I got this from gotquestions.org.Im not looking to debate about this, we just need to see two points of view on this.
The error of "Partial Depravity versus Total Depravity" is that BOTH SYSTEMS redefine grace.
The Total Depravity camp have saving grace defined as "Irresistible Grace" which offsets the "Inability of Man."
The Partial Depravity camp have saving grace defined as "Prevenient Grace" which offsets the "Inability of Man" but they teach that it can be resisted.
The truth is very simple though for the Bible makes no such distinctions in regards to saving grace for it teaches...
Tit 2:11 For
the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men,
Tit 2:12 Teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world;
Saving grace has appeared to all men. Saving grace teaches all men the way they ought to go. Saving grace
does not offset anything because all men have the ability to choose.
It is erroneous to teach the "Inability" of Total Depravity. Likewise it is erroneous to teach that man can either accept or reject salvation apart from any influence from God. God has already influenced all men because his saving grace has already appeared to all men teaching them the way they should go. All men have been given a measure of light by the Word (Joh 1:9). The issue is to whether individuals CHOOSE to receive it or reject it. We either abide in the truth (doer of the word) or we rebel against it (refuse to do it).
The condemnation is in REJECTING the light.
Joh 3:19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
Joh 3:20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.
Joh 3:21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
The only reason that people have redefined grace is due to the underlying error of man being "born a sinner." Thus, under this error, actual sin is the mere symptom of a birth sickness as opposed to being rooted in the free exercise of the will. Throw the underlying error away and the Bible begins to make sense.