Jesus Is Our Truth, Reward, And Faithfulness So We Can Lie, Steal, and Fornicate?

Please, 1 John 2:3-4 KJV and James 2:24-26 KJV do not teach salvatoin by works: they expose OSAS as unable to stand the test of Biblical scrutiny.

OSAS insists that salvation covers deliberate, known, habitual, impenitent sins, saying salvation either changes God's opinion of its continued practice, that grace covers it, or that eternal security makes the guilty one immune to the penalty of it.

Read the verses I present just as they are written without the constant bias with which you view them. They are clear: for the Just Man who falls 7 times but rises out of it there is mercy, but for the OSAS Presumptuous Man who climbs down to it, gets comfortable, swats away the uplifting hand of Jesus, and waves his OSAS License to Sin in His face -- that man is going to the Lake of Fire.

Why do you think people were saved differently in the OT? Don't you realize the blood of bulls and goats never covered anyone's sin? It was what the blood REPRESENTED that covered their sin: the faith in the shed blood of Jesus that had yet to be shed is what covered their sin, just like Abraham's faith was the faith of the circumcision, "him being not circumcised".

We know the people to whom Jesus will say "depart" are sinners who thought they were Christian because He specifically mentions them prophesying, casting out, and doing miracles "IN MY NAME"- what's His name?

"Christ".

Pretty sure I said the same thing as Hebrews 10;4

I think you're the one who's confused. Read Isaiah 8:16 KJV and find out what the disciples of Christ are sealed with.

It is astounding how blind people are to the truths of Scripture because all Christianity is today is an endless round of false pulpit prophets preaching a false OSAS gospel that is no Gospel at all "and My people love to have it so."

You don't realize that the Saints will be judged in the future?

Did you never read Daniel 7? Don't you know that "judgment must begin at the house of God"?

Do you agree with Paul that "we all shall stand before the judgment seat of Christ"? in the future?

Yes, we are saved by grace but judged by our works because our works are the evidence we've been or not been saved by grace.

Pretty sure I said the same thing as Hebrews 10;4

We know the people to whom Jesus will say "depart" are sinners who thought they were Christian because He specifically mentions them prophesying, casting out, and doing miracles "IN MY NAME"- what's His name?

"Christ".

Hey you don't have to break the Law of God habitually for one to have broken the law they can keep punishment is due for the first time and only once.

4For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should TAKE AWAY sins. Why do you change it to covered?

We received God's free gift of eternal life you are preaching a contradiction in terms.

There are verses which do teach loss of salvation. But not to the Church ( the body of christ )

Here's a text that proves beyond question the Saints can wind up lost:

The "love" of the many is "agape" of which only the Saints can partake, according to 1 John 5:4 KJV.

Therefore, Jesus clearly contrasts these two classes of Saints with two obviously different futures before them: the one class who "endure to the end" and are "saved" with the other class whose "agape" turns cold through widespread iniquity and (dare I say it?) are LOST.

Now, if you're going to argue that both classes will be saved regardless when all laws of hermeneutics, vocabulary, syntax, and just plain common sense demand otherwise, you'll have proven yourself unreasonably stubborn beyond acceptable limits and we'll have to terminate our discussion.

"Blessed is he whose transgression is forgiven, whose sin is covered." Psalms 32:1 KJV
" And why dost thou not pardon my transgression, and take away mine iniquity?" Job 7:21 KJV

Here's a text that proves beyond question the Saints can wind up lost:

The "love" of the many is "agape" of which only the Saints can partake, according to 1 John 5:4 KJV.

Therefore, Jesus clearly contrasts these two classes of Saints with two obviously different futures before them: the one class who "endure to the end" and are "saved" with the other class whose "agape" turns cold through widespread iniquity and (dare I say it?) are LOST.

Now, if you're going to argue that both classes will be saved regardless when all laws of hermeneutics, vocabulary, syntax, and just plain common sense demand otherwise, you'll have proven yourself unreasonably stubborn beyond acceptable limits and we'll have to terminate our discussion.

"Blessed is he whose transgression is forgiven, whose sin is covered." Psalms 32:1 KJV
" And why dost thou not pardon my transgression, and take away mine iniquity?" Job 7:21 KJV

"Blessed is he whose transgression is forgiven, whose sin is covered." Psalms 32:1 KJV
" And why dost thou not pardon my transgression, and take away mine iniquity?" Job 7:21 KJV

Punishment is due...but not for those who "walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit

The Bible certainly makes a distinction between the Just Man who falls 7 times and rises again, and the Presumptuous Man who habitually, impenitently sins and is guilt of the "great transgression" -- between the sin that is "not unto death" and the sin that is "unto death".

If we're willing to recognize the distinction, then the fact that we've all broken the Sabbath (or any other laws) in the past is inconsequential, right or wrong? What matters is, "Are we convicted by the Holy Spirit of our guilt and sought repentance -- or -- are we in danger of grieving away the Holy Spirit Who seals us unto the day of redemption with the "Seal of God", which is His law (Isaiah 1:18 KJV) ?

So, if the fact that Jesus is our truth, reward, and faithfulness does not permit us to lie, steal, or fornicate...why do so many claim that since Jesus is their spiritual rest, they may freely break the fourth commandment?

Here's a text that proves beyond question the Saints can wind up lost:

The "love" of the many is "agape" of which only the Saints can partake, according to 1 John 5:4 KJV.

Therefore, Jesus clearly contrasts these two classes of Saints with two obviously different futures before them: the one class who "endure to the end" and are "saved" with the other class whose "agape" turns cold through widespread iniquity and (dare I say it?) are LOST.

Now, if you're going to argue that both classes will be saved regardless when all laws of hermeneutics, vocabulary, syntax, and just plain common sense demand otherwise, you'll have proven yourself unreasonably stubborn beyond acceptable limits and we'll have to terminate our discussion.