Question...
- Thread starter CharliRenee
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
E
God the son...
Creator - Col 1: For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. Allthings were created through Him and for Him.
Lamb Of God who saves the world - Behold the lamb of God who takes away the sin of the word
Judge
High priest.
There are many titles he holds. I have to run for a bit but how many can we find?
Creator - Col 1: For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. Allthings were created through Him and for Him.
Lamb Of God who saves the world - Behold the lamb of God who takes away the sin of the word
Judge
High priest.
There are many titles he holds. I have to run for a bit but how many can we find?
-
1
- Show all
Emmanuel <--GOD with US
I AM <--Eternal self existent one
The Everlasting God
The Lion of Judah
The Good Shepherd
The Branch
The Root and Offspring of David
Alpha and Omega
The First and LAST
The King of kings
The LORD of lords
The Bread of Life
etc..........just off the top of my head and without a full cup of coffee in me yet HAHAHA
I AM <--Eternal self existent one
The Everlasting God
The Lion of Judah
The Good Shepherd
The Branch
The Root and Offspring of David
Alpha and Omega
The First and LAST
The King of kings
The LORD of lords
The Bread of Life
etc..........just off the top of my head and without a full cup of coffee in me yet HAHAHA
-
2
- Show all
But both Israel as a nation and King David were called the firstborn because of their position and rank in God. God is not a man as us and neither is there what scripture calls a daysman as a fleshly mediator between God and man. (a tittle that the Son of man Jesus refused) David and Israel were exalted and given the rights and privileges before God that the ‘first-born’ had. In the same way the verse tells us that Jesus as the Son of God Not in respect to the Son of man is the chief, the master, the spiritual head over all creation. Good reason for that position... He and the father working together in perfect harmony and submissiveness to one another to give us the peace of God that surpasses all understanding together created it all!
God is one Spirit one source of faith as a work or labor of His love as one perfect work in respect to two.
God is one Spirit one source of faith as a work or labor of His love as one perfect work in respect to two.
-
1
- Show all
Garee, respectfully, I encourage you to take a writing class. This sentence of yours is meaningless, and it is but one example among many of your convoluted collections of words separated by periods. At the very least, please spend some time on one of the writing lab sites such as the Purdue University Online Writing Lab (https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/purdue_owl.html) learning how to structure sentences and paragraphs properly. Your contributions will be much more valuable if they are coherent.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
Part of the church fathers starting doctrines was framed in what could and could not be said.
Jesus is God's only begotten.
He is begotten of the father.
Ok,but also he is alpha and omega.
He ISN'T. firstborn OF. the dead.
Firstborn OF THE FATHER.
HE has no beginnig and no ending.
There never was a time when he was not firstborn. He wasn't "not firstborn" waiting to become firstborn.
He just is.
He just is.
You can't understand those components.
It is by faith we simply believe.
( what can,and cannot, be said)
Jesus is God's only begotten.
He is begotten of the father.
Ok,but also he is alpha and omega.
He ISN'T. firstborn OF. the dead.
Firstborn OF THE FATHER.
HE has no beginnig and no ending.
There never was a time when he was not firstborn. He wasn't "not firstborn" waiting to become firstborn.
He just is.
He just is.
You can't understand those components.
It is by faith we simply believe.
( what can,and cannot, be said)
-
1
- Show all
Something else people don't get, when the Bible was translated into the KJV English, it was common then to speak in the 3rd person view. So, many times when we think a scripture means more than ONE person, if you look at it from a 3rd person view, you can obviously see it only means ONE person!!
Just like describing Christ is now sitting on the RIGHT HAND of God, that literally does not mean TWO PEOPLE, it means that Christ has FULL POWER of God (the RIGHT HAND in the OLD ENGLISH means and affirms HIGHEST ABSOLUTE POWER).
But since the Catholics bastardized scripture with their own views (not the view of God), we have people clearly missing out from the TRUTH!!
-
1
-
1
- Show all
Yeah...just like we read the entire Old Testament and not one mention from God that a literal hell exists. Then in the Gospel of Luke, we supposedly have Jesus (WHO is GOD) talking about a literal hell with Lazarus and the rich man.
So yeah, them 2nd century Catholics have done literal damage to how we should both interpret God and understand scripture.
I have no respect for the Catholic garbage and completely understand how many believe the Catholic leaders will be a part of the antichrist and false prophet!!
-
1
-
1
- Show all
Yeah, those catholics.... and not just story about Lazarus, but also Matthew 3:7, Matthew 3:12, Matthew 5:29-30, Matthew 18:9-12, Matthew 13:38-42, Matthew 13:49-50, Matthew 25:46, Mark 9:43-47, Luke 12:5, 2 Thessalonians 1:9, Jude 7, Revelation 14:11, Revelation 20:13-15, and Revelation 21:8
Really terrible. I would complain to pope or something.
Really terrible. I would complain to pope or something.
Like I mentioned in my post to the thread OP...
We have Matthew 28:19 talking to PETER and the other disciples about baptizing in the trinity.
But, when Peter and Paul are in the Book of Acts (the actual FIRST CHURCH EXAMPLE we have), they are baptizing in the NAME of JESUS, not in the trinity.
So, why would Peter not obey Jesus? Why would Paul not obey Jesus?
Because we have information that proves in the second century the CATHOLICS changed Matthew 28:19 from Jesus commanding to baptize in HIS NAME to the bastardized trinity.
The Bible is flawed by Catholic dogma. No doubt those who've done such a thing as changed scripture will NEVER SEE heaven but will be in the Lake of Fire!!
We have Matthew 28:19 talking to PETER and the other disciples about baptizing in the trinity.
But, when Peter and Paul are in the Book of Acts (the actual FIRST CHURCH EXAMPLE we have), they are baptizing in the NAME of JESUS, not in the trinity.
So, why would Peter not obey Jesus? Why would Paul not obey Jesus?
Because we have information that proves in the second century the CATHOLICS changed Matthew 28:19 from Jesus commanding to baptize in HIS NAME to the bastardized trinity.
The Bible is flawed by Catholic dogma. No doubt those who've done such a thing as changed scripture will NEVER SEE heaven but will be in the Lake of Fire!!
-
1
-
1
- Show all
To speak logically and properly, when we have Mt 28:19 and Acts, we have so called contradiction.
From a contradiction to "a proof that the second century catholics changed Mt 28:19" is a long way, very looong way.
This contradiction is not logical, but only in practice.
Maybe, the more simple explanation is that Peter said it differently than Jesus said. Or maybe it does not matter because its not the formula said during baptism, that makes baptism to be a true baptism... or....some other possibility. Or there is an evil conspiration of the catholics, corrupting the Bible.
From a contradiction to "a proof that the second century catholics changed Mt 28:19" is a long way, very looong way.
This contradiction is not logical, but only in practice.
Maybe, the more simple explanation is that Peter said it differently than Jesus said. Or maybe it does not matter because its not the formula said during baptism, that makes baptism to be a true baptism... or....some other possibility. Or there is an evil conspiration of the catholics, corrupting the Bible.