Continuationism vs cessastionism?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
#21
Actually... this was a careless and hasty response. Dead-raising was not among the gifts.
Wasn't it? Oh well....

How about miraculous tongues?

Unless multitudes of Jews from different nations are being converted by Christians miraculously preaching the Gospel in unlearned foreign languages....then you need to subscribe to some kind of cessationism.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#22
Only one passage of scripture addresses cessation. The subject is a matter of interpretation and conceptualization. Few will change their view if they're convinced they hold the truth, just like every other doctrinal position.

Cessation and Continuation are both abused at their extremes. It's unfortunate that there's much more rhetoric and opinion than true exegesis. I spent several years praying and fasting while reading and studying for a clear exegetical understanding that wasn't based on my own or others' pre-supposed disposition. I doubt sharing the entire exegesis will be of any effect on most, even though most positions are "staked out" based on something other than a careful study of the original language.

"That which is perfect (teleios)" is NOT the completed canon according to a thorough exegesis of that passage. That doesn't warrant the rampant wholesale abuse, misuse, and perversion of gifts that deemphasizes the Giver and also exalts the unknown words of tongues over the Word that was made flesh.
hi PPS teleios in that context isn't The Second Advent.
the subject is knowledge or understanding (per the revelatory gifts).
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#23
Wasn't it? Oh well....

How about miraculous tongues?

Unless multitudes of Jews from different nations are being converted by Christians miraculously preaching the Gospel in unlearned foreign languages....then you need to subscribe to some kind of cessationism.
dead-raising was an ability at least 2 apostles exercised.
Paul and Peter.
it came with their office and was a sign of their authority.

Jesus testified beforehand they would do it, among other things.
 
Feb 23, 2011
1,708
13
0
#24
Yes. As was yours that I responded to.

Oh well....

How about miraculous tongues?
Grossly and ridiculously abused and/or manufactured. Almost universally a modern fleshly exhibition.

Unless multitudes of Jews from different nations are being converted by Christians miraculously preaching the Gospel in unlearned foreign languages....then you need to subscribe to some kind of cessationism.
Actually, if there is even one demonstration of one gift functioning scripturally on one occasion by/in/through one believer, then one would need to subscribe to some kind of continuationism.

Other than NAR-nonsense on one extreme and those who deny the modern work of the HS on the other extreme, rhetoric from either side is much less valuable than dealing directly with the text.

The burden of proof is wholly upon Cessationists; and it's essentially about one passage and its immediate and overall context.
 
Feb 23, 2011
1,708
13
0
#25
hi PPS teleios in that context isn't The Second Advent.
I wholly agree. Teleios is neither the finished canon nor the Second Advent. That's another false dichotomy that has plagued the body for centuries. Maybe there's something else. I'd hope everyone was willing to search beyond traditional narrow systems of beliefs to find the substantial truth in the text.

the subject is knowledge or understanding (per the revelatory gifts).
There's a much more significant context. I don't expect you, Strange, or other cessationists to concede. I would be remiss if I simply remained silent, though.
 
A

Abiding

Guest
#26
Why cant it be the second advent? with verse 12 how could it not be?
 
C

Crossfire

Guest
#27
Im wondering why you list my name. Since ive never claimed to be a cessationist, nor ever said anything but to the fact that God always had and always will have full authority and sovereignty over all His creation. Ive quoted scripture that says He appoints kings and takes them down. Although Ive made threads and tried
to produce dialogue, ive never denied any gift except apostles and prophets at the level of those at the beginning of the church...the ones mentioned that will be represented by 12 pillars in New Jerusalem.

But i rekon you have the right to be as presumptious as everyone else in these forums. It seems like there is just a virus of that sort in here.
And who in their right mind would think God wasnt God anyway. This is just careless Muskokaman. But nothing unusual for the forums.
I guessing it has something to do with the company you keep.
 
C

Crossfire

Guest
#28
Only one passage of scripture addresses cessation. The subject is a matter of interpretation and conceptualization. Few will change their view if they're convinced they hold the truth, just like every other doctrinal position.

Cessation and Continuation are both abused at their extremes. It's unfortunate that there's much more rhetoric and opinion than true exegesis. I spent several years praying and fasting while reading and studying for a clear exegetical understanding that wasn't based on my own or others' pre-supposed disposition. I doubt sharing the entire exegesis will be of any effect on most, even though most positions are "staked out" based on something other than a careful study of the original language.

"That which is perfect (teleios)" is NOT the completed canon according to a thorough exegesis of that passage. That doesn't warrant the rampant wholesale abuse, misuse, and perversion of gifts that deemphasizes the Giver and also exalts the unknown words of tongues over the Word that was made flesh.
I would agree.
 
