predestination vs freewill

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Oct 31, 2015
2,290
588
113
Maybe you can ask God about why you need to tell forums that Angels and Lucifer are "sons of God".

Because it’s the truth. Angels are sons of God.


Angels, sons of God can be cast down to hell, for disobedience.


This is the warning from the Apostle Peter.



For if God did not spare the angels who sinned, but cast them down to hell and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved for judgment;
2 Peter 2:4




The point: sons of God are not exempt from going to hell.



For if, after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they are again entangled in them and overcome, the latter end is worse for them than the beginning. For it would have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than having known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered to them. But it has happened to them according to the true proverb: “A dog returns to his own vomit,” and, “a sow, having washed, to her wallowing in the mire.” 2 Peter 2:20-22




  • For it would have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than having known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered to them.







JPT
 
Feb 16, 2017
1,037
285
83
Only those that Christ died for
Christ on the Cross is not just given to the French and the Italians and the Germans, but not the Americans or the Hungarians or the Chinese.

So, see how STUPID that is, to think that?
That is your theology.

"God does not offer the Cross to everyone".............

Read John 3:16

Read this verse....."If I Jesus, be lifted up on the Cross, i will draw ALL MEN TO ME">

Your Cross rejecting hyper calvinism, DENIES Christ's Words.
 

ForestGreenCook

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2018
8,315
1,184
113
Christ on the Cross is not just given to the French and the Italians and the Germans, but not the Americans or the Hungarians or the Chinese.

So, see how STUPID that is, to think that?
That is your theology.

"God does not offer the Cross to everyone".............

Read John 3:16

Read this verse....."If I Jesus, be lifted up on the Cross, i will draw ALL MEN TO ME">

Your Cross rejecting hyper calvinism, DENIES Christ's Words.
The sacrifice of Jesus was offered to God, for God's acceptance, not to mankind for mankind's acception.
 
Feb 16, 2017
1,037
285
83
The sacrifice of Jesus was offered to God, for God's acceptance, not to mankind for mankind's acception.

God does not need to be saved. So, He didnt die on the Cross to save Himself.

Your theology is not related to why Christ died on the Cross.
You might want to realize this, and get out of your denomination.
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,150
437
83
ob 1:6 KJV Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them.
Yes thank you Icedaisey, I did see that verse, but I don't think it informs that Satan was a son of God but rather that he wasn't. I think the "also" and "them" sets him apart from the others in it: he came with them, but the those two words separates him from them. Had he been one of them, that distinction wouldn't have been necessary.
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,150
437
83
Let me explain this to you..

The bible is TRUTH, yet, it can be "wrongly divided". This means you can misunderstand verses, and this causes you to believe wrong.
So, in that condition, you are theologically confused.
What happens next is that if this is not corrected you will become locked into this theological confusion as your FAITH, which then causes you to become a deceived HERETIC.
How do you know that you're not the one theologically confused?
 

awelight

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2020
1,491
449
83
68
I never said that regeneration is something we do. I still don’t see anywhere in the scripture where one is born again before they believe on the gospel. Read the following.

Nicodemus was not born again in John 3.

Jesus said the Spirit of truth was dwelling WITH believers in John 14 and WOULD BE ( future tense) in them. The Spirit in dwelling in the sense that He would be in and abide in and baptize believers into Christ would not come before the blood of the New Covenant was shed and until Christ was also GLORIFED.

John 7 said the Holy Spirit had not yet given. (John 7:39).

The Spirit of Truth was dwelling with believers in John 14. There were instances when the Spirit would be upon believers. He would be in them and would dwell in them forever after Jesus was glorified.

Regeneration can only mean importation of new life , a spiritual resurrection as a precursor to our future bodily resurrections, earnest of our inheritance.

Being born of the Spirit, born again happens when the Spirit indwells a believer forever. According to Jesus’ Words, this gift was not given until after He was glorified.

