Attack of the Judaizers

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

john832

Senior Member
May 31, 2013
11,365
186
63
So you set John against Paul, who is not under the law (1Co 9:20). . .and thereby reveal your misunderstanding of Scripture.

And until you reconcile them, your understanding of Scripture remains faulty.
Just speculation on my part, but I don't think Historicist is the one here with faulty understanding.
 

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,240
6,531
113
I believe I understand well what our Lord was saying in your quote, but I do not get how it relates to my post? Thank you.........

If people who throw around the term new covenant would look at what is written about it, how the truth is to be written on our inward parts on the flesh tablet of our heart, then continue to read how it will no longer be said, know the Lord, know the Lord, for all will know the lord from the least up, perhaps something will dawn on these purporters.

Does it not stand to reason something is amiss with those who come in saying know the Lord, know the Lord? This post is an honest question, so keep it honest in response please.
When Jesus prophesied: "I never knew you" (Matt. 7:23) it was in the context of lawlessness ("iniquity").

 

john832

Senior Member
May 31, 2013
11,365
186
63
The fourth commandment sabbath was never one and the same with the Old Covenant ceremonial sabbaths, this is proved by 1900 years of Christian history. The early church, the Protestant reformers, Charles H. Spurgeon, D. L. Moody and all evangelical leaders, until recent decades, did not try to reduce the Ten Commandments to nine. Why do you?

The Sabbath is actually a perpetual Covenant of it's own...

Exo 31:16 Therefore the children of Israel shall keep the Sabbath, to observe the Sabbath throughout their generations as a perpetual covenant.


Isa 56:6 "Also the sons of the foreigner Who join themselves to the LORD, to serve Him, And to love the name of the LORD, to be His servants— Everyone who keeps from defiling the Sabbath, And holds fast My covenant—
 
2

2Thewaters

Guest
People who hate Jews won't like it in heaven
There will be a lot of Jews there
and they will keep the Sabbath...
Read your
Jewish Bible

If you repent it may be Jesus will adopt you,
repentance means saying sorry for anti-Jewish sentiments.
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
LT said:
Interracial marriage was against the Old Covenant, for the same reason that the high preist could only marry a virgin, and for the same reason that adultery always involves a married woman... bloodline security and purity.

A woman always knows that her child is hers. But if a woman has cheated, a man will always have suspicions about the bloodline of his child.
Also with intermarriage, God called the Jews to be set apart in a special way. Now that the Gentiles have been en-grafted into the family of God, inter-marriage has no bearing on moral standing.

We are now set apart by the love that has been given to us, and set apart by the sanctifying work of the Holy Spirit. Race is no longer a morality, but is blotted out by the blood of Christ!
Salmon the father of Boaz, whose mother was Rahab.
Boaz the father of Obed, whose mother was Ruth.
And Judah, whose mother was Tamar. . .all in the ancestry of the Messiah, showing that in his kingdom

there would no longer be Jew or Greek. . .
 
Last edited:
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
OP

Recently I have noticed a greater influence of modern day Judaizers here at CC. A Modern Judaizer is that believes another gospel. They believe and post another gospel of Christ plus a portion of mosaic law. Paul wrote the book of Galatians to counter Judaizers of his day.

Paul wrote:
But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, he is to be accursed! Gal. 1:8

The false gospel of the Judaizers never leads one to salvation. They teach a contradiction of grace plus law. The Galation Judaizers taught that one must follow Christ and be circumcised. Today the modern Judaizers teach "Christ plus sabbath observance" or "Christ plus Kosher foods", etc. What they do not realize is that any gospel message of Christ plus anything is a false Gospel. A little leaven leavens the whole dough.

This is why Paul wrote:
You have been severed from Christ, you who are seeking to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace. Gal 5:4

This false gospel severs a person from salvation. They are not fit for the kingdom and those who follow them are at risk of being cut off from Christ.

