AstraZeneca's very dangerous vaccine

Nehemiah6 · Mar 10, 2021

[Note: This thread is based on my personal research, not copied from someone else. Quotations are provided as needed]

PART I
AstraZeneca's vaccine was approved by the World Health Organization in February, 2021 and is being currently distributed worldwide. But two long term care patients died in South Korea within days of being vaccinated. As usual, the public health officials tried to suggest that there was no "direct link". And that is the real issue. The truth is never presented honestly. Over and over again, there is a denial of a direct link (unless it suits the public health officials). "Several French hospitals are pausing or slowing down AstraZeneca vaccination programmes for their staff because severe - albeit temporary - side effects have caused many employees to need sick leave, causing severe logistical problems in already over-stretched services." So it could mean that the cure is worse than the disease.

While the mRNA vaccines are troubling, AstraZeneca's COVID-19 vaccine should be very troubling, particularly to third world countries. There are several reasons for this: (1) it is not a genuine vaccine in the traditional and accepted sense; (2) it was improperly tested; (3) it was rushed to market without proper evaluation of all the actual and potential issues; (4) those who have funded it have a conflict of interest in the profits they will reap from it; and (5) the people behind this vaccine are also the people seriously behind Eugenics.

1. AstraZeneca's vaccine is not a genuine traditional vaccine
According to the World Health Organization "The ChAdOx1-S/nCoV-19 [recombinant] vaccine is a replication-deficient adenoviral vector vaccine against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The vaccine expresses the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein gene, which instructs the host cells to produce the protein of the S-antigen unique to SARS-CoV-2, allowing the body to generate an immune response and to retain that information in memory immune cells." In other words it uses another mammalian virus to trick the body into thinking that coronavirus has entered in.

This is further explained here:"A coronavirus vaccine known as ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or AZD1222 was developed by the University of Oxford and AstraZeneca to treat severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (the cause of COVID-19). In this vaccine, a modified version of a chimpanzee adenovirus (ChAdOx1) is used which can enter human cells but not replicate inside. A gene for the coronavirus vaccine was added into the adenovirus DNA, allowing the vaccine to target the spike proteins that SARS-CoV-2 uses to enter human cells." https://www.news-medical.net/health/What-are-Adenovirus-Based-Vaccines.aspx

2. AstraZeneca's vaccine was improperly tested
a) It was tested in only the UK, Brazil, and South Africa, but the results for S. Africa were obfuscated.
b) There was only one medical doctor on the research team. The rest were all PhD's. For a medical study, this appears to be rather irresponsible.
c) It was only an "interim" analysis of results. Yet the vaccine is being distributed.
d) It was limited to ages 18-55 in the primary trials. Those who need it most are in the 65 to 85+ age group, but they were excluded, probably because that would have been the death of the vaccine!
e) While South Africa is mentioned, the total number of participants (11,636 out of a total of 23,848) only included those from the UK and Brazil.
f) While the control (or placebo) is always supposed to be a saline solution, "meningococcal group A, C, W, and Y conjugate vaccine" -- another vaccine -- was used unfairly to skew the results: As a result "From 21 days after the first dose, there were ten cases hospitalised for COVID-19, all in the control arm; two were classified as severe COVID-19, including one death." Using the term "control arm" is rather unusual (if not silly), but the researchers had no business complicating things by administering a vaccine for meningitis as a control.
g) A standard dosage was not used consistently, and for all participants. That in itself should have nullified the trials.
h) Efficacy was tested against symptoms, but also using the discredited PCR test (assuming that the same faulty procedure was used which has skewed results everywhere).
i) None of the participants was actually exposed to real existing cases of coronavirus patients under treatment, which means that no one knows how good the immunization really is (or is not).
j) The manufacturers of the vaccine were actually separate entities from AstraZeneca, so technically it was not even an AstraZeneca vaccine."The recombinant adenovirus for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 was manufactured and vialed by Advent (Pomezia, Italy), and additional batches produced by COBRA Biologics (Keele, UK) and vialed by Symbiosis (Sterling, UK)."

