Poll: Are You a Quarrelsome Person?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Are you a quarrelsome person, according to the description in Kevin's article?

  • Yes, and it is a dominant trait that I am concerned about.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes, to some degree.

    Votes: 6 54.5%
  • No, I am never quarrelsome.

    Votes: 4 36.4%
  • I don't know.

    Votes: 1 9.1%

  • Total voters
    11
Apr 5, 2020
2,273
464
83
#81
This source claims the Bishops/Church Fathers were forced to sign the decree at Nicea.

Encyclopedia Britannica 1968

"The Council of Nicaea met on May 20, 325. Constantine himself presiding, actively guiding the discussion, and personally proposed the crucial formula expressing the relation of Christ to God in the creed issued by the council 'of one substance with the father.' Over-awed by the emperor, the bishops, with two exceptions only, signed the creed, many of them against their inclination. Constantine regarded the decision of Nicaea as divinely inspired. As long as he lived no one dared openly to challenge the creed of Nicaea."
 
Apr 5, 2020
2,273
464
83
#82
Like I have claimed, I absolutely believe in God the Father, the WORD, and the WISDOM!

I am just asking if the Early Church did not believe as Modern Day believes, is it because of different mistranslations?

And if we have different mistranslations, could we be wrong today?
 
Feb 28, 2016
11,311
2,972
113
#83
neither one of us, even before we met were quarrelsome type people -
quite the contrary...
we were before and now after having the same basic-non-quarrelsome personalities...
which 'many on this SITE have come to perceive...
we know for sure that this is an individual 'choice' of either being kind or being contentious...
there is NO GRAY area when you are put before the Judgment Seat of Christ...
like it is written:
1PETER 3:9.
Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that you are
thereunto called, that you should inherit a Blessing.
 
D

DWR

Guest
#86
I have no problem getting alone with those who agree with me.
I have no problem getting alone with those who disagree with me but are respectful in doing so.
Now when a person shows no respect, is full of pride and superiority, judging me as less intelligent, less spiritual, and having studied less, Yea, I will become very quarrelsome with that person.
 

Lightskin

Well-known member
Aug 16, 2019
3,165
3,665
113
#90
You are on the defense and reading what I am saying incorrectly!
Is he reading what you’re saying incorrectly or reading incorrectly what you’re saying?
 
Apr 5, 2020
2,273
464
83
#91
Is he reading what you’re saying incorrectly or reading incorrectly what you’re saying?


HAHAHA good question. The way he basically was ignoring my post by continuing to post the same thing he was trying to claim did make me hesitate and wonder. But the bottom line is simple. No doubt the Church Fathers are in Heaven this very moment. And we ourselves are trying to achieve that accomplishment. It's rather clear their version of the Gospel and our version are not remotely close.

My point is though, if they are already in Heaven, which is our GOAL. It makes perfect sense to adopt their Doctrine for ourselves.

Now, does that mean we have to abandon our current Doctrine, maybe so. But if we do and accept theirs, what is the bottom line most importance? We, like them, end up in Heaven. And to me, that is what I want more than anything else!
 

Lightskin

Well-known member
Aug 16, 2019
3,165
3,665
113
#92
If only Calvinists taught the scripture in biblical context instead of doctrinal bias.

How does a cold heart take God's grace for itself and deny the same opportunity to all others? No doubt an unusual doctrine of love.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
Top five of the best posts of all time.
 

Lightskin

Well-known member
Aug 16, 2019
3,165
3,665
113
#94
HAHAHA good question. The way he basically was ignoring my post by continuing to post the same thing he was trying to claim did make me hesitate and wonder. But the bottom line is simple. No doubt the Church Fathers are in Heaven this very moment. And we ourselves are trying to achieve that accomplishment. It's rather clear their version of the Gospel and our version are not remotely close.

My point is though, if they are already in Heaven, which is our GOAL. It makes perfect sense to adopt their Doctrine for ourselves.

Now, does that mean we have to abandon our current Doctrine, maybe so. But if we do and accept theirs, what is the bottom line most importance? We, like them, end up in Heaven. And to me, that is what I want more than anything else!
Saved by grace through faith, not theology.