Catholic Heresy (for the record)

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jan 17, 2013
612
19
18
Are you a troll?
Are you?

I'm a Christian who simply laughed aloud at a man who in his utter ignorance of the teachings of Christ espouses constantly his hatred for his brothers, and then in his shameless audacity signs every single post with "For the cause of Christ".
 
G

GaryA

Guest
How does Christ who is God become separated from the Father who is God?
.
.
.


Genesis 1:

[SUP]1[/SUP] In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.



The phrase 'In the beginning' is referring to our beginning - 'time and space', as we know it.

It is talking about the beginning of the heaven and the earth - when God created the heaven and the earth.

How did He create it?

He created it "by the Word of His mouth" -- He 'spoke' it into existence.

God said - and it was...

Now -- understand that - because of the true nature of God - the very Word that He speaks is literally 'alive'.

This is because God is 'life'. All life comes from God. All that comes from God is alive.

It is impossible for anything to "come out" from God and not be 'alive'.

This is the true nature of the existence of God.

This 'Word' - that "comes out" from God - that is 'alive' -- is an "extension" of Himself -- the "outward expression" of Himself to His creation.


John 1:

[SUP]1[/SUP] In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. [SUP]2[/SUP] The same was in the beginning with God.



This "outward expression" of God to His creation -- which "was with God" - which "was God" - which "was in the beginning with God" -- was fully alive, and was fully God.

The Word did not "come into existence" - but, rather - "always was" - because of what is being said in verse 2 -- the Word already "was" at the beginning...

What these verses do not say is - that the 'Word' was 'Almighty God [ the Father ]' - in the "full personification" sense.

The Word was God; however, the Word was not [ "the actual", full, complete, "all-that-He-is" ] 'God the Father' Himself.

In the "full Godship" sense - yes.
In the "full personification" sense - no.


In terms of 'identity', this allows for a separate 'entity' that is [ fully ] God without being [ "the exacting original" ] 'God the Father'.

( "This is vitally important to the plan of salvation, as well as some other things involving the 'eternality' of God. And, not to mention, how He can have a Son without being His own Father..." )

In other words - there IS a separation - such that they are not "exactly identically" the same.

The separation exists in the difference between "God Himself" and "the outward expression of Himself" to His creation. Both are actually God. The difference is a matter of finite identity. The former is the Almighty 'personage' ( 'God the Father' ) - who has never been seen by man. ( Please understand the context -- in the "full personification" sense - not in the "effectual sense" of "the back parts" in Exodus 33:23 -- see John 1:18 below... ) The latter is the Almighty 'manifest' ( 'God the Word' ) - revealed to be seen by man.

God 'unseen' and God 'manifest' -- same God.

God the Father maintains His "rightful just 'private' dignified solemn sacred majestic holy existence"...
God the Word manifests His "rightful just 'public' dignified solemn sacred majestic holy existence"...

Also, the scope of the Word in this context goes beyond the text of the Bible ( which is called "the Word of God" ) - and includes "all things ever shown forth" in the "outward expression" of God to all of His creation.

So then - the Word is "the complete total-sum full living manifestation of the outward expression of God to His creation"...

The phrase 'In the beginning' means the exact same thing as it does in Genesis 1:1 -- and, does not represent the "beginning" of God, the Word, or Jesus.


John 1:

[SUP]3[/SUP] All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.



God the Word was the "means" or the "mechanism" - through which and by which - God the Father, "by the Word of His mouth", made everything.

It is perfectly legitimate and acceptable to say that God the Father created everything.

It is perfectly legitimate and acceptable to say that God the Word created everything.

Both of these statements are true and in perfect harmony.


John 1:

[SUP]4[/SUP] In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

[SUP]10[/SUP] He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.

[SUP]14[/SUP] And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

[SUP]18[/SUP] No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.



Jesus was born into the world as a person - body, soul, and spirit. His 'body' was human flesh. His 'soul' was the Word. His 'spirit' was the Holy Spirit.

At His conception, His body was "new"; however, His soul and spirit already existed together before that time - as the Word.

