Trump Outsmarts them again

Glad you stepped back on the Nixon one. I was thinking, Watergate is not just a hotel.

I'll start with your first guy on that list. Paul Manafort. His charges were pre-Trump campaign. Nothing to do with Trump.
I'll look into the rest when I have more time. And when that lovely inviting Cheesecake Factory item in my fridge isn't loudly calling my name before dinner.
Priorities my dear, priorities. Cheeeeeesecake. Proof God loves us and wants to make us exercise more.

That sounds awfully good😁.

Which laws?

Well, I reckon there’s gonna be a whole lotta members of the current administration as well, #45 included, in that chain gang, alongside with the Democrats you have indicted😁.

I said law and not 'laws'

Section 230

both sides actually want to change it....but as my husband is fond of saying, the government is designed to work slowly

read the entire article by all means, but the following is the root of the problem (found in the article)

The statute in Section 230(c)(2) further provides "Good Samaritan" protection from civil liability for operators of interactive computer services in the removal or moderation of third-party material they deem obscene or offensive, even of constitutionally protected speech, as long as it is done in good faith.

Houston Judge And Election Staff Accused Of Voter Fraud By Retired Cop

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ection-staff-accused-voter-fraud-retired-cop/

That sounds awfully good😁.

I'd say that law doesn't actually pertain to Twitter's actions. If it did Twitter, whom we can presume has a gigantic legal team on retainer, would not have walked back their decision to block all members from sharing that NYP Hunter Biden laptop story.

The law Twitter is breaking having censored in that way however is another matter.
What Twitter did may be construed as an illegal corporate "in-kind contribution” to the Joe Biden presidential campaign.

Well, these people are/were somehow part of the Trump administration, so let’s start with Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, Steve Bannon, Michael Cohen, Rick Gates, George Papadopoulus, Michael Flynn, Chris Collins (world dumbest criminal), Duncan Hunter...then there’s yet to be indicted...Tom Price, Scott Pruitt, Wilbur Ross... the list is long.

Don’t think George W. Bush, George H. W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, Gerald Ford or Richard Nixon would have surrounded themselves with such a bunch of outlaws...oh well... forget about me mentioning Nixon, he and ole Trump probably would have been the best of buddies lol.

The questions will be answered by filing a lawsuit against Twitter and Facebook etc.
Anyone can see that the evidence is overwhelming and none of this censorship was done in anything like good faith.

These laws have yet to be challenged and they should. Given the states and the potential damage awards is well worth the money and effort. And oh yes I forgot......they can pay.

The DOJ file civil lawsuits all the time against entities such as banks etc. And they win all the time, netting gigantic monetary rewards in the billions.

Sue them, sue them now, sue them often. That's the solution to the present predicament. There is no defense against these charges.......Constitutional rights have been violated.

***Check out this video*** 50% of Democrats have completed mail-in voting....but only 25% of Republicans. Trump is already leading in the polls....

You do the math. Furthermore a significant percentage will indeed change their vote to Trump from Biden. Trump in an epic landslide 2020.

Hopefully you prediction proves to be true. Starting to look like Trump is going to carry Florida and the polls seem to be tightening in his favor. It is relative easy to change a mail-in ballot. A google search will provide a local phone number, you just say that you want your vote nullified and it's done. After that you are qualified to vote in an actual voting poll. You cannot however, change your vote if you voted early in person at your local precinct as it is tabulated immediately. I believe that a whole lot of predominated Democrat mail-in ballots are going to arrive late and be disqualified. The US Supreme Court will most likely play a critical role in deciding the post-election issues and challenges.

OK, back to your list. Thank God for USA Today huh?
Paul Manafort is down. I already revealed he wasn't indicted for anything that pertained to the Trump campaign.

Let me move on in that USA Today list. Not necessarily in order of names appearing.

Steve Bannon. Of course this is all part of what even Bannon described as "headhunting of high profile political targets" associated with President Trump. And he's right. We know the Democrats in the House went after Trump to take the spotlight off their corruption alongside Biden. The guilt by association tactic is just that, another anti-Trump tactic by a party that hates the first president that doesn't sell out America for money. Unlike the Democrats and even Republicans.

Keeping in mind the standard in America Jurisprudence, innocent until proven guilty. Bannon was indicted and has not yet been to trial. He is currently out on bail. Therefore, being charged isn't the same as being guilty.
Of equal importance? Bannon's alleged sins/crimes cannot be let at the feet of President Donald Trump. Trump isn't guilty of Bannon's crimes because Bannon was indicted. Bannon's indictment

General Michael Flynn = The Justice Department dropped all charges. Therefore the indictment is moot. Indictment does not equal guilt.
Keep in mind BHO attended Harvard law in 1988
RELATED: Newly Declassified Docs Finger Obama in Flynn(That would be General Michael Flynn) Wiretapping


George Papadopoulos = Papadopoulos, who served 12 days in federal prison for lying to investigators about contacts with Russian-connected officials during the 2016 campaign
Remember "Special Council" Robert Mueller? (Talk about a history of corruption?) Papadopoulos was proven to not have anything to do with the so called Russia ties the corrupt Democrats wanted to affix to Trump's winning of the 2016 election.
Papadopoulos wants DOJ to examine $10K given to him by CIA or FBI
Former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos on Sunday said he is returning to Greece to get $10,000 given to him as part of a CIA or FBI setup to entrap him – and he now wants the Department of Justice to examine the cash.

Papadopoulos said he was given the money in Israel during the summer of 2017 from a guy he believes was a spy but turned the moolah over to his attorney for safekeeping in Greece.

“A man named Charles Tawil gave me this money under very suspicious circumstances. A simple Google search about this individual will reveal he was a CIA or State Department asset in South Africa during the ’90s and 2000s. I think around the time when Bob Mueller was the director of the FBI,” he told “Sunday Morning Futures” on Fox News.
[source:NYPost https://nypost.com/2019/07/28/papadopoulos-wants-doj-to-examine-10k-given-to-him-by-cia-or-fbi/) This story is available at other sources as well.