What you and many others who always point to one verse and try to make a doctrine out of it,
Like you did with Acts 2:38? You isolated that verse, built your doctrine on it, then ignored the rest of the verses that I quoted to you.
is if "You beleive on the Lord Jesus Christ and thy house, and thou shalt be saved" means you follow and obey every word Jesus Taught his Apostles.
To "believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved" is to
"trust in Christ as the all sufficient means of your salvation" and you will be saved, in which it was an established fact that Cornelius and his household received the gift of the Holy Spirit and were saved
when they believed on the Lord Jesus Christ BEFORE they received water baptism (Acts 10:43-47; 11:17,18) so your definition of believing equates to salvation by works. Following and obeying the teachings of Jesus AFTER we believe and are saved is the
fruit of believing on the Lord Jesus Christ and being saved and not the essence of believing.
So, you cannot "Cherry Pick" and only except the parts you like, and skip the rest.
I did not cherry pick. I properly harmonized scripture with scripture before reaching my conclusion. You are the one who cherry picked the part you liked and ignored the rest. Do you attend the church of Christ? They love to use the term "cherry pick" and they are also obsessed with the false teaching of salvation by water baptism.
There is enough evidence to prove 100% that Water Baptism is a necessary part of being saved. I have recided all the verses to prove this, and if you still want to argue the point I will let you deal on judgement day with The Author and finisher of our faith..
NOWHERE does the Bible teach that whoever is not water baptized will not be saved, but it does say that
whoever does not believe will be condemned (Mark 16:16; John 3:18). I've been water baptized, so it's not even an issue for me anyway. I know that I believe and I know that I have eternal life (1 John 5:13). Praise God! You can argue with Jesus on judgment day about why you found it necessary to pervert the gospel and refuse to believe the gospel.
To begin with, the Bible is very clear in its teachings that all Christians are expected to be baptized in water. Jesus told His disciples that they were to baptize new disciples of all nations (Matthew 28:19).
On the other hand, the New Testament makes it equally clear that man is saved prior to receiving water baptism. Cornelius and his household received the Holy Spirit and were manifesting the gifts of the Spirit (which is only for the body of Christ - 1 Corinthians 12) after believing the gospel but before being water baptized (Acts 10:44-48; 11:17,18). This observation must be balanced, however, by the fact that baptism was not considered an "optional extra" for Cornelius and his household; it was a command (10:48) that they were expected to obey. However, it was not obedience to this command that saved them, but their believing in Christ (Acts 10:43; 11:17). Baptism is the expected initial outward response to the gospel, but it is not a part of the gospel itself (1 Corinthians 1:17; 15:1-4).
There are a number of alleged proof texts which are often cited to prove that the Bible makes baptism mandatory for salvation. A careful examination of each of these texts in context will show that none of them prove that baptism is absolutely necessary for salvation, though they do prove that baptism was an assumed initiatory response to the gospel of salvation. In other words, these texts prove only that baptism is regularly associated with conversion and salvation, rather than absolutely required for salvation.