The Word does not have a beginning, and has always been with the Father. ( John 1:1 )

Jesus the person -- the Godhead bodily ( Colossians 2:9 ) -- had a beginning ( through human conception by the Holy Spirit ); however, the Word ( "Jesus the person, minus His body" ) always was...

From verse 14:

The Word ( already existing ) was made ( took on the form of ) flesh ( human conception and birth ).

The sonship of Jesus rests totally in the virgin birth. There is no such thing as 'the Son of God' outside of the bodily existence of Jesus. The Word was not 'the Son of God' before, or outside of, the birth of Jesus --- 'Almighty God' is the Father, 'Jesus Christ' is the Son.

Now -- understand that - after Jesus was raised from the dead, with His 'glorified' body, He ( being God ) could ( I believe ) appear to Abraham, for example, in that very same resurrected body -- because, He could "step inside and outside of time" and "make appearances" whenever He wished.

As for the 'Trinity'...

I believe in "the 'triune' nature" of God. I do not tend to think of Him in the full sense of "three persons" -- because -- a 'person' ( in the full sense ) is generally thought of as having body, soul, and spirit. Of course, God the Father - Who is 'Soul and Spirit' - and has no body - is thought of as a person ( in the full sense ). However, the Holy Spirit is never thought of as having any "part" of a person ( in the full sense ) except 'spirit'. So - while all three might be considered a "person" - strictly by virtue of their 'spirit' ( which happens to be the Holy Spirit for all three ) - each of the three is not a "person" ( in the full sense ) - having body, soul, and spirit.

So then -- whether you want to use the word "person" or not -- there are three, which are the same God:


[TABLE="width: 500, align: left"]
[TR]
[TD]God the Word / Jesus[/TD]
[TD]body, soul, and spirit[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]God the Father[/TD]
[TD]soul and spirit[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]God the Holy Spirit[/TD]
[TD]spirit[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]






.
.
.
"Food for thought..."

:)
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Are you?

I'm a Christian who simply laughed aloud at a man who in his utter ignorance of the teachings of Christ espouses constantly his hatred for his brothers, and then in his shameless audacity signs every single post with "For the cause of Christ".
Glad to know you are not a troll.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Are you?

I'm a Christian who simply laughed aloud at a man who in his utter ignorance of the teachings of Christ espouses constantly his hatred for his brothers, and then in his shameless audacity signs every single post with "For the cause of Christ".
I can only surmise that you do not comprehend what the cause of Christ encompasses.

I can only suggest that you laugh because you hate that I do not allow you to have your false piety. Jesus had the Pharisees to deal with and Jesus referred to them as vipers and the tombs filled with dead men's bones. Painted white on the outside to look pure yet inside they contained all the filth of death. Perfect description then as now of those who make a pretense of religion but are without a genuine knowledge of Gods saving grace. They would rescue a little bird that has fallen out of the nest and allow the souls of men to be condemned rather than teach the gospel that can give them eternal life.

Romans 1 speaks of those who knowing the recompense of God continue to do those things that God hates.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
Sep 16, 2014
1,278
23
0
It was the Blood that was shed on the Cross that washed us clean of all our sins. It was not His suffering that washed us clean of our sins.

Look at the shedding of the blood of the animals in the O.T for the cleansing of the sins of the people. Jesus was the ultimate sacrifice for our sins. The Cross is all about the blood of Jesus cleansing us of all our sins.

As for the Catholics we need to pray for them and bring to them the Gospel of Salvation. In Matthew 7:21-23 the Holy Spirit teaches us that not everybody who says "Lord, Lord" has received Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior. Today this applies to the Catholics. Instead of picking on them and fighting with them we need to love them and bring the message of Salvation to them.

Jesus taught its Love we need not hate and in house fighting.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
It was the Blood that was shed on the Cross that washed us clean of all our sins. It was not His suffering that washed us clean of our sins.

