Search results

Not until you watch one of the videos I presented and actually REFUTE them. I already watched one on the first page and refuted it.

Just watch the segment at 39:45 in the above video for size dimensions, but the whole video is pretty well done.

The videos on the 1st page. Here is another great video on the Temple mount being the right location with nice illustrations. I don't get anti-Temple Mount people, no offense. I never ONCE here any of you guys debunk the evidence put forth. And I mean a MOUNTAIN of evidence and archeological...

I'm sorry to hear that. And Ive seen the videos. They simply aren't convincing

I can chime in on any thread, I'm not derailing anything (I wasn't the one bringing up prophecy anyway). You don't "own" this thread on a PUBLIC forum.

threaten me all you want, you still never produced a viable form of archeological evidence. and what you did show was part of David's palace or alter, showing no inscriptions of it being the temple. so you're going off blind faith.

This prophecy was already fulfilled as the city and its walls were built after permission by Cyrus, and it took 49 years.

Believe what you want. You never produced ANY archeological features of the Temple at all, while INSCRIPTIONS of the Temple itself were found in the ruins outside the retaining wall at the Temple Mount. There is so much evidence that the Temple Mount is the exact location is laughable to...

Never mind them, they're just fulfilling Scripture lol

The metrics have been met and are in fact increasing in frequency and fulfillment. Manifesting exactly as Jesus said they would: like birth pains that get more intense and frequent leading up to "birth."

There just isn't enough room. 500 cubits would put the temple out OVER the valley and touching the Mount of Olives. There's just no way. The land is just too narrow. Also, the archeological digs in your video yielded what I believe to be apart of King David's Palace, but there were no...

I did my due diligence and watched the first video you linked. All of it. It just didn't do it for me. There were some good points, but it wasn't nearly enough. A big reason is the space. There's no way a 500 cubit wall could stand where the Ophel is. No room. Funnily enough, there was a...

Ez. 40-48 deals with the millennial.

is the retaining wall the "temple and its buildings"? think hard now.

Ill watch them..but they have to be more convincing than the video I linked. we'll see. Im open to changing my mind.

Im gonna try to say this one last time, but im losing patience. NOT ONE STONE of the BUILDING on top of the mount....NOT the retaining wall that we see today. Jesus wasn't referring to the retaining western wall....He was talking about the building that sit on top (the Temple and other small...

You know what else was fits the dimensions perfectly? The pre-Herodian Temple Mount north wall " At the bottom of a staircase in the northwest corner of the higher section, Ritmeyer noticed a stone with a unique chiseled edge. The stone resembled the pre-Herodian blocks visible on the eastern...

At this point I don't think we're going to get anywhere. I'd need to see digs and archeological evidence of the Temple being on the Ophel or anywhere other than the Mount. I can appreciate your dedication to this subject, but I can't accept your findings without more evidence. Give me...

not one stone....pertaining to the buildings! That's what they were talking about IN CONTEXT. It's like you are actively trying not to understand Scripture on purpose. Very weird.