I never wish to get into a debate over denominational theology because some things do not cause a loss of salvation. On the other hand, I feel compelled to warn Judaizers in hopes they turn from the false gospel to the true gospel which saves.
Do you think they are going to hell, and have no faith, and distort the law as the Pharisees did? Not to debate, just wanting to know. You gave good warning if they are destined for eternal death.

1 Samuel 16:7 (KJV)
[SUP]7 [/SUP]But the LORD said unto Samuel, Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature; because I have refused him: for the LORD seeth not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart.

John 7:24 (KJV)
[SUP]24 [/SUP]Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.
I believe the bible is saying that a person who believes "Christ plus any portion of Mosiac law has lost their salvation unless they repent. The two verses I posted state this.
What's your take on these four scripture references? Does the Mosaic Law cause one to disbelieve Jesus' words, and does the spiritual aspects of the law cause one to revert back to a carnal mind?

John 5:46-47 (KJV)
[SUP]46 [/SUP]For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me.
[SUP]47 [/SUP]But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?

Romans 7:12 (KJV)
[SUP]12 [/SUP]Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.

Romans 7:14 (KJV)
[SUP]14 [/SUP]For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.

Romans 7:22 (KJV)
[SUP]22 [/SUP]For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:

Romans 8:7 (KJV)
[SUP]7 [/SUP]Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.
John 5:46-47 (KJV)
[SUP]46 [/SUP]For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me.
[SUP]47 [/SUP]But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?
This passage is a castigation of the religious leaders of Christ's day. I don't think it is about the law at all but it seems to be about unbelief.

Romans 7:12 (KJV)
[SUP]12 [/SUP]Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.
I do not believe this scripture is referencing the Mosaic law at all. I have noticed in past conversations with a Judaizer that he latched on to every NT usage of the term law or commandment to justify his observance of parts of the Mosiac law. He never saw a difference be tween the Mosaic laws and the laws/commandments of Christ.

In the New Testament we are told to follow Christ's Commandments. Christ affirmed parts of the moral law that was also stated in the OT. In the NT 9 of the 10 commandments are affirmed, sabbath observance, festival observance and kosher foods were not.

Christ seemed to downgrade some of the Mosaic laws. He and His disciples picked grain from a field which was a clear violation of the the letter of Mosaic law but it did not violate the spirit of the law. Another time Christ It is not what goes into a man that defiles him but what comes out. Again this contradicts the law of Moses, "lest you be defiled by them" Lev. 11 Jesus also seemed to violate ritual washing laws.
So do you think it was part of God’s perfect plan to have His Words downgraded by His own son?

Do you realize Sabbath and rest mean the same and are referring to cease from ones own works? And you are labeling those who observe the Sabbath as being legalizers by their own works? That is a clear 180-degree contradiction. You speak oxymoron stuff.

Hebrews 4:10 (KJV)
[SUP]10 [/SUP]For he that is entered into his rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from his.

What did God do on the first Sabbath made for us? The Sabbath was made for man to cease from their own works and you are saying they are keeping the Sabbath and that is their own works. WOW! Evidently you feel justified by your works of denying the Sabbath and saying it’s wrong, and are justified by teaching others not to cease from their own works same as yourself.:confused:

Matthew 5:19 (KJV)
[SUP]19 [/SUP]Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.


So John and Jesus just used Moses for an excuse? John 5:44-45 (KJV)
[SUP]44 [/SUP]How can ye believe, which receive honour one of another, and seek not the honour that cometh from God only?
[SUP]45 [/SUP]Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust.

So you are saying what God gave to Moses Christ changed and is different now?

That's 2 here is more..... You’re doing good so far even though I don't see it as you do. I am curious how you interpret scripture.

Romans 7:14 (KJV)
[SUP]14[/SUP] For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.

Romans 7:22 (KJV)
[SUP]22[/SUP] For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:

Romans 8:7 (KJV)
[SUP]7[/SUP] Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.
These verses mention law and I did answer you about these verses in my previous post.

The Judaizer sees the word law and assumes that to mean the Mosaic Law. However, a detailed look into what the NT calls law is not the same as the Law of Moses at all. All the ritual requirements of the Mosaic Law have been fulfilled by Christ and have no hold on Christians. Judaizers are the ones who seek "Christ plus Mosaic law(s)". While NT law and commandments have been given to us by Christ.