Look at the shedding of the blood of the animals in the O.T for the cleansing of the sins of the people. Jesus was the ultimate sacrifice for our sins. The Cross is all about the blood of Jesus cleansing us of all our sins.

As for the Catholics we need to pray for them and bring to them the Gospel of Salvation. In Matthew 7:21-23 the Holy Spirit teaches us that not everybody who says "Lord, Lord" has received Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior. Today this applies to the Catholics. Instead of picking on them and fighting with them we need to love them and bring the message of Salvation to them.

Jesus taught its Love we need not hate and in house fighting.
Reconcile that with Galatians 1:8 where Paul says though we or an angel from heaven preach any other gospel that we have preached unto you let him be accursed.

Shall we allow error to go unchallenged? Shall we allow souls to perish because of ignorance of the gospel?

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
Sep 21, 2014
214
1
0
It was the Blood that was shed on the Cross that washed us clean of all our sins. It was not His suffering that washed us clean of our sins.

Look at the shedding of the blood of the animals in the O.T for the cleansing of the sins of the people. Jesus was the ultimate sacrifice for our sins. The Cross is all about the blood of Jesus cleansing us of all our sins.

As for the Catholics we need to pray for them and bring to them the Gospel of Salvation. In Matthew 7:21-23 the Holy Spirit teaches us that not everybody who says "Lord, Lord" has received Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior. Today this applies to the Catholics. Instead of picking on them and fighting with them we need to love them and bring the message of Salvation to them.

Jesus taught its Love we need not hate and in house fighting.
The thread title is an invitation to Catholic bashing. It's a Rule #2 violation in my opinion. I haven't read the entire thread but I am appalled by the hate, lies, bigotry, misrepresentation, quotes taken out of context, and snippets from anti-Catholic publications. Anyone reading this thread with no knowledge of Catholicism could come away believing so much garbage.


None of the early reformers believed Mary was a sinner. So it's a safe conclusion that those who subscribe to this kind of thinking are in rebellion to their own spiritual forefathers (who invented "Bible-alone theology). It must be recorded somewhere who the first post-reformation Christian was who invented this insult to Our Lord's mother. Anybody have a reference?
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
The thread title is an invitation to Catholic bashing. It's a Rule #2 violation in my opinion. I haven't read the entire thread but I am appalled by the hate, lies, bigotry, misrepresentation, quotes taken out of context, and snippets from anti-Catholic publications. Anyone reading this thread with no knowledge of Catholicism could come away believing so much garbage.


None of the early reformers believed Mary was a sinner. So it's a safe conclusion that those who subscribe to this kind of thinking are in rebellion to their own spiritual forefathers (who invented "Bible-alone theology). It must be recorded somewhere who the first post-reformation Christian was who invented this insult to Our Lord's mother. Anybody have a reference?
Your opinion is duly noted. Now having Catholic family members I have found little in this thread that is untrue. I am watching my father in law face the end of his life. He is miserable and sacred to die. He has trusted the church all his life and he innately knows that they are lying to him but its too late for him to change. He has been presented the gospel and he is too steeped in tradition to receive it. Too religious to receive the simple truth that Jesus saves and not the church. Salvation by grace and not through the rites and works of the Catholic church. He very much believes that the communion elements impart saving grace. He goes to mass everyday to attempt to ease the burden he carries in his heart. Rome adds to his burden everyday. No hope and no relief it is very sad.

Mary never claimed to be sinless. I think she would have been horrified at the thought.

This thread has only pointed out the many anti biblical positions of the Catholic church. It is not an attack on individual Catholics. True piety and holiness does not vaunt itself. Bashing no, warning yes.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
Sep 21, 2014
214
1
0
Your opinion is duly noted. Now having Catholic family members I have found little in this thread that is untrue.
Having Catholic family members does not make you an authority on Catholicism and most of what is in this thread on Catholicism is based on lies and bigotry that you accept as true.(out of blind prejudice)

I am watching my father in law face the end of his life. He is miserable and sacred to die
.

