Textual conditions vs The sensible horizon

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,142
612
113
69
Alabama
#41
Well you know before the written word, those in faith offered the blood sacrifice of a clean animal...Im sure they was some oral words that went with it, but the Lamb for sure spoke a volume about things to come...
Whether it is written or oral it is still linguistic communication. When information is linked to the mind of man it MUST assume linguistic form for it to be understood.
 
M

Mitspa

Guest
#43
Whether it is written or oral it is still linguistic communication. When information is linked to the mind of man it MUST assume linguistic form for it to be understood.
Now hold on...the Lamb did not speak, but was a symbolic type of Christ...that blood spoke in the Spiritual realm, im sure.
 
M

Mitspa

Guest
#45
Now hold on...the Lamb did not speak, but was a symbolic type of Christ...that blood spoke in the Spiritual realm, im sure.
My point being God has always used temporal objects to reveal or even hide in shadow or type eternal truths.
 
Jan 27, 2013
4,769
18
0
#46
Whether it is written or oral it is still linguistic communication. When information is linked to the mind of man it MUST assume linguistic form for it to be understood.
you need god as a third,even you agreed, yet god has many gifts, not just reading,what is wrote. but if you cant read what is wrote. how can you define, if you need an other gift to understand, what the bible writer wrote. a vision, a dream, prophetic written words. etc
so oral or communication is lost. with out an other source to understand what is wrote.
 
Last edited:

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,142
612
113
69
Alabama
#47
Now hold on...the Lamb did not speak, but was a symbolic type of Christ...that blood spoke in the Spiritual realm, im sure.
You are not getting the point. Yes, the Lamb did not speak but the vision of the lamb takes place in the mind of John as a string of word. His mind attatches language to the symbols - this is a lamb - this lamb is standing - this lamb has been slain. John continues this representation of these symbols in the following linguistic form, "All who dwell on the earth will worship him, everyone whose name has not been written from the foundation of the world in the book of life of the Lamb who has been slain."
 
Jan 27, 2013
4,769
18
0
#48
You are not getting the point. Yes, the Lamb did not speak but the vision of the lamb takes place in the mind of John as a string of word. His mind attatches language to the symbols - this is a lamb - this lamb is standing - this lamb has been slain. John continues this representation of these symbols in the following linguistic form, "All who dwell on the earth will worship him, everyone whose name has not been written from the foundation of the world in the book of life of the Lamb who has been slain."
it is still prophetic written.
Now Joseph had a dream, and when he told it to his brothers they hated him even more.6 He said to them, "Hear this dream that I have dreamed:7 Behold, we were binding sheaves in the field, and behold, my sheaf arose and stood upright. And behold, your sheaves gathered around it and bowed down to my sheaf Genesis 37
for example.
how many sheaves of wheat have you saw bowing to each other.
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,142
612
113
69
Alabama
#49
you need god as a third,even you agreed, yet god has many gifts, not just reading,what is wrote. but if you cant read what is wrote. how can you define, if you need an other gift to understand, what the bible writer wrote. a vision, a dream, prophetic written words. etc
so oral or communication is lost. with out an other source to understand what is wrote.
Yes. The triadic structure (of which communication is a part) must be there or there is not triadic structure.
Yes, it is the ability to either read or listen that allows the information to be linked to the mind of that person. This is why Paul says "faith comes by hearing the word of God." Faith is the result of the mind of God being transferred to the mind of man in some type of linguistic form.
 
M

Mitspa

Guest
#50
You are not getting the point. Yes, the Lamb did not speak but the vision of the lamb takes place in the mind of John as a string of word. His mind attatches language to the symbols - this is a lamb - this lamb is standing - this lamb has been slain. John continues this representation of these symbols in the following linguistic form, "All who dwell on the earth will worship him, everyone whose name has not been written from the foundation of the world in the book of life of the Lamb who has been slain."
Now come on brother...lets have a honest discussion...the lamb was a symbolic type, well before the written Word was established through Moses...in fact there was many symbolic types in the Temple and elsewhere that was not explained in the written record but was faith pictures. Symbolism is such a large part of Gods way of speaking that the Lord almost always spoke in parabolic terms.
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,142
612
113
69
Alabama
#51
it is still prophetic written.
Now Joseph had a dream, and when he told it to his brothers they hated him even more.6 He said to them, "Hear this dream that I have dreamed:7 Behold, we were binding sheaves in the field, and behold, my sheaf arose and stood upright. And behold, your sheaves gathered around it and bowed down to my sheaf Genesis 37
for example.
how many sheaves of wheat have you saw bowing to each other.
It is still linguistic form no matter how it is received. This dream of Joseph must take linguistic form in the mind of Joseph or he would have never been able to convey that dream to his brothers.
 
