Calvinist Kitchen...stirring the pot

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
And neither is salvation in the Old Testament eternal by any stretch of the imagination. It was temporary and it was sustained by the blood of bulls and goats. It was entirely a works-based salvation. God's grace was found in that He allowed the blood of animals to cover sin then. They were justified, as Abraham was, by faith - but they were kept in covenant relationship through the sacrificial system.
What about all the years there was no sacrifices given? Did those men and women go to hell because they could not have their sins forgiven?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
And the purpose of the statement was to show that his ELECTION shall stand.
No. The purpose was to show that Israel was chosen not by birthright, But By Gods election. No ones salvation was ever in question. For all we know both esau and Jacob were saved.
 
Sep 9, 2018
2,244
1,032
113
70
Illinois
What about all the years there was no sacrifices given? Did those men and women go to hell because they could not have their sins forgiven?
Nope!

That is what Paul tells us in Romans . . .

"For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law; (For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified. For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves: Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another) In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel" (Romans 2:12-16).

In many regards the faith (or obedience to conscience) of the heathen far surpassed that of the Jew who had the law but disobeyed it because he figured he could since he was a Jew.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Nope!

That is what Paul tells us in Romans . . .

"For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law; (For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified. For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves: Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another) In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel" (Romans 2:12-16).

In many regards the faith (or obedience to conscience) of the heathen far surpassed that of the Jew who had the law but disobeyed it because he figured he could since he was a Jew.
1. There was no sacrifice before moses for sin (sacrifices was given as an offering to God. Not for redemption of sin)
2. While Isreal was under babylonian captivity there was no sacrifice
3. The blood of bulls and goats NEVER TOOK AWAY SIN.

There is a flaw in your logic.
 
Sep 9, 2018
2,244
1,032
113
70
Illinois
There is a flaw in your logic.
I'm only telling you what Paul said about the conscience before the giving of the law. There are those that knew right from wrong because of their ability to discern. So, they chose to do right - and God honored that. That was all before the Jew came on the scene. But Paul is still comparing the man under conscience to the Jew under law. And the Jew more often than not was faulted for using his title 'Jew' as a replacement for any duty he had to do right.

Remember, Paul does say that a man may be saved by good works . . . if those works exceed God's standards. Well, before the Law, there was no measuring stick, so God honored the right living of those that didn't know any better but knew what it was to obey his conscience.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I'm only telling you what Paul said about the conscience before the giving of the law. There are those that knew right from wrong because of their ability to discern. So, they chose to do right - and God honored that. That was all before the Jew came on the scene. But Paul is still comparing the man under conscience to the Jew under law. And the Jew more often than not was faulted for using his title 'Jew' as a replacement for any duty he had to do right.

Remember, Paul does say that a man may be saved by good works . . . if those works exceed God's standards. Well, before the Law, there was no measuring stick, so God honored the right living of those that didn't know any better but knew what it was to obey his conscience.
The reason the gentiles by nature followed the law is the law is written in our dna, We are made in the image of Christ.

That is the point Paul was trying to make.

Abraham was saved by faith, Not by works of any type. Thay is how salvation was granted to all men and women of all time..
 
Sep 9, 2018
2,244
1,032
113
70
Illinois
Abraham was saved by faith, Not by works of any type. Thay is how salvation was granted to all men and women of all time..
Abraham was not under the law, and yes, he was justified by faith in a promise-keeping God.

Under the law, that covenant relationship was maintained through animal sacrifices. No such thing as eternal security back than. That came at the cross and the sealing of the Holy Spirit.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Abraham was not under the law, and yes, he was justified by faith in a promise-keeping God.

Under the law, that covenant relationship was maintained through animal sacrifices. No such thing as eternal security back than. That came at the cross and the sealing of the Holy Spirit.
No, it was not

Even David understood sacrifice and burnt offering God did nto desire.

You have God holding a group of people to different standard than other people.

God is the same yesterday today and tomorrow. Salvation has, and always will be by grace.

The law was a tutor to lead people to christ. It could NEVER make anyone rightous, not one person was ever justified by any part of the law
 
Sep 9, 2018
2,244
1,032
113
70
Illinois
The Law was added . . . it didn't have to be added . . . Israel insisted. But since they did insist, now the Law is the Old Testament standard. Israel, as a nation, forsook grace and demanded law.

"And all the people answered together, and said, All that the LORD hath spoken we will do. And Moses returned the words of the people unto the LORD" (Exodus 19:8).

Too bad Israel chose Law over grace.

But then, Israel can hardly be referred to as geniuses when it comes to their national decisions.

"Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children" (Matthew 27:25).

Again . . .

"Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator" (Galatians 3:19).
 
Sep 9, 2018
2,244
1,032
113
70
Illinois
God is the same yesterday today and tomorrow. Salvation has, and always will be by grace.
God is the same always, but His dealings with man change quite a bit. Progressive revelation shows that.

You 'are' a dispensationalist, are you not? I believe I recall you saying you were.
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
This is more like a frying pan than a pot.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,629
3,532
113
No, it was not

Even David understood sacrifice and burnt offering God did nto desire.

You have God holding a group of people to different standard than other people.

God is the same yesterday today and tomorrow. Salvation has, and always will be by grace.