The Spirit was given and rested upon men as the fulfilled a specific office in the Old Covenant. NICODEMUS WAS still under the old covenant, for the blood of the New Covenant had not been shed

As well, the prophets said that one of the marks of the New Covenanant would be that God would write His Law on our hearts and put His Spirit to live in us forever. This is the New Covenant in Jesus blood, that was ratified by His blood and consummated on the day of Pentecost
I am somewhat dumbfounded by your insistence of a verse that says we are born again before we understand the Gospel. Many things that believers have come to know, is a culmination of verses that help paint a particular conclusion. This is spiritual discernment. If I insisted on a verse of Scripture to prove many Truths, I would still be in the dark about a great many things. For instance:

1) Show me a verse of Scripture that says that God is a Triune God. Triune is not in Scripture.
2) Show me a verse of Scripture that says Christ was the God-man.
3) Show me a verse of Scripture that says there is going to be a Rapture. Rapture is not in Scripture.

See my point? Many things we know because we discern them from many verses, OT and NT alike.

I don't know why you remarked on Nicodemus in John3, I never said he was saved or a present believer. Indeed he was rebuked by Christ because of his lack of knowledge about the new birth because he was supposed to be a teacher of Israel. I am beginning to think you are not giving my posts a careful read and due consideration.

I gave a clear and concise explanation of what Regeneration was and was not, yet you then brought up the subject of the indwelling of the Spirit. What does this have to do with the new birth? The indwelling of the Spirit, in believers, is unique to the church age, as you pointed out; however, the indwelling of the Spirit is a completely different subject and has nothing to do with the new birth. Once again I say, the new birth is a work of the Holy Spirit upon the elect individual, at the appropriate time appointed by the Lord. This takes a spiritually dead person and breaths life into their spirit. Now possessing a living, working spirit, that person can hear and be effected by the Gospel message. The indwelling of the Spirit comes when the person believes upon Jesus Christ and they are then sealed. One must make the proper distinction between Regeneration and Conversion - Regeneration enables Conversion but Regeneration is not Conversion.

Then you brought up Pentecost. The Holy Spirit came not only to dwell in believers but also to empower the young Church. Everyone who was in the room, as a believer, had already been regenerated, otherwise they would have not been true believers. Christ gave the disciples a foretaste of this coming event in John 20:22.

It seems to me that you are mixing up terminologies. Regeneration is one act, indwelling is another act, sealing is yet another act, just as being Baptized in the Spirit, is still another act. Baptism in the Spirit is a collective act and is not done on Individuals. The Jews were baptized first, then the Gentiles. But this is getting off topic.

Regeneration or being born again, is the work of the Holy Spirit upon whom He was sent. When the person is born again, they are "passive" according to the "voice" of the Greek word. This means they are the recipients of the Birth but in no way had any part to play in it. The Holy Spirit acts upon the individual and what God sends is received. An individual so acted upon, could no more stop it from happening, than they could leap from the earth to the moon. This is God's Sovereign act of Election being poured out upon the individual in time.

If you do not believe that regeneration comes before hearing the Gospel, then you are left with one difficult problem. I pose it as a question that I would like for you to answer.

When the Gospel is preached to a large group, what is the determiner that makes some believe, while others do not? In other words, why is the Gospel "effectual" in some and falls upon deft ears in others?
 

Icedaisey

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2021
1,398
475
83
I disagree. Y this time
Yes thank you Icedaisey, I did see that verse, but I don't think it informs that Satan was a son of God but rather that he wasn't. I think the "also" and "them" sets him apart from the others in it: he came with them, but the those two words separates him from them. Had he been one of them, that distinction wouldn't have been necessary.
I disagree. By this time fallen Lucifer , let by God to be Lord of this world, would remain with access to heaven. He was a son of God before his fall however the narrative, as I see it, would take into account the reader being aware of that. And as such to avoid confusion when referring to the sons of God would speak accordingly.

And this so to avoid confusion and provide distinguishing characteristics for the present day narrative.

If it was said only that the sons of God arrived, and Satan was among that number, we'd lose the distinction as to his being included among that number as his present self in the story.

He was always a son of God. But now he was removed from the heavens and served as lord of this realm,world.

Which is why his return to heaven with his brothers needs be distinct.
 

Icedaisey

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2021
1,398
475
83
What you are describing in the paragraphs that start with “ I know someone who thinks”…splounds like Cerenthius or adoptionism, which I reject.
I've no idea what the name of his tradition was. He alluded to it being similar to the JW's.
But chapters like John 1, Johnny 17, and the baptism accounts show a clear distinction between persons in the Godhead.
I would suggest you are certainly mistaken as regards John 1.
There is no Johnny listed in the NT books.
 