It's normal to face death with difficulty and you want to blame the Church for that.
He has trusted the church all his life and he innately knows that they are lying to him but its too late for him to change.
This is typical anti-Catholic rhetoric. "he innately knows that they are lying to him". Really? Are you a mind reader? You know the state of his soul?
He has been presented the gospel and he is too steeped in tradition to receive it.
Which gospel? the evangelical gospel? The non-denominational gospel which is different from the evangelical gospel? or the baptist gospel which is different from both? Or has he been presented with your opinion of what the gospel is?
Too religious to receive the simple truth that Jesus saves and not the church.
This is a good example of twisting. The Church's primary mission is to teach salvation through Jesus. I would be happy to quote the official catechism but you would just ignore it. BTW, it is a doctrine you borrowed from us.
Salvation by grace and not through the rites and works of the Catholic church.
This is really muddled. Salvation by grace is a Catholic doctrine, and I submit you don't have a clue what "rites and works" are.
He very much believes that the communion elements impart saving grace. He goes to mass everyday to attempt to ease the burden he carries in his heart. Rome adds to his burden everyday. No hope and no relief it is very sad.
What's sad is your blind prejudice, and judging the Church based on the struggles of a man in his last days.

Mary never claimed to be sinless. I think she would have been horrified at the thought.
Then you should have no problem answering my question. If none of the reformers believed Mary to be a sinner, who invented the insulting doctrine? If you cannot or will not give a name, at least give a time frame when "bible-Christians" invented it.

This thread has only pointed out the many anti biblical positions of the Catholic church. It is not an attack on individual Catholics. True piety and holiness does not vaunt itself. Bashing no, warning yes.
Just answer the question.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Having Catholic family members does not make you an authority on Catholicism and most of what is in this thread on Catholicism is based on lies and bigotry that you accept as true.(out of blind prejudice)
I read the book. Be honest the Catholic church does not teach salvation by grace.
It's normal to face death with difficulty and you want to blame the Church for that.
I've seen believers face death with true abiding peace. The Catholic church denies peace even for the pope. No certainty of salvation only a hope for a short time in purgatory.
This is typical anti-Catholic rhetoric. "he innately knows that they are lying to him". Really? Are you a mind reader? You know the state of his soul?
I know when someone is fearful of what they face. Rome teaches purgatory which burns with the fires of hell. He knows he's a sinner and has less confidence in Rome's ability to save him the closer he gets to his death. I have eyes to see and ears to hear.
Which gospel? the evangelical gospel? The non-denominational gospel which is different from the evangelical gospel? or the baptist gospel which is different from both? Or has he been presented with your opinion of what the gospel is?
How about the gospel of Christ the one the real apostles declared? Not the perversion Rome has made it to be.
This is a good example of twisting. The Church's primary mission is to teach salvation through Jesus. I would be happy to quote the official catechism but you would just ignore it. BTW, it is a doctrine you borrowed from us.
Quote away perhaps you can refresh some of your Catholic buddies about what they are supposed to believe.
This is really muddled. Salvation by grace is a Catholic doctrine, and I submit you don't have a clue what "rites and works" are. What's sad is your blind prejudice, and judging the Church based on the struggles of a man in his last days.
Grace meted out by the church. Grace received by water baptism, by confirmation, by communion elements, by absolution and penance. Not the grace God gives to the sinner who humbly comes to the foot of the cross under conviction of the Holy Spirit seeking forgiveness.
Then you should have no problem answering my question. If none of the reformers believed Mary to be a sinner, who invented the insulting doctrine? If you cannot or will not give a name, at least give a time frame when "bible-Christians" invented it.
Paul wrote it in Romans chapter 3. For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God. Catholics have invented nothing but falsehoods regarding the gospel.
Just answer the question.
Just be honest with yourself. I have tasted of the goodness of Christ and have no interest in the false teachings of Rome. Even the pope has no certain hope that he will avoid the fires of purgatory. Masses for the dead will be offered but God does not hear. With their lips these serve Me but their hearts are far from Me.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Just answer the question.
Repeating Romans 3:23 where Paul says by inspiration of the Holy Spirit All men including Mary are sinners, all have come short of the glory of God. Romans 3:10 There is none righteous no not one all the way to verse 17.

