History of the Trinity

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

suaso

Guest
#21
A Christianity without belief in the Triune nature of God as one God in three persons is about as heretical as it gets :D
 
Apr 23, 2009
2,253
5
0
#22
This thread makes Arius look like he should have a St. before his name.
You either have no idea what Arius taught or you have no idea what those of us in this thread believe. Either way you should know what you are speaking about before you speak at all.
 
Apr 23, 2009
2,253
5
0
#23
Then by your own admission I would say you should be banned from this site given this is considered one of those doctrines considered essential here when you join.
Me and half the people in this site. :)
 
Apr 23, 2009
2,253
5
0
#24
A Christianity without belief in the Triune nature of God as one God in three persons is about as heretical as it gets :D
That is your view, however the Bible says diferently.

John 17
1 These words spake Jesus, and lifted up his eyes to heaven, and said, Father, the hour is come; glorify thy Son, that thy Son also may glorify thee:
2 As thou hast given him power over all flesh, that he should give eternal life to as many as thou hast given him.
3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.

1st Corinthians 8:6 But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him;

There is only one God ''The Father'' who became a man.
John 1
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

1st Timothy 3:16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.

And the man He became who is God the Father Himself incarnate is Jesus.
John 14
7 If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him.
8 Philip saith unto him, Lord, show us the Father, and it sufficeth us.
9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father?
 
Apr 13, 2007
985
6
0
36
#25
the Trinity put in the most simple way:

Father: provided/offered/gave the way
Son: Paid the way
Holy Spirit: shows the way

I firmly believe in Trinity, and when the Bible says they're one, it means they work together as one. Not the same person, cause God has always been, Jesus wasn't always around though, God didn't die, Jesus did, God raised Jesus from the dead, Jesus didn't raise Himself, God is the Father, Jesus the Son, you can't be your own father and son. Jesus prayed TO the Father, not to Himself. So many things prove that oneness is wrong. Anyways, peace, and God bless.
 
Apr 23, 2009
2,253
5
0
#26
the Trinity put in the most simple way:

Father: provided/offered/gave the way
Son: Paid the way
Holy Spirit: shows the way

I firmly believe in Trinity, and when the Bible says they're one, it means they work together as one. Not the same person, cause God has always been, Jesus wasn't always around though, God didn't die, Jesus did, God raised Jesus from the dead, Jesus didn't raise Himself, God is the Father, Jesus the Son, you can't be your own father and son. Jesus prayed TO the Father, not to Himself. So many things prove that oneness is wrong. Anyways, peace, and God bless.
Are you saying Jesus is not God?
 
G

Groundhog

Guest
#27
still learning - Thanks for starting this thread. I don't know how many times I've gotten into a discussion of the Trinity with people who have no idea that it is a post-scriptural doctrine.

Then by your own admission I would say you should be banned from this site given this is considered one of those doctrines considered essential here when you join.
First of all, no one should be banned for stating a reasonable position simply because it differs from the mainstream: that kind of thinking would have gotten Martin Luther banned here. Second, where is this rule you're speaking of? I've read the rules of conduct (the ones that you agree to when you sign up) and I saw no list of doctrines that members must agree with.
 
G

Groundhog

Guest
#28
the Trinity put in the most simple way:

Father: provided/offered/gave the way
Son: Paid the way
Holy Spirit: shows the way
You can choose to believe whatever you want to believe, and I'm quoting you not because I want to argue with you, but because your post brought up something I wanted to mention.

This is one of the clever anecdotes that people use to explain how the Trinity works. Another one I've heard is that water can be in three phases (liquid, ice, vapor) but it is still water, and that is supposed to help us understand how God works. I'm sure there are dozens of others. There's also the notion that our "feeble" minds are inadequate when trying to grasp the concept of the Trinity, which is the real reason why these anecdotes were invented. People can invent all sorts of explanations and theologies around false premises, and that may be what's happening here. Christians who choose to believe in the Trinitarian view of God can do so if they wish, but those who believe that God is an undivided One, and that Jesus is His son, have the better scriptural basis for their argument. This does not make the Trinity less true--indeed it may be true--but it certainly makes it a less likely possibility. And the key here is that this is a doctrine invented by men, not one that is clearly articulated in scripture.
 
Apr 13, 2007
985
6
0
36
#29
You can choose to believe whatever you want to believe, and I'm quoting you not because I want to argue with you, but because your post brought up something I wanted to mention.

This is one of the clever anecdotes that people use to explain how the Trinity works. Another one I've heard is that water can be in three phases (liquid, ice, vapor) but it is still water, and that is supposed to help us understand how God works. I'm sure there are dozens of others. There's also the notion that our "feeble" minds are inadequate when trying to grasp the concept of the Trinity, which is the real reason why these anecdotes were invented. People can invent all sorts of explanations and theologies around false premises, and that may be what's happening here. Christians who choose to believe in the Trinitarian view of God can do so if they wish, but those who believe that God is an undivided One, and that Jesus is His son, have the better scriptural basis for their argument. This does not make the Trinity less true--indeed it may be true--but it certainly makes it a less likely possibility. And the key here is that this is a doctrine invented by men, not one that is clearly articulated in scripture.
It's fine, I'm not here to argue it either. everyone has religous freedom, we can all believe as we choose and feel led. I see your point, I was just saying, that's how it's best explained is all. God bless.
 
Apr 13, 2007
985
6
0
36
#30
still learning - Thanks for starting this thread. I don't know how many times I've gotten into a discussion of the Trinity with people who have no idea that it is a post-scriptural doctrine.



