Search results

And who would have paid for their sins?

Of course he does. He changes in the ways he deals with his people

It's convenient because it's in the word of God. I don't give myself the liberty to go beyond that with imagined revelation like you do. You can't prove anything you teach; you just dangle some verses in front of everyone and say, 'See. If only you were as enlightened as I am'

Sin against God. I already showed you above that there is no 'thou shalt not be partial' in the 10 commandments, but it is sin. How do we know? By the word of God and the witness of the spirit

Nah not going to happen. Nobody leaves earth, except through death, until the 7th trumpet resurrection and return of Christ

This is not correct. The godly sons of Adam are called the sons of God in Genesis. Adam was the son of God Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God. Luke 3:38

You're just making things up

Messianic Jews believe in Christ. I know because I used to go to a messianic congregation. It appears you may be using the term to mean something else. It's a past, present and future event. It doesn't relate to Judaism. All of those foreknown by God will hear his voice and be drawn to him...

I don't know what this means. The word in the LXX is ἄγγελοι, ie angels. There's no way to translate it to 'sons'

Gnosis to the gnostics was esoteric knowledge revealed only to the elect. It deviated so much from scripture they had to make their own writings.

Like I said, the Masoretic Text calls angels the sons of God, the LXX doesn't. Both are bibles. Sons are begotten, angels aren't And it came to pass on a day, that behold, the angels of God came to stand before the Lord, and the devil came with them. Job 1:6 (LXX) Now there was a day when the...

Oh my goodness what a bunch of gobbledygook. I can't even follow this.

The current day 'apostolic movement' is about feeding egos, not the sheep

Abraham was called By faith Abraham, when he was called to go out into a place which he should after receive for an inheritance, obeyed; and he went out, not knowing whither he went. Hebrews 11:8

The apostles were also called and they had to remain faithful as anyone has to be. There is no difference as you are trying to make for some reason. So again, this is your interpretation and opinion.

I see a lot of your opinions and interpretations in your initial post, but those aren't scripture

The ark in that verse is Christ, who is the antitype of the wooden ark.

This is just meaningless double-talk because even though you admit here that those who are released from law are not condemned by it, you believe that if you don't follow the 4th commandment you will be condemned by it. So which is it? Completely freed from the law, or still under its authority?

btw I understand your frustration with the system and the vanity of voting. This country is doomed. It has too many sins to answer for and the citizens are too dull and foolish to know what to do to correct the matter.

This never gets addressed in a direct, meaningful way by the law-keepers because they can't; it completely undermines their whole position.