Galatian Conundrums

You are again anticipating revelation here. There is no problem on my part.

I have already stated that Galatians was written after the events in acts 15.

Only after the decision of the council was given and Paul given the right hand of fellowship to the gentiles, then Paul could proclaim his double curse on those Jews who tried to bring the gentiles under the gospel of the kingdom.

As for the Jews, as the events in James 21 showed, the Jews who believed still had to keep the law. The agreement was that only the gentile believers were exempted.

would it be fair to call it 'semi-Pelagianism' when someone holds as doctrine that there are two paths to salvation, a fully Pelagian one & a fully Augustinian one?

also, what do you call it when someone holds as doctrine that it doesn't matter if they have right doctrine or not?

((trying to brush up on vocabulary))

That's probably better than sounding cool & frumpy as I would consider that to be a conundrum.

actually, 'cool' raises a conundrum, all by itself, too:
if my coffee has become 'cool' - is that really 'cool' ? because i like it hot, i.e. cool coffee is uncool.

i dunno, maybe 'cool' just has to 'agree to disagree' with itself for the sake of common usage. which is another conundrum of its own!

confounded thread, lol, why do we talk for 20 pages about whether there's 'another gospel' -- that is the conundrum!

It’s acts 21, particularly v25 instead. 🤗

To dispensationalists, the idea of progressive revelation is important.

Jesus told Nicodemus "you must be born again"
What part of Jesus gospel do you not understand?
Jesus preached salvation through Himself.
Paul preached the same.
Same gospel.
Salvation through Jesus.

I am asking you what gospel was Peter preaching in Luke 9:6.

Is it that difficult to answer?

I don't see anywhere in Scripture that tells us to treat men and women differently in discussion about Scripture. Perhaps you think it's okay to have two standards.

Once you accept the concept of progressive revelation, you don't have to worry about Galatians 1-2. I realized that is maybe why many of you here resist the idea that the gospel of the Kingdom differs from the gospel of Grace.

Is it that hard for you to agree to disagree politely?

All of us reason in part here. There is no need to go LOL, or "you people", when others view scripture differently from you.

Gal 1
15 But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother's womb, and called me by his grace,

16 To reveal his Son in me, that I might preach him among the heathen; immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood:

17 Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto Damascus.

18 Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days.

You are assuming Paul went directly to the gentiles.
He went to Arabia to sort out and be instructed by Jesus and the Holy Spirit The Gospel of Jesus Christ to the world.
meanwhile Peter had also received the revelation of the gospel to the gentiles.

But later in the council in Jerusalem,It was PETER who spoke of the gospel to the gentiles with Paul present and silent.

9 Then he called his twelve disciples together, and gave them power and authority over all devils, and to cure diseases.

2 And he sent them to preach the kingdom of God

What do you come away with since it says in acts Paul preached the kingdom of God?

keep in mind Gospel means "good news"
What good news did they have?

So you do agree that Peter was not preaching the "death burial and resurrection of Jesus" correct?

He was preaching the Gospel of the Kingdom, which is based on the identity of Jesus. (John 20:31).

Look, if you want to insist that these 2 gospels are the same, that is your prerogative. You are still a Christian even if you do.

Is there a reason why you decline to quote v25 instead, since you are replying to my point?

Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to His great mercy has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, to obtain an inheritance which is imperishable and undefiled and will not fade away, reserved in heaven for you,
1 Peter 1:3‭-‬4 NASB
https://bible.com/bible/100/1pe.1.3-4.NASB

Looks like Peter preaching the death and resurrection of Jesus.