The Bible is the word of God

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
A

Adam4Eve

Active member
#1
Nov 26, 2018
179
42
28
#1
As many of you will know, I'm vehemently against allowing our relationship with God to be influenced by peripheral human tradition and culture, or learning the Bible through second hand testimony of humans (best to read it yourself).

Just like tithing is for some, one of the other things that I suspect will be close to people's hearts but which has no Biblical basis whatsoever is the idea that the Bible is
'fully and completely the unadulterated word of God'.

I believe the word of God is contained within the Bible but that much of the Bible is a human description of events that took place at some time, or things like that.

Disagree?
Then show me where it says that the ENTIRE Bible is the pure and unadulterated word of God.

If you can't show me, then this idea is merely part of Christian tradition or culture, with no actual Biblical basis.


PS:
I know, I know! By asking this question I "can't possibly be a Christian", right?
 
breno785au

breno785au

Senior Member
#2
Jul 23, 2013
6,002
764
113
39
Australia
#2
I can see what you're saying but if we go down this path, can you begin to describe which verse(s) in the Bible are not Truth?
 
A

Adam4Eve

Active member
#3
Nov 26, 2018
179
42
28
#3
breno785au said:
I can see what you're saying but if we go down this path, can you begin to describe which verse(s) in the Bible are not Truth?
Click to expand...
It has nothing to do with truth and untruth.
It's about God's word versus narrative.
 
Nehemiah6

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
#4
Jul 18, 2017
24,357
12,876
113
#4
Adam4Eve said:
...which has no Biblical basis whatsoever is the idea that the Bible is 'fully and completely the unadulterated word of God
Click to expand...
What makes you think this has no biblical basis? And if you believe that is the case THE BURDEN IS ON YOU to show from Scripture that this has no biblical basis.
Adam4Eve said:
If you can't show me, then this idea is merely part of Christian tradition or culture, with no actual Biblical basis.
Click to expand...
Thus comment is pure arrogance.

What I see coming out of the woodwork is a whole bunch of wacky ideas on Christian forums because people have not been actually studying the Word.
 
A

Adam4Eve

Active member
#5
Nov 26, 2018
179
42
28
#5
Nehemiah6 said:
What makes you think this has no biblical basis? And if you believe that is the case THE BURDEN IS ON YOU to show from Scripture that this has no biblical basis.

Thus comment is pure arrogance.

What I see coming out of the woodwork is a whole bunch of wacky ideas on Christian forums because people have not been actually studying the Word.
Click to expand...
Oh I see, typical move on these forums:
Somebody questions a deeply held belief, but one that has no basis and is thus mere tradition, and then the burden is placed on them to prove that somebody else's belief is untrue.

It's called a burden of proof reversal, and in this context is a move made by somebody because they realise that their belief has no empirical basis at all, so they request that somebody else proves the negative.

I'm not even going to get into this with you - it's logic 101.

If you'd like to answer the question I ask in the OP then please do.

Have a nice day.
 
Lanolin

Lanolin

Well-known member
#6
Dec 15, 2018
23,460
7,177
113
#6
Easy look up 2 Timothy 3:16

Notice it says ALL SCRIPTURE

PRoverbs 30:5

Notice....EVERY word of God is PURE

REvelation 22:18-19

Specifically talking about the book of Revelation not to add or take away from any words in, prophecy

john 10:35

Scripture cannot be broken
There is many more, for you to look up just a few...do your homework and study YOUR BIBLE. Blessings to you. You are smart, you can do it.

Wont be answering any more crazy questions from you because....you can find out for yourself when you read the Bible. :)

Hebrews 4:12 look that one up too.
 
posthuman

posthuman

Senior Member
#7
Jul 31, 2013
36,647
13,121
113
#7
Adam4Eve said:
show me where it says that the ENTIRE Bible is the pure and unadulterated word of God.