C

Crossfire

Guest
#29
From the Strong's...

5046. teleios

having reached its end, i.e. complete, by ext. perfect
Original Word: τέλειος, α, ον
Part of Speech: Adjective
Transliteration: teleios
Phonetic Spelling: (tel'-i-os)
Short Definition: perfect, full-grown
Definition: perfect, (a) complete in all its parts, (b) full grown, of full age, (c) specially of the completeness of Christian character.

Cognate: 5046 téleios (an adjective, derived from 5056 /télos, "consummated goal") – mature (consummated) from going through the necessary stages to reach the end-goal, i.e. developed into a consummating completion by fulfilling the necessary process (spiritual journey). See 5056 (telos).

[This root (tel-) means "reaching the end (aim)." It is well-illustrated with the old pirate's telescope, unfolding (extending out) one stage at a time to function at full-strength (capacity effectiveness).]

Word Origin
from telos

Definition
having reached its end, i.e. complete, by ext. perfect

NASB Word Usage
complete (2), mature (4), more perfect (1), perfect (12).
 
C

Crossfire

Guest
#30
From the Strong's...

5046. teleios

having reached its end, i.e. complete, by ext. perfect
Original Word: τέλειος, α, ον
Part of Speech: Adjective
Transliteration: teleios
Phonetic Spelling: (tel'-i-os)
Short Definition: perfect, full-grown
Definition: perfect, (a) complete in all its parts, (b) full grown, of full age, (c) specially of the completeness of Christian character.

Cognate: 5046 téleios (an adjective, derived from 5056 /télos, "consummated goal") – mature (consummated) from going through the necessary stages to reach the end-goal, i.e. developed into a consummating completion by fulfilling the necessary process (spiritual journey). See 5056 (telos).

[This root (tel-) means "reaching the end (aim)." It is well-illustrated with the old pirate's telescope, unfolding (extending out) one stage at a time to function at full-strength (capacity effectiveness).]

Word Origin
from telos

Definition
having reached its end, i.e. complete, by ext. perfect

NASB Word Usage
complete (2), mature (4), more perfect (1), perfect (12).
In my opinion, the interpretation would mean the end of the age. However, that leads us right back to square one; what age are we in?

Just my perspective.
 
C

Crossfire

Guest
#31
In my opinion, the interpretation would mean the end of the age. However, that leads us right back to square one; what age are we in?

Just my perspective.
By defining the perfect / telios, I don't see how it is interpreted to mean knowledge when obviously means maturity, fulness, completion.

I personally believe that it's referring to the Great Commission and the church.

I will provide verses later as to why I think this. I've got a couple of errands to run.
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
#32
Yes. As was yours that I responded to.



Grossly and ridiculously abused and/or manufactured. Almost universally a modern fleshly exhibition.



Actually, if there is even one demonstration of one gift functioning scripturally on one occasion by/in/through one believer, then one would need to subscribe to some kind of continuationism.

Other than NAR-nonsense on one extreme and those who deny the modern work of the HS on the other extreme, rhetoric from either side is much less valuable than dealing directly with the text.

The burden of proof is wholly upon Cessationists; and it's essentially about one passage and its immediate and overall context.
So which gift are you gonna show us funtioning?
 

Calmador

Senior Member
Jun 23, 2011
945
40
28
#33
I just want to point out a few things in debates...

Does it glorify G-d or does it glorify the stupidity that is our intelligence?

Do we have to have all the answers? Does it help? Not always, not even Solomon who was the wisest man in the world had much help with wisdom. G-d is the key, I don't understand how and I accept that but is the key to it. If were to find wisdom or knowledge then it should be within his will. It's not by power, or by the sword but by his Spirt. Wisdom or knowledge I would put as a form of power.

G-d Bless and pray for his will
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
#34
I just want to point out a few things in debates...

Does it glorify G-d or does it glorify the stupidity that is our intelligence?

Do we have to have all the answers? Does it help? Not always, not even Solomon who was the wisest man in the world had much help with wisdom. G-d is the key, I don't understand how and I accept that but is the key to it. If were to find wisdom or knowledge then it should be within his will. It's not by power, or by the sword but by his Spirt. Wisdom or knowledge I would put as a form of power.

G-d Bless and pray for his will
Who's G-d?
 
C

Crossfire

Guest
#35
I just want to point out a few things in debates...

Does it glorify G-d or does it glorify the stupidity that is our intelligence?

