Women will be saved through Childbearing, if

you're saying what Paul said to them does not apply to us.

why?

how are we different than Corinth?

you're saying what he told them is right, is not right for us. was he wrong or is something fundamentally different about us as human believers in 2020 compared to 60AD ?

why would you say we're not 'the church of Paul' ?
does w/e preacher get to establish principles for w/e church, all of it being not necessarily true, but we abide by it because of whoever is our 'manager' ?
or is @bud62 right to say, what is for that church, is for the church, because the church is the church?

do you think different churches can have different truths and they're all valid?

God appointed her to this highly elevated position of authority. God could have chose a man but He chose this specific woman. Apparently, God didn't get the memo that woman should not hold positions of authority. There are many other examples as well of women in positions of authority in the bible.

Does scripture actual state this as the reason that God appointed her as a judge of Israel or is this your own personal opinion?

The Lord had to raise up women during this time

The Bible says women cannot become Church leaders. Deaconess is a position of service mostly to fellow women, like preparing women for baptism, not leadership.

or is @bud62 right to say, what is for that church, is for the church, because the church is the church?

The epistle to Timothy is Paul's opinion.

Uh, no you didn't. Really.
Seriously, you would not have said what you did if you understood my point.

The Lord had to raise up women during this time:

1Again the Israelites did evil in the eyes of the Lord, now that Ehud was dead. 2So the Lord sold them into the hands of Jabin king of Canaan, who reigned in Hazor. Sisera, the commander of his army, was based in Harosheth Haggoyim. 3Because he had nine hundred chariots fitted with iron and had cruelly oppressed the Israelites for twenty years, they cried to the Lord for help.

4Now Deborah, a prophet, the wife of Lappidoth, was leading a Israel at that time. 5She held court under the Palm of Deborah between Ramah and Bethel in the hill country of Ephraim, and the Israelites went up to her to have their disputes decided. 6She sent for Barak son of Abinoam from Kedesh in Naphtali and said to him, “The Lord, the God of Israel, commands you: ‘Go, take with you ten thousand men of Naphtali and Zebulun and lead them up to Mount Tabor. 7I (the Lord) will lead Sisera, the commander of Jabin’s army, with his chariots and his troops to the Kishon River and give him into your hands.’ ”

8Barak said to her (Deborah), “If you go with me, I will go; but if you don’t go with me, I won’t go.”

9“Certainly I will go with you,” said Deborah. “But because of the course you are taking, the honor will not be yours, for the Lord will deliver Sisera into the hands of a woman.”

21 ...Heber’s wife (Jael), picked up a tent peg and a hammer and went quietly to him (Sisera) while he lay fast asleep, exhausted. She drove the peg through his temple into the ground, and he died.

Judges 4

As I said before, something's not right when women (or children) are in charge of God's people. Something's wrong if women are doing what men are supposed to be doing.

4“I will make mere youths their officials;
children will rule over them.”

12 Youths oppress my people,
women rule over them.
My people, your guides lead you astray;
they turn you from the path."

Isaiah 3:4, 12

See it?
If women ruling the people of God, and assuming the duties that men perform, is not a bad thing, why does the Prophet point it out as a bad thing? And why does it matter that honor go to a woman rather than to a man for the death of Sisera the enemy of Israel?

It seems to me when men fail, women had to fulfill the role.

Similarly, when Moses could not circumcise his son, God was upset and wanted to kill Moses. However, Moses' wife quickly circumcised their son to prevent this. During those times, circumcision was a big deal and men were responsible for this role.

Nowadays, there is a lack of people volunteering for responsibility and leadership positions at church. Church attendance is decreasing. People are not rushing to volunteer, and there is a big need for people who are committed to the church. For example, at my church, the tellers/people who count the offerings are mostly women. As a result, a lot of the church finance team such as Treasurer come through the ranks of tellers and so consist of women.

Such can the case in modern times when women are called to be pastors/leaders in church. I am sure women pastors are prayerful and feel led by God to be pastors.

it can be said that both were deceived by the serpent because being together at that encounter, they both did eat.

