EVOLUTION: a-sexual to sexual transition

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Aug 25, 2013
2,260
10
0
#41
you're never going to accept that God is "measurable" until you have a little h-nu of faith to reflect off of Him. You're never going to detect that h-nu he emits until you believe and point your photon detector at Him.
Hmm. Would you know where to point such a detector? Are you talking about a physical detector or are you saying a person has to have faith to find God in the first place?
 
Last edited:
Jun 30, 2011
2,521
35
0
#42
There is no grand reason or purpose for being here. I never shied away from that fact. We just need to learn from those before us and leave something for those who will come after.
why should we leave anything for them, screw em - it doesn't matter what you leave to them - what is the basis for this? wouldn't this be meaningless morality
 
Aug 25, 2013
2,260
10
0
#43
As believers, we are looking forward to an eternity of paradise in a perfected body. You are looking forward to nothing.
If I believed I was going to have a perfect body and live in paradise, I'd be looking forward to the end of this life as well.

Huckleberry said:
You don't "see it as bleak"...
Do you see your own existence on this Earth as bleak?
 
D

didymos

Guest
#44
Oh look, games with semantics, where apparently "not accepting" evolution is significantly different than "not believing" evolution. And therefore, evolution is true.
I guess you're the one trying to play games with semantics. ;)
 
Jun 30, 2011
2,521
35
0
#45
Where is the scientific evidence that proves mankind can reach the stars? Where is the evidence that demonstrates this is possible? Where is the evidence that demonstrates we can cure the common cold, all cancers, and so on.

This question you ask is an important one. How did sexual organisms evolve from a-sexual ones? Currently our level of knowledge is not great enough to answer the question. It’s that simple. Just because we don’t know something now, or can’t do something, doesn’t mean those things are impossible to know or do. I think, Megaman, you should agree with me on this point. Then why do you think the answer to this question of yours must be answered this day or else evolution is disproved? I’ll answer for you: you want evolution disproved and so you are willing to ignore the obvious fact that not knowing something is not proof that it can’t happen, or didn’t happen.

What you are presenting is the God of the Gaps Argument: if we don’t understand how something happened then God must be the Cause. It’s a bad argument.
I would only answer a few things on here

One there is a cure for cancer but we make more money by treating cancer - peoples deaths are of little consequence. We could have eradicated world hunger a few times with all the billions trying to find an atomic particle

If you want an interesting article on the failures of what people using the tools of science should be able to do by now "Billions and Billions of demons by Richard Lewinton. Over promised and under delivered

There also is a book called the secret war on cancer - very interesting - Devora Davis is the author
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#46
I could try to explain. It would not be an argument against God, only an explanation of why I can no longer believe.
hmm....well, you don't seem as though you're about to start ridiculing the notion of a Creator God (some do of course).

but excluding the possibility of a Creator God is specifically what i wondered. as in, you are not 'agnostic' as they say (maybe there is a God, maybe there isn't)....but in fact an atheist (there is no God).

so, i would very much be interested in how you were able to with absolute certainty rule out the possibility of a Creator God, i.e: "there is no God"

i saw you write about an epiphany. did i read you correctly that this was the moment of 'knowing' with absolute certainty there is no God? anyway....i'll wait for clarification, or if it's off topic for this thread (it really isn't but), maybe you would start another. if not, no big deal. i'll keep reading.

k....ttyl.
z
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#47
i have a question for evolutionists - forgive my caveman presentation of the question:

what was before the Big Bang?

what went "bang"?
 
Jun 30, 2011
2,521
35
0
#48
i have a question for evolutionists - forgive my caveman presentation of the question:

what was before the Big Bang?

what went "bang"?
Big bang is quite inconsistent with Biblical Creation, The main thread of Big bang cosmogony is the "eternal universe" Newton though orthodox in his faith, struggled with the notion that the universe had a beginning so accepted the idea of the eternal universe

Ecclesiastes 1:9 says that there is nothing new under the sun - Ideas are never new, though they might have new shiny parts, the main concept is always the same

I explain it like a Christmas tree whose ornaments change over time, but the tree is the same. Big bang cosmogony has different ornaments but the tree of the eternal universe remains the same - although they explain as our universe came from another universe and so on -

Biological Evolution - the tree would be that people came from animals

Geological Evolution - would be the Earth is really really old(need a better one) but that's the gist


