Trump Stands By Israel

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
U

UnderGrace

Guest
Yes interesting how public opinion and policy has slowly been shifted.

There's more.

The Jewish refugees the US turned away

In May 1939 more than 900 Jews fled Hitler's Germany on a luxury liner, the SS St Louis; they hoped to reach Cuba then travel to the US, but were turned away from both.

The increasingly desperate passengers were forced to sail back to Europe, where more than 250 of them were later killed by the Nazis.
Gerald Granston, who was six years old when he and his father travelled on the SS St Louis, recalls that frantic search for sanctuary across the Atlantic

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/magazine-39857056/the-jewish-refugees-the-us-turned-away
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
This is all very interesting shtuff:

This New York Daily News front page headline hailed the massive anti-German protest rally held in Madison Square Garden on March 27, 1933. Despite efforts by the German government to alleviate tensions and prevent the escalation of name-calling and threats by the international Jewish leadership, the rally was held as scheduled.

Similar rallies and protest marches were also being held in other cities during the same time frame. The intensity of the Jewish campaign against Germany was such that the Hitler government vowed that if the campaign did not stop, there would be a one-day boycott in Germany of Jewish-owned stores.

Despite this, the hate campaign continued, forcing Germany to take defensive measures that created a situation wherein the Jews of Germany became increasingly marginalized. The truth about the Jewish war on Germany has been suppressed by most histories of the period.

 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
Another interesting site:

Scotland, Edinburgh, 2nd November 2012

Introduction

In this presentation we are going to trace some of the significant events and individuals that led to the Balfour Declaration.

1. Puritanism and the Conversion of the Jews

The road to Balfour began in the Protestant Reformation. The Reformation brought about a renewed interest in the Old Testament and God’s dealings with the Jewish people. From Protestant pulpits right across Europe, the Bible was for the first time in centuries being taught within its historical context and given its plain literal sense. At the same time, a new assessment of the place of the Jews within the purposes of God emerged.

Puritan eschatology was essentially postmillennial and believed the conversion of the Jews would lead to future blessing for the entire world. In 1621, for example, Sir Henry Finch, an eminent lawyer and member of the English Parliament, published a book:

The World’s Great Restauration (sic) or Calling of the Jews, (and with them) all the Nations and Kingdoms of the Earth, to the Faith of Christ.

http://www.balfourproject.org/the-road-to-balfour-the-history-of-christian-zionism-by-stephen-sizer/

http://www.balfourproject.org/427/
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
I think you have the right lens now.:)

Another interesting site:

Scotland, Edinburgh, 2nd November 2012

Introduction

In this presentation we are going to trace some of the significant events and individuals that led to the Balfour Declaration.

1. Puritanism and the Conversion of the Jews

The road to Balfour began in the Protestant Reformation. The Reformation brought about a renewed interest in the Old Testament and God’s dealings with the Jewish people. From Protestant pulpits right across Europe, the Bible was for the first time in centuries being taught within its historical context and given its plain literal sense. At the same time, a new assessment of the place of the Jews within the purposes of God emerged.

Puritan eschatology was essentially postmillennial and believed the conversion of the Jews would lead to future blessing for the entire world. In 1621, for example, Sir Henry Finch, an eminent lawyer and member of the English Parliament, published a book:

The World’s Great Restauration (sic) or Calling of the Jews, (and with them) all the Nations and Kingdoms of the Earth, to the Faith of Christ.

http://www.balfourproject.org/the-road-to-balfour-the-history-of-christian-zionism-by-stephen-sizer/

http://www.balfourproject.org/427/
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
Good links:)

You is keeping me busy.

Another interesting site:

Scotland, Edinburgh, 2nd November 2012

Introduction

In this presentation we are going to trace some of the significant events and individuals that led to the Balfour Declaration.

1. Puritanism and the Conversion of the Jews

The road to Balfour began in the Protestant Reformation. The Reformation brought about a renewed interest in the Old Testament and God’s dealings with the Jewish people. From Protestant pulpits right across Europe, the Bible was for the first time in centuries being taught within its historical context and given its plain literal sense. At the same time, a new assessment of the place of the Jews within the purposes of God emerged.

Puritan eschatology was essentially postmillennial and believed the conversion of the Jews would lead to future blessing for the entire world. In 1621, for example, Sir Henry Finch, an eminent lawyer and member of the English Parliament, published a book:

The World’s Great Restauration (sic) or Calling of the Jews, (and with them) all the Nations and Kingdoms of the Earth, to the Faith of Christ.

http://www.balfourproject.org/the-road-to-balfour-the-history-of-christian-zionism-by-stephen-sizer/

http://www.balfourproject.org/427/
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
Good links:)

You is keeping me busy.
Good - idle hands and all that BigSmile.gif

"Napoleon believed that with compliant Jews controlling Palestine, French imperial and commercial interests as far as India, Arabia and Africa could be secured. Neither Napoleon nor the Jews were able to deliver. Nevertheless his proclamation ‘is a barometer of the extent to which the European atmosphere was charged with these messianic expectations."

Follow the dough.


