start an apologetics area for christians only to answer cults

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Subhumanoidal

Well-known member
Sep 17, 2018
3,669
2,887
113
#2
Not likely to happen. New areas are only created when there's enough clear support to justify it. And debate areas are not really wanted by the site owner.
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
7,897
1,458
113
67
Brighton, MI
#3
It would not be a debate area. It would be for Christians only sharing information that works.
 

Subhumanoidal

Well-known member
Sep 17, 2018
3,669
2,887
113
#4
It would not be a debate area. It would be for Christians only sharing information that works.
Where cult members would inevitably go to argue against the claims, as happens in threads tackling the same sort of topics.
It would be a constant task to remove every post that disagreed, not to mention disrupt the flow of threads. And there's no way to keep people out who disagreed.

But again there has to be a perceived need by enough people to even be considered, according to the site owner.

What I've learned, in 9 years on the site, about new forum topic

suggestjons:
*nothing debate oriented or that could be perceived as such
*nothing that puts undue demand on mods
*must be enough people to justify it
*I've never seen them censor other beliefs, unless they are preaching or aggressively defending beliefs that go against Christian beliefs
*the number of options is purposefully kept to a minimum to keep the site from being bloated
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
7,897
1,458
113
67
Brighton, MI
#5
Where cult members would inevitably go to argue against the claims, as happens in threads tackling the same sort of topics.
It would be a constant task to remove every post that disagreed, not to mention disrupt the flow of threads. And there's no way to keep people out who disagreed.

But again there has to be a perceived need by enough people to even be considered, according to the site owner.

What I've learned, in 9 years on the site, about new forum topic

suggestjons:
*nothing debate oriented or that could be perceived as such
*nothing that puts undue demand on mods
*must be enough people to justify it
*I've never seen them censor other beliefs, unless they are preaching or aggressively defending beliefs that go against Christian beliefs
*the number of options is purposefully kept to a minimum to keep the site from being bloated
We need only report then on the first post.
A filter could be installed on the subjuct line of the report looking for the word "cultist" to autodelete thier posts in that area. Also, when doing a special registration for that area, they would have to agree to a statement of faith that all real Christian hold to like.

Jesus is fully God, fully Man
The Trinity with standard defintion given.
Salvation by Grace, not by works.
No extra Biblical Revelations.
Only Christian Sources like the Early Church Fathers is allowed.
 

GardenofWeeden

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2018
411
369
63
The Garden of Weeden
#6
We need only report then on the first post.
A filter could be installed on the subjuct line of the report looking for the word "cultist" to autodelete thier posts in that area. Also, when doing a special registration for that area, they would have to agree to a statement of faith that all real Christian hold to like.

Jesus is fully God, fully Man
The Trinity with standard defintion given.
Salvation by Grace, not by works.
No extra Biblical Revelations.
Only Christian Sources like the Early Church Fathers is allowed.
You can't find two "real Christians" to agree on everything 100%, so while it's a nice idea, it won't happen or work. Sorry. :)
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
7,897
1,458
113
67
Brighton, MI
#7
You can't find two "real Christians" to agree on everything 100%, so while it's a nice idea, it won't happen or work. Sorry. :)
The purpose is only to discuss Major Theology not Minor.

Majors are:
Jesus is fully God, fully Man
The Trinity with standard defintion given.
Salvation by Grace, not by works.
No extra Biblical Revelations.
Only Christian Sources like the Early Church Fathers is allowed.

This rules out Minor doctrines that Divide:
Spiritual Gifts
second Coming
Dispensationalism
Calvinism vs Free Will
existence of Hell
church goverment
and others like that

Also, filters can be applied.
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,075
3,965
113
mywebsite.us
#11
What????? o_O

You mean - a group of Christians don't have the self-discipline and determination to accomplish that without hard-line-rule preventions put in place??? What is that all about???

:rolleyes:
 
Jun 28, 2022
1,258
383
83
#12
God Bless Sister, I wonder if I can moderate only that area?
It's not going to happen from the looks of it.

Compitacy theory forum would do. Or even BDF. Maybe even Miscellaneous. These are boards that already exist.

An answering cults board sounds more like an invite for an offensive. A battlefield.😟 Isn't there enough of that already?
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
7,897
1,458
113
67
Brighton, MI
#13
What????? o_O

You mean - a group of Christians don't have the self-discipline and determination to accomplish that without hard-line-rule preventions put in place??? What is that all about???

:rolleyes:
it would help to avoid rabbit holes off topic.
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
7,897
1,458
113
67
Brighton, MI
#14
It's not going to happen from the looks of it.

Compitacy theory forum would do. Or even BDF. Maybe even Miscellaneous. These are boards that already exist.

An answering cults board sounds more like an invite for an offensive. A battlefield.😟 Isn't there enough of that already?
what is BDF ?
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
55,810
25,988
113
#17
You can't find two "real Christians" to agree on everything 100%, so while it's a nice idea, it won't happen or work. Sorry. :)
This is true. There are even those who will claim there is room for a multiplicity of differing opinions here, but if
you disagree with them on something, they will turn around and condemn you, showing their words to be false :oops:
 

GardenofWeeden

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2018
411
369
63
The Garden of Weeden
#18
I avoid that room if I can help it lol
This is true. There are even those who will claim there is room for a multiplicity of differing opinions here, but if
you disagree with them on something, they will turn around and condemn you, showing their words to be false :oops:
Unfortunately.
 

Subhumanoidal

Well-known member
Sep 17, 2018
3,669
2,887
113
#19
We need only report then on the first post.
A filter could be installed on the subjuct line of the report looking for the word "cultist" to autodelete thier posts in that area. Also, when doing a special registration for that area, they would have to agree to a statement of faith that all real Christian hold to like.

Jesus is fully God, fully Man
The Trinity with standard defintion given.
Salvation by Grace, not by works.
No extra Biblical Revelations.
Only Christian Sources like the Early Church Fathers is allowed.
Bottom line You're pushing and arguing a point that goes against previously disagreed with notions by the site owner.

Owner doesn't prefer to add new subforums
Owner purposefully allows other beliefs to be expressed on this site, with some limitations.
No matter how you cut it, more work for the mods who are volunteers.
Ways to easily get around your checks.
Uncertainty the site owner agrees with your list of requirements.
Auto deleting posts just for the headline, with no checks, is begging for abuse of that system. The mods will get complaints and have to check each one to verify whether the report is true or not. And that's assuming the deleted post is still visible to them. As it is the report button is highly misused as it rarely is used to actually report against rule breakers, but rather for personal reasons.