Icedaisey

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2021
1,398
475
83
Yes.

Let me explain this to you..

The bible is TRUTH, yet, it can be "wrongly divided". This means you can misunderstand verses, and this causes you to believe wrong.
So, in that condition, you are theologically confused.
What happens next is that if this is not corrected you will become locked into this theological confusion as your FAITH, which then causes you to become a deceived HERETIC.
You just demonstrated in detail twice now your own fault in that regard.

First in an attempt to describe your understanding of pagan tritheism somehow being consolidated by scripture, which you failed to do so when God is only one.

And now, above, as you detailed how and why that all made sense to you, as you attempted to first define the heresy of tritheism, and then detailed how it all makes sense to you.


Well done.:)
 

awelight

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2020
1,491
449
83
68
Because it’s the truth. Angels are sons of God.


Angels, sons of God can be cast down to hell, for disobedience.


This is the warning from the Apostle Peter.



For if God did not spare the angels who sinned, but cast them down to hell and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved for judgment;
2 Peter 2:4




The point: sons of God are not exempt from going to hell.



For if, after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they are again entangled in them and overcome, the latter end is worse for them than the beginning. For it would have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than having known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered to them. But it has happened to them according to the true proverb: “A dog returns to his own vomit,” and, “a sow, having washed, to her wallowing in the mire.” 2 Peter 2:20-22




  • For it would have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than having known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered to them.







JPT
I am not sure what your point was you were trying to make but hopefully, it was not to deny eternal security.

2 Peter 2:4, was stating a fact, after the war in Heaven, 1/3 of the Angels were cast out of Heaven. No more will be cast out because they are upheld by God's Righteousness and Power.

2 Peter 2:20-22. is not referencing a true believer, it is talking about one who meddles in the things of God but walks in the flesh. This is the picture of a Religionist, talks a good talk, calls themselves a Christian but continues in the entanglements of the world and it's vices. But having learned some of the things about God's laws and Commandments but are still lost, it would have been better for them to have never known. Why? Because this knowledge will be used against them in the coming Judgement. The proof of who this type of person is - is in 2 Peter 2:10-19.

A true believer cannot fall from Grace. If this could happen, it would make Christ a liar.
 
Aug 20, 2021
1,863
310
83
It doesn't say a thing in the NT about human freewill{Will we r all bond by something our job our loved ones our physical limitations.[he that sins is a slave to sin ]{It's implied not said out right,that is we have choices to make.}I think that you r defineing that sound very narrowly an maybe not considering what that sound means to the other person
  1. The human will regarded as free from restraints,compulsions,or any antecedent conditions;freedom of decision or choice.
  2. The doctrine that people have this:as opposed to determinism.
 

awelight

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2020
1,491
449
83
68
It doesn't say a thing in the NT about human freewill{Will we r all bond by something our job our loved ones our physical limitations.[he that sins is a slave to sin ]{It's implied not said out right,that is we have choices to make.}I think that you r defineing that sound very narrowly an maybe not considering what that sound means to the other person
  1. The human will regarded as free from restraints,compulsions,or any antecedent conditions;freedom of decision or choice.
  2. The doctrine that people have this:as opposed to determinism.
That is why the subject of "Freewill" bugs me personally. It defies even the English understanding of the word. As you pointed out in the definition: Human will regarded as free from restraint or compulsion.

Man after the fall, has a will (Desire) equal to his fallen nature. If Scripture calls this nature "darkness" and is at enmity with God, then that ones desires are towards the things of darkness and are anti-God. Additionally, Scripture says this "will" is in bondage to sin. Further, Scripture says, that many times throughout history, God has either influenced a persons "will" or has outright overruled and changed it.

So one must ask - What's so "free" about it?
 

OIC1965

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2020
2,754
1,016
113
I am somewhat dumbfounded by your insistence of a verse that says we are born again before we understand the Gospel. Many things that believers have come to know, is a culmination of verses that help paint a particular conclusion. This is spiritual discernment. If I insisted on a verse of Scripture to prove many Truths, I would still be in the dark about a great many things. For instance:

1) Show me a verse of Scripture that says that God is a Triune God. Triune is not in Scripture.
2) Show me a verse of Scripture that says Christ was the God-man.
3) Show me a verse of Scripture that says there is going to be a Rapture. Rapture is not in Scripture.