Christ affirmed 9 out of the 10 commandments and he never affirmed observance of sabbath, dietary restrictions, animal sacrifice or ritual washing. We are still under obligation to love God and our neighbor. We as Christians are told to obey the Moral laws Christ gave us. We as Christians are not under the ritual laws of the Mosaic laws. If think otherwise, then you maybe a Judaizer or plain confused. The Judaizer's gospel is "Christ plus one or more aspects of the ritual laws of Moses". Jesus clearly taught the old covenant and the new covenant are not compatible.
I didn’t see you address these verses as I searched through your thread twice to see if I missed something. Maybe you can point out to me the post that you are referring to?
You said previously that Jesus was not referring to the Mosaic Law when I quoted
John 5:46-47 (KJV)
[SUP]46 [/SUP]For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me.
[SUP]47 [/SUP]But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?

Are you saying now that Moses is not equated with the law?
Strong’s 3551 Law means “food for grazing” all the way through the NT, and there are exceptions such as “father in law, and daughter in law, mother in law, lawlessness etc.

Strong’s 460 in Romans 2:12 (KJV) means those who are lawless will die without the “food for grazing”.
[SUP]12 [/SUP]For as many as have sinned without law (460) shall also perish without law (3551) and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law;

Romans 7:14 (KJV)

[SUP]14[/SUP] For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.

Romans 7:22 (KJV)
[SUP]22[/SUP] For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:

Romans 8:7 (KJV)
[SUP]7[/SUP] Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.
These three verses, that you said you addressed, all are Strong’s 3551 as inGalatians 2:16
[SUP]16 [/SUP]Knowing that a man is not justified by the *works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.

Self justifying *“works” (2041, an obligated effort by means of self justification) is what to focus on, not the ones who observe this food for grazing. To observe the law through faith is right. As long as I have been in CC, I have never seen anyone say that they are justified by the observance of the law and say that’s right to do minus faith. All the people that are observers of the Mosaic Law advocate a sincere faith.

So we see the original intent of our Father in Heaven was to give us food for grazing such as the spiritual meaning of the manna given the desert of Sinai. We should never say that this food is corrupt because of the completion of God’s purpose through Christ Jesus. It is another oxymoron that you would want people to be lawless. I’m sure that isn’t your intention, but that’s exactly what you are teaching.
 
Last edited:

john832

Senior Member
May 31, 2013
11,365
186
63
People who hate Jews won't like it in heaven
There will be a lot of Jews there
and they will keep the Sabbath...
Read your
Jewish Bible

If you repent it may be Jesus will adopt you,
repentance means saying sorry for anti-Jewish sentiments.
You won't need to read a Jewish Bible to find that in the Kingdom the Sabbath will be kept, it is right there in the good ole KJV...

Isa 66:22 For as the new heavens and the new earth, which I will make, shall remain before me, saith the LORD, so shall your seed and your name remain.
Isa 66:23 And it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before me, saith the LORD.
 
Last edited:
Dec 29, 2013
599
6
0
I agree john832, except for the fact that "sabbath," in the context of the fourth commandment, does not mean Saterday. All it means is one day in a cycle of sevens. History proves that the day we now call Sunday was observed as the fourth commandment sabbath from the time of the apostles up to and through the nineteenth century. The "blue laws," once in our nations statute books prove this. The bottom line is, the Ten Commandments were not reduced to nine as a result of Jesus and the New Covenant. That they were is a teaching "crept in" in recent decades.
 

john832

Senior Member
May 31, 2013
11,365
186
63
I agree john832, except for the fact that "sabbath," in the context of the fourth commandment, does not mean Saterday. All it means is one day in a cycle of sevens. History proves that the day we now call Sunday was observed as the fourth commandment sabbath from the time of the apostles up to and through the nineteenth century. The "blue laws," once in our nations statute books prove this. The bottom line is, the Ten Commandments were not reduced to nine as a result of Jesus and the New Covenant. That they were is a teaching "crept in" in recent decades.
Nope, it means the seventh day. The Commandment in Ex 20 looks back to the creation week. Now which day was it that God hallowed and set apart? The seventh day, not just a day.
 
