Who will Win

I agree with most of what you posted and 100 percent of the last sentence. I've worked with bipolars, addicts, alcoholics, ex-convicts, probation departments. Mental health and homeless outreaches. I've worked for treatment centers, suicide prevention ministries and the Salvation Army,

Yes most problems are self inflicted by stubbornness, selfishness, self-centeredness, false pride, lust greed and sloth. Jesus didn't give up on them or me either. When I was in the position and ability to help them. I put my hands and feet to the task. Some repent but most don't. still;

Luke 15:
The Parable of the Lost Coin
…9And when she finds it, she calls together her friends and neighbors to say, ‘Rejoice with me, for I have found my lost coin.’ 10 In the same way, I tell you, there is rejoicing in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner who repents."

New Living Translation
In the same way, there is joy in the presence of God’s angels when even one sinner repents.”

English Standard Version
Just so, I tell you, there is joy before the angels of God over one sinner who repents.”

Berean Study Bible
In the same way, I tell you, there is joy in the presence of God’s angels over one sinner who repents.”

King James Bible
Likewise, I say unto you, there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner that repenteth.

This is mostly true as well. Trump is far from the worst President we’ve had, but I can’t turn a blind eye to his failure to address the Russians meddling.

I offer facts.

Back to the ad hominem

Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a term that refers to several types of arguments, most of which are fallacious.


Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion to some irrelevant but often highly charged issue. The most common form of this fallacy is "A makes a claim x, B asserts that A holds a property that is unwelcome, and hence B concludes that argument x is wrong".


Source

Say it again, might make you feel better. Want a hankie?

And so I am blessed

Definitely there are globalist communist sympathizer trolls on this board. Paid by Soros Zuckerberg.......who knows who else.

People have been debating with you for 300 pages on this thread and you refuse to listen and learn. Lessons in futility are limited.

Ah yes, like you calling a grown man a little kid. Your lack of integrity and the FACT you claim to offer facts, as if nothing else, while characterizing me as mindlessly blathering on for pointing out the facts, shows a rather self-deluded mindset.

But continue puffing yourself up as you please. It's no skin off my nose

Umm.... I think you mean my refusal to be inculcated to a conspiratorial fanciful view that Trump asserts that he in fact won the election, without any real proof of systemic fraud, mind you, which would stand up in a court of law.

Sorry but you are back on ignore.
I'm looking for people who are posting new research items.
Inane pugnacious irrelevant combative duplicitous deceptive denials are worse than useless.
I have yet to see one single link or reference to anything useful, which would benefit this thread.

oh, there is plenty of proof.

but, since no one will do anything about it, it does not matter. Biden will go in.

Umm.... I think you mean my refusal to be inculcated to a conspiratorial fanciful view that Trump asserts that he in fact won the election, without any real proof of systemic fraud, mind you, which would stand up in a court of law.

oh, there is plenty of proof.

but, since no one will do anything about it, it does not matter. Biden will go in.

Proof of isolated incidence perhaps.

They actually charged a man in Pennsylvania I read with voter fraud, funny thing is the vote was for Trump. LOL

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alison...rump-under-dead-mothers-name/?sh=fdfb33559bfc

Here is the Evidence. And it is positively HUMONGOUS.

https://hereistheevidence.com

Man, that’s backstabbing. Whenever you’re out of arguments you’re crying “troll”. Are you a snowflake? I think you are. A sheep in sheep’s clothing.