Adam nor Eve did not possess the capacity to comprehend obedience, because they did not possess the knowledge of good/ obedience and evil/disobedience

This whole adventure is why people think a man is to be head over the woman. That idea fails however, when Adam failed to be head over Eve as he was the one that was told directly by God what not to do in the garden. And rather than lead the woman toward the directive of God, he himself abandoned what God had told him and ate at Eve's offering.

Eve had an excuse. She was naive. Adam did not. He was told by God what not to do and did it anyway. That doesn't make a man worthy of being in headship over a woman.

Eve had an excuse. She was naive. Adam did not. He was told by God what not to do and did it anyway. That doesn't make a man worthy of being in headship over a woman.

I'm not going to belabor this, when you don't read the chapter you really don't have a point.

This is not "us" today in our church, not mine, not yours, is it? "... It is widely reported that there is sexual immorality among you, " Of course not.

This is not "us" today in our church, not mine, not yours, is it? "... It is widely reported that there is sexual immorality among you, " Of course not.

There is no historical explanation given for the comment, "women rule over them" either in Kings or Chronicles, and little is said of Jotham that would justify such a comment. The latter part of chapter 3 gives a clue; the women of Judah were bound up in materialism and outward displays of beauty. In that sense, the women (who were clearly doing wrong) were steering the course of the nation by their selfish demands. If that is the case, then the problem still is not "women in authority" but wrongly-motivated women misusing their influence.

The problem is Barak's hesitation or perhaps cowardice, not the fact that a woman was in the position of authority.

What usually gets overlooked in these discussions is the fact that, on the whole, the men in the OT did a horrible job of leadership. People decry the rare instances of female leaders, and ignore the rank corruption of nearly all male leaders. Good leadership is not a gender-based issue.

You're right the Bible shows us that Paul told those in the churches he founded and managed through his epistles to them, (epistles=letters), that he did not permit women to have authority over men.
Note the first person narrative here as Paul used the singular nominative personal pronoun, "I".
1 Timothy 2:12 I do not permit a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man ...

While in Paul's other letters we find him saying this to the church at Philippi, the first European church founded by the Apostle.

The Epistle of Philippians chapter 4:1Therefore, my brothers, whom I love and long for, my joy and crown, stand firm thus in the Lord, my beloved.
Exhortation, Encouragement, and Prayer
2 I entreat Euodia and I entreat Syntyche to agree in the Lord. 3 Yes, I ask you also, true companion, help these women, who have labored[c] side by side with me in the gospel together with Clement and the rest of my fellow workers, whose names are in the book of life.
Footnote: [c]Or strived (see 1:27)

The Epistle to the Romans chapter 16:1 has Paul mentioning Phoebe, who was a Diaconos, a Deacon, of the church of Cenchrea. She carried Paul's epistles from Greece to the Romans and by sea. Paul praised her work at the church.

And when Paul speaks at length about the spiritual gifts given to the church he does not discriminate and state those were given unto men alone. Nor does he say some gifts were for men and others for women only. Instead these were for all the church.
The Epistle to the Romans chapter 12:6 Having gifts that differ according to the grace given to us, let us use them: if prophecy, in proportion to our faith; 7 if service, in our serving; the one who teaches, in his teaching; 8 the one who exhorts, in his exhortation; the one who contributes, in generosity; the one who leads,[f] with zeal; the one who does acts of mercy, with cheerfulness.

The Epistle of 1st Corinthians chapter 12
Spiritual Gifts

The Epistle of the Ephesians chapter 4
Unity in the Body of Christ

The Epistle of the Galatians chapter 3
28.There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.


Article:
Did Paul Really Say That About Women?
"....
How do we reconcile all of this with Paul's oft-quoted words about women being silent and not teaching men? The same way we deal with other passages that obviously were meant for specific times and cultures. Five times the New Testament says, “Greet one another with a holy kiss.” Do we follow that? Paul tells Timothy to “drink a little wine for the sake of your stomach.” Does that mean wine is the “biblical cure” for all stomach ailments?

