Did Paul cancel the 1 19th Psalm?

I think the ten commandments are directly from God, they all tell of ways we can make God's love come alive. If they are done legalistically, or without love, they are changed by humans into laws that are not of love, but the law itself is Godly I think.

Paul is just impossible, I could shake him. He doesn't tell us when he is speaking of the oral traditions that Jews at the time even called the law of Moses and the real Law of the Lord. What I do to try to get them straight is to keep in mind the ways of the Lord and what God tells us in other chapters and fit Paul's speaking of law fit into the eternal way of the Lord.

I think that it has always been so that the rituals God gave man has always been just that: rituals. They have been a help to man, but are not eternal law and never was. I think it changed when people didn't need rituals any longer but the rituals were replaced at Pentecost. Jews still use them as a means to keep God as part of every part of living and it works for them. The rituals aren't what work, but keeping God as part of everything they do works. For them it includes eating, washing their hands, going to bed, waking---everything every day. It just doesn't save.

I think the ten commandments are directly from God, they all tell of ways we can make God's love come alive. If they are done legalistically, or without love, they are changed by humans into laws that are not of love, but the law itself is Godly I think.

Paul is just impossible, I could shake him. He doesn't tell us when he is speaking of the oral traditions that Jews at the time even called the law of Moses and the real Law of the Lord. What I do to try to get them straight is to keep in mind the ways of the Lord and what God tells us in other chapters and fit Paul's speaking of law fit into the eternal way of the Lord.

I think that it has always been so that the rituals God gave man has always been just that: rituals. They have been a help to man, but are not eternal law and never was. I think it changed when people didn't need rituals any longer but the rituals were replaced at Pentecost. Jews still use them as a means to keep God as part of every part of living and it works for them. The rituals aren't what work, but keeping God as part of everything they do works. For them it includes eating, washing their hands, going to bed, waking---everything every day. It just doesn't save.

Paul was a Sheriff of the law but then on the road to Damascus he was blinded by an outlaw and his sight held hostage until he agreed to switch sides......
Later on he relented....but dont come at me if you dont have a sense of humor....
because he contradicts himself a lot in Timothy...
in Cor. 15 he writes we must put on an immortal body then in Timothy 6:16 he says only God is immortal.... so .....I think that Paul guy wrote so much he forgot some of what he said.....
Of course you know he had that thorn thing going on and people trying to bash him in the head with rocks so.....you have to cut him a little slack

I don't think we should cut Paul one tiny bit of slack. Paul is speaking for the Lord and has no right to assign a wrong thought to God. If it seems he is doing this, it is time to search the way the scripture agrees, for God assigned him as a spokesman for Him. Paul is either right or Paul is not speaking for the lord so he can't be believed.

Paul was even tested by the brother of Christ and a panel of judges for this and came out as innocent so I'll bet if you study enough you will see Paul is right and you are wrong.

I don't think we should cut Paul one tiny bit of slack. Paul is speaking for the Lord and has no right to assign a wrong thought to God. If it seems he is doing this, it is time to search the way the scripture agrees, for God assigned him as a spokesman for Him. Paul is either right or Paul is not speaking for the lord so he can't be believed.

Paul was even tested by the brother of Christ and a panel of judges for this and came out as innocent so I'll bet if you study enough you will see Paul is right and you are wrong.

I don't think we should cut Paul one tiny bit of slack. Paul is speaking for the Lord and has no right to assign a wrong thought to God. If it seems he is doing this, it is time to search the way the scripture agrees, for God assigned him as a spokesman for Him. Paul is either right or Paul is not speaking for the lord so he can't be believed.

Paul was even tested by the brother of Christ and a panel of judges for this and came out as innocent so I'll bet if you study enough you will see Paul is right and you are wrong.

You're the one saying Paul can't be human has to be perfect and I am wrong ...
so you prove how the books agree. Because in the KJV they don't agree.

I didn't say Paul was perfect, Paul says he isn't but that God commissioned Him to only give scripture to us from God.

I don't see these scriptures speaking of the same thing at all. In 1 Corinthians it speaks of how it will be after the end of our earth happens and what our bodies will be like. In Timothy it is speaking of what God is like. Two completely different things.

Yesh well there is a fifference a. If omly God is immortal nan cant put on a immortal body bscauss only God is immortal ... Contradiction

So Paul can be believed because he truly speaks for the lord. If Paul tells us that the 119th Psalm in cancelled, we can believe Paul. Did Paul do that?

Many posts say the law is cancelled, I hope that answers to this thread will make their position clear. If the law is cancelled, so is the 119th Psalm.

Gal. 3:24-25 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. 25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.

I understand that when scripture speaks of “under the law” it means using the law for our salvation and does not tell us to ignore the law for our guidance. When scripture tells us we are under grace, my understanding is that we are saved by the grace of the Lord, and has nothing to do with our need to obey God. Do you think this is wrong?

