Do you think Judge Kavanaugh is guilty or innocent? (anonymous POLL)

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Do you think Judge Kavanaugh is guilty or innocent? (anonymous POLL)

  • Innocent

    Votes: 34 66.7%
  • Guilty

    Votes: 7 13.7%
  • Unsure

    Votes: 10 19.6%

  • Total voters
    51

HeraldtheNews

Well-known member
Apr 26, 2012
1,550
435
83
66
sounds like both-- some possible unhealthy and/or abusive tendencies, and an obsessive witch-hunt. I think it would serve the best interests of the nation if Kavanaugh would give someone else a chance.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
Over turning Roe v Wade is not gonna stop abortions - just as banning assault weapons is not gonna stop mass shootings.
Well that was not my point, my point was that neutrality is very difficult since laws are often not separate from societal moral values and ethics.

Well to me that is not logical reasoning since laws against murder do not stop murders from occurring either. ;)
 
J

Jennie-Mae

Guest
Why did they stop appointing
sounds like both-- some possible unhealthy and/or abusive tendencies, and an obsessive witch-hunt. I think it would serve the best interests of the nation if Kavanaugh would give someone else a chance.

I agree.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
sounds like both-- some possible unhealthy and/or abusive tendencies, and an obsessive witch-hunt. I think it would serve the best interests of the nation if Kavanaugh would give someone else a chance.
Why should an innocent man, the presumption is always innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, turn down such an opportunity after all his hard work and effort based on such flimsy allegations?

Why should democrats be allowed time and time again to malign a person's career and character based on a "she said only"

If he is deemed guilty before the process is allowed to run its course every man in the United States is completely vulnerable to these attacks.

This is the third time the Democrats have done this and yet they persist.

When every man cowers in fear or steps aside based on unproven allegations there will be no more a "rule of law" but the "rule of men" which is dangerous thing,
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
19 votes for not guilty - yer not thanking straight.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,344
12,870
113
I think he is innocent and agree with 1of......her story has too many holes and for sure the Dems will do anything to keep him from being appointed........
Correct. We already heard from one unhinged senator (Booker) that it does not matter whether the judge is innocent or guilty. The Dems simply want to shut Kavanaugh out by fair means or foul.

This female accuser is totally bogus as confirmed by the female prosecutor who examined her testimony. All the charges are TOTALLY BOGUS and no one in their right mind would believe any of this nonsense.

But the Republicans are responsible for allowing this circus to go on and on. They have refused to use their political clout to do what is right over and over again, while catering to the unhinged Democrats. Shame on them.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
19 votes for not guilty - yer not thanking straight.
Now that she has been exposed as lying under oath .... well it does make me wonder who is actually not thinking straight?:unsure:
 
S

SpoonJuly

Guest
19 votes for not guilty - yer not thanking straight.
We are entering dangerous territory when we declare a person guilty and destroy his life without due process--A trial.
Would you be so quick to judge a family member as you have this man?
What if it were you?
 

Quantrill

Well-known member
Sep 20, 2018
988
300
63
Now that she has been exposed as lying under oath .... well it does make me wonder who is actually not thinking straight?:unsure:
Grow up. The atheistic liberal left does not care if it is lying, or thinking straight, or whose life it destroys. It doesn't care. It wants it's way and it doesn't care who are what it destroys in the process.

Don't ever try to appeal to any sense of moral responsibility with them. They have none and do not care for yours.

Quantrill
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
Now that she has been exposed as lying under oath .... well it does make me wonder who is actually not thinking straight?:unsure:
We don't know if the ex boyfriend is lying or not UG.

Bart was evasive about being the barfer in his buds book:

Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., Kavanaugh declined to say whether his life inspired the similarly named character who appears in the 1997 book "Wasted: Tales of a Gen X Drunk," written by his high school friend Mark Judge.

"I'm trying to get a straight answer from you under oath. Are you the Bart O'Kavanaugh that he's referring to? Yes or no," Leahy said.

Kavanaugh responded: "You have to ask him."

The character in Judge's book is said to have "puked in someone's car" and "passed out on his way back from a party."
His room mate stated he was a boozer:

, "Brett Kavanaugh stood up under oath and lied about his drinking and about the meaning of words in his yearbook. He did so baldly, without hesitation or reservation."

"In his words and his behavior, Judge Kavanaugh has shown contempt for the truth, for the process, for the rule of law, and for accountability," Roche added. "His willingness to lie to avoid embarrassment throws doubt on his denials about the larger questions of sexual assault."

Roche told CNN, "I saw him both what I would consider blackout drunk and also dealing with the repercussions of that in the morning."

