is censorship. And I don't think Twitter cares one iota. They're another propaganda resource for the extreme Left.
The tech giants owners are billionaires, their censoring conservative speech is a political donation the the democratic party.

This is why they will soon be classified as (Publishers) subjecting them to civil lawsuits.
 

soggykitten

Well-known member
Jul 3, 2020
2,322
1,362
113
#31
The tech giants owners are billionaires, their censoring conservative speech is a political donation the the democratic party.

This is why they will soon be classified as (Publishers) subjecting them to civil lawsuits.
Hmm, I'd like to see that. It is true that Twitter, Facebook, even this site, are private domains. As such free speech can exist there but it isn't without limits either. All such sites can edit content due to their standards of use. Twitter does censor members though.

Censoring POTUS is a huge mistake because the impetus is to stymie his Conservative political insights. And as such that's political. However, exercising that censorship cannot be construed as a political donation I wouldn't think. Rather, it is a political ploy or action against an opposing party member.
Twitter is a platform wherein members can exchange ideas. They are not publishers. Until someone changes section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the scenario you shared above isn't likely to happen.
This is what comes from burning midnight oil with the attorney friend of mine after carping about anti-Trump Tweets all over the place.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
9,500
562
113
#32
My best friend had their account suspended due to their very vocal conservative political views. She joined before Twitter required a contact phone number with the registration.
They suspended the account and posted a note that they suspected she was a Spam-Bot. After she'd had the account for five years! Little slow on the uptake in identifying a Bot there Tweety bird? :LOL: That would be funnier if Twitter hadn't actually sold out to the deep state years ago. :oops:
Except the deep State isn't a real thing
 

soggykitten

Well-known member
Jul 3, 2020
2,322
1,362
113
#33
*translation-

orange man bad. anything orange man says is wrong. any medicine orange man supports is posion.
Translation in any language wherein our President is referred to as, orange man, makes the speaker of those words unqualified to be taken seriously as an adult or Christian. We're told to respect our leaders because God put them in charge over us. We may disagree with their politics vehemently. However, the sin of Lookism, yes a real word, isn't something a Christian resorts to. Especially if they own a mirror.

We're all made in the image and likeness of God. Someone on the Trump team thought he'd appear washed out if he didn't appear tanned, since he avoids natural tanning for personal reasons. Of late he doesn't appear to be wearing a bronzer that does not show well under media lighting. He actually does look tanned. Bad advice. Like when Nixon was going to debate years ago in his first presidential bid. He was advised to wear a blue suit. Bad choice. Made him look terrible under the studio lights because those are different than normal ones. Still are.

Those people you point out as casting aspersions on orange man have their priorities skewed. They think if they demean the skin color of our President that makes him less important. They're wrong. The effort makes them appear as needing Jesus.
We should pray for them that they find the middle eastern Savior man real soon.
 

Truth7t7

Well-known member
May 19, 2020
7,708
2,496
113
#34
Hmm, I'd like to see that. It is true that Twitter, Facebook, even this site, are private domains. As such free speech can exist there but it isn't without limits either. All such sites can edit content due to their standards of use. Twitter does censor members though.

Censoring POTUS is a huge mistake because the impetus is to stymie his Conservative political insights. And as such that's political. However, exercising that censorship cannot be construed as a political donation I wouldn't think. Rather, it is a political ploy or action against an opposing party member.
Twitter is a platform wherein members can exchange ideas. They are not publishers. Until someone changes section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the scenario you shared above isn't likely to happen.
This is what comes from burning midnight oil with the attorney friend of mine after carping about anti-Trump Tweets all over the place.
FoxNews

Hawley introduces bill targeting Big Tech companies over political censorship concerns

June 17, 2020

Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., introduced legislation Wednesday to give Americans the ability to sue major tech companies like Facebook, Google and Twitter if they engage in selective censorship of political speech.
The Limiting Section 230 Immunity to Good Samaritans Act, cosponsored by Sens. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., Mike Braun, R-Ind., and Tom Cotton, R-Ark., would stop such companies from receiving immunity under section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, unless they update their terms of service to promise to operate in good faith.
 

soggykitten

Well-known member
Jul 3, 2020
2,322
1,362
113
#35
FoxNews

Hawley introduces bill targeting Big Tech companies over political censorship concerns

June 17, 2020

Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., introduced legislation Wednesday to give Americans the ability to sue major tech companies like Facebook, Google and Twitter if they engage in selective censorship of political speech.
The Limiting Section 230 Immunity to Good Samaritans Act, cosponsored by Sens. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., Mike Braun, R-Ind., and Tom Cotton, R-Ark., would stop such companies from receiving immunity under section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, unless they update their terms of service to promise to operate in good faith.
No Senate bill number at that 116th Congress link?
 

surfer14

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2020
814
449
63
#36
...As such free speech can exist there but it isn't without limits either.
Did you ever take notice of the fact that waaaayyyy back when, they used to have anti-blasphemy laws. Well, certain people decided we couldn't have anti-blasphemy laws because of this thing called fee speech. So the anti-blasphemy laws went away. Time passed. Blasphemy becomes more socially acceptable. Then it got to a point where there was a movement to curtail the relatively new freedom of speech - political correctness. Political correctness has now blossomed into what we have now where where drag queen story hour in libraries is a thing and if you don't publicly agree with BLM then you're in danger of losing your job. These and other things are done in the name of free speech.