See my point? Many things we know because we discern them from many verses, OT and NT alike.

I don't know why you remarked on Nicodemus in John3, I never said he was saved or a present believer. Indeed he was rebuked by Christ because of his lack of knowledge about the new birth because he was supposed to be a teacher of Israel. I am beginning to think you are not giving my posts a careful read and due consideration.

I gave a clear and concise explanation of what Regeneration was and was not, yet you then brought up the subject of the indwelling of the Spirit. What does this have to do with the new birth? The indwelling of the Spirit, in believers, is unique to the church age, as you pointed out; however, the indwelling of the Spirit is a completely different subject and has nothing to do with the new birth. Once again I say, the new birth is a work of the Holy Spirit upon the elect individual, at the appropriate time appointed by the Lord. This takes a spiritually dead person and breaths life into their spirit. Now possessing a living, working spirit, that person can hear and be effected by the Gospel message. The indwelling of the Spirit comes when the person believes upon Jesus Christ and they are then sealed. One must make the proper distinction between Regeneration and Conversion - Regeneration enables Conversion but Regeneration is not Conversion.

Then you brought up Pentecost. The Holy Spirit came not only to dwell in believers but also to empower the young Church. Everyone who was in the room, as a believer, had already been regenerated, otherwise they would have not been true believers. Christ gave the disciples a foretaste of this coming event in John 20:22.

It seems to me that you are mixing up terminologies. Regeneration is one act, indwelling is another act, sealing is yet another act, just as being Baptized in the Spirit, is still another act. Baptism in the Spirit is a collective act and is not done on Individuals. The Jews were baptized first, then the Gentiles. But this is getting off topic.

Regeneration or being born again, is the work of the Holy Spirit upon whom He was sent. When the person is born again, they are "passive" according to the "voice" of the Greek word. This means they are the recipients of the Birth but in no way had any part to play in it. The Holy Spirit acts upon the individual and what God sends is received. An individual so acted upon, could no more stop it from happening, than they could leap from the earth to the moon. This is God's Sovereign act of Election being poured out upon the individual in time.

If you do not believe that regeneration comes before hearing the Gospel, then you are left with one difficult problem. I pose it as a question that I would like for you to answer.

When the Gospel is preached to a large group, what is the determiner that makes some believe, while others do not? In other words, why is the Gospel "effectual" in some and falls upon deft ears in others?
verses you asked for.

1. Matthew 28:19

2. John 1:14.

3. 1 Thess 4:17.

I will now read the rest of your post.
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,150
437
83
Now possessing a living, working spirit, that person can hear and be effected by the Gospel message. The indwelling of the Spirit comes when the person believes upon Jesus Christ and they are then sealed.
How, or by what means, do the regenerated, if not indwelt, gain belief in Christ? Isn't faith a fruit of the Spirit and therefore the Spirit a prerequisite for hearing?
 

awelight

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2020
1,491
449
83
68
verses you asked for.

1. Matthew 28:19

2. John 1:14.

3. 1 Thess 4:17.

I will now read the rest of your post.
Mat. 28:19 - mentions the three persons of the Godhead but it does not say that God is a trinity or triune. I could conclude from this verse alone, that God is three gods. It says nothing about them being one. to make my point, where is the word trinity or triune found in this verse? Your not following my argument.

John 1:14 - says nothing about Jesus being the God-man.

1 Th, 4:17 - does not have any mention of a Rapture.

This is my entire point. You cannot find these things in black and white in the Scriptures but yet, we know them to be true. We discern them by comparing spiritual things with spiritual things. Verses with other verses. So you are not going to find a verse that teaches Spirit regeneration in one particular verse - it is gleamed from throughout the Bible by weaving together the verses.
 

OIC1965

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2020
2,754
1,016
113
I am somewhat dumbfounded by your insistence of a verse that says we are born again before we understand the Gospel. Many things that believers have come to know, is a culmination of verses that help paint a particular conclusion. This is spiritual discernment. If I insisted on a verse of Scripture to prove many Truths, I would still be in the dark about a great many things. For instance:

1) Show me a verse of Scripture that says that God is a Triune God. Triune is not in Scripture.
2) Show me a verse of Scripture that says Christ was the God-man.
3) Show me a verse of Scripture that says there is going to be a Rapture. Rapture is not in Scripture.