The law was a tutor to lead people to christ. It could NEVER make anyone rightous, not one person was ever justified by any part of the law
First of all, the blood of those sacrificed animals could forgive sins, cover sins, but never take them away. This is the righteousness found under the law. It was self righteousness for obeying the law. God's righteousness is found through the shed blood of Jesus Christ. It was not yet available to those OT saints.

Leviticus 19
21 And he shall bring his trespass offering unto the Lord, unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, even a ram for a trespass offering.
22 And the priest shall make an atonement for him with the ram of the trespass offering before the Lord for his sin which he hath done: and the sin which he hath done shall be forgiven him.


Exodus 34
6 And the Lord passed by before him, and proclaimed, The Lord, The Lord God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth,
7 Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children's children, unto the third and to the fourth generation.


Forgiveness of sin was available to the man who live by the law, but his sin was not forgotten as under the blood of Christ.

Another example:

Luke 1
5 There was in the days of Herod, the king of Judaea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the course of Abia: and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisabeth.
6 And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.


Romans 10
2 For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge.
3 For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.
4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5 For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
 

Endoscopy

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2017
4,028
400
83
God does not change. He is the same yesterday, today, and tomorrow, neither does his inspired word change. Rev 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
You ignore the fact that the inspired word of God is in Hebrew, Aramaic and koine Judeo Greek. Not English. Translators do their best but they are human. Errors have occurred in translations. That is why I use my smart phone as my Bible. I have a web page on biblegateway.com and select book and chapter. Then I can easily switch between translations to compare the language in each. My favorites are KJV, NIV, ESV, and AMPC. What I like about AMPC is it puts the different meanings of a word in parentheses. This verse is a favorite of mine for demonstrating this. Look at "believes in".

John 3 AMPC
16 For God so greatly loved and dearly prized the world that He [even] gave up His only begotten (unique) Son, so that whoever believes in (trusts in, clings to, relies on) Him shall not perish (come to destruction, be lost) but have eternal (everlasting) life
 

ForestGreenCook

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2018
8,310
1,184
113
Election is always found in a temporal setting. Notice salvation is not the topic of discussion and also note that the "decrees of God" in (verses 12 and 13), happen in time. Verse 12 was said when she conceived ... (verse 10, and 13) is a quote from (Mal. 1:2,3) again in time. No eternal election is found in the passage.

Note carefully the context, (vs. 11, 12, 13) Old Testament. No one in the Old Testament is "in Christ". The subject is mercy and compassion, not salvation. A man cannot force God, by his will or works to have mercy on him. The practical application would be: if you are going to receive mercy, you will receive it on God's terms not your own, you can't will it or work it any other way.
The old testament saints were regenerated and were given the indwelling of the Holy Spirit (Isa 63:11). The natural man does not have the ability to discern spiritual things.(1 Cor 2:14) Election started before the foundation of the world and is evidenced throughout the scriptures.
 

ForestGreenCook

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2018
8,310
1,184
113
And neither is salvation in the Old Testament eternal by any stretch of the imagination. It was temporary and it was sustained by the blood of bulls and goats. It was entirely a works-based salvation. God's grace was found in that He allowed the blood of animals to cover sin then. They were justified, as Abraham was, by faith - but they were kept in covenant relationship through the sacrificial system.
Heb 10:4 - For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,629
3,532
113
Heb 10:4 - For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.
Read post #552 again and again. The blood of animals could not take away sin but it could cover sin, forgive sin. When a sin is covered, the sin is still there. A sin can be forgiven, but it's still can be there. Christ's blood washed away sin, taking it away.
 

ForestGreenCook

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2018
8,310
1,184
113
You ignore the fact that the inspired word of God is in Hebrew, Aramaic and koine Judeo Greek. Not English. Translators do their best but they are human. Errors have occurred in translations. That is why I use my smart phone as my Bible. I have a web page on biblegateway.com and select book and chapter. Then I can easily switch between translations to compare the language in each. My favorites are KJV, NIV, ESV, and AMPC. What I like about AMPC is it puts the different meanings of a word in parentheses. This verse is a favorite of mine for demonstrating this. Look at "believes in".

John 3 AMPC
16 For God so greatly loved and dearly prized the world that He [even] gave up His only begotten (unique) Son, so that whoever believes in (trusts in, clings to, relies on) Him shall not perish (come to destruction, be lost) but have eternal (everlasting) life
Does this mean that you are going to ignore Rev 22:19?
 

ForestGreenCook

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2018
8,310
1,184
113
No. The purpose was to show that Israel was chosen not by birthright, But By Gods election. No ones salvation was ever in question. For all we know both esau and Jacob were saved.
In Gen God changed Jacob's name to be called no more Jacob, but his name shall be called Israel. Jacob is a type of the elect of God.
 

Endoscopy

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2017
4,028
400
83
What about all the years there was no sacrifices given? Did those men and women go to hell because they could not have their sins forgiven?
You ignore why Cain killed Abel. He was killed because his sacrifice was rejected and Abel’s was accepted. So from the beginning the concept of sacrifices for sins existed.
 

Endoscopy

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2017
4,028
400
83
Does this mean that you are going to ignore Rev 22:19?
Foolish question. Along with Rev 22:18 no attempt is being made to add or subtract words. Only the attempt to create a correct translation. Where do you come up with this idiocy?

We are all flawed human beings and make mistakes as a result. This is why the more recent translations are made by committees not single persons. What one misses hopefully will be caught by someone else.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.