So what does this tell you? It tells you that anti-christianity was the whole point of "freedom of speech" from the very beginning. I know you will probably have a knee jerk reaction of "No! Free speech is good!" But give it some thought before dismissing it. Key to understanding this is go way back and ask yourself whether people really have a RIGHT to blaspheme against God. God does certainly allow it, but that doesn't mean He gives us the 'right' to do it.

Anti-racism is code word for anti-white.
Free speech is code word for anti-christian.
 

soggykitten

Well-known member
Jul 3, 2020
2,322
1,362
113
#37
Did you ever take notice of the fact that waaaayyyy back when, they used to have anti-blasphemy laws. Well, certain people decided we couldn't have anti-blasphemy laws because of this thing called fee speech. So the anti-blasphemy laws went away. Time passed. Blasphemy becomes more socially acceptable. Then it got to a point where there was a movement to curtail the relatively new freedom of speech - political correctness. Political correctness has now blossomed into what we have now where where drag queen story hour in libraries is a thing and if you don't publicly agree with BLM then you're in danger of losing your job. These and other things are done in the name of free speech.

So what does this tell you? It tells you that anti-christianity was the whole point of "freedom of speech" from the very beginning. I know you will probably have a knee jerk reaction of "No! Free speech is good!" But give it some thought before dismissing it. Key to understanding this is go way back and ask yourself whether people really have a RIGHT to blaspheme against God. God does certainly allow it, but that doesn't mean He gives us the 'right' to do it.

Anti-racism is code word for anti-white.
Free speech is code word for anti-christian.
Anti-white, anti-Christian. Surely does fit the bill for the erosion of America's intrinsic values since her founding and beginning that erosion in the 60's.
In order to destroy and reform a nation to a different standard, the religious security of its majority has to be crumpled and ultimately destroyed.
Of all the religious faiths practiced in America Christianity has the foremost population here and across the globe. Coupled with that the fact our faith is intolerant of immorality, and openly vocal about that and what immorality is, as well as its consequence, and a faith that installs a foundation of character, morality, and personal sense of responsibility for ones actions, the target looms huge.
It becomes the enemy that must be destroyed so that its antithesis can seed the minds of the future generations as the old ones who die off shocked and repulsed by the advent of an immoral hedonist carnal construct takes power.

But!
Isn't it all God's will according to his divine plan? We're to be equipped to withstand the machinations of the adversary who God allows to roam this world as its lord. And as he seeks souls to devour. I think that is why we're told we are not of this world even though we live in it. And it is right if we feel led to get involved in politics and lay down the gauntlet in an effort to stem the tide of degradation, communism, and patent immorality. It shows, I believe, the enemies of God that God is not dead. That God is not mute as this all goes on within his awareness as creator of all things. It shows that there are watchers on the wall who see the dark clouds and the Satanic armies coming, and some sticking their flag in the landscape of this nation. And we are there to herald the battle call to resistance, unshakable faith, stalwart resolve to stand on the words of The Word that makes it all possible. And from time to time have at hand a double bladed ax and flame thrower so as to put an end to that flag, and in the process let the fire that blazes to life with its consumption send its own message!

We will NOT GO QUIETLY INTO THE NIGHT! Patriot Christian blood fought to secure a more perfect union of life, liberty, justice and the pursuit of happiness, with God as the cornerstone of all of it! And in God we trust still and forever, that he has our back! And we SHALL NOT BE MOVED!
Because?
When the racist domestic terrorists, the homosexual and transsexual domestic terrorists, and practitioners of immoral acts, the Communist advocates, the anti-Christian, anti-America traitors empowered by the vote of we the people, and all unrepentant sinners arrive at the gates of Hell after their judgment, that march of pride STOPS!
And the vocal resonance of countless years of ministry and Christian and colleague efforts to stem that fallen tide, whispers, we told you so, shall ring among the screams of the dead forever.



May those who are against us repent and turn back from their ways before it is too late.


I am not afraid! :)
Are you?
 