Nehemiah6 · Mar 10, 2021

PART II
3. AstraZeneca's vaccine was rushed to market without the proper evaluation of all issues

a) In pre-trials with monkeys, the vaccine was found to be useless: 'A trial of the vaccine in rhesus macaque monkeys did not stop the animals from catching the virus and has raised questions about the vaccine's likely human efficacy and ongoing development. The vaccine, known as ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, is undergoing human trials in Britain. The Government has brokered a deal between Oxford University and the drug company AstraZeneca to produce up to 30 million doses if it proves successful, having ploughed £47 million into the research. "All of the vaccinated monkeys treated with the Oxford vaccine became infected when challenged as judged by recovery of virus genomic RNA from nasal secretions," said Dr William Haseltine, a former Harvard Medical School professor who had a pivotal role in the development of early HIV/Aids treatments. "There was no difference in the amount of viral RNA detected from this site in the vaccinated monkeys as compared to the unvaccinated animals. Which is to say, all vaccinated animals were infected," Dr Haseltine wrote in an article on Forbes.' https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-...vaccine-fails-stop-coronavirus-animal-trials/

b) Qualifying symptoms were not uniform for all those tested: "In the UK and Brazil, the list of qualifying symptoms for swabbing included any one of the following: fever of at least 37·8°C, cough, shortness of breath, and anosmia or ageusia. In South Africa, the list of qualifying symptoms for swabbing was broader, and additionally included myalgia, chills, sore throat, headache, nasal congestion, diarrhoea, runny nose, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and loss of appetite."

c) All serious adverse results were obfuscated, minimized or dismissed as unrelated, which is totally irresponsible, and dishonest to boot:
(i) Serious adverse events occurred in 168 participants, 79 of whom received ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and 89 of whom received MenACWY or saline control (appendix 1 pp 15–18). There were 175 events (84 in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group and 91 in the control group), three of which were considered possibly related to either the experimental or a control vaccine.
(ii) A case of haemolytic anaemia in the control group in the UK phase 1/2 study occurring 10 days after MenACWY vaccine was considered possibly related to the intervention and has been previously described.5
(iii) A case of transverse myelitis was reported 14 days after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 booster vaccination as being possibly related to vaccination, with the independent neurological committee considering the most likely diagnosis to be of an idiopathic, short segment, spinal cord demyelination.
(iv) A potentially vaccine-related serious adverse event was reported 2 days after vaccination in South Africa in an individual who recorded fever higher than 40°C, but who recovered rapidly without an alternative diagnosis and was not admitted to hospital. The participant remains masked to group allocation, continues in the trial, and received a second dose of the allocated vaccine without a similar reaction.
(v) There were two additional cases of transverse myelitis that were originally reported as potentially related but later determined to be unlikely to be related to vaccination by an independent committee of neurological experts. One case that occurred 10 days after a first vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 was initially assessed as possibly related, but later considered unlikely to be related by the site investigator when further investigation revealed pre-existing, but previously unrecognised, multiple sclerosis. The second case was reported 68 days after MenACWY vaccination. While considered possibly related by the site investigator at the time of reporting, an independent panel of neurological experts considered this to be unlikely. All trial participants have recovered, or are in a stable or improving condition.
(vi) There were four non-COVID-19 deaths reported across the studies (three in the control arm and one in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 arm) that were all considered unrelated to the vaccine, with cause of death assessed as road traffic accident, blunt force trauma, homicide, and fungal pneumonia.

It should be noted that "The issues raised by their decision to partner with manufacturers with dark histories of product safety issues are compounded by the adverse reactions reported in the Oxford-AstraZeneca trials as well as the ways in which those trials have been conducted. In September, AstraZeneca was forced to pause its experimental COVID-19 vaccine trial after a woman in the UK developed a “suspected serious reaction” that the New York Times reported was consistent with transverse myelitis. TM is a neurological disorder characterized by inflammation of the spinal cord, a major element of the central nervous system. It often results in weakness of the limbs, problems emptying the bladder, and paralysis. Patients can become severely disabled, and there is currently no effective cure." https://unlimitedhangout.com/2020/1...azeneca-vaccine-tied-to-uk-eugenics-movement/

c) No one knows the long-term effects of this vaccine. Yet it is being rushed out all over the world.

5. There was a mild critique of the AstraZeneca study
On December 8, 2020 Nature published "Oxford COVID-vaccine paper highlights lingering unknowns about results" which focused on the issues which were not addressed by the study, but did not go far enough.
a) They called the reduced dosage to some participants as a "measurement error" (which is inexcusable). However, those results were still included in the study.
b) They wondered how a higher efficacy was possible with a lower dosage.
c) They also pointed out that the study excluded those over 55 years of age.
d) They also talked about asymptomatic people infecting others, when that really is a non-issue.
e) They neglected to talk about the adverse reactions and deaths.

