We are commanded to obey. I have never said you should disobey God.
That is not the question? I
didn't ask if you ever said if we should disobey God". So you dont want to answer okay.
I have not said that either. I do not know where you are getting this idea.
I get the idea because you attack me saying I am trying to have good works or whatever because I say we must obey God.
Cmon, why are you beating around the bush.
1. Sense God has commanded us to obey him - are you saying we do not have to?
2. Are you saying if we do not obey him we can still go to heaven?
That's where this is going. You know that.
Your menstrual rags will not save you.
straw man, never said they would. Were talking about obeidence to his commands. Stay on subject.
You can pile up as many bloody tampons and chuckie cheese tokens you want, but they will not atone. Only Christ can save you. You are wicked and vile.* Cotex doesn't take care of that.
More straw man, not the arguement. Were talking about obedience, your trying to change it into something else.
Obedience in which you admit is commanded to us, and that we should not disobey. So are you saying if we do disobey, and not keep this command we will still go to heaven?
Quit fooling yourself with your works righteousness. You cannot work your way to God. Obedience comes as a result of having been saved.
Why is it that you all ALWAYS revert to this straw man when dealing with the subject of obedience?
Like I said, and your proving it, you NEED and WANT me to say this, otherwise you have no argument.
OBEDIENCE OBEDIENCE OBEDIENCE answer the questions or dont. If not quit trying to attack people or least wait until you able to defend what your saying without the straw man arguments.
You still have no even
answered what you started. It' is because you cant, because you can see the inconsistency in your own belief before you even say it.
So what do you do? SWITCH lets talk about how good works and deeds dont save, then I prove that point, instead of what I actually said, and the argument at hand, an no one will notice I am only refuting myself sense I made this whole works thing up, and everyone will agree.
No, Libertarian Free Will is an Enlightenment notion produced by heathen who were insolent God-haters.
Okay then your back to saying they did not have a choice to be saved. So then God created them just to be punished. They had no chance, and Jesus wrongly places the blame on what they did and did not do Matt 25:40-f
So again, your theology has God punishing people for no reason other than they were wicked, yet they did not have a choice to be righteousness, because God did not choose to call them.
So call it want you want, dress it how you will, it is stupid.
John 6:44
44 “No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them, and I will raise them up at the last day.
And ye calls/draws us by the gospel II Thess 2:4. Then we have a choice which we are to do. You believe their is no chioice, so then those who refuse, could not have accepted, therefore they were created only to be punished.
Would you have a child just to punish him? If not why not? Sinful? Immoral? But you have God doing this.
Romans 3:11
“There is no one righteous, not even one;
11 there is no one who understands;
there is no one who seeks God.
Describing the condition of Israel. SO what? Do yo u think this means there will never be none rightoues? Or none who ever seek God?
How are the righteous on the right hand of Christ if there are none?
So are yo going answer what you started concerning obedience?
Just throwing in a straw man did not fool anyone. SO get back to the actual argument.