If you can't show me, then this idea is merely part of Christian tradition or culture, with no actual Biblical basis.
Click to expand...
for simplicity define
A = the entire Bible is the word of God
B = the idea that the entire Bible is the word of God is a false product of tradition/culture

B is not proven by lack of proof for A - much less because a certain small group of people fail to come up with a proof for A in a limited time period.

but anyway..

all scripture is God-breathed ​
(2 Timothy 3:16) ​

now decide what is 'scripture' and what is not ;)
 
posthuman

posthuman

Senior Member
#8
Jul 31, 2013
36,647
13,121
113
#8
Adam4Eve said:
It's called a burden of proof reversal
Click to expand...
uh, didn't you do the burden-of-proof-reversal-dance yourself when you made a claim that is obviously outrageous / extraordinary to the audience you're addressing and demanded that they disprove it? :unsure:

((not that i'm complaining))
 
JaumeJ

JaumeJ

Senior Member
#9
Jul 2, 2011
21,229
6,526
113
#9
The Bible is only imperfect when there is absence of the Key, the Holy Spirit.

With God teaching, one may readily obtain truth from a Betty Crocker Cookbook…...

Scoffers will be ignored.
 
A

Adam4Eve

Active member
#11
Nov 26, 2018
179
42
28
#11
breno785au said:
Yes it is and you're way out of line. Which scriptures do you not believe is truth?
Click to expand...
No, I'm not out of line.
I'm asking a question.
If my question makes you feel uncomfortable, I'm afraid I don't care.
I just want to know what the answer is.

It's not that I don't believe that scriptures are truth, I do.
I'm just unsure whether everything contained in the Bible is the word of God, or whether narrative is given by man.
 
A

Adam4Eve

Active member
#12
Nov 26, 2018
179
42
28
#12
JaumeJ said:
The Bible is only imperfect when there is absence of the Key, the Holy Spirit.

With God teaching, one may readily obtain truth from a Betty Crocker Cookbook…...

Scoffers will be ignored.
Click to expand...
You seem sensible, so I'll ask you because you seem to be able to perceive beyond the infantile mirage of cultural assertion shared by so many that have replied to this thread.

Is the Bible in it's entirety the pure unadulterated word of God, or are parts (e.g. narrative or descriptions of events that took place) written purely by man?

Where does it say either way?
If it doesn't say either way, why do people believe either way?
 
wolfwint

wolfwint

Senior Member
#13
Feb 15, 2014
3,590
879
113
61
#13
Adam4Eve said:
As many of you will know, I'm vehemently against allowing our relationship with God to be influenced by peripheral human tradition and culture, or learning the Bible through second hand testimony of humans (best to read it yourself).

Just like tithing is for some, one of the other things that I suspect will be close to people's hearts but which has no Biblical basis whatsoever is the idea that the Bible is
'fully and completely the unadulterated word of God'.

I believe the word of God is contained within the Bible but that much of the Bible is a human description of events that took place at some time, or things like that.

Disagree?
Then show me where it says that the ENTIRE Bible is the pure and unadulterated word of God.

If you can't show me, then this idea is merely part of Christian tradition or culture, with no actual Biblical basis.


PS:
I know, I know! By asking this question I "can't possibly be a Christian", right?
Click to expand...
Why you ask this question?
In the german protestant universitys they teach that the bible contains the word of God. But they have different measures to deceide what is the word of God. In the way you see the bible, its in the hand of the human to deceide what is the word of God. And this is the opening for every false teaching. And this why we have among a 3rd of german protestant pastors the believe that Jesus birth was not a virgin birth and that his body did not resurected. How many people are led in a wrong way and astray from God, because the people claim the bible contains the word of God, instead to teach the bible is the word of God!
 
A

Adam4Eve

Active member
#14
Nov 26, 2018
179
42
28
#14
wolfwint said:
Why you ask this question?
In the german protestant universitys they teach that the bible contains the word of God. But they have different measures to deceide what is the word of God. In the way you see the bible, its in the hand of the human to deceide what is the word of God. And this is the opening for every false teaching. And this why we have among a 3rd of german protestant pastors the believe that Jesus birth was not a virgin birth and that his body did not resurected. How many people are led in a wrong way and astray from God, because the people claim the bible contains the word of God, instead to teach the bible is the word of God!
Click to expand...
No, you're trying to tell me what my view is, and you're wrong.

I didn't say it's up to humans to decide which parts of the Bible are written by man, and which by the Holy Spirit.
That's not what I believe thank you.

Please stick to the original question and stop making out I'm saying something I'm not.

I'm not being rude, so please don't take it personally.
I'm just keen to quash any accidental attempt to derail this important topic and turn it into something else.

Have a great day.
 