"I didn't socialize with Brett," Roche said. "He would come home and he was incoherent, stumbling, he would sometimes be singing, he occasionally would wear this -- I think it was an old leather football helmet -- and he would throw up, and then in the morning would have a lot of trouble getting out of bed."
 
7

7seasrekeyed

Guest
Ford lied. just listening to her responses last week, if a person were paying attention, she exposed her false story line a minimum of 3 times. she lied about being afraid to fly, she lied about why she installed a second door, she lied about not understanding that she could have been questioned by the GOP in CA.

and apparently she has taught others how to sway the outcome on a lie detector exam.

that's just Ford. her backup singers have been all over the place and less credible then Ghaghis Khan saying he was employed as a tour guide and didn't mean to overrun all those countries

the Dem dongs said from the get go they would never vote to have Kavanaugh confirmed before the man opened his mouth and the dire lack of actual questions asked by them to the candidate is, as they say, conspicuous by their absence. all the background info on Kavanaugh...more than the last 5 judges up for confirmation for a seat on the Supreme Court COMBINED..means nothing to people who simply want to have THEIR pick for the Supreme Court and have never accepted Trump as their President

what has happened, is really no different from the KKK years back, deciding to hang people of a different color without due process and creating intimidation by burning crosses on people's lawns. there was no fair process then and the Dem dongs have done their best to try and create a guilty verdict for an innocent man simply because he is not valuable to their political process and burned their crosses on every lawn they thought they could

everyone has seen the same thing, if they took the time to involve themself and took an interest, and the same rift is still in existence between the two parties.

however, when the senior senator from one side says “I will oppose Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination with everything I have, and I hope a bipartisan majority will do the same,” and concludes with “The stakes are simply too high for anything less. " you will side with one party or the other unless you prefer to lie on your back and kick your legs in the air if it doesn't go your way.

Schumer was right about one thing...the stakes are very high.
 
Oct 3, 2018
83
52
18
www.jbs.org

Were I Mr.Kavanaugh I'd sue the pants off everyone smearing my name with these lies. The Demonic Dem's involved in this abuse have gone so far as to slander his daughter. A picture of her on her knees at her bedside praying was corrupted to this end. They have no conscience and they should be made to answer for this. Especially when abusing a child.
 

1ofthem

Senior Member
Mar 30, 2016
3,729
1,912
113
Ford lied. just listening to her responses last week, if a person were paying attention, she exposed her false story line a minimum of 3 times. she lied about being afraid to fly, she lied about why she installed a second door, she lied about not understanding that she could have been questioned by the GOP in CA.

and apparently she has taught others how to sway the outcome on a lie detector exam.

that's just Ford. her backup singers have been all over the place and less credible then Ghaghis Khan saying he was employed as a tour guide and didn't mean to overrun all those countries

the Dem dongs said from the get go they would never vote to have Kavanaugh confirmed before the man opened his mouth and the dire lack of actual questions asked by them to the candidate is, as they say, conspicuous by their absence. all the background info on Kavanaugh...more than the last 5 judges up for confirmation for a seat on the Supreme Court COMBINED..means nothing to people who simply want to have THEIR pick for the Supreme Court and have never accepted Trump as their President

what has happened, is really no different from the KKK years back, deciding to hang people of a different color without due process and creating intimidation by burning crosses on people's lawns. there was no fair process then and the Dem dongs have done their best to try and create a guilty verdict for an innocent man simply because he is not valuable to their political process and burned their crosses on every lawn they thought they could

everyone has seen the same thing, if they took the time to involve themself and took an interest, and the same rift is still in existence between the two parties.

however, when the senior senator from one side says “I will oppose Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination with everything I have, and I hope a bipartisan majority will do the same,” and concludes with “The stakes are simply too high for anything less. " you will side with one party or the other unless you prefer to lie on your back and kick your legs in the air if it doesn't go your way.

Schumer was right about one thing...the stakes are very high.
Yeah and I think Kentucky Sen. Mitch Mcconnel made a good speech about this bullying and intimidation tactic that is being used by the Democrats.
https://www.breitbart.com/big-gover...by-protesters-camping-outside-senators-homes/
 
Oct 3, 2018
83
52
18
www.jbs.org
Senator Graham was great when he called this circus what it is.

And the Demonic Dem's acting as if they're in pursuit of these obviously fake stories so as to defend abused women on the grounds of morality And Diane Feinstein is reprehensible. I think she's behind this whole thing and wonder how much money she's paid these women for their purjury.
August 23, 2018
In case you forgot: Congress paid millions in hush money to protect politicians
By Keith Edwards