Truth7t7

Well-known member
May 19, 2020
7,708
2,496
113
#38
Did you ever take notice of the fact that waaaayyyy back when, they used to have anti-blasphemy laws. Well, certain people decided we couldn't have anti-blasphemy laws because of this thing called fee speech. So the anti-blasphemy laws went away. Time passed. Blasphemy becomes more socially acceptable. Then it got to a point where there was a movement to curtail the relatively new freedom of speech - political correctness. Political correctness has now blossomed into what we have now where where drag queen story hour in libraries is a thing and if you don't publicly agree with BLM then you're in danger of losing your job. These and other things are done in the name of free speech.

So what does this tell you? It tells you that anti-christianity was the whole point of "freedom of speech" from the very beginning. I know you will probably have a knee jerk reaction of "No! Free speech is good!" But give it some thought before dismissing it. Key to understanding this is go way back and ask yourself whether people really have a RIGHT to blaspheme against God. God does certainly allow it, but that doesn't mean He gives us the 'right' to do it.

Anti-racism is code word for anti-white.
Free speech is code word for anti-christian.
I agree in many aspects of your claim.

Yes the narrative today is racist, racist, racist, and it only applies to whites.

Yes I believe the founders and framers when looking at the 1st amendment (1791) in freedom of speech and religion, yes they were protecting those that were not of the Christian faith, that consumed 90% if not more of the Nation at that time.

Example:

(Deism) and the French Enlightment, (Thomas Paine) was a fashion of the day, it opposed many aspects of Christianity, Jefferson, Franklin, and others were ardent followers of Paine, and desired freedom to practice and speak their beliefs.
 

Truth7t7

Well-known member
May 19, 2020
7,708
2,496
113
#39
Anti-white, anti-Christian. Surely does fit the bill for the erosion of America's intrinsic values since her founding and beginning that erosion in the 60's.
In order to destroy and reform a nation to a different standard, the religious security of its majority has to be crumpled and ultimately destroyed.
Of all the religious faiths practiced in America Christianity has the foremost population here and across the globe. Coupled with that the fact our faith is intolerant of immorality, and openly vocal about that and what immorality is, as well as its consequence, and a faith that installs a foundation of character, morality, and personal sense of responsibility for ones actions, the target looms huge.
It becomes the enemy that must be destroyed so that its antithesis can seed the minds of the future generations as the old ones who die off shocked and repulsed by the advent of an immoral hedonist carnal construct takes power.

But!
Isn't it all God's will according to his divine plan? We're to be equipped to withstand the machinations of the adversary who God allows to roam this world as its lord. And as he seeks souls to devour. I think that is why we're told we are not of this world even though we live in it. And it is right if we feel led to get involved in politics and lay down the gauntlet in an effort to stem the tide of degradation, communism, and patent immorality. It shows, I believe, the enemies of God that God is not dead. That God is not mute as this all goes on within his awareness as creator of all things. It shows that there are watchers on the wall who see the dark clouds and the Satanic armies coming, and some sticking their flag in the landscape of this nation. And we are there to herald the battle call to resistance, unshakable faith, stalwart resolve to stand on the words of The Word that makes it all possible. And from time to time have at hand a double bladed ax and flame thrower so as to put an end to that flag, and in the process let the fire that blazes to life with its consumption send its own message!

We will NOT GO QUIETLY INTO THE NIGHT! Patriot Christian blood fought to secure a more perfect union of life, liberty, justice and the pursuit of happiness, with God as the cornerstone of all of it! And in God we trust still and forever, that he has our back! And we SHALL NOT BE MOVED!
Because?
When the racist domestic terrorists, the homosexual and transsexual domestic terrorists, and practitioners of immoral acts, the Communist advocates, the anti-Christian, anti-America traitors empowered by the vote of we the people, and all unrepentant sinners arrive at the gates of Hell after their judgment, that march of pride STOPS!
And the vocal resonance of countless years of ministry and Christian and colleague efforts to stem that fallen tide, whispers, we told you so, shall ring among the screams of the dead forever.



May those who are against us repent and turn back from their ways before it is too late.


I am not afraid! :)
Are you?
Your little cartoon is reality in many parts of the country, California is leading the pack on the road to Sodom and Gomorrah

Homosexuality being taught in K-12 schools, transgender homosexuals dressed up as devil's with horns, giving storytime in public libraries, yes the five hours on the Sodomite are configured to represent the inverted pentagram?

I thanks God for President Trump, 200+ conservative federal justices appointed, the ship has turned around, and the Sodomites are screaming!

A drag queen who goes by the name Xochi Mochi reads a story to children at the Michelle Obama Neighborhood Library in Long Beach, California, on October 14, 2017.
 

soggykitten

Well-known member
Jul 3, 2020
2,322
1,362
113
#40
The nightmares that must have followed those little children after that thing read a book to them. In a public library?
But it is California. Carnalfornia. Commiefornia. It of many names.