Baptism and holy spirit

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
S

Stunnedbygrace

Senior Member
#381
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
822
113
#381
And so, Paul didn't intend for them to think angels were going to come down and preach another gospel to them or that men could speak the language of angels.
 
S

shrume

Senior Member
#382
Jun 26, 2017
2,193
463
83
#382
It's interesting how people put scriptures together in order to support what they already believe.

Why can't 1 Cor 13:1 and Galatians 1:8 simply be statements of fact?

"I do not believe in speaking in tongues, so 1 Cor 13:1 is hyperbole."

"I don't speak in tongues, therefore 1 Cor 13:8 means tongues has ceased."
 
peacefulbeliever

peacefulbeliever

Senior Member
#383
Feb 21, 2012
3,794
199
63
#383
Stunnedbygrace said:
I was talking about where paul says to not listen to anyone with a different gospel than the one they'd heard. Paul says even if an angel from heaven preaches a different gospel to you, etc., etc. So I can't then go and say that when someone preaches a different gospel then they are an angel because paul said so!

He's basically saying: don't listen to any other gospel from any other man. In fact, even if an angel were to come and preach a different gospel, don't listen.

He uses the same hyperbolic device in the verse you give though. He's basically doing the same thing. Saying if I could speak every language there is on earth - heck, even if I could speak the language of angels, without love, it is useless.
Click to expand...
I entered in the phrase "angel from heaven preaches a different gospel" into Biblegateway and there were 0 usages of that phrase - that's why I asked you if 2 Cor. 11:4 was the verse you were speaking about. If the verse you are quoting does not exist - how can you compare the two? Are you saying that there is not an angelic language? How do we know there is not an angelic language? I agree with the perception that ANYTHING done without love is NOTHING. Also because a figure of speech is used does not make a statement not true . . . figures of speech are used to emphasize, to call attention to the point, to add force or power to an expression - in that sense I could see how this could be an hyperbole . . . exaggerating the fact that without love nothing has meaning. I am just trying to understand why the questioning over something simply stated?
Shoot, I need to go back and read where this debate over this section of scripture started!!!! o_O to see what I am even debating!!! LOL!
 
7

7seasrekeyed

Guest
#384
#384
notuptome said:
It is a bit self serving to make knowledge of 1 Cor 13 all knowledge.

One must keep in mind that the apostles and disciples did not have the benefit of a codified canon at the time they walked on the earth. They had the OT which they were able to use to persuade men that Jesus was the Messiah He claimed to be.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
Click to expand...

I'm really not following you on the self serving thing...

strange that Apostles wrote the NT though

what were they thinking? didn't they know you were coming on board? (kinda joking) :geek::geek::geek:
 
S

Stunnedbygrace

Senior Member
#385
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
822
113
#385
shrume said:
It's interesting how people put scriptures together in order to support what they already believe.

Why can't 1 Cor 13:1 and Galatians 1:8 simply be statements of fact?

"I do not believe in speaking in tongues, so 1 Cor 13:1 is hyperbole."

"I don't speak in tongues, therefore 1 Cor 13:8 means tongues has ceased."
Click to expand...

And then there's me. I believe tongues exist but I also believe paul was speaking hyperbolically in those two verses. :D
 
peacefulbeliever

peacefulbeliever

Senior Member
#386
Feb 21, 2012
3,794
199
63
#386
Stunnedbygrace said:
PB, it's like this:

My child acts up and I put him in a chair in the corner and I say: You don't get up until I tell you that you can. I don't care if your hair is on fire, you sit there. In fact, I don't care if a bear comes into the room, you don't move. It's hyperbole. I do not mean for him to think a bear will come into the house or his hair will catch fire.
Click to expand...
Thank you but I know what an hyperbole is . . . :giggle:
 
7

7seasrekeyed

Guest
#387
#387
shrume said:
It's interesting how people put scriptures together in order to support what they already believe.

Why can't 1 Cor 13:1 and Galatians 1:8 simply be statements of fact?

"I do not believe in speaking in tongues, so 1 Cor 13:1 is hyperbole."

"I don't speak in tongues, therefore 1 Cor 13:8 means tongues has ceased."
Click to expand...
said in my bestest droll voice

'yes. isn't it though'
 
S

Stunnedbygrace

Senior Member
#388
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
822
113
#388
peacefulbeliever said:
I entered in the phrase "angel from heaven preaches a different gospel" into Biblegateway and there were 0 usages of that phrase - that's why I asked you if 2 Cor. 11:4 was the verse you were speaking about. If the verse you are quoting does not exist - how can you compare the two? Are you saying that there is not an angelic language? How do we know there is not an angelic language? I agree with the perception that ANYTHING done without love is NOTHING. Also because a figure of speech is used does not make a statement not true . . . figures of speech are used to emphasize, to call attention to the point, to add force or power to an expression - in that sense I could see how this could be an hyperbole . . . I am just trying to understand why the questioning over something simply stated?
Shoot, I need to go back and read where this debate over this section of scripture started!!!! o_O to see what I am even debating!!! LOL!
Click to expand...
1 Cor 13:1
Gal 1:8

Those were the verses I was referring to. Sorry I didn't list them. I paraphrase a lot and just assume others will know the verses I am referring to, which is ridiculous. No one knows every verse! :D
 
peacefulbeliever

peacefulbeliever

Senior Member
#389
Feb 21, 2012
3,794
199
63
#389
shrume said:
It's interesting how people put scriptures together in order to support what they already believe.