Jan 27, 2013
4,769
18
0
#52
I am not sure you and I are even on the same page. You are making absolutely no sense.
funny, an other open ended quote to why your chain of reasoning cant answer to reason you used else ware.
 
Feb 19, 2015
313
2
0
#53
Each man's perspective is his reality. The unsaved man cannot perceive the perspective of the saved man.

For the cause of Christ
Roger

It is true that the unsaved man cannot perceive the perspective of the saved man, untill the unsaved man is ready to agree with God to admit they have sinned agasint God and deserve to burn in Hell.

It is not true that each man's perspective is his reality. A man's perspective can have little or nothing to do with reality. A lost person who thinks they have the right to exist outside of Hell simply because they are not in Hell now is completely out of touch with reality, and their perspective creates for themselves a false reality in which they are deceived while they are on thin ice melting over the fire of Hell, with one foot on top of the ice and the other foot already poking through and going down.

Reality is what God made it to be, and He clearly conveyed what it is in His Word. His Word is the guide to reality, our perspective is not the guide to His Word or to reality. Many people think the Holy Spirit leads them into all truth so they don't need to worry to much about what the Word of God says because they interpret it as they go along according to their own perspective claiming it's the Holy Spirit leading them into truth when they have no objective standard for discerning truth. That standard is supposed to be the written Word of God, not each person's personal perspective.
 
M

Mitspa

Guest
#54
It is still linguistic form no matter how it is received. This dream of Joseph must take linguistic form in the mind of Joseph or he would have never been able to convey that dream to his brothers.
Well he explained it in words, but the dream was not a dream of words, it was a dream of symbolic types. And again the root of all linguistics is pictures and types...so it must be considered in your presentation of the truth of Gods word? Right?
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,142
612
113
69
Alabama
#55
Now come on brother...lets have a honest discussion...the lamb was a symbolic type, well before the written Word was established through Moses...in fact there was many symbolic types in the Temple and elsewhere that was not explained in the written record but was faith pictures. Symbolism is such a large part of Gods way of speaking that the Lord almost always spoke in parabolic terms.
Why is this so hard for you to understand? I know the Lamb was a symbolic type. What I am trying to get you to see is the simple fact that the vision of the Lamb was recorded as a batch of words that we call the book of Revelation. Revealed information was given linguistic form in order to accommodate the limitations of the human mind. This is true of the entire text of scripture.
 
Jan 27, 2013
4,769
18
0
#56
It is still linguistic form no matter how it is received. This dream of Joseph must take linguistic form in the mind of Joseph or he would have never been able to convey that dream to his brothers.[/QUOT
is johns explaining a dream. joseph is telling a dream. yet wheat dont bow to anyone.

it was only following joseph life, you find out why they bowed to him. so dreams are something that need more than, linguistic reasoning or meaning to understand there meaning.
 
Feb 19, 2015
313
2
0
#58
royal is arguing outside revelation determines the validity of the Word of God rather than the Word of God determining the validity of the source of the outside revelation.
 
Feb 19, 2015
313
2
0
#59
He thinks he is gifted for interpretation based on an outside source which goew beyond words.
 
M

Mitspa

Guest
#60
Why is this so hard for you to understand? I know the Lamb was a symbolic type. What I am trying to get you to see is the simple fact that the vision of the Lamb was recorded as a batch of words that we call the book of Revelation. Revealed information was given linguistic form in order to accommodate the limitations of the human mind. This is true of the entire text of scripture.
The lamb is way before Johns Dream or vision! The Lamb was a symbolic part of the true faith from before Abraham! Do you not know that? Im not even talking about the book of Revelation, im talking about how God communicates His Will apart from the direct use of words.