L

LT

Guest
What I see on this thread is 4 points of view, 2 of which are in error.
Two members on this thread are preaching pure legalism, opposed by Christ, and by the Epistles.
One member is going too far the other way, and preaching license to sin.

The rest of us agree.

We may have a different perspective or focus, but looking at the same object.

We all understand that we are saved by faith alone, not of works.
We all respect the Law of Moses, and seek to please God by living out the Spirit of the Law.
We all know that once saved, our goal is to pursue the holiness of God, and the spreading of His Good News.

I pray to the Lord, and beg of you all that we learn to agree in the Lord on this issue.
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
That makes no sense, nor do I find scripture to back you up.
There is no scripture that says that the old
covenant was destroyed because a new one was added.
Wrong. . .do you not know the NT any better than that?

"The ministry Jesus has received is as superior to theirs (OT High Priests) as
the covenant of which he is mediator is superior to the old one, and it is founded on better promises.
If there had been nothing wrong with the first covenant, no place would have been sought for another.
But God found fault with the people and said. . .'I will make a new covenant. . .
By calling this covenant "new," he has made the first (old) one (Sinaitic) obsolete.
And what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear." (Heb 8:7-8, 13)

What part of "disappear" do you not understand?
 
Last edited:

john832

Senior Member
May 31, 2013
11,365
186
63
What I see on this thread is 4 points of view, 2 of which are in error.
Two members on this thread are preaching pure legalism, opposed by Christ, and by the Epistles.
One member is going too far the other way, and preaching license to sin.

The rest of us agree.

We may have a different perspective or focus, but looking at the same object.

We all understand that we are saved by faith alone, not of works.
We all respect the Law of Moses, and seek to please God by living out the Spirit of the Law.
We all know that once saved, our goal is to pursue the holiness of God, and the spreading of His Good News.

I pray to the Lord, and beg of you all that we learn to agree in the Lord on this issue.
Well, I am glad to know that truth is found in the majority.
 

john832

Senior Member
May 31, 2013
11,365
186
63
Wrong. . .do you not know the NT any better than that?

"The ministry Jesus has received is as superior to theirs (OT High Priests) as
the covenant of which he is mediator is superior to the old one, and it is founded on better promises.
If there had been nothing wrong with the first covenant, no place would have been sought for another.
But God found fault with the people and said. . .'I will make a new covenant. . .
By calling this covenant "new," he has made the first (old) one (Sinaitic) obsolete.
And what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear." (Heb 8:7-8, 13)

What part of "disappear" do you not understand?
What part of will soon being future not past tense do you not understand?
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Of all the commandments, which is the most important?“The most important one,” answered Yeshua, “is this: ‘Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one. Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength...."
Yeshua said: What is written in the Law? How do you read it?
He answered:" Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind...."
Of all the commandments - which commandments?
What is written in the Law?
Is this commandment for Christians? Gentile Christian? Where is this commandment from? Is it not from the Law?
How to love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind?
Lip service?
Deut 6:4-9 Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one.Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength. These commandments that I give you today are to be on your hearts. Impress them on your children. Talk about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up. Tie them as symbols on your hands and bind them on your foreheads. Write them on the doorframes of your houses and on your gates.
These verses look awfulyl similar to what Yeshua said in Mark 12:29-30 for a reason.
For accuracy's sake, the part in blue doesn't look similar to anything at Mk 12:29-30 in my Bible.
 
L

LT

Guest
Well, I am glad to know that truth is found in the majority.
Truth is found in the Word of God. I am glad to see that so many in this forum trust the Word of God.
It hurts to see several wolves in among the sheep.

It also seems that you don't mind being called a legalist...