"Numerous preachers and commentators speculated on whether Napoleon was indeed the Antichrist"

lol2.gif

Charles Finney, for example, predicted the imminent end of the world. In 1835 he speculated that ‘If the church will do all her duty, the Millennium may come in this country in three years
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
In 1839, Shaftesbury wrote an anonymous 30 page article for the Quarterly Review, entitled ‘State and Restauration (sic) of the Jews.’ In it Shaftesbury advocated a Jewish national homeland with Jerusalem the capital, remaining under Turkish rule but with British protection.[13] Shaftesbury predicted a new era for the Jews:

‘ … the Jews must be encouraged to return in yet greater numbers and become once more the husbandman of Judea and Galilee … though admittedly a stiff-necked, dark hearted people, and sunk in moral degradation, obduracy, and ignorance of the Gospel … [They are] … not only worthy of salvation but also vital to Christianity’s hope of salvation.’[14]
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
Sure Mr . Locutus, yes idle hands still waiting on that one.

...always, always follow the money.

These groups, provocateurs who funds them? Someone funded Hitler?
Who are these agitators, like the Fabian socialists during the French revolution.

Keep the info coming I will give you a cut on me royalities...LOL

Good - idle hands and all that View attachment 196385

"Napoleon believed that with compliant Jews controlling Palestine, French imperial and commercial interests as far as India, Arabia and Africa could be secured. Neither Napoleon nor the Jews were able to deliver. Nevertheless his proclamation ‘is a barometer of the extent to which the European atmosphere was charged with these messianic expectations."

Follow the dough.


"Numerous preachers and commentators speculated on whether Napoleon was indeed the Antichrist"

View attachment 196387

Charles Finney, for example, predicted the imminent end of the world. In 1835 he speculated that ‘If the church will do all her duty, the Millennium may come in this country in three years
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
In 1839, Shaftesbury wrote an anonymous 30 page article for the Quarterly Review, entitled ‘State and Restauration (sic) of the Jews.’ In it Shaftesbury advocated a Jewish national homeland with Jerusalem the capital, remaining under Turkish rule but with British protection.[13] Shaftesbury predicted a new era for the Jews:

‘ … the Jews must be encouraged to return in yet greater numbers and become once more the husbandman of Judea and Galilee … though admittedly a stiff-necked, dark hearted people, and sunk in moral degradation, obduracy, and ignorance of the Gospel … [They are] … not only worthy of salvation but also vital to Christianity’s hope of salvation.’[14]
Wow what does that last line mean...wow:unsure:
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
Wow what does that last line mean...wow:unsure:
Good question - what about this:

Balfour was in fact already committed to the Zionist programme out of theological conviction and had no intention of consulting with the indigenous Arab population. In a letter to Lord Curzon, written in 1919, Balfour insisted somewhat cynically:

‘For in Palestine we do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country …the Four Great Powers are committed to Zionism.

And Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is rooted in age-long traditions, in present needs, in future hopes, of far profounder import than the desires or prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land … I do not think that Zionism will hurt the Arabs … in short, so far as Palestine is concerned, the Powers have made no statement of fact which is not admittedly wrong, and no declaration of policy which, at least in the letter, they have not always intended to violate.’[30]
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
Referring to the land as Palestine was all part of WW 1

However, one really has to consider the purpose of WW 1 in light of the fact that the European countries made secret alliances about how to take control of the former Ottoman lands, eventually leading to the war.

I wonder about the theological conviction part, could it have been a convenient conviction for a greater goal?

Good question - what about this:

Balfour was in fact already committed to the Zionist programme out of theological conviction and had no intention of consulting with the indigenous Arab population. In a letter to Lord Curzon, written in 1919, Balfour insisted somewhat cynically:

‘For in Palestine we do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country …the Four Great Powers are committed to Zionism.

And Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is rooted in age-long traditions, in present needs, in future hopes, of far profounder import than the desires or prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land … I do not think that Zionism will hurt the Arabs … in short, so far as Palestine is concerned, the Powers have made no statement of fact which is not admittedly wrong, and no declaration of policy which, at least in the letter, they have not always intended to violate.’[30]
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
Referring to the land as Palestine was all part of WW 1

However, one really has to consider the purpose of WW 1 in light of the fact that the European countries made secret alliances about how to take control of the former Ottoman lands, eventually leading to the war.

I wonder about the theological conviction part, could it have been a convenient conviction for a greater goal?
Who knows really, it could have been "convenient" and or/both expediency as it is today in politics. The problem I see is basing foreign/military policy on fawlty and debatable theological reasoning is a re-cipe for disaster.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
Who knows really, it could have been "convenient" and or/both expediency as it is today in politics. The problem I see is basing foreign/military policy on fawlty and debatable theological reasoning is a re-cipe for disaster.
Ultimately yes, for sure and we have not see it come to fruition yet. Thinking this needs to be in place for Jesus to return??

