Spare

not real news, but the book 'revenge' was quite an expose on Meghan, while another book 'finding freedom' was all PR gush.
I dont seriously entertain that Meghan didnt know what she was getting into or that she isnt an actress, though being a royal and being a hollywood celeb seem to be conflated together in her mind.

Actually she did go on Oprah.

The Bible is full of royal antics though, most of those who ruled and reigned were not exemplary and abused their status and position. Power went to their heads, they lived the high life, they forgot about God and encouraged idolatry of themselves. The altar of celebrity is now TV and associated media platforms.

If this is the lesson of fame, dont ever go seeking it.

Satan was clear to Jesus when he tempted him with all the kingdoms of this world, if he would bow down to worship him. Jesus refused to even be considered a king when he was on earth, though many ppl considered him to be, He refused that title and just said he was the Son of man.

That also meant he was no Prince. We know and believe him to be the Son of God though He wouldnt accept worship of himself on earth but always referred to His Father.

These two are very entertaining, don't you think @Lanolin.
They're on their "respect my privacy tour".
They have the mental maturity of a 10 year old but i'm seeing a lot of trends with the young generation that show that they are very sheltered and isolated with the world around them.

I hope everyone understands what this term "Spare" means.

Harry shares his name with Harry Potter, no doubt something that is not lost on him. He describes his treatment by King Charles as being similar to the way Harry Potter was mistreated by his adoptive parents with King Charles calling him a bastard child.

The Harry Potter series is about how the rich elites rule the world with witchcraft, something that has been alluded to by Diana and was displayed for all to see in the Commonwealth games and with King Charles coronation. Talking about this in plain language gets you killed, but the term "spare" tells you all you need to know.

In the Harry Potter movies Voldemort refers to someone as a "spare" saying "Kill the spare".

When I see this title I see Harry making a very clear reference to King Charles equating him with Voldemort. If he stated it any more clearly he would surely be killed.

There is no conspiracy theory, everything is as plain as can be. But if you want a conspiracy theory turn this on its head and suppose that JK Rowling was speaking about King Charles, and Harry and William (Dudley) in her fantasy novel.

In the story they say it is an outrage to say that Harry's mom died in a car crash, she was killed by Voldemort but protected her son Harry from him killing him as well. So, is that coincidence or was she talking about Diana being killed in a car crash or by Prince Charles?

um ok, thats quite the theory
I dont think Harry ever mentioned Harry Potter either the books or movies in his memoir. I dont remember it anyway.

Meghans older half-sister also published a memoir called 'diary of princess pushy' which has quite a different narrative surrounding the royal wedding and why her dad wasnt present. Prince Charles walked her down the aisle to 'give her away' even though her mother was there, and Harry was to say that his family was 'the family Meghan never had' which irked her own dad, who was the one who had brought her up (her own parents had divorced by the time she was 6)

This was made a huge deal in the tabloids at the time. Even though they already married in secret and the wedding people saw on tv was mostly staged, though it apparently cost the British taxpayer $40 million. Most brits didnt mind as they like a good show and wanted to be happy for Harry. However he didnt actually HAVE to have a public wedding or even do any royal duties at all, though it would have taken some pressure off his brother. There was some rivalry over petty things like, Harry got to grow a beard! or Charlottes hem of her dress was too short! Meghan borrowed Kates lip gloss! But the british public and the royal PR love to hear and report things like this.

Here are the facts:

1. King Charles is a 33rd degree Mason and he had two very notable Satanists at his coronation, one a 33rd degree mason.

2. King Charles has been certified by rabbis in Israel to be descended from King David.

3. Islam believes their Mahdi (what we would call the Antichrist) comes from Britain (though the name of the land is different it is an island nation to the west of Europe).

4. King Charles is reputed to have converted to Islam.

5. King Charles is considered the "savior" of Agenda 2030 and they have even built a 10 cubit high winged statue of him called "savior of the world" to celebrate that, the statue is supposed to go into the Jewish temple when it is rebuilt.

6. Agenda 2030 is a covenant that was made in 2015 and they are scheduled to "confirm" this covenant when the UN meets this September on Feast of Trumpets. They want to strengthen the covenant by having every person "chipped" with a rfid chip that gives them access to a digital bank account which the UN can control with a social credit score so they can decide if you you can buy or sell.

7. Diana was killed in a car crash after saying on the BBC that Charles would not make a good king.

8. Charles questions whether or not Harry is his son. It is easy to see the resemblance between William and Charles, not so easy to see a resemblance of Harry with William or Charles.

9. Charles presided over the Commonwealth games which began with a worship of Moloch ceremony involving witches

But by all means, focus on lip gloss and hemlines.

Ok but what evidence is number 4 as a friend told me that yesterday and Im not sure whether to believe that. The saudis were very wealthy though and have connections to the british royal family am not sure how though. The saudis have their own royalty.

I was personally irked that my parents wanted to watch the coronation on tv and seeing Camilla being crowned queen was strange especially with all the finery everyone was wearing, just all out touch with what a christian woman wears....modest dress and adorned with good works. I couldnt recall any good works Camilla had done. According to Charles, he valued her for simply being his mistress.