I didn't want to name names, but you just identified yourself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dec 29, 2013
599
6
0
Elin, where do you get the idea that the "Greeks" who intermarried with Jews were a mixture of the other "families of the earth" (Amos 3:2)? You are reading this into the text. The "Greeks" were Israelites, non-Jew Israelites of the dispersion. This is who the Pharisees were speaking of when they said, "will he go unto the dispersed among the Gentiles and teach the Gentiles" (John 7:35). The Gentiles in this context were the Greeks you speak of, the non-Jew Greek speaking Israelites of the dispersion. These were the "...other sheep I have which are not of this fold" (John 10:16). The Jews therefore, were not marrying out of their race, they were marrying after their kind, a command repeated throughtout scripture. The religious establishment does not want us to know this.
 

john832

Senior Member
May 31, 2013
11,365
186
63
Truth is found in the Word of God. I am glad to see that so many in this forum trust the Word of God.
It hurts to see several wolves in among the sheep.

It also seems that you don't mind being called a legalist...
If you mean by legalist one who keeps the Commandments...

Mat 19:17 So He said to him, "Why do you call Me good? No one is good but One, that is, God. But if you want to enter into life, keep the commandments."

Rev 14:12 Here is the patience of the saints; here are those who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus.

Rev 22:14 Blessed are those who do His commandments, that they may have the right to the tree of life, and may enter through the gates into the city.

1Co 7:19 Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing, but keeping the commandments of God is what matters.

Joh 14:15 "If you love Me, keep My commandments.

Joh 14:21 He who has My commandments and keeps them, it is he who loves Me. And he who loves Me will be loved by My Father, and I will love him and manifest Myself to him."

Joh 15:10 If you keep My commandments, you will abide in My love, just as I have kept My Father's commandments and abide in His love.

Then by all means label me a legalist. I believe that I should keep the Commandments.
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
LT, the letter of the law says "thou shalt not commit adultery" and the spirit of the law
There is no "letter of the law" nor is there "spirit of the law" in the NT.

There is only "the letter" and "the Spirit."

"Letter of the law" and "spirit of the law" are man-made notions, which are the basis of your false dichotomy.
 

john832

Senior Member
May 31, 2013
11,365
186
63
Truth is found in the Word of God. I am glad to see that so many in this forum trust the Word of God.
It hurts to see several wolves in among the sheep.

It also seems that you don't mind being called a legalist...

I didn't want to name names, but you just identified yourself.
Now, in light of the scriptures I posted in Post #277, do you believe that you should keep the Commandments or not?
 

WomanLovesTX

Senior Member
Jan 1, 2010
1,390
38
0
Sin is the trasngression of the law. Oops, looks like I just admited it.

You know nothing of me yet you have several times put words in my mouth which I have never posted. Frankly, I do not appreciate that. It is intellectual laziness on your part. Sunday is the day I have gone to church for decades. Though I can go to any church service on any day. Sunday is a tradition in the Church as it is the day Christ rose from the dead on.
Sunday is a tradition in the Church as it is the day Christ rose from the dead on.
Mar 7:9 And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.

Col 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.

I am wondering, because of your "belief" that Jesus "rose from the dead" on a Sunday, if you believe He was placed in the grave on Friday? Only can count 3 nights and 3 days if He was buried on a Wednesday, just before sundown and therefore He rose before the close of the Sabbath. He was discovered to have already risen on the first day when the women came to the grave. You have zero proof He was risen on the first day, only a speculation. What I have is assurance that He died on Nisan 14, which was a Wednesday. At sundown on that Wednesday would be the beginning of Nisan 15th. If you know the OT, Leviticus 23 explains all the Feast of God (no, they are not Jewish Feast, God said they are HIS and for all His children for ever.) Oh wait! I'm bad...you are not God's children of Israel. Never mind. The scriptures don't apply to you.

Perhaps this scripture applies to you, since you are a Gentile...

Jer 16:19 O LORD, my strength, and my fortress, and my refuge in the day of affliction, the Gentiles shall come unto thee from the ends of the earth, and shall say, Surely our fathers have inherited lies, vanity, and things wherein there is no profit.