PennEd

PennEd

Senior Member
#15
Apr 22, 2013
12,923
8,656
113
#15
Adam4Eve said:
As many of you will know, I'm vehemently against allowing our relationship with God to be influenced by peripheral human tradition and culture, or learning the Bible through second hand testimony of humans (best to read it yourself).

Just like tithing is for some, one of the other things that I suspect will be close to people's hearts but which has no Biblical basis whatsoever is the idea that the Bible is
'fully and completely the unadulterated word of God'.

I believe the word of God is contained within the Bible but that much of the Bible is a human description of events that took place at some time, or things like that.

Disagree?
Then show me where it says that the ENTIRE Bible is the pure and unadulterated word of God.

If you can't show me, then this idea is merely part of Christian tradition or culture, with no actual Biblical basis.


PS:
I know, I know! By asking this question I "can't possibly be a Christian", right?
Click to expand...

Here ya go:

2 Timothy 3:16-17 New International Version (NIV)
16 ALL Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the servant of God[a]may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.


Now it may be true that some translations may not get it 100% right, but in it's original languages it IS ALL God's Word.
 
JaumeJ

JaumeJ

Senior Member
#16
Jul 2, 2011
21,229
6,526
113
#16
Adam4Eve said:
You seem sensible, so I'll ask you because you seem to be able to perceive beyond the infantile mirage of cultural assertion shared by so many that have replied to this thread.

Is the Bible in it's entirety the pure unadulterated word of God, or are parts (e.g. narrative or descriptions of events that took place) written purely by man?

Where does it say either way?
If it doesn't say either way, why do people believe either way?
Click to expand...
How sensible I am, I would not dare say but I have already responded in the post your replied to.

If you want quotes that satisfy believers, try the first chapter of the evangelist, John.

As folks who are convinced by the Holy Spirit it is an inherent knowledge tha our Father has assured we each will ascertain all each needs by the Holy Spirit.


It is not an intellectual endeavor, it is completely spiritual, and no amount of scholarly hanky panky can dent that.
 
H

Hungry

Banned
#18
Nov 26, 2012
3,095
1,050
113
#18
Adam4Eve said:
No, I'm not out of line.
I'm asking a question.
If my question makes you feel uncomfortable, I'm afraid I don't care.
I just want to know what the answer is.

It's not that I don't believe that scriptures are truth, I do.
I'm just unsure whether everything contained in the Bible is the word of God, or whether narrative is given by man.
Click to expand...
Considering many parts of the Bible hadn’t been written yet, the “all Scripture is God breathed” I believe was specifically talking about the Scriptures/scrolls written by the prophets. I’m not saying the New Testament is a work of fiction, I just hate when people say that statement automatically includes it. Interpretation is subject to preconceptions. I think in many cases what the words say aren’t taught correctly. That’s why you have so much division in the church. To emphatically believe what religious establishments have extracted and presented to be the accurate Word of God, is putting trust in corrupt leadership. A brief glimpse into history shows those who ordained the Bible weren’t ones who lived by its precepts.
 
Dino246

Dino246

Senior Member
#19
Jun 30, 2015
24,682
13,368
113
#19
Adam4Eve said:
As many of you will know, I'm vehemently against allowing our relationship with God to be influenced by peripheral human tradition and culture, or learning the Bible through second hand testimony of humans (best to read it yourself).

Just like tithing is for some, one of the other things that I suspect will be close to people's hearts but which has no Biblical basis whatsoever is the idea that the Bible is
'fully and completely the unadulterated word of God'.

I believe the word of God is contained within the Bible but that much of the Bible is a human description of events that took place at some time, or things like that.

Disagree?
Then show me where it says that the ENTIRE Bible is the pure and unadulterated word of God.

If you can't show me, then this idea is merely part of Christian tradition or culture, with no actual Biblical basis.


PS:
I know, I know! By asking this question I "can't possibly be a Christian", right?
Click to expand...
Fallacy: burden of proof reversal. Support your own assertion with evidence first.
 
Dino246

Dino246

Senior Member
#20
Jun 30, 2015
24,682
13,368
113
#20
Adam4Eve said:
Oh I see, typical move on these forums: ...

It's called a burden of proof reversal, and in this context is a move made by somebody because they realise that their belief has no empirical basis at all, so they request that somebody else proves the negative.

I'm not even going to get into this with you - it's logic 101.
Click to expand...
If you understand “logic 101” you will see the silliness of calling a BoPR on others when you began with one yourself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.