2020 American Election And President Trump Capitol Rally, Criminal Fraud Exposed!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
18,155
7,208
113
Honest oath keeping Police and military and politicians are one of the greatest blessings society can have. Dishonest ones are the greatest curse. For God's sake you people in authority please maintain the highest standards of honesty. The people will LOVE you for it.

 

Truth7t7

Well-known member
May 19, 2020
7,685
2,492
113
K

KT88

Guest
Marjorie Taylor Greene does a great impression of Miss Piggy on the Muppet show.



:LOL:
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
18,155
7,208
113

Solemateleft

Honor, Courage, Commitment
Jun 25, 2017
12,004
3,588
113
LOL, seems the Left is more fascinated with 'Q' than most on the Right...
Here's a funny coincidence... Just noticed for those of us who receive weather and traffic alerts from Quantico Marine Base...
Just noticed the 'Q' icon .. haha...

1612659285483.png
 

JustEli

Well-known member
Dec 23, 2018
1,374
983
113
49
Article V is the constitutional answer to many of our unconstitutional problems. A convention of the states is a must.
That is why the framers put the second part in Article V, for times like this.
 
Jun 18, 2020
508
377
63
LOL, seems the Left is more fascinated with 'Q' than most on the Right...
Here's a funny coincidence... Just noticed for those of us who receive weather and traffic alerts from Quantico Marine Base...
Just noticed the 'Q' icon .. haha...

View attachment 225282
.
The lefty droids gobble up the ‘Q’ nonsense like there’s no tomorrow ( I suppose it gives their paltry lives some meaning…) and then project it on the normies to fulfill their weird fantasies. They’re more to be pitied than scorned I suppose – well maybe scorned too…
.
 

Truth7t7

Well-known member
May 19, 2020
7,685
2,492
113
POLL: 64% of Republicans, 15% of Democrats ‘Likely’ to Join Hypothetical New Trump-Led Political Party
Definitely some good news there. Everybody knew Trump was the best man. He could bring Americas divisions together in this new party. The only people that would be joining would be true blue patriots. This is good....

https://politicofire.com/2021/02/05...ave-gop-for-new-third-party-founded-by-trump/
Once again, Ain't Gonna happen, the Tea Party tried and "Failed" split the conservative vote

Recall and get rid of the Rino's and dead wood, its that simple

Get rid of electronic voting, back to paper ballots, and clean house

Why run from the Rinos, get rid of them!
 

Solemateleft

Honor, Courage, Commitment
Jun 25, 2017
12,004
3,588
113
Supreme Court to Consider 2020 Election Challenge Lawsuits in February Conference
BY TOM OZIMEK

February 6, 2021 Updated: February 6, 2021
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday scheduled several high-profile contest-of-election lawsuits, including ones brought by attorneys Sidney Powell and Lin Wood, and the Trump campaign, for consideration at its Feb. 19 conference.
According to a case listing, the lawsuits include Sidney Powell’s Michigan case (20-815), the Trump campaign’s Pennsylvania lawsuit (20-845) and Wisconsin lawsuit (20-882), the Pennsylvania lawsuit brought by Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) (20-810), and Lin Wood’s Georgia case (20-799).

All cases allege some form of unlawful election-related conduct affecting the result of the election, including expansion of mail-in balloting by elections officials changing rules in contravention of state election laws, lack of adequate security measures around mail ballots, issues with machine vote tabulation, and denial of meaningful access to poll watchers.
The Supreme Court declined to grant relief or fast-track the cases as requested in respective petitions filed ahead of the Jan. 20 inauguration of President Joe Biden.
Powell’s Michigan petition (pdf) sought “emergency declaratory relief avowing that the presidential election results certified by Michigan officials were unconstitutional and otherwise contrary to law, together with injunctive relief de-certifying those results.”
Wood’s Georgia petition (pdf) asked the Supreme Court to “enter an emergency order instructing Respondents to de-certify the results of the General Election for the Office of the President.”
The Kelly petition (pdf) asked the court for an injunction “that prohibits the Executive-Respondents from taking official action to tabulate, compute, canvass, certify, or otherwise finalize the results of the Election.”
The Trump campaign suits similarly called for emergency injunctive relief in the form of expedited hearings and blocking certification of the electoral college votes for Biden.
Some of the lawyers in the cases said that seeing the challenges through is important as they could have an impact on long-term election fairness.
“Our legal issue remains important in need of the court’s review,” attorney John Eastman told the Washington Examiner, referring to Pennsylvania’s conduct during the 2020 election.
Greg Teufel, Kelly’s lawyer, told the Washington Examiner that the congressman has no intention of dropping the suit.
The Supreme Court has kept its distance from Trump’s election challenges. In December, it rejected a lawsuit filed by the Republican attorney general of Texas and backed by Trump seeking to decertify the election results in four states.
If, at the Feb. 19 conference, the Supreme Court decides to take up any of the election lawsuits, they most likely won’t be heard until October.
In a sweeping report on the integrity of the 2020 election, Trump adviser Peter Navarro concluded that the allegations of irregularities surrounding the vote in key battleground states were serious enough to warrant an urgent probe and substantial enough to potentially overturn the results.
“If these election irregularities are not fully investigated prior to Inauguration Day and thereby effectively allowed to stand, this nation runs the very real risk of never being able to have a fair presidential election again,” Navarro warned in his report.
 