First of all, no one should be banned for stating a reasonable position simply because it differs from the mainstream: that kind of thinking would have gotten Martin Luther banned here. Second, where is this rule you're speaking of? I've read the rules of conduct (the ones that you agree to when you sign up) and I saw no list of doctrines that members must agree with.
I agree, I have read the rules myself, the only thing that could fall into that catergory is where it says not to say or post anything anti-Christian or against what God's word says. No one should be banned for their own beliefs, if that were true, should not the person that said the other should be banned also be banned? for beliving differently? Okay then, point taken lol. I'm with you on this one Groundhog.

God bless.
 
Apr 13, 2007
985
6
0
36
#31
Are you saying Jesus is not God?
Jesus is the SON of God, and yes Jesus was God in the flesh....He came to represent the Father, since no one could see Him. That's all I'm saying.
 
Apr 23, 2009
2,253
5
0
#32
Jesus is the SON of God, and yes Jesus was God in the flesh....He came to represent the Father, since no one could see Him. That's all I'm saying.
So if Jesus is ''God'' in the Flesh and according to Jesus Himself the Father is the only true God does that not mean that Jesus has to be the Father incarnate?

John 17
1 These words spake Jesus, and lifted up his eyes to heaven, and said, Father, the hour is come; glorify thy Son, that thy Son also may glorify thee:
2 As thou hast given him power over all flesh, that he should give eternal life to as many as thou hast given him.
3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.
 
Apr 23, 2009
2,253
5
0
#34
According to John 10:17 tells us Jesus did raise Himself from the dead

Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again. John 10:17
Good verse sis ren
 
Apr 13, 2007
985
6
0
36
#35
As I said, everyone believes as they want, I'm not here to, or will I argue, I believe what I believe and y'all believe what you do. I don't love you any less if we don't agree on all things, that's all I shall say to avoid arguing. God bless.
 
C

Cup-of-Ruin

Guest
#36
the Trinity put in the most simple way:

Father: provided/offered/gave the way
Son: Paid the way
Holy Spirit: shows the way
These are acts of One God! There are not 3 gods, there is one God, who performed these acts.

I firmly believe in Trinity, and when the Bible says they're one, it means they work together as one. Not the same person, cause God has always been, Jesus wasn't always around though, God didn't die, Jesus did, God raised Jesus from the dead, Jesus didn't raise Himself, God is the Father, Jesus the Son, you can't be your own father and son. Jesus prayed TO the Father, not to Himself. So many things prove that oneness is wrong. Anyways, peace, and God bless.
Jesus is the "Rock", does that mean that He is a Quartet? Where in the Bible is God described as being 3 seperate entities, 3 seperate persons? If God appears as the burning bush does that mean that the burning bush is a god as well? There is no way of keeping a trinity doctrine without dissappearing into a theological maze, out of which there is no end, I mean how many times does the Bible have to say that God is Saviour, He is the Son, the Son and the Father are one, there is one God? There is simply no biblical basis for "3 gods in 1"...
 
G

Groundhog

Guest
#37
According to John 10:17 tells us Jesus did raise Himself from the dead

Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again. John 10:17
It's important to point out that Jesus was speaking figuratively there, making an analogy between His body and the Temple. It's important primarily because the rest of the New Testament seems to contradict your assumption:

Acts 2:24
24 But God raised him from the dead, freeing him from the agony of death, because it was impossible for death to keep its hold on him.

Acts 3:15, Acts 4:10, Acts 10:40, Acts 13:30-37 (several times there), 1 Peter 1:21, Romans 8:11, Romans 10:9, Ephesians 1:20, and several other scriptures clearly state that God raised Christ from the dead.
 
Apr 13, 2007
985
6
0
36
#38
These are acts of One God! There are not 3 gods, there is one God, who performed these acts.



Jesus is the "Rock", does that mean that He is a Quartet? Where in the Bible is God described as being 3 seperate entities, 3 seperate persons? If God appears as the burning bush does that mean that the burning bush is a god as well? There is no way of keeping a trinity doctrine without dissappearing into a theological maze, out of which there is no end, I mean how many times does the Bible have to say that God is Saviour, He is the Son, the Son and the Father are one, there is one God? There is simply no biblical basis for "3 gods in 1"...

I never said there's 3 gods, there's not. you and others completely take what I say and twist it, as usual, and I'm not gonna argue with y'all, it ain't worth it, can't change what you believe, and you can't change what I believe. Bless all of you. Love all of you in Christ Jesus.
 
C

Cup-of-Ruin

Guest
#39
I never said there's 3 gods, there's not. you and others completely take what I say and twist it, as usual, and I'm not gonna argue with y'all, it ain't worth it, can't change what you believe, and you can't change what I believe. Bless all of you. Love all of you in Christ Jesus.
But that is the Trinity doctrine, i'm not 'twisting' anything - God the Father, God the son and God the Holy Spirit = a Godhead, if the 3 Gods are distinct and have different personalites but are of the same substance than by definition they are still 3 Gods, just like I share the same substance with 6 billion other humans of the human family, different personalities, made of the same 7 basics elemental stuff so part of one human race, that's exactly the same philosophy behind the Trinity doctrine. So I am just stating the actual facts of the Trinity doctrine, which I believe to be incorrect in relation to the nature of God.
 
Apr 13, 2007
985
6
0
36
#40
But that is the Trinity doctrine, i'm not 'twisting' anything - God the Father, God the son and God the Holy Spirit = a Godhead, if the 3 Gods are distinct and have different personalites but are of the same substance than by definition they are still 3 Gods, just like I share the same substance with 6 billion other humans of the human family, different personalities, made of the same 7 basics elemental stuff so part of one human race, that's exactly the same philosophy behind the Trinity doctrine. So I am just stating the actual facts of the Trinity doctrine, which I believe to be incorrect in relation to the nature of God.
Yet again you're wrong, not everyone that believes in the Trinity believes that it's 3 gods, I don't. Anyhow, I'm not gonna argue like I said.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.