Search results

Post hoc rationalization and a denial of what 2.38 says . I recieved the Holy spirit as per Eph 1.13 .

Water doesn't save them . Recieving the Holy Spirit does .

What Peter tells them to do in Acts 2.38 is what they had to do . The results were immediate. 41Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls. They that gladly received his word were baptized: ' Gladly ' . Why...

Saved by the blood of christ . The prerequisite is as described. The prerequisite Today is not Acts 2.38 . That was for Israel. Today its as we see in Eph 1.13 . 1 cor 15 .1-4 ..Rom 10 .9 . 1 cor 1.21 ect ect .

So is Acts 8 also a different Gospel? 15Who, when they were come down, prayed for them, that they might receive the Holy Ghost: 16(For as yet he was fallen upon none of them: only they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.) 17Then laid they their hands on them, and they recieved the...

//Peter did NOT, I repeat NOT tell any jew to be baptized to recieve the gift of the spirit and remission of sin.// The Bible . 38¶Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the...

Finally some sense .

Thats my whole point. The verse is fine as it says ,because the context is Israel . Peter is simply telling this Audience what they need to do and why . The issues come because today people take the verse out of context and apply it TODAY thinking this is the order of salvation . Catholics and...

In what way ? Its not the same message . The instruction is not the same as we find later in Paul's letters . its not the same instruction even within the 29 conversion accounts in Acts . The details matter . Its why the verse gets greekafied to death, and others use it to teach baptismal...

I'm referring to Acts 2 36¶Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ. Why are you denying what it says ? It literally says who Peter is addressing. What more do you want?

The context reveals the correct word usage. Acts 2.38 is just fine ,without needing to to ridiculous mental gymnastics around it . Look at how much effort your putting in to changing what it says .

Peter is not addressing anyone but Israel. They are surprised by Cornelius.

The ' Night ' is the great tribulation.

Which Greek ? I trust the English today . The Kjv .

The Kjv is fine . I think God knew that English would be the dominant language.

The ' Horse ' is very much alive .

Hmm ? It proves your wrong.

No I said ' first ' . The verse in question Should be understood in its immediate context first, before we go wandering off into other books and letters . The writer specifically is writing for a reason.

The baptism of Colossians 2:12 is by “the operation of God” who raised Christ from the dead, not “the operation of the pastor or evangelist” who immerses the subject in water. Saving baptism is Spirit baptism. Water baptism is a figure of this saving baptism.

When you see the word ' baptism ' in those verses , Its referring to this. ¶For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ. 13For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles...