Why I Didn’t Eat at Chick Fil A Today by CAROLE CHAPUT on AUGUST 2, 2012

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
S

simplyme_bekah

Guest
#1
Why I Didn’t Eat at Chick Fil A Today
by CAROLE CHAPUT on AUGUST 2, 2012


Not that you care, I just feel like expressing this…

Our family eats a lot of Chick Fil A.

A lot.

Too much really.

We should own stock in the company, but oh yea, we can’t because it’s privately held.

I support Chick Fil A’s stand for traditional marriage and for their adherence to Christian business practices. Thanks be to God, CFA does much good in our communities.

But I don’t idolize CFA.

CFA is an entity run and led by fallen humans just like the rest of us…and the rest of the world for that matter.

Sinners saved by grace.

The unmerited, undeserved grace of Jesus Christ.

Saints in and through the righteousness of Christ alone.

I don’t have a problem with CFA.

And I do think the attacks that CFA and Dan Cathy endured in the media and from liberal politicians have been unfair, unjustified and a clear violation of First Amendment rights.

But what is disconcerting and telling is how the conservative Christian community reacted to CFA’s unjust treatment. I can’t help but feel that the response has been on the level of “tit for tat” if you know what I mean?

Anti- Christian liberals respond “in the flesh” to Dan Cathy’s support for Christian values, so how did conservative Christians respond?

I’m sorry if this offends you but I believe we Christians responded “in the flesh” right back to our anti-Christian values opponents. In other words, did we look any different than our opponents? Or did we merely play the “tit for tat” game?

Where is the love people?

And for crying out loud, where is the Spirit of the living God?

Where oh where, pray tell, is the gospel of Jesus Christ in all of this?

I’m sorry again…because this will offend “good” Christian, church going people, but this whole “CFA appreciation day” backlash has had me thinking about the story in John chapter 8 of the woman caught in adultery.

In Jesus’ day, adultery was the socially unacceptable sexual sin amongst the religious, much like homosexuality is today. It’s ironic since we Christians pick and choose which sins are acceptable and tolerable in our own sight…our “pet” sins…never mind about how God views them. We set ourselves up as judge and jury when it comes to the sin meter, don’t we? The sins we are guilty of are, of course, the acceptable ones, while the sins which others commit that are different than our own are the unacceptable sins.

Of course.

That’s how we play the game.

We are always.

At all times.

Better.

More righteous.

And more worthy.

Than those who sin differently than we do.

Of course.

That’s how the game is played.



So there she is, caught and surrounded by a hostile, clinched fists, stone holding crowd.

Ready to unleash a barrage of jagged rocks that will beat and batter her to death.

Law breathing.

Self-righteous.

Condemning.

Religious souls.

Perhaps as a setup to trap Jesus, they bring her to Him.

Oh praise be to God!

Those bent on her destruction and death brought her into the very Presence of deliverance and Life.

What the enemy intended for evil, the Lord intended for good!

Pure brilliance.

Pure goodness.

Pure holiness.

Pure beauty ensues.

As the angry crowd awaits Jesus’ judgment regarding the woman, Jesus pauses, bends down and begins to write in the sand.

What oh what did He write? Don’t we wish we knew?

I like to imagine He wrote something simple yet profound…something like “Think” or “Love” or “Mercy”.

But don’t miss the fact that He paused.

Jesus paused.

As if to say through His pause, “Be still and know that I am God.”

He didn’t react like we are so prone to react. He was quiet and He responded thoughtfully, not emotively or reactively.

Jesus didn’t play “tit for tat” games with His opponents. He responded on a completely different level, a higher plane:

“If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her.” John 8:7

Then He paused, stooped down again and wrote on the ground.

I’d REALLY love to know what He wrote this time.

“Just who do you think you are?” comes to mind as appropriate for the moment. Or how about, “There is only One Righteous Judge and you are MOST definitely not Him.”

Hmmm…Jesus paused again…

“Be still and know that I am God.”

“I am God and you are not.”

Let that sink into your stone clenching souls.



You know the rest of the story.

One by one they drop their stones and walk away.

Jesus and the woman are left alone.

This is the profound good that God brought forth from the humiliating situation.

The woman is alone and face to face with Jesus.

A divine encounter with unconditional love and lavish grace.