Nehemiah6 · Mar 10, 2021

PART III
6. The hidden agenda of AstraZeneca needs to be understood
"Developers of Oxford-AstraZeneca Vaccine Tied to UK Eugenics Movement" is an article which has been written by Jeremy Loffredo and Whitney Webb, and published here: https://unlimitedhangout.com/2020/1...azeneca-vaccine-tied-to-uk-eugenics-movement/

It is quite detailed and exposes all the high-level connections in the UK between (1) Oxford University, (2) the UK and US governments, (3) various institutes involved with both virology and eugenics, (4) various multi-million and multi-billion dollar trusts and foundations which are working towards de-populating the planet, and (5) pharmaceutical companies (which will make huge profits), which the mainstream media have simply ignored or refused to expose. There are billions of dollars to be made from this vaccine, and all these people have two primary goals in mind: (1) de-populate the third world and (2) promote annual vaccinations for COVID-19 forever. But there is a web of deceit which has been hidden from view.

"Historically, eugenics encouraged people of so-called healthy, superior stock to reproduce and discouraged reproduction of the mentally challenged or anyone who fell outside the social norm. Eugenics was popular in America during much of the first half of the twentieth century, yet it earned its negative association mainly from Adolf Hitler’s obsessive attempts to create a superior Aryan race." https://www.history.com/topics/germany/eugenics.

What is noted in this article is "As this series has shown, there are many concerns regarding the points where race and the COVID-19 vaccination campaign in the US and abroad intersect, both publicly and privately. Part 1 of this series raised questions about the policy-shaping role of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, which suggested that the US government make COVID-19 vaccines available to ethnic minorities and the mentally challenged first. Part 2 explained how in order to allocate COVID-19 vaccines in the US, health agencies are using a program created by Palantir, a company with a record of helping the US agencies target ethnic minorities through immigration policy and racist policing."

The following entities have all been named and connected:

A. Big Tech
The venture-capital arm of Google, Google Ventures

B. Foundations
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
The Global Alliance for Vaccine Initiative (GAVI), a public-private partnership founded and currently funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, plans to distribute the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine to low-income, predominantly African and Asian countries once it’s approved.
The Race Betterment Foundation

C. Governments
Operation Warp Speed funded by the US government
The UK’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies
The Medical Research Council (UK government)
Department of Health (UK government)
The UK’s Vaccines Network
The EU’s Vaccines Network equivalent, MultiMalVax
US Health and Human Service’s BARDA
USAID

D. Individuals
Adrian Hill, with multiple connections
Sarah Gilbert, with multiple connections
Richard Horton, editor in chief of the Lancet
Andrew Baum, global head of health care for Citi Group
Andrew Crawford-Brunt (Deutsche Bank’s long-time global head of equity trading at its London branch)
Google’s cofounder Larry Page and his wife Lucy
John Bell—an Oxford medical professor and an “architect” of the Oxford-AstraZeneca partnership
Pascal Soriot, the CEO of AstraZeneca
Vaccitech’s CEO, Bill Enright
Anthony Fauci
Charles Chiu, a professor of infectious diseases at the University of California–San Francisco
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla
Turi King
Elena Bochukova
Jess Buxton
David Coleman with MigrationWatch
John Harvey Kellogg, founder of the Race Betterment Foundation
Charles Davenport, a scientist known for his collaborative research efforts with eugenicists in Nazi Germany
David Weatherall, for whom the Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine is named
Walter Bodmer, a former president of the Galton Institute
David J. Galton,Emeritus professor of molecular genetics at the Galton Institute and one of its officers, whose work includes Eugenics: The Future of Human Life in the 21st Century.
Yanzhong Huang, a senior fellow for global health at the Council on Foreign Relations
Frederick Osborn, as the cofounder of the American Eugenics Society (later renamed Society for the Study of Social Biology) put it in 1968, “Eugenic goals are most likely to be attained under a name other than eugenics.”

