Search results

I make no mistakes and can make .o mistakes sticking solely with the simple truth of God's inspired word. Believe whatever junk you like. Goodbye 👋

Zero biblical support for infant baptism, actually, less than zero. And even less than that for sprinkling or pouring water on infants and calling that baptism!

Yes agreed, and you can start with John the Baptist in Luke 3.

The did ache is NOT the scriptures, the Holy Word of God. It's garbage

And after all the above? What's That your point, that they sprinkled things in the OT? So what? What does that have to do with the subject of baptism??? NOTHING!

Chapter 7 of what??? NOT THE BIBLE and they whomever they were, gad no right or authority to alter God's word.

Not really. Baptism is transliterated not translated from the Greek word baptizo which means to dip, plunge, immerse. Pour and sprinkle arre different words with different meanings and are not interchangeable with baptizo. So, if you had water poured on you or sprinkled on you, you weren't...

But read a bit further in 1 Cor to chapter 3 to understand Paul's statement you quoted from one. Paul was the great orator, preacher, and convincer. Paul preached, Apollos baptized, and God gave the increase. 1 Cor 3:6 I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase

Yes! Baptism, water immersion, into Christ is the one baptism!

I'd like to know to since God doesn't talk to anyone except thru his written word.

👋

Exactly how are you or were you baptized into his death? By what process, what scriptures say this and how its done?

Goodbye everlasting nonsense

No written response for you. I'm simply sitting here shaking my head. Goodbye. Go study. Your remarks make no sense.

Yes, many fakes, like 100%

And to whom was this statement made?? You, us? No: Timothy!

Catch all phrases and related logic or illogic doesn't work when trying to understand the truth of scripture. You either seek truth in depth or you don't, and make ill-conceived comments from the peanut gallery as you do. Goodbye.

The only thing that's incorrect is YOU and your understanding of scripture. Goodbye

Where does it say or even infer that??? There is no scriptural evidence that the laying on of the apostle's hands was passed on in perpetuity. On the contrary, you can clearly see by the origin that the power frkm on high was solely meant for the apostles.

The language of the scriptures is not my "continued misrepresentation of these passages" it's simply the scriptures themselves! I didn't add to or take away from them, I simply quoted them. Because you disagree with me you are in essence disagreeing with them. Go complain to God.