Eve's Purpose

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
24,555
13,320
113
#41
Genesis 218

Genesis 2:18
Respectfully, claiming that a particular translation of a word is correct based on the translation of the word is circular reasoning and therefore without merit. Is there something beyond or behind the English translation of "ezer kenegdo" on which you base your assertion that "help mate" is correct?
 

OneFaith

Senior Member
Sep 5, 2016
2,270
369
83
#42
Respectfully, claiming that a particular translation of a word is correct based on the translation of the word is circular reasoning and therefore without merit. Is there something beyond or behind the English translation of "ezer kenegdo" on which you base your assertion that "help mate" is correct?
Proverbs 31
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
24,555
13,320
113
#43

I'm looking for a little more here. Proverbs 31, while describing "an excelent wife", does not directly support the idea that "help mate" is the correct translation of "ezer kenegdo".
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,530
13,098
113
#44
This (bolded) is an interesting question. If you read Genesis 1 as a summary, and Genesis 2 as a detailed explanation, the conflict is resolved. I believe it was always God's intention to fashion Eve; He just chose to delay the act until Adam recognized the need.
i am sure it was His intention from the beginning, which to me raises the significant question of why did He bring all the animals before Adam first? He knew there would be no suitable companion -- whose benefit is this for? my wife and i were talking about this today, and she points out that it's not recorded that Adam initiated any of this: He didn't 'complain' or ask for anything ((just gong by the text)). we both think the idea that Adam's life in paradise was "unbearable" is utterly preposterous, and it's certainly not supported by the text at all.
we came to a conclusion that it is probably for the angels -- see, there is Adam, there is God, there are the created living souls, and there is the angelic realm who see this take place. it is not for God's benefit, certainly, and improbably for the creatures. it's plausible, maybe, that this is to teach Adam something, but the text doesn't reflect that since he's not asking for anything. which leaves the angels -- what would the angels be taught by these events, in this order? which angels?

why make man without woman if your intention is to make woman also?

what is the significance that Adam was formed outside the garden and then placed in it, while Woman is formed in the garden - she, from his side, and he, from dust?
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
24,555
13,320
113
#46
...
why make man without woman if your intention is to make woman also?

what is the significance that Adam was formed outside the garden and then placed in it, while Woman is formed in the garden - she, from his side, and he, from dust?
While I wouldn't bank on it, I suspect that the reason God made Eve later was to show Adam that he needed to trust God's provision in all things.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,530
13,098
113
#47
While I wouldn't bank on it, I suspect that the reason God made Eve later was to show Adam that he needed to trust God's provision in all things.
i'm thinking Adam was doing this already - he wasn't tilling the ground, producing food through sweat and toil, at the time.

i'm thinking, if this were a sign for the angels, what would it mean?

which angels are 'alone' ?
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
24,555
13,320
113
#48
i'm thinking Adam was doing this already - he wasn't tilling the ground, producing food through sweat and toil, at the time.

i'm thinking, if this were a sign for the angels, what would it mean?

which angels are 'alone' ?
Whatever it is, keep digging. :)
 

Deade

Called of God
Dec 17, 2017
16,724
10,529
113
77
Vinita, Oklahoma, USA
yeshuaofisrael.org
#49
I wondered what would happen if a woman started that thread. I know several men here would cordially participate. But part of me believes some men won’t even bother. And then I wonder if some will say, “ womanz! Who are you to tell ME what my role izzzzz???” Lol.
Well melita, what would you say if a man started that thread? I am willing, say the word and I'll start it. Maybe men would participate. How's this for a title "Husbands, love your wives" bou-ques-mrk.gif
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,530
13,098
113
#50
if sin hadn't yet entered the world, why would i think Adam was failing to trust God in any way?
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
689
113
#51
Jezebel ruled over Ahab such that she was used to symbolize the flesh ruling over the church in Revelation 2:20. She did what seductresses do - seduce men to do what they want.
I don't care what NASA says: I still think the Moon is made of green cheese. Awww-Haw-Haw-Haw-Haw-Hawwwww!! :ROFL:
_
This is what Jesus meant in Matthew 7:6