Ecclesiastes presents a discourse about the state of the dead. So I think we'll have to interpret these words literally. the dead have no contact with the living. They are physically, mentally and emotionally inactive.
The Lazarus story is a parable. A parable teaches one lesson but it is not necessarily a true story. The dualism (body and soul) in the parable is an accretion of Greek thought. I believe that Jesus was making use of the thought prevailing in his time to teach spiritual truth. Regarding this spiritual truth, we'd have to consider the literary context. The adjoining account in Luke 16 is the story of the shrewd manager, which also doesn't need to be a true story. This story deals with the attitude towards money (Luke 16:13). I would think that the parable of Lazarus should be interpreted in a similar vein.
Now, about these other verses that talk about the soul or spirit of the dead communicating with the living, please mention them to me.
The Lazarus story is a parable. A parable teaches one lesson but it is not necessarily a true story. The dualism (body and soul) in the parable is an accretion of Greek thought. I believe that Jesus was making use of the thought prevailing in his time to teach spiritual truth. Regarding this spiritual truth, we'd have to consider the literary context. The adjoining account in Luke 16 is the story of the shrewd manager, which also doesn't need to be a true story. This story deals with the attitude towards money (Luke 16:13). I would think that the parable of Lazarus should be interpreted in a similar vein.
Now, about these other verses that talk about the soul or spirit of the dead communicating with the living, please mention them to me.
Let me ask you this question brother. For sure did you believe if one burn to dead like at sodom, his or her soul dead?