Kavanaugh Debacle

With all due respect.

The only thing I have asked for is some more investigation. You, amongst others, have been chanting that Mrs Ford is a liar no matter what. Maybe she is, but I cannot know that before an investigation has concluded.

A prosecutor can’t conclude on those grounds. But you obviously can, and that’s disappointing.

Would you stand before the judge, presenting as solid evidence, a report made in, what has to be considered, to put it mildly, a hurry?

Furthermore, would you, knowing that the President himself is expecting a certain outcome of the investigation, and, as you would probably know, was ready to, quite literally, fire you if the report didn’t fit his agenda. As you probably also know, that’s happened before to an FBI employee...

Now, would you?

I think you could use that Criminal Law 101 yourself.

Listen, if you can’t provide anything of legal value, that’s all good, but don’t pretend you can. Okay?

Well, a Supreme Court Justice should under no circumstances be sworn in because there was reasonable doubt about his actions.

I think it’s pretty clear that none of them are saints. However, that be not the case here. What really is the case is the fact that we have a Justice that is being accused of immoral and criminal behavior. How many Justices have been accused of that before him?

The burden of proof is on the prosecution, not on a citizen.

I say there is reason to investigate this further.

If you don’t agree, feel free, but your false accusations are no better than what you’re accusing others of.

Ponder that for a while.

Trump is the most honest person there is. Never told a lie. Never cheated anyone. A really family man.

He just changes his mind a lot....depending on his audience.

Well, a Supreme Court Justice should under no circumstances be sworn in because there was reasonable doubt about his actions.

I think it’s pretty clear that none of them are saints. However, that be not the case here. What really is the case is the fact that we have a Justice that is being accused of immoral and criminal behavior. How many Justices have been accused of that before him?

Clarence Thomas was accused of immoral behavior but that does not mean that he actually did anything wrong.

get serious

I'm really getting the picture now. I am sure you even have a serious face on

Ford was caught lying during her questioning. I heard her myself and you go ahead and do what you do and I will do what I do

I have an excellent memory and pretty good judgement and she was caught lying with regards to her knowledge of the offer made by Grassley (sp might be wrong, lying about being afraid to fly, and lying about the 2nd front door she had installed on her CA house

you know she is lying but for some bizarre reason, you insist proper investigation has not been done


chanting? seems you are starting to use derogatory terms and try to destroy the evidence with terms like 'red herring'

you are coming real close to ad hominem attacks

you bring up conviction, but there has been no trial. there is nothing to have a trial with

perhaps you are not aware, but the FBI is said to have intimated that it would be Ford under investigation if things were to proceed farther

the woman is a lying manipulative dem, well coached and well rewarded

hearsay

your honor, does the prosecution have an actual question here?

judge: strike those remarks from the record. now Ms Jennie I am going to have to ask you to stick to the known facts which do not include badgering the witnesses. please refrain from personal remarks directed at the witnesses. they are not on trial

for that matter, no one is on trial. therefore, I must conclude your remarks are biased and you show prejudicial contempt for the entire proceedings

Exactly, but apparently now even lawyers argue against due process and protective basic legal rights.

Well, but due process and basic legal rights applies to both Mr Kavanaugh and Mrs Ford.

You have failed to give her those rights solely on the grounds of sympathizing with Mr Kavanaugh. That’s not due process in my book.

Now, let me tell you something, I prefer Mr Kavanaugh over some liberal, left leaning, soft on crime, pro choice candidate that might could have been appointed after the midterm.

This case, however, is not about who is the preferred judge, it’s about whether our processes are sound.

This case has shown that the country is divided along the party lines, and for political reasons, both parties are ready to commit all kinds of forgery to achieve their goals.

Forgery ....lol

All kinds even....wow

Interesting bar exam they must have where ever you live.

Well, but due process and basic legal rights applies to both Mr Kavanaugh and Mrs Ford.

You have failed to give her those rights solely on the grounds of sympathizing with Mr Kavanaugh. That’s not due process in my book.

Now, let me tell you something, I prefer Mr Kavanaugh over some liberal, left leaning, soft on crime, pro choice candidate that might could have been appointed after the midterm.

This case, however, is not about who is the preferred judge, it’s about whether our processes are sound.

This case has shown that the country is divided along the party lines, and for political reasons, both parties are ready to commit all kinds of forgery to achieve their goals.

That’s a political question that wouldn’t be part of a bar exam😊.