Jesus does not condemn her.

Jesus does not condemn her.

Jesus does not condemn her.

Did you get that?

JESUS DOES NOT CONDEMN HER.

Jesus sets her free from the condemnation of the law and the condemnation of the self-righteous religious crowd with these words:

“Neither do I condemn you. Go now and leave your life of sin” (John 8:11).

Beautiful, breathtaking, game changing, Jesus.

And the polar opposite response of the fire breathing, stone clenching, hell bent on judgment and condemnation crowd.

Wouldn’t it be encouraging to see this kind of response from conservative Christians under attack or persecution? What if we played the part of Jesus in the story and responded thoughtfully instead of reactively? What if we humbly acknowledged that NOT ONE OF US is without sin, therefore we have no grounds to throw stones at our opponents or to play “tit for tat” games with them.

What if our stones were merely disguised as chicken sandwiches today?

Could it be that we played the part of the condemning crowd unleashing a barrage of self-righteous stones that battered and beat those we are called to love and set free through the gospel?

After all, what was accomplished today?

Did CFA make gobs of money as a “reward” for standing for traditional marriage? What kingdom purpose did that serve?

Did the divisions between the Christian community and our opponents get deeper?

Did the love of Christ grow longer, wider, deeper or higher in our lives or in our communities?

Was the gospel represented well, in a manner worthy of Christ?

Did anyone come face to face with Jesus today?

Did any sinners, of the self-righteous sort or the scandalous sort, encounter unconditional love or healing grace today?

Maybe…just maybe…the gospel would have been far better served today if we had put down our chicken sandwiches and picked up the banner of love instead…

And that’s why I didn’t eat at Chick-Fil-A today.

Tomorrow however is another story.

“Be still, and know that I am God; I will be exalted among the nations, 
I will be exalted in the earth.” Psalm 46:10
 

Nautilus

Senior Member
Jun 29, 2012
6,488
53
48
#2
The whole thing is stupid from very possible angle. Ive been annoyed by it more than anything. I don't agre with Chick-Fil-a's stance on the issue and I dont agree with the reactions of people on either side.
 
W

wolfywolfs

Guest
#3
if you think about it chick fil a might just be using the christian agenda to make more money the debate in your country on weather same sex marriages should happen or not be going on for ages and getting bigger by the second and as chrisitan appear to be the majority in your country why not side with them and say hey we support this come eat at our restruants i wonder how much money they made in the last week.

in all honesty i dont think they really care they just want the money
 

Elizabeth619

Senior Member
Jul 19, 2011
6,397
109
48
#4
I think this is a wonderful article. It puts alot of things in perspective. Just because someone acts in a "sinful" way does not give us right to act like fools to prove one is better than the other.

I am totally posting this on facebook. lol
 

zeroturbulence

Senior Member
Aug 2, 2009
24,579
4,268
113
#5
You can all call me crazy but I think God blessed that man and his company with some extra income yesterday because he stood up for God's Word and the Word is God.

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." - John 1:1
 
Jul 25, 2005
2,417
34
0
#6
I think the article itself is ludicrous. No one is claiming CFA is a divine institution. Dan Cathy has not been handed a staff and a Papal Miter.

What are people doing? They are supporting and affirming a man's right to say what he believes (largely because most believe the same thing). His company is also well-loved, so they are sticking up for any injunction against it. There are, to the best of my knowledge, no organized marches into Chelsea or Key West.

I didn't go to CFA today because Sonic was across the street and had no line.
 
W

wolfywolfs

Guest
#7
You can all call me crazy but I think God blessed that man and his company with some extra income yesterday because he stood up for God's Word and the Word is God.

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." - John 1:1
and then that man will proberly figure out the end of the world millions will belive and flock to the restraunt and give all there money to put up billboards and posters and do tours to tell the world the end is comeing

then the world doesnt end and the man is 10 times richer

o wait my bad that's already happened surely the same trick wont work twice right ....... right

anyway my point is when someone makes money of something its not normal a good thing
 

zeroturbulence

Senior Member
Aug 2, 2009
24,579
4,268
113
#8
and then that man will proberly figure out the end of the world millions will belive and flock to the restraunt and give all there money to put up billboards and posters and do tours to tell the world the end is comeing

then the world doesnt end and the man is 10 times richer

o wait my bad that's already happened surely the same trick wont work twice right ....... right

anyway my point is when someone makes money of something its not normal a good thing
I don't know why people think that Cathy somehow orchestrated the Appreciation Day unless they haven't followed the chain of events.