E. Institutions
The Edward Jenner Institute for Vaccine Research
The Oxford Vaccine Group
The Galton Institute (which is the renamed UK Eugenics Society, or the British Eugenics Society) and has called for reducing population growth selectively
The University of Oxford
The Institute for Animal Health (now called the Pirbright Institute)
The Serum Institute of India

F. Pharmaceutical & Biotech Companies
GlaxoSmithKline
Vaccitech
Emergent Biosolutions
Italian biotech Okairos
A small French biotech called Imaxio
Oxford Science Innovations
Braavos Capital
Sequoia Capital’s Chinese branch
The Chinese pharmaceutical company Fosun Pharma
Shenzhen Kangtai Biological Products
BioPort
BioThrax

G. Trusts
The Wellcome Trust
Wellcome Trust Strategic Awards
Wellcome Trust’s Centre for Human Genomics
Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics
The Myers Group

mailmandan · Mar 10, 2021

Utah mother dies four days after taking second COVID vaccine dose

https://www.foxnews.com/us/utah-mom-dies-four-days-after-taking-covid-vaccine

PC123 · Mar 11, 2021

Thank you @Nehemiah6 for publishing these facts on here.
I got a van and turned into a camper. Hitting the road in a few days, away from the city and into the bush towns...

I can see the big businesses enforcing some kind of vaccine green card and surrounding businesses will be forced to comply
So the city will be bad i think, the big companies can afford to do that but but not the small town businesses

I wonder how many people will stand firm.
It seems like there are a lot of people with the "if u can't beat em join em" attitude now

Nehemiah6 · Mar 11, 2021

PC123 said:

You will find this news heartening. See below.

Canadian group defending people given COVID fines says many ‘unconstitutional charges’ are being dropped

'We expect the mass withdrawal of Covid tickets to continue as prosecutors across the country correctly decide to stay charges'

Thu Mar 11, 2021 - 7:20 am EST

ALBERTA, March 11, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – A prominent Canadian legal group fighting for constitutional freedoms and representing many individuals charged with various COVID-related offenses says that to date, many tickets are being dropped by Alberta Provincial Crown prosecutors. “So far, all COVID-related tickets issued to rally demonstrators in Alberta that the Justice Centre has defended have been withdrawn by Crown Prosecutors before trial,” said The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) in a news release Tuesday.

Litigation Director for the JCCF Jay Cameron said that many of the COVID tickets issued will “never be prosecuted” due to them being issued under “unconstitutional” and “arbitrary” health orders. “Public health officials are not the supreme law of the land – the Constitution is,” noted Cameron in the press release. “A significant portion of the arbitrary and confusing public health orders which have so oppressed Canadian society are, on their face, unconstitutional and cannot be justified. As a result, many of the tickets issued for the supposed violation of such orders will never be prosecuted. We expect the mass withdrawal of Covid tickets to continue as prosecutors across the country correctly decide to stay charges.”

The JCCF represents almost 100 people who have been ticketed for “allegedly breaching public health orders” in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Ontario. The JCCF say that such charges include “allegedly participating in peaceful protests, not wearing a mask, providing services during lockdowns, not complying with public health guidelines on signage, and other issues surrounding the Charter freedoms to move, travel, assemble, associate, worship and express themselves.”

The JCCF has released an powerful video to accompany the news release about the continued rate of dropped COVID charges. The video features parts of a speech given by its president John Carpay at a recent lockdown protest, along with video summaries of some of the COVID tickets withdrawn. One highlight involves a $1,200 ticket handed to Bernie Driedger, who works as a primary care paramedic in La Crete, Alberta, for allegedly not wearing a mask in the town's small grocery store. According to the JCCF, Driedger says a “nosy out-of-towner” went around town to take “pictures of La Crete residents and businesses because the majority of people refuse to wear masks.” “I believe the photo was sent in to the provincial snitch line,” said Driedger. Due to losing “trust in his fellow citizens” Driedger has moved out of the Le Crete community, and stated he received a three-day suspension from work because of the picture.

“On a personal level, I believe wearing a mask is unnatural, unsanitary, and predominately anti God…I believe it to be symbolic. Wearing a mask shows the world I am easily compliant and am a willing participant in orders unsubstantiated by proper science or reason. This also shows that if I give a little on my convictions here, maybe I will give more in the next rollout of unjust violations of our freedoms,” said Driedger. The JCCF says his ticket has been withdrawn by the Provincial Crown Prosecutor.

Another COVID related fine dropped by the Provincial Crown Prosecutor involves the case of a Calgary man, Trevor Simpson, who was fined $1,200 for “allegedly not practicing safe social distancing, at a lockdown protest in Calgary on Boxing Day.” According to Simpson, Calgary police were waiting until he was blocks away from the rally and alone. He was then blocked by “four Calgary Police Service officers on bicycles.” “It was really outlandish to me that they would wait until I was no longer breaking the law to actually fine me!” said Simpson as stated in the JCCF news release. “I told the police as they were writing the ticket that it went against my Charter rights and I did not believe the ticket was legal and fair.”