So what are you saying...Charles is the anti christ? But havent there been many anti christs? Going through the books of Kings and Chronicles in the OT there is rarely an example of a good king.

yes

can you explain without the you tube video please. For those who cant view it.

Not sure if anyones going to sit through 2 hours of video programming thats all.

mm I think it just went on for ages with all the home videos of Archie etc. In their santa barbara lifestyle mansion.
The Queen had let cameras into her 'home' before and showed what she wanted to show. Theres always that tensions of 'we are human just like you' as oppposed to 'we are divine and have blue blood, as well as insanely wealthy and above the rest of the hoi polloi' that comes with being royal.

The Queen had five residences/palaces and numerous properties, basically owned all of the UK pretty much, although I dont really know how all that works with all the titles. Theres the house of Lords and the house of commons. Lords own the land, common people are the tenants. It was always blue bloods/nobility/aristocrats were never meant to mix or marry with the common people.

The Cambridges are meant to be rulers of Cambridge and the Sussexes the counties of sussex right.
I find it strange that the Prince and Princess of Wales are not Welsh, nor were the Duke and Duchess of Cornwall Cornish. The Duke and Duchess of York are not from Yorkshire...but then who can really make sense of the British royal family.

Maybe someone from the UK knows all that and can explain it to everyone else.

He provides 23 Biblical reasons why King Charles is "the Antichrist" and why the Bible cannot be referring to anyone else. That is why it is worth 2 hours. Also, as a rule you can put these on 1.5x as they play back to save a little time.

Spare, like a spare tire for if you had a flat on the auto. A back up king so to speak in case the starting player falls off his horse and lands on the second string player and he cant replace the first string king. Harry's the third or fourth string king that you can put on the car if one morning there is a flat. That funny looking little tire that don't look as good or preform as well as the others.

Im just glad that Jesus calls us co-heirs or joint-heirs in Christ not spares. lol
What if Diana had had twin boys though or even siamese twins.

Jacob and Esau were fighting in Rebeccas womb who was going to be born first. Of course the firstborn had the original inheritence. Jacob was pulling on Esaus heel though but it was prohesied that the elder would serve the younger.

I cut these Royal Kids a lot of Slack after loosing their Mother like that and having a nitwit for a NON Dad.

In the US and probably other nations the term spare I think just seems a little odd. If you look for spares in the UK you'll find spares for mower blades to electronic parts but we call them replacement parts. In his book he pretty much explains what he means by the title "Spare" but it doesn't seem to mean to them what it means to us. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spare_(memoir) https://www.google.com/search?channel=fs&client=ubuntu-sn&q=uk+spares#ip=1

Royals would often say to Diana she had to produce an 'heir and a spare' . And royals are under pressure to produce a son because girls dont inherit, they are expected to marry out. Its called primogeniture. Its been practiced for centuries amongst royalty and aristocrats.

The whole book of Jane Austens Pride and Prejudice (which features landed gentry) was regarding this as five daughters of Mrs Bennett had to marry out quickly produce sons so that the land could go to the firstborn grandson to inherit the title (titles have to do with land deeds ) upon the fathers death. It was just by her uncles freak abdication that Elizabeth got to be Queen when her father King George died.

The 'common' people dont have any inheritance or land. They just rent or are tenants.

royals and aristocrats seem to have their own rules and practise open marriages and often have many mistresses. They also have a tonne of staff looking after them...maids, ladies in waiting, butlers, nannies, valets, dressers, chauffers, bodyguards, bottle washers but they dont call it an entourage just servants.

They cannot live like ordinary people cos they have to be seen in public patronising everyone.

In the book Harry seemed estranged from his dad but closer to his grandad who, he admired.
Becase they had so many residences and they were away at boarding school a lot Harry would just divide time with his parents, and see them separately. They also had nannies, some of whom acted like big sisters to the brothers. Because of the divorce I dont think any of his aunts and uncles could have stepped in and counselled him in his grief as some may have been relieved Diana was out of the picture. And its not like Camilla would take on the step-mothering role! It seemed like he was closest to cousins Beatrice and Eugenie.

Anyway you can read the book yourself though I think going into the army and acting out his rage in combat was the only way he knew how to deal with it, or numbing everything out with drugs and partying.

How would you begin to witness to someone like Harry, if his dad is meant to be defender of faith, yet ditched his wife for another woman. Do people reckon he's saved now hes a dad and a husband and fled the royal family? Will he and Meghan remain faithful to each other? I guess thats the litmus test.

Maybe they will periodically give people updates on their coupledom and family to keep in the public eye like celebs in america do, or have their own reality show series like Tori Spelling and Kardashians and Paris Hilton do filming their lives forever for income I dont know.

Here’s some cheery news

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/...s-voting-opens-best-business-party-style.html

Mullet Championship 2023 finalists show off their tresses - as voting opens to find the best 'business at the front, party at the back' style

uh..not sure if anything to do with Spare.

Am reading A Kings story now, its by King Edward after he married Wallis Simpson. Because he abdicated, his brother George became King instead. King Edward was only King for a couple of days I think.

So anyway thats how it works.