First of all,Cathy was interviewed by a Baptist (christian) media organization and that's where he expressed his view on gay marriage, that is ALL he did.

Second, he had nothing to do with the protests from the gay community OR Appreciation Day.

Third, it was governor Mike Huckabee (an outspoken christian) who suggested on Facebook that people show their support on that date, to counter all of the press coverage of the gay rights protestors.

NOBODY could have foreseen that it would garner over 500,000 attendance confirmations on Facebook or foresee that so many people would show up that day. Not Cathy, Not Huckabee, no one! People need to stop saying that Cathy somehow caused this.
 
Last edited:
K

kayem77

Guest
#9
Why is supporting a Christian principle considered hatred? Why is it that people can support all kind of companies and organizations without the necessity of over analizing the motives behind? There are gay pride parades all over the country, people celebrating debauchery and immorality on TV everyday, there are stores that publicly declare their stance on same-sex marriage but I haven't seen this same reaction towards them. What does this tell us? That our views and beliefs are not welcomed, this tells us that just because we don't agree with Hollywood and the media we can be labeled as bigots and intolerant. This isn't really about Chic Fil A, this is about Christian freedoms. If that man, a selfproclaimed Christian businessman, gave his honest opinion when he was asked about it and this was the media's reaction....I don't see why it can be any different with any of us.
 

Nautilus

Senior Member
Jun 29, 2012
6,488
53
48
#10
Well you can blame the vocal christians on your issues Kayem. The average citizens main opinion about christians and homosexuality is what they see on the news...which is guess what? stuff like westboro baptist with their god hates fags signs protesting funerals saying God killed the soldier because America likes gays. I mean can you blame them for not supporting Christians stance on the issue?
 
Jul 25, 2012
1,904
24
0
#11
I scrolled all this because I didn't want to read your posts.
 
K

kayem77

Guest
#12
Well you can blame the vocal christians on your issues Kayem. The average citizens main opinion about christians and homosexuality is what they see on the news...which is guess what? stuff like westboro baptist with their god hates fags signs protesting funerals saying God killed the soldier because America likes gays. I mean can you blame them for not supporting Christians stance on the issue?
I understand the main opinion about Christians and I'm saddened to see that the only things they show in the media is the negative side. The Westboro Baptist Church is a small church, and it is one of the few churches that preaches hatred against homosexuals, and that deeply bothers me. I'm sure there are many ''christians'' who share their view, however in most churches you can clearly see that this is not the main opinion. This is not about counting how many bad and good deeds Christians have done though.

Are you gonna put all Christians in a box and ignore them just because some people are full of hate? I could do the same with any group really. If one has to have a fair debate you can't really use the argument '' well you know this is what Christians or whoever have done in the past so whatever you're saying right now doesn't matter''. Dan Cathy didn't say God hates fags, he didn't say God was pleased when people go to hell like the WBC. He simply said '' I believe in biblical marriage'' and that was pretty much it. He could've been talking about divorce too, ...are all the divorceess gonna start a boycott too? or the people who have sex outside of marriage?
Labeling people as bigots doesn't make the sin go away...it just makes it worse for those struggling with homosexuality. I have a homosexual friend, and oh, surprise! I don't hate him . I don't agree with his lifestyle but I love him, and he is a great person. I once told him he should go to church. Not because he is gay, but because he is a person just like me.. a sinner. And because I believe in a God who can restore and save EVERYONE. Labeling all Christians who believe in this as bigots is what bothers me. If a store publicly declares '' I hate gays, and God hates theml'' I would gladly support anyone who is against it. But this is not the case.
 
Jan 15, 2011
736
28
28
#13
I think the article itself is ludicrous. No one is claiming CFA is a divine institution. Dan Cathy has not been handed a staff and a Papal Miter.

What are people doing? They are supporting and affirming a man's right to say what he believes (largely because most believe the same thing). His company is also well-loved, so they are sticking up for any injunction against it. There are, to the best of my knowledge, no organized marches into Chelsea or Key West.

I didn't go to CFA today because Sonic was across the street and had no line.

