The Lie of Evolution......

I mean environmental changes..tge climate..the food source..for instance the first men that were hunters ..body structure different..brain structure..teeth....where the ones that were more forgers and farmers were different...now WHO in the Bible..set of brothers..1 was hunter..1 was farmer..that gave thier offering to God.? Lol..love when science n Bible come together!

The bible contradicts your theory...
You even post a great story that shows your contradiction...
No where in the bible does it say humans were first hunters... In fact we were farmers at first... E.G. Adam and Eve....


But you have side stepped the question...
So I will ask again and hope you don't rabbit trail again.
With evolving do you mean we are gaining information in DNA or do you mean that DNA is selecting certain traits.

And again you seem pretty closed minded to see my answers and 'adding" words to my answers..never said that they were FIRST "hunters" etc ..please study or google envuronmental changes/evolution of man. And as far as the dna question ..that wasnt your ORIGINAL question (which i answered 2 times so no rabbit hole) and i ALSO said im not a darwyn evolutionist...i BELIEVE in creationism n i told you why..how etc so why the continued beat down?

Repeating yourself doesnt prove a point..its just tail chasing which ive done with you now 3 times so SOMEONE isnt LISTENING!

Adapt and evolve are very different ideas. No we are not still evolving.

Here..ill help..AND WE ARE STILL EVOLVING TODAY...

Actually, bible says that spiritual beings were first.

Regarding life on our planet, sea life was first according to Genesis 1.

Which is what the evolution theory says, too. Life evolved in waters first.

Read the Biblical story of Jacob and Esau..they are the EXAMPLE i was referring to earlier..one was a hunter..1 farmer..NOT SAYING THEY WERE THE VERY FIRST because ive already answered your question as to what "creature was created first".

Theres the "therory" of evolution made popular by darwyn n theres environmental etc evolution..,evolution" in itself means..changing and evolving..mankind is NOT the same as when first created..and due to our current food etc..weather..eyc of COURSE man is still adapting to his environment..do you think men of today will even be the same in 100 yrs from now? Basic history..lol

Why can't you answer this question?
With evolving do you mean we are gaining information in DNA or do you mean that DNA is selecting certain traits.
Seriously, it's a simple question, which one...

You said creature" thats why i said birds..i also gave scripture that birds n fish were created on the same day..if you wouldve asked first living "entity" it was God like i have stated before as well..so why do i have to keep repeating myself with you?

I think you think I am not who I am

DNA is an interesting thing, because its both language and code in that language, therefore your question doest not make sense.

All based on wrong assumptions about the earth.

And these assumptions are wrong, because... literal reading of Genesis?

It does make sense, but I am done playing these games, these conversations will go no where...
Aight guys, have a good time.

Do you understand what it means to evolve?

How has man evolved, that is his actual biology, physiology and neurology become more complex. Tell me how has his heart, kidney function, eye function, ear function etc., etc., evolved ?

It changes everything because of the assertion it was symboli Evolution concepts fails the scientific discoveries of the God created n My mindset is from the reading of the Bible especially Genesis I reject many of the assertions made in this video. I believe Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg a Messianic Jew who is an expert on Biblical languages and Biblical history. Google him. He states that the begining of Genesis is a narrative not symbolic poetry. There is also a relationship between day one and four, day two and five, and day three and six. The foolish discussion of the word Yom and the different meanings also fits our word for it. Day has all of those same meanings. Context always indicates that defination. In the day of King James for example. This video has several problems.

Apparently not.......ice are not so accurate.

Carlson says. “That, to us, means the source of precipitation has changed in Greenland across the last deglatiation. And therefore that the strict interpretation of this iconic record as purely temperature of snowfall above this ice sheet is wrong.”

https://www.astrobio.net/climate/ice-cores-may-not-be-accurate-thermometers/