All this is to say : if the universe never had a beginning - nothing created it, if we came from animals - then we are animals and are not accountable to anyone, etc
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#49
Big bang is quite inconsistent with Biblical Creation, The main thread of Big bang cosmogony is the "eternal universe" Newton though orthodox in his faith, struggled with the notion that the universe had a beginning so accepted the idea of the eternal universe

Ecclesiastes 1:9 says that there is nothing new under the sun - Ideas are never new, though they might have new shiny parts, the main concept is always the same

I explain it like a Christmas tree whose ornaments change over time, but the tree is the same. Big bang cosmogony has different ornaments but the tree of the eternal universe remains the same - although they explain as our universe came from another universe and so on -

Biological Evolution - the tree would be that people came from animals

Geological Evolution - would be the Earth is really really old(need a better one) but that's the gist


All this is to say : if the universe never had a beginning - nothing created it, if we came from animals - then we are animals and are not accountable to anyone, etc
so, there was a Bigger Bang before the Big Bang, and a Bigger One before the......?
or a smaller one:confused:

what do they say went 'bang'?
 
Sep 6, 2013
266
3
0
#50
what was before the Big Bang?
Cosmologists aren't even sure that this question has meaning. Since our universe and the laws that govern it appear to have originated at the same time that matter started expanding, we have no idea what conditions were like before that - or even IF THERE WAS a "before that."

We believe we have a pretty good understanding of how the universe has worked back to that initial expansion event, because things seem to behave as though they have been acting under the laws of physics we already know since that time. But right now we just don't have any way to tell what, if anything, existed before that, or how time or space or matter worked prior to that point.

We may eventually come up with a way to figure it out, but we haven't yet.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#51
Cosmologists aren't even sure that this question has meaning. Since our universe and the laws that govern it appear to have originated at the same time that matter started expanding, we have no idea what conditions were like before that - or even IF THERE WAS a "before that."

We believe we have a pretty good understanding of how the universe has worked back to that initial expansion event, because things seem to behave as though they have been acting under the laws of physics we already know since that time. But right now we just don't have any way to tell what, if anything, existed before that, or how time or space or matter worked prior to that point.

We may eventually come up with a way to figure it out, but we haven't yet.
okay. so really, we have only two options then:

1) there was something before the big bang
2) there was nothing before the big bang

but we do not know which of those is true.
we're focused on the big bang as the starting point, but not really because there might have been something before that.
we don't have a clue, at all.

we're guessing..

on the other side of the big bang there could be.......God, right?

what was it that went bang?
 
Sep 6, 2013
266
3
0
#52
okay. so really, we have only two options then:

1) there was something before the big bang
2) there was nothing before the big bang

but we do not know which of those is true.
Not yet, anyway.

we're focused on the big bang as the starting point, but not really because there might have been something before that.
The universal expansion event is a starting point whether or not something came before - it's when the universe started doing the stuff that we DO observe and understand, and it's when the chain of events happened that led to today.

we don't have a clue, at all.
we're guessing..
Scientists are coming up with possibilities and trying to figure out ways to test them, right.

on the other side of the big bang there could be.......God, right?
We don't know, and anyway it depends on what you mean by "God." My God, YHWH, isn't limited to before the Big Bang; He still exists in the universe today.

what was it that went bang?
All of the matter in the universe.
 
G

Grey

Guest
#53
You've got some great, well structured and argued points. Though likely this should be in Misc.
 
Aug 25, 2013
2,260
10
0
#54
hmm....well, you don't seem as though you're about to start ridiculing the notion of a Creator God (some do of course).
Sorry to have been so long answering your post. I see no point in ridicule.

zone said:
but excluding the possibility of a Creator God is specifically what i wondered. as in, you are not 'agnostic' as they say (maybe there is a God, maybe there isn't)....but in fact an atheist (there is no God).
I probably have answered this already, but as no one can possibly read every post I will gladly provide an answer. I am an atheist. I am a seven on Richard Dawkins' scale (see page 50 of The God Delusion).

zone said:
so, i would very much be interested in how you were able to with absolute certainty rule out the possibility of a Creator God, i.e: "there is no God"
First, I had no personal experience of God. There was nothing on an emotional level to persuade me of his existence. One thing I have noticed among those who have a deep and profound belief in God is that many of them believe God connects with them personally. Secondly, I have never found any other evidence to support the idea that God exists. Lastly, and this should perhaps have come second, the Bible presents views of the world and universe that make no sense in scientific terms. Put them all together and they present a formula for atheism.