Since when does a a pagan staff and a papal miter (dagon hat) make anything divine?
Dan Cathy was asked a question and responded with the truth and the media decided to capitalize on it for a political agenda. Eat at CFA, don't eat at CFA, everyone has their own free will.

Standing up for the truth in God's Word will always incur animosity from the world and those with worldly minds (including professing Christians). We don't conform our lives to the world, but to the will of God and to what the Bible shows us in terms of conduct and belief. This will often make you uncomfortable when you are living in opposition to the world's system, and thus you need to change your opinions and beliefs to what God wants you to believe. We have a choice... follow God's word or do what the world does and believe what the world believes. Christians believe in the 100% absolute truth of the bible. Or, they can pick and choose what they want to believe in a way that doesn't conflict with their flesh and become lukewarm (not believing in the 100% truth of the bible and following every wind of doctrine). And we know what will happen to these lukewarm Christians in the end (spewed out of the mouth of Jesus).

Joshua 24:15 (NKJV)
15 And if it seems evil to you to serve the Lord, choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve, whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the River, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land you dwell. But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.”
 
V

violakat

Guest
#14
Has anyone mentioned the point that Cathy didn't even volunteer this information. That in fact, a reporter asked him about his stance in regards to his views on traditional family units.
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#15
This isn't really about Chic Fil A, this is about Christian freedoms.
Dead men have no freedoms, and no rights.

I didn't eat at Chik-Fil-A, because the closest one is over 100 miles away.
 
Last edited:
Aug 3, 2012
7
0
0
#16
Many institutions in society use the phrase "sexual orientation" in
association with one's sexuality. The term orientation is unfairly
slanted towards left-leaning activist groups to support their claim
that because of inborn genetic tendencies homosexuals can not change.
The scientific consensus on homosexuality is that it is a due to a
complex interaction of environmental and genetic factors. This is the
same as the scientific consensus lifestyles for alcoholism, gluttony,
and pathological deceit." Regardless of whether or not tendencies are
genetic, the lifestyle choice is up to the individual. I have created
this petition to encourage organizations to present a more balanced
view of homosexual lifestyle choices and to remove the prejudicious
label that implies that homosexuals can not change. Please join me in
signing this petition at

**edited**

Join me in adding your name to the list to promote a change that would
make a real difference in the lives of those who are deceived into
thinking that there is no choice but for them to be gay, share this
with your friends, and help me get this to go viral so that we can make
a stand for what is right.

Chadwick E. Harvey
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jul 25, 2005
2,417
34
0
#17
Since when does a a pagan staff and a papal miter (dagon hat) make anything divine?
Dan Cathy was asked a question and responded with the truth and the media decided to capitalize on it for a political agenda. Eat at CFA, don't eat at CFA, everyone has their own free will.

Standing up for the truth in God's Word will always incur animosity from the world and those with worldly minds (including professing Christians). We don't conform our lives to the world, but to the will of God and to what the Bible shows us in terms of conduct and belief. This will often make you uncomfortable when you are living in opposition to the world's system, and thus you need to change your opinions and beliefs to what God wants you to believe. We have a choice... follow God's word or do what the world does and believe what the world believes. Christians believe in the 100% absolute truth of the bible. Or, they can pick and choose what they want to believe in a way that doesn't conflict with their flesh and become lukewarm (not believing in the 100% truth of the bible and following every wind of doctrine). And we know what will happen to these lukewarm Christians in the end (spewed out of the mouth of Jesus).

Joshua 24:15 (NKJV)
15 And if it seems evil to you to serve the Lord, choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve, whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the River, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land you dwell. But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.”
I was speaking tongue in cheek, not literally.
 
S

simplyme_bekah

Guest
#18
All I have to say is Gods side is going to win lol.
 
Jul 25, 2005
2,417
34
0
#19
Cheater! You read the final chapter!
 
Jul 25, 2005
2,417
34
0
#20
and then that man will proberly figure out the end of the world millions will belive and flock to the restraunt and give all there money to put up billboards and posters and do tours to tell the world the end is comeing

then the world doesnt end and the man is 10 times richer

o wait my bad that's already happened surely the same trick wont work twice right ....... right

anyway my point is when someone makes money of something its not normal a good thing
Interesting logic.