Most of Paul's letters are written to address specific problems. That may account for that one verse about “women being silent.” The main thing to remember is that in I Cor. 11 (same letter!) Paul told women HOW they were to pray and prophesy in public meetings: with heads covered. He did not say they should NOT pray and prophesy!

The letter to Timothy was a personal letter dealing with problems that Timothy knew well, and so did Paul, but we do not! We know that Ephesus, where Timothy lived, was a den of iniquity. Paul mentions in the first chapter the endless myths and genealogies that consumed the people. False teaching abounded. Perhaps some of it was by women. Timothy knew that Priscilla and Aquila, who had now come to help him, had taught in Ephesus earlier and Timothy surely would not think of keeping her from teaching now!

Sound Bible interpretation requires us to interpret the “unclear” passages in the light of the clear ones. Paul showed by his life practices and his teaching that women were to use their God-given gifts for the benefit of the church of Christ. Paul was a devout follower of Jesus, whose dealings with women indicated that they could teach and lead in whatever way God led them.

The church has suffered through the centuries by discouraging and disqualifying half its members, many of whom have been called by the Spirit to serve. A healthy church needs every member and the gifts they bring.

Let us build the church--not in our own image, but in the image of him who died to save us. "

Actually Adam was with Eve when she encountered the serpent. And since God gave his commandment to Adam, while Adam was with Eve when she encountered the serpent that tempted her to eat of that which was forbidden, and both she and then Adam did eat of that which was forbidden, it can be said that both were deceived by the serpent because being together at that encounter, they both did eat.
However, because Adam was told by God not to eat, and while Adam nor Eve did not possess the capacity to comprehend obedience, because they did not possess the knowledge of good/ obedience and evil/disobedience , as yet, that is why we are told in the New Testament that it was by Adam that sin entered the world.
Because while Eve also did not possess the knowledge of good/obedience and evil/disobedience, Adam was directly in contact with God when God gave is instruction to not eat of that particular tree.

The argument can be hashed out to the end of time, Adam wasn't deceived, this is Paul's claim, Adam was deceived when he was with Eve when she was being persuaded by the serpent to eat, being if it was persuasive enough for Eve to eat and Adam then did too, knowing what God ha told him, then Adam was also deceived by the serpent because rather than stop Eve from eating he himself did also eat.
What is the issue really is, it was the man that was called responsible for sin entering the world. Not Eve. Adam was held responsible because he was with Eve, as Genesis 3 tells us, and chose to eat what she offered, rather than stop her from eating and then refusing to eat himself.
Adam was also blamed as the one by which sin entered this world because Eve was not there when God spoke to Adam and told him not to eat.
This whole adventure is why people think a man is to be head over the woman. That idea fails however, when Adam failed to be head over Eve as he was the one that was told directly by God what not to do in the garden. And rather than lead the woman toward the directive of God, he himself abandoned what God had told him and ate at Eve's offering.
Eve had an excuse. She was naive. Adam did not. He was told by God what not to do and did it anyway. That doesn't make a man worthy of being in headship over a woman.

Priscilla was with her husband in Acts 18. In 2 John, the elder was just reminding the elect lady not to have fellowship with unbelievers and not to accept them in her home, not even wish them Godspeed. No mention of her being a Church leader. Since there is no mention of a husband, the lady was probably a widow so the elder is trying to be protective of her.

Good morning Wispered, my interpretation of the verse in question and I agree with you about Paul speaking in the first person but closer to home, in plain english: I sufer not a woman to teach by seduction to bring me in bondage of dominnation and submittion.
Now I also have to admit that this is something I strugled with my whole life. I had an Idol of woman in my heart and many men do. The relationship I'm in now is the first healty relationship I'm in, quite the learning experience and still stumbling along espesially when I think am doing well: letting my guard down and sinking in fantasy of being dominated sexually. When I do, the obvious outcome is that it's no longer about a relationship with her but and Idol of woman and loosing sight of the Lord: the relationship becomes quarelsome. The Lord warned me many times and rescued us from break up 7 times that I'm aware of. We are miserable creatures in the flesh so that appart from the Holy Spirit we are not for real. "Without Love I am nothing."