Nakedness and the Bible, pt 2

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Should a Christian change clothes (to a bathing suit) inside a locker room?

  • yes

    Votes: 5 45.5%
  • no

    Votes: 4 36.4%
  • I don't know, unsure, aka any other answer.............explain.

    Votes: 2 18.2%

  • Total voters
    11
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oct 17, 2009
325
1
0
#41
Danny's exegesis is clearly faulty; you can't even conclude that with an honest reading of the text.

The problem was that Noah did something embarrassing and instead of helping his father out, his son went and tried to get a laugh out of it. The sin in question here is disrespect of the father.
 
L

lil-rush

Guest
#42
I agree with the whole self esteem thing.. but, just wondering, do you think these people (the one sitting on the ground) commit a sin? They are pretty much naked in their daily lives.

Do you think God will hold them accountable for having indecent culture?
Appeals to emotion have no place in a logical argument.

Logically, yes I believe God would hold people accountable for sins. God is a just God, and He is not going to have different standards for people just because they are more or less informed than others.
 
Jan 22, 2010
1,022
1
0
#43
For some reason the girl native in the row of white guys looks like a guy.
 
Oct 17, 2009
325
1
0
#44
That's offensive that you chalk up other people's modesty to immaturity. It has nothing to do with immaturity. It has to do with personal convictions, and I am convicted that I am not to walk around naked. Yes, some people feel uncomfortable showing their naked body to others. That does not make them immature. If someone feels uncomfortable showing their nakedness to others perhaps they have a low self-esteem. It is in no way immature to have a low self-esteem, so instead of calling those people immature, perhaps you should try to help them raise their self-esteem.

At the end of the day, God cares. If God did not care, he would not have required Adam and Eve to wear clothes.
Where does it say that God required Adam and Eve to wear clothes? God gave them clothes because they were ashamed to be naked, not because their nakedness was inherently sinful.
 
Jan 22, 2010
1,022
1
0
#45
Where does it say that God required Adam and Eve to wear clothes? God gave them clothes because they were ashamed to be naked, not because their nakedness was inherently sinful.
This is true.
 

VW

Banned
Dec 22, 2009
4,579
9
0
#46
Where does it say that God required Adam and Eve to wear clothes? God gave them clothes because they were ashamed to be naked, not because their nakedness was inherently sinful.
God gave them clothes by killing animals to take their skins to make the clothes. Adam and Eve did not even know they were naked until they ate of the fruit. And after, they hid from God, and tried to cover their nakedness which they were now aware of. Their nakedness was before natural and beautiful.
 
Jan 22, 2010
1,022
1
0
#47
God gave them clothes by killing animals to take their skins to make the clothes. Adam and Eve did not even know they were naked until they ate of the fruit. And after, they hid from God, and tried to cover their nakedness which they were now aware of. Their nakedness was before natural and beautiful.
And is still natural and beautiful.
 
L

lil-rush

Guest
#48
Ironically, you are always talking about God giving us a brain to think.

If you think it through, you would see that by giving Adam and Eve clothes, God is saying nakedness is something that is no longer acceptable.

What I don't understand is how you of all people can say men must wear kippahs, but you think it is okay to waltz around naked. Why would God give a hoot about a head covering, but then allow His people to walk around naked? That makes no sense. "I don't care if you walk around naked, but you better have your head covered!"
 
Jan 22, 2010
1,022
1
0
#49
Ironically, you are always talking about God giving us a brain to think.

If you think it through, you would see that by giving Adam and Eve clothes, God is saying nakedness is something that is no longer acceptable.

What I don't understand is how you of all people can say men must wear kippahs, but you think it is okay to waltz around naked. Why would God give a hoot about a head covering, but then allow His people to walk around naked? That makes no sense. "I don't care if you walk around naked, but you better have your head covered!"
Well, David danced naked before G-d, and rather than getting rebuked by G-d, G-d called him a man after His own heart.
 
Oct 17, 2009
325
1
0
#50
Wearing a head covering for religious services is kind of besides the point here. That's a ceremonial ritual, not a moral issue.

Who is saying that we should 'walk around naked'? That's not considered acceptable by our society. It can get you arrested. What we're saying is that just because our society frowns on public nudity, doesn't mean that it's morally wrong in and of itself. We're saying that, if you were in a situation where nobody would be offended, then it would be okay to be naked. If you were at a nude beach or nudist resort, it would be okay to be naked because it's expected or required there. Customs are different.
 
Jan 22, 2010
1,022
1
0
#51
Also, I've never EVER said men must wear kippahs :p
 
L

lil-rush

Guest
#52
Well, David danced naked before G-d, and rather than getting rebuked by G-d, G-d called him a man after His own heart.
David was not completely naked.

Also, weak argument at best. You support walking around naked just for the fun of it. David only danced nearly-naked once, and it was a very special occasion, and he was led by God to do so.
 