You cannot deflect this as a doctrine of men but you must see it as doctrine given by God.

If you have a problem it is with God and not me.

Now tell me how a Roman Catholic is saved. If you can.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

blue_ladybug

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2014
70,869
9,601
113
Repeating Romans 3:23 where Paul says by inspiration of the Holy Spirit All men including Mary are sinners, all have come short of the glory of God. Romans 3:10 There is none righteous no not one all the way to verse 17.

You cannot deflect this as a doctrine of men but you must see it as doctrine given by God.

If you have a problem it is with God and not me.

Now tell me how a Roman Catholic is saved. If you can.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
Romans 3:23: "For all have sinned, and fallen short of the glory of God." This verse does NOT say "all men INCLUDING MARY are sinners!" LOL! Was Mary a sinner? Yes of course she was, but Romans 3:23 does NOT state that she was. :)
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Romans 3:23: "For all have sinned, and fallen short of the glory of God." This verse does NOT say "all men INCLUDING MARY are sinners!" LOL! Was Mary a sinner? Yes of course she was, but Romans 3:23 does NOT state that she was. :)
Come on! Mary was not part of all men? In context all men is everybody both men and women.

The heresy of Rome is no laughing matter to me. You know this doctrine leads to the assumption of Mary? Rome teaches that Mary did not die but was assumed into heaven. For if Mary was without sin she could never die.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
Sep 21, 2014
214
1
0
Romans 3:23 or 10-17 does not disqualify Mary from being "Full of Grace". And it still does not answer the question. Who or what time period after the reformation did "Bible-Christians" invent the "Mary is a sinner" theory? Or has all of Christendom been wrong until such time? I already gave the answer. It's a man made insult to Our Lord's mother, not because it's true, but because out of the long list of anti-Catholic falsehoods, that one is particularly offensive to Catholics, including Jesus Himself. It's spiritual sadism. My point is this: how can any Christian who accepts notions pulled out of thin air 300 years ago declare anyone else to be in heresy?
 
G

GaryA

Guest
Who or what time period after the reformation did "Bible-Christians" invent the "Mary is a sinner" theory?
No-one invented "Mary is a sinner" -- the Bible indicates clearly that she was a sinner - just like everyone else...

Jesus is the only human being - who has ever lived on the face of this earth - who lived "sinless" --- if you do not understand this properly - or do not agree with this - you are completely and entirely missing "the whole point" and "the central meaning" of the Gospel message...


... that one is particularly offensive to Catholics, including Jesus Himself.
So -- you are saying that Jesus was a Catholic?
 
Jan 17, 2013
612
19
18
Repeating Romans 3:23 where Paul says by inspiration of the Holy Spirit All men including Mary are sinners, all have come short of the glory of God. Romans 3:10 There is none righteous no not one all the way to verse 17.

You cannot deflect this.....

For the cause of Christ
Roger
Jesus said;
"Truly, I say to you, among those born of women there has risen no one greater than John the Baptist;"
(Mat. 11:11)

Jesus was born of a woman. Is John the Baptist then greater than Jesus?
Of course not.

Picking and choosing your verses, as you do, with no regard for the body of scripture, only serves to twist the teachings of Christ for your own hateful and utterly ignorant cause, which btw is certainly not the "cause for Christ", Roger.
 
K

kennethcadwell

Guest
Jesus said;
"Truly, I say to you, among those born of women there has risen no one greater than John the Baptist;"
(Mat. 11:11)

Jesus was born of a woman. Is John the Baptist then greater than Jesus?
Of course not.

Picking and choosing your verses, as you do, with no regard for the body of scripture, only serves to twist the teachings of Christ for your own hateful and utterly ignorant cause, which btw is certainly not the "cause for Christ", Roger.
That is true just as you only gave half the scripture you just said.

Matthew 11:11
Verily I say unto you, Among them that are born of women there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist: notwithstanding he that is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.