A week ago the JCCF released another powerful video calling out Alberta Premier Jason Kenney for COVID-related emergency laws that led to the recent jailing of Christian Pastor James Coates of Grace Life Church. Coates is the pastor of Grace Life of Spruce Grove, Alberta, and both he and his church are being represented by the JCCF. Coates has been detained at the Edmonton Remand Centre, awaiting trial since February 16, after refusing to agree to bail conditions which block his release unless he agrees to not hold church services amid severe coronavirus lockdowns. On March 5, an Alberta court judge dismissed an appeal to his bail conditions, meaning Coates will remain behind bars for another two months as his trial date is set for May 3 to 5.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/c...h-covid-offences-says-crown-are-dropping-many charges?utm_source=top_news&utm_campaign=standard

PC123 · Mar 11, 2021

Nehemiah6 said:

You will find this news heartening. See below.

Canadian group defending people given COVID fines says many ‘unconstitutional charges’ are being dropped

'We expect the mass withdrawal of Covid tickets to continue as prosecutors across the country correctly decide to stay charges'

Thu Mar 11, 2021 - 7:20 am EST

ALBERTA, March 11, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – A prominent Canadian legal group fighting for constitutional freedoms and representing many individuals charged with various COVID-related offenses says that to date, many tickets are being dropped by Alberta Provincial Crown prosecutors. “So far, all COVID-related tickets issued to rally demonstrators in Alberta that the Justice Centre has defended have been withdrawn by Crown Prosecutors before trial,” said The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) in a news release Tuesday.

Litigation Director for the JCCF Jay Cameron said that many of the COVID tickets issued will “never be prosecuted” due to them being issued under “unconstitutional” and “arbitrary” health orders. “Public health officials are not the supreme law of the land – the Constitution is,” noted Cameron in the press release. “A significant portion of the arbitrary and confusing public health orders which have so oppressed Canadian society are, on their face, unconstitutional and cannot be justified. As a result, many of the tickets issued for the supposed violation of such orders will never be prosecuted. We expect the mass withdrawal of Covid tickets to continue as prosecutors across the country correctly decide to stay charges.”

The JCCF represents almost 100 people who have been ticketed for “allegedly breaching public health orders” in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Ontario. The JCCF say that such charges include “allegedly participating in peaceful protests, not wearing a mask, providing services during lockdowns, not complying with public health guidelines on signage, and other issues surrounding the Charter freedoms to move, travel, assemble, associate, worship and express themselves.”

The JCCF has released an powerful video to accompany the news release about the continued rate of dropped COVID charges. The video features parts of a speech given by its president John Carpay at a recent lockdown protest, along with video summaries of some of the COVID tickets withdrawn. One highlight involves a $1,200 ticket handed to Bernie Driedger, who works as a primary care paramedic in La Crete, Alberta, for allegedly not wearing a mask in the town's small grocery store. According to the JCCF, Driedger says a “nosy out-of-towner” went around town to take “pictures of La Crete residents and businesses because the majority of people refuse to wear masks.” “I believe the photo was sent in to the provincial snitch line,” said Driedger. Due to losing “trust in his fellow citizens” Driedger has moved out of the Le Crete community, and stated he received a three-day suspension from work because of the picture.

“On a personal level, I believe wearing a mask is unnatural, unsanitary, and predominately anti God…I believe it to be symbolic. Wearing a mask shows the world I am easily compliant and am a willing participant in orders unsubstantiated by proper science or reason. This also shows that if I give a little on my convictions here, maybe I will give more in the next rollout of unjust violations of our freedoms,” said Driedger. The JCCF says his ticket has been withdrawn by the Provincial Crown Prosecutor.

Another COVID related fine dropped by the Provincial Crown Prosecutor involves the case of a Calgary man, Trevor Simpson, who was fined $1,200 for “allegedly not practicing safe social distancing, at a lockdown protest in Calgary on Boxing Day.” According to Simpson, Calgary police were waiting until he was blocks away from the rally and alone. He was then blocked by “four Calgary Police Service officers on bicycles.” “It was really outlandish to me that they would wait until I was no longer breaking the law to actually fine me!” said Simpson as stated in the JCCF news release. “I told the police as they were writing the ticket that it went against my Charter rights and I did not believe the ticket was legal and fair.”