Truth7t7

Well-known member
May 19, 2020
7,685
2,492
113
Supreme Court to Consider 2020 Election Challenge Lawsuits in February Conference
BY TOM OZIMEK

February 6, 2021 Updated: February 6, 2021
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday scheduled several high-profile contest-of-election lawsuits, including ones brought by attorneys Sidney Powell and Lin Wood, and the Trump campaign, for consideration at its Feb. 19 conference.
According to a case listing, the lawsuits include Sidney Powell’s Michigan case (20-815), the Trump campaign’s Pennsylvania lawsuit (20-845) and Wisconsin lawsuit (20-882), the Pennsylvania lawsuit brought by Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) (20-810), and Lin Wood’s Georgia case (20-799).

All cases allege some form of unlawful election-related conduct affecting the result of the election, including expansion of mail-in balloting by elections officials changing rules in contravention of state election laws, lack of adequate security measures around mail ballots, issues with machine vote tabulation, and denial of meaningful access to poll watchers.
The Supreme Court declined to grant relief or fast-track the cases as requested in respective petitions filed ahead of the Jan. 20 inauguration of President Joe Biden.
Powell’s Michigan petition (pdf) sought “emergency declaratory relief avowing that the presidential election results certified by Michigan officials were unconstitutional and otherwise contrary to law, together with injunctive relief de-certifying those results.”
Wood’s Georgia petition (pdf) asked the Supreme Court to “enter an emergency order instructing Respondents to de-certify the results of the General Election for the Office of the President.”
The Kelly petition (pdf) asked the court for an injunction “that prohibits the Executive-Respondents from taking official action to tabulate, compute, canvass, certify, or otherwise finalize the results of the Election.”
The Trump campaign suits similarly called for emergency injunctive relief in the form of expedited hearings and blocking certification of the electoral college votes for Biden.
Some of the lawyers in the cases said that seeing the challenges through is important as they could have an impact on long-term election fairness.
“Our legal issue remains important in need of the court’s review,” attorney John Eastman told the Washington Examiner, referring to Pennsylvania’s conduct during the 2020 election.
Greg Teufel, Kelly’s lawyer, told the Washington Examiner that the congressman has no intention of dropping the suit.
The Supreme Court has kept its distance from Trump’s election challenges. In December, it rejected a lawsuit filed by the Republican attorney general of Texas and backed by Trump seeking to decertify the election results in four states.
If, at the Feb. 19 conference, the Supreme Court decides to take up any of the election lawsuits, they most likely won’t be heard until October.
In a sweeping report on the integrity of the 2020 election, Trump adviser Peter Navarro concluded that the allegations of irregularities surrounding the vote in key battleground states were serious enough to warrant an urgent probe and substantial enough to potentially overturn the results.
“If these election irregularities are not fully investigated prior to Inauguration Day and thereby effectively allowed to stand, this nation runs the very real risk of never being able to have a fair presidential election again,” Navarro warned in his report.
Good News

100% of Republicans, and 50% of Democrats are ready to get rid of the Biden fraud Presidency

The past 3 weeks have been eye opening, even to the most liberal of democrats
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
Marjorie Taylor Greene does a great impression of Miss Piggy on the Muppet show.



:LOL:
If you don't stand up for something,pretty soon you will believe in nothing.

Your deal is defending evil.

Your stand is a nothing burger.

You are on the wrong side.

You are here and any forum you choose via free speech.
Celebrating censorship is evil.
That's what communists do.
....and lie about their silenced prey.

You pitch your tent with evil entities.

Psssst....they also kill their own....when done with you.
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
Good News

100% of Republicans, and 50% of Democrats are ready to get rid of the Biden fraud Presidency

The past 3 weeks have been eye opening, even to the most liberal of democrats
Won't work.
Kamala becomes potus at that point.
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
Such evil to police free speech.

Silencing ones enemy.

There's the thing of it.
Republicans could never do that.
It is un american to the core. Evil and shamefully. Strikes the heart of america.

The days are evil.

You democrats are oblivious to right and wrong.

We are witnessing the reprobate mind that defends the birth of communism through the democratic party.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.