L

lil-rush

Guest
#53
Wearing a head covering for religious services is kind of besides the point here. That's a ceremonial ritual, not a moral issue.

Who is saying that we should 'walk around naked'? That's not considered acceptable by our society. It can get you arrested. What we're saying is that just because our society frowns on public nudity, doesn't mean that it's morally wrong in and of itself. We're saying that, if you were in a situation where nobody would be offended, then it would be okay to be naked. If you were at a nude beach or nudist resort, it would be okay to be naked because it's expected or required there. Customs are different.
I'm talking to Nuhen, since I'm relatively familiar with his view on the subject.
 
L

lil-rush

Guest
#54
Also, I've never EVER said men must wear kippahs :p
My point was that, why would God pay such attention to something as little as a kippah, but not care about what covers the rest of the body?

Also, Brackenzee, I probably should have pointed out that I don't seperate the moral from the ceremonial. They're all important to God.
 
Jan 22, 2010
1,022
1
0
#55
David was not completely naked.

Also, weak argument at best. You support walking around naked just for the fun of it. David only danced nearly-naked once, and it was a very special occasion, and he was led by God to do so.
I don't support walking around naked just for the fun of it. However, I won't condemn people who, say, go to nude beaches or live in nudist colonies or anything like that, because I don't have anything in Scripture to suggest that what G-d once called pure and holy and beautiful is now shameful and wicked.
 
L

lil-rush

Guest
#56
I don't support walking around naked just for the fun of it. However, I won't condemn people who, say, go to nude beaches or live in nudist colonies or anything like that, because I don't have anything in Scripture to suggest that what G-d once called pure and holy and beautiful is now shameful and wicked.
Yeah, to me, walking around at a nudist beach or colony is walking around naked for the fun of it.

Just because you must cover it up doesn't mean it is shameful or wicked. It is not the body that is shameful and wicked. What is shameful is it be immodest.

Look, before sin entered the world, Adam and Eve could walk around naked because there was no lust, no sexual perversion, etc. Did you ever stop to think that God covered Adam and Eve up because He knew sin had entered the world and it would be in man's best interest to cover his body in order to keep from sinning?

God is not saying the body is shameful and wicked by requiring us to be clothed. Wearing clothes is just the same as the laws that Rabbis might hand down in the respect that they are given to help keep people from sinning. God clothes us in order to help keep us from having lustful thoughts, etc.

Before the fall clothes were not needed, because Adam and Eve did not have to worry about sin. After the fall, sin entered and God realized His creation would not be able to function naked any longer.
 
Jan 22, 2010
1,022
1
0
#57
Yeah, to me, walking around at a nudist beach or colony is walking around naked for the fun of it.

Just because you must cover it up doesn't mean it is shameful or wicked. It is not the body that is shameful and wicked. What is shameful is it be immodest.

Look, before sin entered the world, Adam and Eve could walk around naked because there was no lust, no sexual perversion, etc. Did you ever stop to think that God covered Adam and Eve up because He knew sin had entered the world and it would be in man's best interest to cover his body in order to keep from sinning?

God is not saying the body is shameful and wicked by requiring us to be clothed. Wearing clothes is just the same as the laws that Rabbis might hand down in the respect that they are given to help keep people from sinning. God clothes us in order to help keep us from having lustful thoughts, etc.

Before the fall clothes were not needed, because Adam and Eve did not have to worry about sin. After the fall, sin entered and God realized His creation would not be able to function naked any longer.
Can a person not ask G-d to keep them from lust and sexual perversion?
 
L

lil-rush

Guest
#58
Can a person not ask G-d to keep them from lust and sexual perversion?
If I asked God to keep me from lust and seuxal perversion, does that mean I could walk around naked? Not trying to be vain, but let's be honest, babe. If I walked around naked, would it be my own thoughts I'd have to worry about, or the thoughts of men who would see me?
 
Jan 22, 2010
1,022
1
0
#59
If I asked God to keep me from lust and seuxal perversion, does that mean I could walk around naked? Not trying to be vain, but let's be honest, babe. If I walked around naked, would it be my own thoughts I'd have to worry about, or the thoughts of men who would see me?
I said keep them, not their thoughts. As in, completely.

Besides, that's the whole point of nude beaches/colonies. It's for people who don't look at naked people and go, "Heck yes, I'd love to get in bed with that!"

And yes, those people exist.
 
L

lil-rush

Guest
#60
I said keep them, not their thoughts. As in, completely.

Besides, that's the whole point of nude beaches/colonies. It's for people who don't look at naked people and go, "Heck yes, I'd love to get in bed with that!"

And yes, those people exist.
You think that everyone at nude beaches/colonies can look at other naked people and not be attracted to good-looking people?

If someone is attracted to a girl when she is clothed, why would that change just because they go to a nude beach?

I'm not going to risk it. If my being naked could cause a man or woman to have even 1 lustful thought, why would I do it? I am not going to be a stumbling block.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.