Many posts say the law is cancelled, I hope that answers to this thread will make their position clear. If the law is cancelled, so is the 119th Psalm.

Many posters say the law has been cancelled, but if it has been cancelled then the 119th Psalm is not truth. We are told in this psalm that the law is eternal.

We know many things in the OT has been changed, just as Christ is the innocent blood that was symbolized in the OT. It is now wrong to use animal blood as a symbol for Christ. It is required, however, that we learn what the animal blood did so we better understand what Christ does for us for now Christ is the innocent blood.

The form of innocent blood shed was changed, was the law changed? Is it wrong to belief in the 119th Psalm as scripture?

i read through all the posts and did not see this mentioned. If i missed it i apologize.

Psalm 119 is key to understanding all of Scripture. The key to understanding Psalm 119 is knowing Whose prayer it is.

Psalm 119 is Yahshua's prayer for life based on the promise of life in the Law in Leviticus 18:4 and 5.

Leviticus 18:4 and 5
You shall do My ordinances, and You shall keep My statutes, and walk in them: I am the YHVH Your Elohiym. You shall therefore keep My statutes and My ordinances; which if a Man does, He shall live by them: I am YHVH.

Yahshua prays for Life the Hebrew word chaYAH 16 times in Psalm 119. ChaYAH is translated to revive many times in most translations. He was asking for life because of His obedience to the law in giving His life to save us. He was asking to be raised from the dead. The Law was His path to life because of His obedience. Only He could fulfill the law by offering His sinless life to save us.

There are key verses in Psalm 119 that show it is Yahshua's prayer. No one else could pray this prayer, which if we are honest must all admit.

Here is one section verses 73-80.

Your hands have made Me and formed Me. Give Me understanding, that I may learn Your mitzvot. Those who fear You will see Me and be glad, Because I have put My hope in Your Word. YHVH, I know that Your judgments are righteous, That in faithfulness You have afflicted Me. Please let Your lovingkindness be for My comfort, According to Your Word to Your Servant. Let Your tender mercies come to Me, that I may live(chaYAH); For Your law is My delight. Let the proud be put to shame, for they have overthrown Me wrongfully. I will meditate on Your precepts. Let those who fear You turn to Me. They will know Your statutes. Let My heart be blameless toward Your decrees, That I may not be put to shame.

When you read Psalm 119 with the understanding that it is Yahshua praying to His Father, it makes complete sense. In fact, it reveals so much. He prays for us, that we will turn to Him. He asks to be raised to life(chaYAH) and praises the law which was Life to Him because of His obedience.

The Law was fulfilled, when He breathed His last breath on the cross and said it is finished, into Your hands I commend My Spirit. In that moment He had completely obeyed the law. Psalm 119 is His prayer for life because of His obedience in saving us.

Gal. 3:24-25 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. 25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.

I understand that when scripture speaks of “under the law” it means using the law for our salvation and does not tell us to ignore the law for our guidance. When scripture tells us we are under grace, my understanding is that we are saved by the grace of the Lord, and has nothing to do with our need to obey God. Do you think this is wrong?

Many posts say the law is cancelled, I hope that answers to this thread will make their position clear. If the law is cancelled, so is the 119th Psalm.

Many posters say the law has been cancelled, but if it has been cancelled then the 119th Psalm is not truth. We are told in this psalm that the law is eternal.

We know many things in the OT has been changed, just as Christ is the innocent blood that was symbolized in the OT. It is now wrong to use animal blood as a symbol for Christ. It is required, however, that we learn what the animal blood did so we better understand what Christ does for us for now Christ is the innocent blood.

The form of innocent blood shed was changed, was the law changed? Is it wrong to belief in the 119th Psalm as scripture?

Gal. 3:24-25 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. 25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.

I understand that when scripture speaks of “under the law” it means using the law for our salvation and does not tell us to ignore the law for our guidance. When scripture tells us we are under grace, my understanding is that we are saved by the grace of the Lord, and has nothing to do with our need to obey God. Do you think this is wrong?

Many posts say the law is cancelled, I hope that answers to this thread will make their position clear. If the law is cancelled, so is the 119th Psalm.

Many posters say the law has been cancelled, but if it has been cancelled then the 119th Psalm is not truth. We are told in this psalm that the law is eternal.

We know many things in the OT has been changed, just as Christ is the innocent blood that was symbolized in the OT. It is now wrong to use animal blood as a symbol for Christ. It is required, however, that we learn what the animal blood did so we better understand what Christ does for us for now Christ is the innocent blood.

The form of innocent blood shed was changed, was the law changed? Is it wrong to belief in the 119th Psalm as scripture?

Therefore completing the circuit . The Christian's circular reasoning law not subject to change.