Cherie, if you go back somewhere on page 5, I believe, I went through the entire OP and compared it to the Bible. The OP came up lacking.
I know you are new, but I think last year, we went through Joseph Prince and his new "hypergrace" theology in detail. It became obvious it was not Biblical, and in fact, further discussion was banned by the mods on account of it not being Biblical and in fact being a heresy. For some reason, Joanie-Marie continues to post his devotionals, which are easily debunked simply by comparing them to the Bible.
These devotionals are always verses pulled out of context to support the hypergrace heresy, which, in theological terms is called "eisegesis." That means "to read into the verse" something that supports a prior idea or concept. Properly, in hermeneutics, or Bible interpretation, the goal is exegesis. That means "to take out of the Bible" something that is actually there. NEVER to read "into" it.
Also, taking part of a verse, without the surrounding verse, or twisting it to mean something the verse was never meant to say, is another part of how heresies, including hypergrace are started. Joseph Prince is a master of out of context and twisting verses.
Here are a few links about his theology because you missed all this. Joanie Marie was here for at least part of this, under this profile and a previous one. So she knows what has been said about this.
Joseph Prince: Unmerited Favor - Christian Research Institute
Long For Truth: 4 Theological Flaws of Joseph Prince
As for me, I am finding it harder and harder to reply to JM's absurd rebuttals, when she never reads what is written, or perhaps she doesn't understand? And then there is another more serious issue. That is that I am running out of words to describe hypergrace and Joseph Prince's heresies, without crossing over the line. So, I may have to bow out of this fruitless discussion. However, I did want to address your concerns, being newer to the forum.