See my point? Many things we know because we discern them from many verses, OT and NT alike.

I don't know why you remarked on Nicodemus in John3, I never said he was saved or a present believer. Indeed he was rebuked by Christ because of his lack of knowledge about the new birth because he was supposed to be a teacher of Israel. I am beginning to think you are not giving my posts a careful read and due consideration.

I gave a clear and concise explanation of what Regeneration was and was not, yet you then brought up the subject of the indwelling of the Spirit. What does this have to do with the new birth? The indwelling of the Spirit, in believers, is unique to the church age, as you pointed out; however, the indwelling of the Spirit is a completely different subject and has nothing to do with the new birth. Once again I say, the new birth is a work of the Holy Spirit upon the elect individual, at the appropriate time appointed by the Lord. This takes a spiritually dead person and breaths life into their spirit. Now possessing a living, working spirit, that person can hear and be effected by the Gospel message. The indwelling of the Spirit comes when the person believes upon Jesus Christ and they are then sealed. One must make the proper distinction between Regeneration and Conversion - Regeneration enables Conversion but Regeneration is not Conversion.

Then you brought up Pentecost. The Holy Spirit came not only to dwell in believers but also to empower the young Church. Everyone who was in the room, as a believer, had already been regenerated, otherwise they would have not been true believers. Christ gave the disciples a foretaste of this coming event in John 20:22.

It seems to me that you are mixing up terminologies. Regeneration is one act, indwelling is another act, sealing is yet another act, just as being Baptized in the Spirit, is still another act. Baptism in the Spirit is a collective act and is not done on Individuals. The Jews were baptized first, then the Gentiles. But this is getting off topic.

Regeneration or being born again, is the work of the Holy Spirit upon whom He was sent. When the person is born again, they are "passive" according to the "voice" of the Greek word. This means they are the recipients of the Birth but in no way had any part to play in it. The Holy Spirit acts upon the individual and what God sends is received. An individual so acted upon, could no more stop it from happening, than they could leap from the earth to the moon. This is God's Sovereign act of Election being poured out upon the individual in time.

If you do not believe that regeneration comes before hearing the Gospel, then you are left with one difficult problem. I pose it as a question that I would like for you to answer.

When the Gospel is preached to a large group, what is the determiner that makes some believe, while others do not? In other words, why is the Gospel "effectual" in some and falls upon deft ears in others?
Please see the verses I provided in previous posts. that you asked for.

In John 3, we read “ whoever believes in Him is not condemned, whoever believes not is condemned already…”

This establishes that justification happens at the moment one believes.

Now you have people receiving new life, born of the Spirit before justification.

I believe that regeneration and faith are simultaneous. Just like Lazarus. When He heard the voice of Jesus, He arose.

Why some believe and some don’t? If I believe in a monergistic work of God that accompanies the preaching of the Gospel that raises us to life, tgd only difference between my view and yours is that you have an hypothetical gap of time between hearing and being regenerated.
 

OIC1965

Well-known member
Sep 19, 2020
2,754
1,016
113
Mat. 28:19 - mentions the three persons of the Godhead but it does not say that God is a trinity or triune. I could conclude from this verse alone, that God is three gods. It says nothing about them being one. to make my point, where is the word trinity or triune found in this verse? Your not following my argument.

John 1:14 - says nothing about Jesus being the God-man.

1 Th, 4:17 - does not have any mention of a Rapture.

This is my entire point. You cannot find these things in black and white in the Scriptures but yet, we know them to be true. We discern them by comparing spiritual things with spiritual things. Verses with other verses. So you are not going to find a verse that teaches Spirit regeneration in one particular verse - it is gleamed from throughout the Bible by weaving together the verses.
Well, your first error is limiting me to one verse. I did not ask you for a verse, I said where in the Bible do you find such and such.

Now we know in the Bible that there is One God. And we know from the verse in Matthew that the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Spirit is God. So the Trinity is clearly taught in the Bible.

I assumed we would be starting from monotheism, not polytheism.

John 1:1-14 teaches that Jesus is God and Man.

1 Thess. 4 does indeed teach the rapture. The word is derived from the Latin translation of Harpazo, which is in 1 Thess 4.

I usually don’t call it the rapture. I call it the harpazo. We will be caught up to meet Jesus at His Return. That is what rapture means.