Einstein Was Wrong !

Sorry. Posthuman is getting under my skin. He is on ignore.

I would jump in and do some reading on the matter regardless of your level of education. Common sense by God's Grace is enough for anybody to look into this further. I use the results of my research for my ministry efforts.….ALL the time. Constantly. And what is disturbing is that there are confused Christians who balk at the Truth of Scripture because of being constantly bombarded by scientific fallacy. So in that respect it is both edifying on a personal level (it was for me) but MUCH more importantly…...WITNESSING.

That's a shame. Aren't you being a bit sensitive. You should consider what he said about disproving hypothess. A hypothesis might be true but another variable is interfering. Scientists generally do not change their dogma without evidence like a grand theory that becomes popular. There is no evidence for the multiverse that I know of but it is not universally accepted either.



The apologetics aspect is appealing. I wonder, though, for the time investment if better approach to reach atheists might be just share the gospel without arguing science, show love, pray for their sick grandma ir ither beefs and ket them see Gid answer prayer, etc. But if you can do science apolegetics as a tool to open people to the gospel more power to you.

It s funny what wins people. I sawa video Chinese people were using, a video about ancient Chinese poetry and an ancient word for enpoer meaning the one chosen y God or with wisdom from God. It seemed pointless for evangelism from an American perspective but the idea that believing in God is Chinese might be a useful apologetic for a Chinese atheist

This guy I met in a church service once told me that God would use me to reach atheists. I think it had to do with college campuses. I will have to look and see if I took notes. If physics would help evangelism, I am open.

But I know I am mot a physicist and I o not like being pretentious. I have the letters after my name from another field and I feel I have all the more of a duty not to feign expertise.

Einstein revealed himself to me, and he said you were completely bonkers..........Do I believe him or you?

Hmm

Think I'll go with him..............he ain't quite as big a wing nut as you are revealing yourself to be

when did we mention the age of the universe?
or do you mean something different by the word 'world'?

What I do is testify and witness (to the world, everybody and anybody) to the fact that I have studied the matter in great depth and detail, and know and have confirmed that the


Lol. Quite an aggressive response. At any rate, the data is there for your approbation. And it is quite conclusive. Einstein was/is wrong. His theories are pure unadulterated humbug. On every level. Natural philosophy at its worst. Fortunately some of us have actually made the effort (EFFORT IN CAPITAL LETTERS) to successfully refute the theories.

I bet he is getting under your skin dude.................after all, he is making you look the dunce you are............

View attachment 191060

Einstein was/is wrong. His theories are pure unadulterated humbug.

I am just guessing but one would probably have to get to second or third year PhD student knowledge of physics to understand the math with the arguments and theory right?

Have you gone through all Posthuman provided? Doubt it.............I have nothing to prove to you............you are simply pfishing...........

Here, lemme make you a wee bit more comfortable...

View attachment 191063

There! Now, pfish to your hearts content

It's a good thing Einstein is not around to set you straight, Einstein.

It's a good thing Einstein is not around to set you straight, Einstein.

I'm not going to get deep in this conversation, but I will just add that I have come across information supporting the theory that space is largely controlled by electromagnetic rather than gravitational forces.

I will also add that anyone who presents an unfamiliar idea does well to do so humbly, and to avoid insulting those whom he is trying to convince.

Maxwell's equations:


where is mass in these?

how do i derive
from this?

Those are NOT my equations.


Here are my equations.


Well there's really only one equation... my equation of 1+1.


1 + 1 = an unknown quantity which is most likely greater than 1 but smaller than an unknown quantity which is larger than the aforementioned unknown quantity which is most likely greater than 1, unless and until such time as the equation is expressing said quantities in a hitherto unknown parallel universe in which: such expressions are expressionless due to the non existence of abstract entities or the non existence of cognitive entities capable of expressing said entities, or in which said expressions have logical ability to be expressed but no longer result in the same outcome due to differentials in causality resulting from changes in the anisotropic property of time, or due to a systemic difference to all known laws of physics insofar as we understand them.


I should also mention...
math really confuses me.


...

It's a good thing Einstein is not around to set you straight, Einstein.

That's all you got? Because that is not all I've got. Not even close. This could take many months. Or years.

View attachment 191070

Hilarious.

...I will just add that I have come across information supporting the theory that space is largely controlled by electromagnetic rather than gravitational forces.