Search results

That's not what Mathew 23:3 says. Jesus told everyone to be subject to their authority, but not their works. Governments are even more corrupt than the Pharasees, and yet Romans 13:1 still tells us to obey all authority, because all authority is ultimately sanctioned by God and anyone who...

Do you know the people in the videos? Do you know their education or background? There are countless videos on YouTube all refuting the point you are making, so unless you can prove that ALL those people have no knowledge of ancient Hewbrew, you have no argument. Like I said, post a video from a...

Pharisees also brought forth false doctrines and Jesus still told everyone to obey their authority (Mathew 23:3)

We are not just individual believers, we are all part of the same body - 1 Corinthians 12:13. It doesn't matter how corrupt or apostate the pope is, he still has physical authority according to the Bible. Just like Romans 13:1 tells us to obey all government authority no matter how corrupt...

You are misinterpreting the candlestick analogy - once the candlesticks got removed, the 7 churches were no more. The Catholic church obviously still has it's candlestick. The same way Jews, who were under the old covenant had to be under the authority of Pharisees (those who are in the seat of...

You keep putting fingers in your ears and screaming lalala, but that's not helping your case. You still haven't addressed any of my points, and that further proves you are speaking out of ignorance. Your analogy of the king of Sweden is irrelevant because we are not in Sweden, but we are part of...

You have no proof of how much or how little of ancient Hebrew those people know, but either way, post a video of an ancient Hebrew scholar of your choice, and then you'll at least have a valid argument.

What does that have to do with anything? That's from the 7 churches that don't exist anymore. Obviously the Catholic church still has it's candlestick. Pharisees had authority according to Jesus in Mathew 23:3. They spoke with authority and Jesus told everyone to be subjects under them whether...

I provided PLENTY of evidence for their authority, and you haven't provided ANY rebuttal against the points I made. Just saying you disagree therefore you're correct is a very immature and childish way to communicate. You can put fingers in your ears and scream LA LA LA, but you're just...

That is an argument from authority and it's a logical fallacy. Address the argument, not the credentials.

Deuteronomy 30:11-14 is talking about present moment in the past, when people had just received God's word. It says the people now have the God given law and must now follow it. Nowhere did the Bible say that God's word would be perfectly preserved on earth as it is in heaven until, that is off...

I found many videos refuting KJV translation in various ways, one being, not following the Hebrew grammar - the word "them" in Hebrew is masculine, but the word for "words" is feminine, so it cannot be talking about the word God being preserved. I don't know anything about Hebrew, so I can't...

That is irrelevant. Pharisees were just as corrupt if not worse, and yet in Mathew 23:3 Jesus told everyone to be subjects under them.

How ironic of you to talk against Gnosticism while most people (likely including you) use translations from Gnostic Alexandrian manuscripts.

I think what he's talking about (if he bothered to clarify) is "generation" of people mentioned in verse 5. God will protect his people, not his word. I haven't found any evidence that God would protect the Bible from corruption (other than the video at the start of this topic). God's word...

Absolutely NOTHING to do with what we are talking about here. You, like many people on here just blindly hate and spam replies without even watching the video posted. Equidistant letter sequences have been DEBUNKED a long time ago and they have nothing to do with what we are talking about.

You obviously haven't even watched the video. The first link you posted just lists some events that anyone can claim happened with no proof, while the video I posted shows astronomically impossible odds of certain words occurring a certain number of times, while combined with other statistically...

"Gematria" has NOTHING to do with "this stuff" No, it's not. Gematria is assigning value to letters, this stuff is counting words.

What are you asking me? Do you have specific verses in the book of Jeremaya that prove your case?

I'm looking for answers and truth, which church is true church and which Bible version is the truest. So far, of the proof I provided for Catholicism, very little has been refuted.