Do we have to have all the answers? Does it help? Not always, not even Solomon who was the wisest man in the world had much help with wisdom. G-d is the key, I don't understand how and I accept that but is the key to it. If were to find wisdom or knowledge then it should be within his will. It's not by power, or by the sword but by his Spirt. Wisdom or knowledge I would put as a form of power.

G-d Bless and pray for his will
Hopefully, people can agree to disagree and leave it at that. Unfortunately that is rare on these boards.

Anyways, I understand and share your concern. Take care!
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#36
I wholly agree. Teleios is neither the finished canon nor the Second Advent. That's another false dichotomy that has plagued the body for centuries. Maybe there's something else. I'd hope everyone was willing to search beyond traditional narrow systems of beliefs to find the substantial truth in the text.



There's a much more significant context. I don't expect you, Strange, or other cessationists to concede. I would be remiss if I simply remained silent, though.
by all means carry on.
please do.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#37
From the Strong's...

5046. teleios

having reached its end, i.e. complete, by ext. perfect
Original Word: τέλειος, α, ον
Part of Speech: Adjective
Transliteration: teleios
Phonetic Spelling: (tel'-i-os)
Short Definition: perfect, full-grown
Definition: perfect, (a) complete in all its parts, (b) full grown, of full age, (c) specially of the completeness of Christian character.

Cognate: 5046 téleios (an adjective, derived from 5056 /télos, "consummated goal") – mature (consummated) from going through the necessary stages to reach the end-goal, i.e. developed into a consummating completion by fulfilling the necessary process (spiritual journey). See 5056 (telos).

[This root (tel-) means "reaching the end (aim)." It is well-illustrated with the old pirate's telescope, unfolding (extending out) one stage at a time to function at full-strength (capacity effectiveness).]

Word Origin
from telos

Definition
having reached its end, i.e. complete, by ext. perfect

NASB Word Usage
complete (2), mature (4), more perfect (1), perfect (12).
and?
the end goal of the apostolic era gifts and offices was a completed canon (the fullest expression of God's Plan and Will, given throuhgout time to prophets, and apostles, and scribes, and Jesus Christ)

that canon came to us one stage at a time. and now functions at full strength and capacity (when used correctly via the Holy Spirit).

the alternative to this is that God's completeld word IS NOT THOSE THINGS.
that came to us one stage at a time
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#38
By defining the perfect / telios, I don't see how it is interpreted to mean knowledge when obviously means maturity, fulness, completion.

I personally believe that it's referring to the Great Commission and the church.

I will provide verses later as to why I think this. I've got a couple of errands to run.
i didn't say telelios meant knowledge/understanding.

i said it was used IN THE CONTEXT OF A LETTER THAT WAS CONCERNING KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING - Corinthians.

Paul sent a corrective letter to them concerning what were for the most part REVELATORY GIFTS.the means through which God was revealing new information. new knowledge. His Plan, the full knowledge of what He has revealed about Himself DIDN'T EXIST yet. UNTIL JOHN PUT DOWN HIS PEN.


the Bible is the COMPLETE, MATURE, FULL revelation of GOD, written down - His ordained method of communicating to man.

the gifts were partial, the knowledge of God (that He has chosen to give us) is COMPLETE in scripture.

ANYONE ATTAMEPTING TO HAVE GOD REVERT TO PARTIAL REVELATORY GIFTS FORFEITS SOLA SCRIPTURA
 
Last edited:
A

AnandaHya

Guest
#39
and?
the end goal of the apostolic era gifts and offices was a completed canon (the fullest expression of God's Plan and Will, given throuhgout time to prophets, and apostles, and scribes, and Jesus Christ)

that canon came to us one stage at a time. and now functions at full strength and capacity (when used correctly via the Holy Spirit).

the alternative to this is that God's completeld word IS NOT THOSE THINGS.
that came to us one stage at a time
I thought the goal was to build the foundation of the church and build up believers into the Body of Christ.....Has God finished building the Church?
 
Feb 23, 2011
1,708
13
0
#40
So which gift are you gonna show us funtioning?
Other than tongues, I've seen a number of the gifts function scripturally. One can denounce the ridiculous NAR silliness and not have to be a cessationist.

Personal observation and/or participation isn't at issue, though we've both referred to it. It's about exegeting the text. Inference and eisegesis aren't valid exegesis, from either perspective.

Having personally seen blind eyes opened, etc., my experience and observation certainly coincide with my personal in-depth exegesis.

I was a Cessationist. I'm now a simple Continuationist, and reject teleios as referring to closed canon or second advent. The truth lies beyond either.