A week ago the JCCF released another powerful video calling out Alberta Premier Jason Kenney for COVID-related emergency laws that led to the recent jailing of Christian Pastor James Coates of Grace Life Church. Coates is the pastor of Grace Life of Spruce Grove, Alberta, and both he and his church are being represented by the JCCF. Coates has been detained at the Edmonton Remand Centre, awaiting trial since February 16, after refusing to agree to bail conditions which block his release unless he agrees to not hold church services amid severe coronavirus lockdowns. On March 5, an Alberta court judge dismissed an appeal to his bail conditions, meaning Coates will remain behind bars for another two months as his trial date is set for May 3 to 5.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/c...h-covid-offences-says-crown-are-dropping-many charges?utm_source=top_news&utm_campaign=standard

Ye, all the fines that were given out here got rescinded as well

kinda · Mar 11, 2021

PC123 said:

Thank you @Nehemiah6 for publishing these facts on here.
I got a van and turned into a camper. Hitting the road in a few days, away from the city and into the bush towns...

I can see the big businesses enforcing some kind of vaccine green card and surrounding businesses will be forced to comply
So the city will be bad i think, the big companies can afford to do that but but not the small town businesses

I wonder how many people will stand firm.
It seems like there are a lot of people with the "if u can't beat em join em" attitude now

No way!?! You are really doing it.

You can start a YouTube blog maybe....

UnoiAmarah · Mar 11, 2021

Isn't one vaccine being made by a corporation currently involved in a class-action lawsuit for selling a product which they knew was contaminated by asbestos and could cause mesothelioma and ovarian cancer, but they did nothing to warn consumers about the risk of their products.

So if you don't take a vaccine and die from Covid-19 then your family get a $250 check from the government. But if you take the vaccine and die from its side effects, which won't be reported until after they make billions, your family might get a settlement check somewhere down the road for a couple of thousand dollars.

Nehemiah6 · Mar 12, 2021

UnoiAmarah said:

I have not heard about this. It may be from an older vaccine. But it is interesting that the day after I posted this thread, this news appeared on zerohedge.com:
7 European Nations Halt AstraZeneca Jabs On Reports Of "Serious" Blood Clots
Update (0954ET): Iceland has become the latest European nation to suspend the AstraZeneca jab.

ICELAND HAS ALSO SUSPENDED USE OF THE OXFORD/ASTRAZENECA COVID VACCINE

The tiny island nation has confirmed roughly 6K COVID cases since the start of the pandemic, which is roughly 2% of the population.

Back on the Continent, the EMA (the European equivalent of the FDA) confirmed that it has counted no fewer than 30 incidents of harmful blood clots in patients who received the vaccine, including at least one case in Denmark where the patient died. That doesn't sound good.
* * *
Update (0820ET): More countries have followed Denmark by suspending approval of the AstraZeneca-Oxford COVID vaccine. Norway, Denmark, Estonia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Latvia, and Italy have now opted to halt use of the vaccine, creating more problems for Europe's sluggish vaccine rollout.

The halts follow incidents involving blood clots in patients who recently received the vaccine. Two incidents were reported in Austria, although Vienna is allowing the vaccine to continue to be used, at least for now. Serious cases of blood clotshave been reported in Denmark and other countries as well.

Writer and skeptic Alex Berenson noted in a tweet that the AZ jab isn't the only COVID shot suspected of causing harmful side effects in a small number of patients.

In a tweet confirming the suspension, Denmark's health minister said there's currently no way to know for certain whether the cases of serious blood clots are connected to the vaccine, but the situation certainly warrants ore investigation. "We acted early, it needs to be thoroughly investigated," he said.

Just days ago, Italian PM Mario Draghi halted a shipment of AstraZeneca jabs to Australia, marking the first time an EU leader invoked rules to prioritize domestic vaccine access. Now, Italian authorities are suspending vaccinations from a current batch of the AstraZeneca jab following a pair of suspicious deaths.

Meanwhile, health authorities in Brussels and London have dismissed these concerns, insisting that the AZ jab is safe, while moving ahead with plans to approve Johnson & Johnson's single-dose jab.c

The EU medicines regulator said it was recommending the vaccine be authorized for all adults over 18 "after a thorough evaluation" of JNJ's data found the vaccine met the criteria for efficacy, safety and quality. The JNJ jab is the fourth to be licensed for use inside the EU.
* * *
Europe's much-criticized vaccination rollout has just hit another snag, as Danish health authorities are increasingly concerned about harmful side-effects believed to be associated with the AstraZeneca-Oxford jab, the cheap COVID remedy that was supposed to help Europe catch up with the US, UK and Israel.