American foreign policy has slowly but surely removed renegade leaders not willing to bow down to the military industrial complex and the safety and security of Israel has been the ruse to make this happen, along with the need for black gold of course.
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
Ultimately yes, for sure and we have not see it come to fruition yet. Thinking this needs to be in place for Jesus to return??.
I dunno how much the powers that be are working to the dispensational and or return of Jesus plan - we do know the EV/disps have made meddling inroads into the power base in the US.

How "theology" plays into European politics I havenay a clue.
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
Other movements, however, focussed on the ancient Jewish states of the Levant and developed the notion of “return” of Jews to the land of Israel (said to have been given to the Jewish people by God) which had ceased to exist some two thousand years ago. Prominent among such groups were Christian protestant evangelicals in Britain.

These developed, from the 17th Century onwards, a doctrine of conversion of Jews to Christianity, often linked with their return to Jerusalem. Only in this way, could the devoutly-desired second coming of the Messiah be secured. This belief became widespread in the middle of the 19th century in Britain where it influenced the highest levels of politics.

Towards the end of that century, a thoroughly-assimilated Austro-Hungarian Jewish journalist, Theodor Herzl, reacting to antisemitism in Vienna and Paris, proposed the founding of a Jewish nation-state – der Judenstaat.

This encountered vociferous opposition from almost all the Jews of Europe. But Herzl’s careful and incessant knocking on the doors of powerful men in the capitals of Europe was to bring success for his movement in the new century, as rivalries between the great powers spun out of control and crashed into the First World War.

Full artickle:

http://www.balfourproject.org/the-jewish-question-in-19th-century-europe/
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
Palestine: a land without people?

Not all members of Hovevei Zion had a Jewish state in mind – some were deeply religious and considered the building of a new temple in Jerusalem would be blasphemous unless directed by a specific sign from God.

Then there was the question of the people who already lived in that part of the Ottoman Empire. Although many Zionists subsequently perpetuated the myth that the land was practically empty, some, who were in contact with the settlements in Palestine, were compelled to face reality.

By 1870, the area later officially recognised as Palestine had a population of approximately 380,000 people: 300,000. 88 per cent were Muslims or Druze, 8 per cent Christian, and per cent were Jews [25].

In 1914-15, according to official Ottoman Census statistics, there were 722,143 people in Palestine, of whom 602,377 were Muslims, 81,012 Christians and 38,754 Jews (of whom 12,332 were Ottoman citizens and the rest immigrants. [26]

http://www.balfourproject.org/the-jewish-question-in-19th-century-europe/#loving
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
A group of activists known as “cultural Zionists,” did worry about Palestine’s Arab population. Preeminent among these was the Russian writer Asher Ginsberg, who took the pen name Ahad Ha’am (Hebrew for “one of the people”) by which he is best known. He had joined Hovevei Zion but sought a revival of Jewish culture centred on a limited, symbolic presence in that land with so much resonance for the Jewish faith.

Ginsberg’s take on Zionism later attracted a number of leading intellectuals such as Martin Buber, Albert Einstein, Harry Sacher and Hannah Arendt. For Ginsberg, the goal of Zionism should be to revive Judaism not to rescue Jews. The Jewish “homeland” he interpreted as a spiritual renewal.

Mass migration to Palestine was impractical and unacceptable. Settlers would be obliged to assist the Arab population to develop the company and should treat them with respect. Although Ginsberg was a friend of Pinsker’s, he deeply opposed colonizing a country inhabited by people of a different culture and religion.

In 1891, Hovevei Zion asked him to visit Palestine to report on conditions there. This fact-finding tour opened Ginsberg’s eyes; in The Truth from the Land of Israel, he wrote:

From abroad, we are accustomed to believe that Eretz Israel is presently almost totally desolate, an uncultivated desert, and that anyone wishing to buy land there can come and buy all he wants. But in truth, it is not so. In the entire land, it is hard to find tillable land that is not already tilled … If the time comes when the life of our people in Eretz Israel develops to the point of encroaching upon the native population, they will not easily yield their place [27].

http://www.balfourproject.org/the-jewish-question-in-19th-century-europe/#loving
 
7

7seasrekeyed

Guest
No, you are wrong!! What are you a bot now? Where did the doggie go?

just remember that there are 2 preterists creating the distractions and posting fabricated 'facts'

that will explain the extraordinary view that leaves scripture out, and therefore God also by default, and creates in them the belief that they are superior

now the dems have lost their case...are stating Trump has not been found guilty but that does not mean he is inoocent

much the same with preterists

the proof is before their eyes, it's not the answer they want and so people are pulling strings trying to make it look like God

Jesus warned us many times of deception

it is the devil's best tool and has worked since the garden

get people to question if God actually said such and such and they will follow a false Jesus, a false spirit and come to a false conclusion
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
Romans does not support Hagee or other dispensational dogma.

God is not a Zionist in the sense that you understand it as Zion based on dirt in the middle east.

Heb 12:22 But you have come to Mount Zion and to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to myriads of angels.

It's too bad that many Christians have swallowed the dispensational delusion.
No,what's too bad is Christians who have swallowed the replacement theology (under many names) and used it against God's chosen people. Then we can't understand why a Jew distrusts a Christian. smh It's a sin, and the church will answer for it. God has his hand on the Jewish people.