Why can't 1 Cor 13:1 and Galatians 1:8 simply be statements of fact?

"I do not believe in speaking in tongues, so 1 Cor 13:1 is hyperbole."

"I don't speak in tongues, therefore 1 Cor 13:8 means tongues has ceased."
Click to expand...
Thank you shrume for posting the verse . . . I couldn't find it!!!
 
S

Stunnedbygrace

Senior Member
#390
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
822
113
#390
peacefulbeliever said:
Thank you but I know what an hyperbole is . . . :giggle:
Click to expand...
Yes, I'm certain you do! :D I was comparing: don't move even if your hair catches on fire, to the same device used in: if I were to speak every known human language and even the language that angels speak.

That isn't to say the angels don't speak some language that isn't of earth, they very well could. But neither is it to say that paul was declaring that angels speak some special language and humans can speak that very language they speak.

So if I were to insist that I know for a fact that angels don't speak some language humans don't speak, I would be wrong because I can't know that. Conversely, if I were to say angels do speak some language humans don't speak but that believers can speak that language, I would also be wrong, because I can't know that.
 
S

shrume

Senior Member
#391
Jun 26, 2017
2,193
463
83
#391
Stunnedbygrace said:
Yes, I'm certain you do! :D I was comparing: don't move even if your hair catches on fire, to the same device used in: if I were to speak every known human language and even the language that angels speak.
Click to expand...
I don't believe that in 1 Cor 13:1 Paul was stating that "if I were to speak every known human language...". He is simply stating that when he speaks in tongues, it's a language of men or angels.
 
S

Stunnedbygrace

Senior Member
#392
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
822
113
#392
shrume said:
I don't believe that in 1 Cor 13:1 Paul was stating that "if I were to speak every known human language...". He is simply stating that when he speaks in tongues, it's a language of men or angels.
Click to expand...
If I could speak all the languages of earth and of angels, but didn’t love others, I would only be a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal.
 
S

Stunnedbygrace

Senior Member
#393
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
822
113
#393
To me, he's stating: if I could speak every language on earth and every language even in heaven...
 
S

shrume

Senior Member
#394
Jun 26, 2017
2,193
463
83
#394
Stunnedbygrace said:
If I could speak all the languages of earth and of angels, but didn’t love others, I would only be a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal.
Click to expand...
What version is that?

I don't believe that's a good translation of the verse..
 
S

Stunnedbygrace

Senior Member
#396
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
822
113
#396
Here's NASB:

13 If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but do not have love, I have become a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal.
 
hornetguy

hornetguy

Senior Member
#397
Jan 18, 2016
6,646
1,396
113
#397
shrume said:
I don't believe that in 1 Cor 13:1 Paul was stating that "if I were to speak every known human language...". He is simply stating that when he speaks in tongues, it's a language of men or angels.
Click to expand...
I don't know why you don't understand the hyperbolic tone Paul is using in this verse... (well, I DO know why, but for the sake of this posting...)

He very clearly says

If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but do not have love, I have become a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal. 2 If I have the gift of prophecy, and know all mysteries and all knowledge; and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing. 3 And if I give all my possessions to feed the poor, and if I surrender my body [a]to be burned, but do not have love, it profits me nothing.
Click to expand...
EACH of those examples is hyperbolic in nature. Do you think that Paul knew all mysteries and knowledge? Did you ever hear of Paul moving a mountain because of his faith? Did Paul surrender his body to be burned?

That is hyperbolic speaking... does understanding that fact somehow interfere with your established belief system?

My cut and paste scripture is NASB.
 
S

shrume

Senior Member
#398
Jun 26, 2017
2,193
463
83
#398
Found it, it's the New Living Translation, which in many places is not a good translation. They paraphrase a lot.
 
S

Stunnedbygrace

Senior Member
#399
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
822
113
#399
hornetguy said:
I don't know why you don't understand the hyperbolic tone Paul is using in this verse... (well, I DO know why, but for the sake of this posting...)

He very clearly says



EACH of those examples is hyperbolic in nature. Do you think that Paul knew all mysteries and knowledge? Did you ever hear of Paul moving a mountain because of his faith? Did Paul surrender his body to be burned?

That is hyperbolic speaking... does understanding that fact somehow interfere with your established belief system?
Click to expand...

That's where I'm currently scratching my head too. I mean, I believe tongues exist and he believes tongues exist, but that verse being hyperbolic doesn't threaten my construct....so I'm left wondering why it would collapse his.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.