-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
The purpose of the creation story in Genesis is not there for us to prove or disprove creationism, nor evolution. There is not enough detail in it for a valid proof. It is there to show us just how easy it is for sin to enter our life. In the perfect environment of the Garden of Eden, just a little temptation, and what happened. It is also there to teach us the results of disobedience to God's directions. Man lost the close fellowship, and stiff punishment. Please look beyond the surface. Do you really believe that God is concerned with how the world sees the story?
P
Hold on there Jack old boy...I don't think that Tin tin or Phil think anyone other than Jesus Christ is their Messiah, what about you Jack. You never answered my question on the other thread re Genesis, how do you explain death before the fall of Adam when surely God would not have called that good. Sin entered the world through Adam, I'm sure we all agree on that as Romans explains that to us and therefore the possibility of salvation comes to us through one man...Christ. So when did death enter the world? Before Adam and regardless of his sin or after as a result of Adam's sin? Does your theory of "progressive evolution" allow for creatures to evolve through countless generations without actually dying? Only asking because as you have pointed out before I have little or no understanding...
oh and what is a "ham clone"? Is that like a spam or a pork chop?
oh and what is a "ham clone"? Is that like a spam or a pork chop?
Since the topic of this thread pertains to dinosaurs, I'll stay on topic in answering your question.
In my opinion, based upon the preponderance of evidence, both scientific and scriptural, dinosaurs died before Adam's sin.
As in millions of years before Adam's sin.
Don't believe everything you watch on TV. Like Fred Flintstone and Dino.
I'm a French model you know. Bon jour. You can read it on the internet so it must be true. Just like everything Ken Ham says is true.
In my opinion, based upon the preponderance of evidence, both scientific and scriptural, dinosaurs died before Adam's sin.
As in millions of years before Adam's sin.
Don't believe everything you watch on TV. Like Fred Flintstone and Dino.
I'm a French model you know. Bon jour. You can read it on the internet so it must be true. Just like everything Ken Ham says is true.
K
well, if nothing else, it proved that wolly mammoths liked grass...........and that's something they have in common with the majority of the citizens of California.......... 
Oh finding soft tissue in dinosaurs proves the earth can't be millions of years old, much less tens of thousands of years. Then you have the layering of the soil proving the Flood, historical review of literature also proves the Flood and a young earth, the fact dinosaur bones are found dishevelled and foudn through various layers, the fact we still have animals that were alive before the Flood, atmospheric levels found in ice core samples and the fact they abruptly changed, the fact the earth is not litterred with carcasses as it would be if it were around any longer than 100,000 years, the fact all the radio-dating methods are wildly inaccurate, and of course the supreme fact that there is absolutely zero proof for an old earth besides unprovable or disproven theories put out by questionable sources.
If you are familiar with how the fossilization process works (requiring a lot of water and mineral) then you would know it is something of a miracle this soft tissue even survived approximately 4,000-5,000 years. At any span of time longer than that the probability of finding soft tissue and even hard fossilized tissue given the immense pressures within the earth, makes it impossible to be of age older than 10,000 years. The fact they have found multiple fossils with soft tissue particles only further supports the fact the earth is quite younger than the New Age mythologies would beguile people into believing.
T
You seem to be so scared that the Bible is true, as it's written, that you try to hide your discomfort by trying to be funny by making Flintstones comparisons etc. Instead you come across as a complete jackass. Nowhere have I implied that humans rode T-Rex's in a dino rodeo. You're the one making up all this bollocks. Maybe you're the one who needs help?