Danish authorities on Thursday temporarily suspended AstraZeneca's COVID-19 shot following reports of cases of dangerous blood clots forming inside patients, including one such incident that took place in Denmark. Authorities didn't specify exactly how many reports of blood clots there had been, but Reuters reports that Austria has also stopped using a batch of AstraZeneca shots while investigating a death attributed to coagulation disorders, along with an illness attributed ot a pulmonary embolism, a condition where one or more of the lung's arteries becomes blocked by a blood clot. Six other European countries have also reportedly halted distribution of the COVID jab.

"Both we and the Danish Medicines Agency have to respond to reports of possible serious side-effects, both from Denmark and other European countries," the director of the Danish Health Authority, Soren Brostrom, said in a statement.

The Danish Medicines Agency said the suspension would last for 14 days as authorities launch an investigation into the blood clots, with assistance from other EU member states.

They did not say how many reports of blood clots there had been, but Austria has stopped using a batch of AstraZeneca shots while investigating a death from coagulation disorders and an illness from a pulmonary embolism.

AstraZeneca claims its vaccine is subject to strict and rigorous quality controls and that there have been "no confirmed serious adverse events associated with the vaccine." It said it was in contact with Austrian authorities and would fully support their investigation.

"Both we and the Danish Medicines Agency have to respond to reports of possible serious side-effects, both from Denmark and other European countries," the director of the Danish Health Authority, Soren Brostrom, said. "It is important to emphasize that we have not opted out of using the AstraZeneca vaccine, but that we are putting it on hold."

The European Medicines Agency said Wednesday there is no evidence linking AstraZeneca to the two cases of blood clots in Austria. The company said the number of (thromboembolic events" (blood clots forming) in people who have received the AstraZeneca vaccine is no higher than that seen in the general population, with 22 cases of such events being reported among the 3MM people who have received it as of March 9.

And at least one investor claimed Denmark’s suspension of AstraZeneca's COVID vaccine on blood clot concerns shows "the detection systems that look for potential safety issues are working," and that most of these "safety events" would ultimately be linked to natural processes, not the jab.

"It’s good to see the safety signal detection systems working and it’s important that any safety signal is followed-up using the correct protocols,” Shore analyst Adam Barker told Bloomberg. Data from the vaccine's phase three trials suggests that "you would expect that most safety signals won’t ultimately be linked to the vaccine,” he said.

However, "it’s hard to make judgments on the impact on shareholder value,” he added, given there are “a lot of moving parts." But ultimately, a risk-reward trade-off with any therapy; “you can only confidently make judgments on that decision when all the data is finalized and clear”

Nevertheless, shares of AZ tumbled on Thursday on signs that the European vaccine rollout is facing fresh skepticism and obstacles. Shares were down more than 2% in London's mid-morning trade.

Whether Austria and other EU states will follow suit remains to be seen, though at least one other national health authority is reportedly considering a halt: the Norwegian Institute of Public Health and the Medicines Agency are meeting to discuss Denmark's decision to halt vaccinations using doses of the vaccine, according to reports from state broadcaster NRK.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/astrazeneca-slides-denmark-suspends-vaccinations-blood-clot-fears

PEOPLE SHOULD NOTE CAREFULLY HOW ALL THE MANUFACTURERS AND PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICIALS DENY THE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN SERIOUS ADVERSE EFFECTS (AND DEATHS) AND THE VACCINES.

PC123 · Mar 12, 2021

kinda said:

Yep, leaving Sunday... My rig isn't as classy as that but... Its a modest Toyota Hiace

Runningman · Mar 12, 2021

@Nehemiah6 good post thank very much sir!

I don't want to create another post but I thought if I brought it up here maybe you knew about one of the other vaccines. I heard/read somewhere that the Johnson & Johnson vaccine is made from the stem cells of aborted baby humans.

For example, I just searched it out, but there are numerous articles on various media outlets that basically say "Catholics Should Avoid Johnson & Johnson Vaccine" because it is "morally compromised" due to it allegedly being made from fetal tissue. Johnson & Johnson deny that by saying they use "engineered cell lines." In other words, they were able to synthesize the cells they needed from their years of researching murdered babies.

This is just good to be aware of.

kinda · Mar 12, 2021

PC123 said:

This sounds crazy. I'm sure your not the first to try this, so happy travels!

What's your plan? Are you gonna camp out at a small city and find a job, or just check out of society some where?

