Search results

On what basis do you say that nature prohibits same-sex marriage? I'm not advocating for it, I'm just curious what you'll say.

My question to you then is this: does the Bible say it's not normal? I'm not either advocating or vise versa for men to have long hair. Like I've said before in one of my posts you liked, "But it's still a heart issue though, on whether or not he is convicted of it because if he does feel like...

So then if your first suggestion is true, then Paul made a false claim. Still, if the man has long hair and doesn't feel shame before reading scripture, that doesn't mean that's not what nature supposedly teaches. Like a homosexual couple could say that they don't feel ashamed to have a same sex...

Well, it's possible for the man to have not cut his hair recently and also read the scriptures at the same time. But it's still a heart issue though, on whether or not he is convicted of it because if he does feel like it's wrong, he's being convicted by the Holy Spirit for nothing in our own...

Finally! Someone actually understands that that wasn't Paul's main point here!

Do you believe it's wrong to wear makeup, earrings dresses, etc? I can see the point you're trying to make when you say, "Every Christian from that period could have had long hair, but it doesn’t make it right.". But it also doesn't make it wrong either, does it? You may be thinking of the verse...

The question in my last post you responded to, which was, "Do you believe that Paul was making a 1st-century misunderstanding?".

We don't have to confess our sin to anyone else but, it is good to tell others, especially those whom you are closest to to keep you accountable. Proverbs 27:17.

Good morning! My birthday is June 22 by the way. I found it interesting that our birthdays were pretty close!

Hello and welcome! I hope your time here so far was great!

Do you know what Paul is saying in that verse? He in other areas would reinforce the law. What do you think about this? 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 Paul says how certain kind of people won't inherit the kingdom of heaven.

So, are you able to answer this question with a simple yes or no? If not, I understand. Do you believe that Paul was making a 1st-century misunderstanding? By the way, I'm was not trying to prove that you are not allowed to have long hair this whole time at any point.

Well, I was just providing evidence. Still, it may not be very good evidence though considered by some people. I'll have to think about that. But Paul also was an apostle, would he lie about himself? He was in Christ, he loved God, and obeying God's commandments brought him such joy for he was...

Here are a few verses to look at: 1 Corinthians 2:16; 2 Timothy 3:16-17; Galatians 1:11-12; Ephesians 3:4-5; 2 Peter 1:20-21; 1 Thessalonians 2:13; Romans 15:4; and 1 Corinthians 14:37. These are just a few verses that can be considered evidence that Paul was divinely inspired by the Holy...

Well, actually a lot of people would make up reasons probably not to believe it. Here's an example: there's two guys (Jerry and Bob) and one other person who died (Luke). At the crime scene (let's say, a pizza place for example), there was a little strand of Jerry's hair and a different guy...

"'Does not nature itself teach you...'" That is something that Paul wrote, and then you go on to say this, "would therefore be 1st-century misunderstanding of 'nature'". Isn't that clearly a claim that Paul wrote a 1st-century misunderstanding of nature? It sure seems like it to me. But then you...

I can give you evidence from God's Word itself, but I want to make sure though first that you would even believe it.