UnoiAmarah · Mar 16, 2021

Nehemiah6 said:

I was referring unto the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. J&J sold a product they knew had the potential of causing cancer and did tell consumers. If not mistaken their vaccine being made in such short time didn't even get tested on animals before it was rolling out,

Moses_Young · Mar 16, 2021

Is the Covid vaccine really an IQ test? Those who pass survive and/or reproduce, and those who fail either die or are sterilised?

Obviously, they can't sell it as such, or everyone would try to choose wisely. But by doing it stealthily, many of the unthinking masses with low IQ are opting to get the poisoned needle.

Nehemiah6 · Mar 17, 2021

Moses_Young said:

Yesterday Italy has opened a manslaughter investigation into AstraZeneca. So it is more about a criminal conspiracy.

Nehemiah6 · Mar 17, 2021

Doctor Warns Experimental COVID “Vaccine” Actually “Dangerous Gene Therapy”
by Kelen McBreen
March 17th 2021, 2:19 pm

"It does not meet the CDC's own definition of a vaccine," says Dr. Steven Hotze

Dr. Steven Hotze M.D., a conservative activist and medical professional out of Houston, Texas, wants Americans to know the COVID-19 is not technically a “vaccine” and is actually “a dangerous, experimental gene therapy.”

“The so-called COVID-19 vaccine is not a vaccine at all. It’s a dangerous, experimental gene therapy,” he explains. “The Center for Disease Control, the CDC, gives the definition of the term vaccine on its website. A vaccine is a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease. Immunity is the protection from an infectious disease. If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without being infected.”

Continuing, the doctor says, “This so-called COVID-19 vaccine does not provide any individual who receives the vaccine with immunity to COVID-19. Nor does it prevent the spread of the disease.”

Because of this, “It does not meet the CDC’s own definition of a vaccine. That’s why it’s a deceptive trade practice, under 15 U.S. Code Section 41 of the Federal Trade Commission, for pharmaceutical companies who are producing this experimental gene therapy to claim that it’s a vaccine.”

Dr. Hotze alleges these companies, along with government health bureaucrats, are lying to the public by mislabeling the product. The experimental gene therapy is “only designed to minimize your symptoms if you were to be infected with the COVID-19 virus.”

For those who might ask why the pharmaceutical companies would intentionally call the gene therapy treatments a “vaccine,” Dr. Hotze claims Big Pharma is attempting to shield itself “because vaccine injuries or deaths are exempted by law from any product liability lawsuits.”

With no published animal studies and no long-term human studies, individuals who are taking the experimental gene therapy “vaccines,” are basically Guinea Pigs for the scientific elite.

The Texas doctor adds, “These ‘vaccines,’ which are manufactured using cells derived from human babies that were aborted in the 1970s, should more accurately be called an experimental gene therapy. They are an untested, unproven experimental gene therapy that poses a much greater danger to your health than COVID-19 itself.”

Dr. Hotze explains how major pharma company Moderna was founded in 2010 as ModeRNA Therapeutics because they were interested in developing experimental gene therapy using synthetic mRNA for the treatment of various diseases.

“Moderna has never successfully developed a product for treatment of any disease prior to this,” he states. “An experimental gene therapy using synthetic mRNA to treat an infectious disease has never been attempted in humans, because of its failure in previous animal studies.”

The synthetic messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) experimental gene therapy has previously immune system hyper-reactions during animal testing.
Dr. Hotze warns a similar side-effect could take place in humans when they are later exposed to the same coronavirus against which they had been previously vaccinated.
The auto-immune response could set people up for a lifetime of serious inflammatory disease.

According to Dr. Hotze, when people who take the COVID shot start to get even sicker due to the mRNA therapy, anti-vaxxers and “variant strains” of the virus will be blamed.
However, since the experimental gene therapy is being labeled a “vaccine,” the companies producing these potentially harmful products are exempt from being sued for any injury caused by vaccinations.

https://www.infowars.com/posts/doct...ovid-vaccine-actually-dangerous-gene-therapy/

Search

AstraZeneca's very dangerous vaccine

Nehemiah6

Senior Member

Nehemiah6

Senior Member

Nehemiah6

Senior Member

mailmandan

Senior Member

PC123

Banned

Nehemiah6

Senior Member

PC123

Banned

kinda

Senior Member

UnoiAmarah

Junior Member

Nehemiah6

Senior Member

PC123

Banned

Runningman

Banned

kinda

Senior Member

UnoiAmarah

Junior Member

Moses_Young

Well-known member

Nehemiah6

Senior Member

Nehemiah6

Senior Member