Is the great biblical flood real or not?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,248
6,541
113
Just about everyone here knows the written code kills, it is only the Holy Spirit Who gives life to the Word, that is to say, the Bible.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
Just about everyone here knows the written code kills, it is only the Holy Spirit Who gives life to the Word, that is to say, the Bible.
This sentence seems to say that Jesus is Bible...

Bible is a book. Jesus is the Word with the capital W.
 

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,248
6,541
113
Boy do you ever want a confrontation. The truth is the Bibles does become Jesus when directed by the Hoy Spirit. Read the first chapter of John.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
Boy do you ever want a confrontation. The truth is the Bibles does become Jesus when directed by the Hoy Spirit. Read the first chapter of John.
What? No, thats not truth at all.

As your post is not you, so also Bible is not Jesus Christ.
 

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,248
6,541
113
You are talking over my head or yours......it is jsut too intellectual for my understandign. God bless you. I will continue to believe the written code becomes Jesus Christ speaking when given life by His Hoy Spirit. Call me too ignorant to learn, I do not mind, I prefer faith in what He teaches me.


What? No, thats not truth at all.

As your post is not you, so also Bible is not Jesus Christ.
 
Dec 14, 2017
408
2
0
Boy do you ever want a confrontation. The truth is the Bibles does become Jesus when directed by the Hoy Spirit. Read the first chapter of John.

WHAT BIBLE VERSION(S) are you talking about? There are more than 20 that I know about.
 

lightbearer

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
2,375
504
113
58
HBG. Pa. USA
Originally Posted by lightbearer

That verse is not saying one of GOD's days is a thousand years. That verse if taken in context to the chapter is relating to the LORD's patience.
And the biblical PROOFS of your statements of conjecture immediately above can be found exactly WHERE?
In the chapter.
 
Last edited:

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,248
6,541
113
I have probably read 20 versions in my lifetime, not including the reading in French, Spanish ad Hebrew with some in other anguages.

Now it is you looking to contend. Don't you know the Holy Spirit brings any version of God's Word to life b e it God's will? For that matter a person may find His Word in any writig, again, be it HIs will. Have fiath, and do not contend withthose who ae content with their own.


WHAT BIBLE VERSION(S) are you talking about? There are more than 20 that I know about.
 

lightbearer

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
2,375
504
113
58
HBG. Pa. USA
You are talking over my head or yours......it is jsut too intellectual for my understandign. God bless you. I will continue to believe the written code becomes Jesus Christ speaking when given life by His Hoy Spirit. Call me too ignorant to learn, I do not mind, I prefer faith in what He teaches me.
The following was written prior to the Bible being compiled. What do you make of it?

But ye have an unction from the Holy One, and ye know all things. The anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
(1Jn 2:20,27)
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
56,322
26,350
113
Great! so now we all know that we cannot trust (or at least we cannot apply English language standards) from the King James versions of the bible! At least that somewhat narrows the field of bible versions that we can rely on!
I do believe you missed the point. The prefix of "re" on verbs does not always connote a doing of something again. Case in point: Adam and Eve "re"producing does not mean they had already produced offspring. Your argument is null and void :)
 

star

Senior Member
Nov 8, 2017
1,582
2,046
113
North Carolina
1 Corinthians 15:20 But Christ has indeed been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep.

19If our hope in Christ is for this life alone, we are to be pitied more than all men. 20But Christ has indeed been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep. 21For since death came through a man, the resurrection of the dead comes also through a man.


Before there was a resurrection, there was a crucifixion and ultimately a death. Died, buried, then resurrected. Praise God that He provided all for we unworthy sinners.
 

lightbearer

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
2,375
504
113
58
HBG. Pa. USA
There is another point that you have not mentioned! God told Adam and Eve to RE-PLENISH the earth! Why would that be the language, if in fact, Adam and Eve were the FIRST humans on earth?


King James Bible
And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth.
I was weaned on the KJV and I love it. But it is translated into old English. Word meanings change. Here is the Hebrew word as define from the BDB Lexicon.

- Original: מלא מלא
- Transliteration: Male'
- Phonetic: maw-lay'
- Definition:
1. to fill, be full
a. (Qal)
1. to be full 1a
b. fulness, abundance (participle) 1a
c. to be full, be accomplished, be ended
1. to consecrate, fill the hand
d. (Niphal)
1. to be filled, be armed, be satisfied
2. to be accomplished, be ended
e. (Piel)
1. to fill
2. to satisfy
3. to fulfil, accomplish, complete
4. to confirm
f. (Pual) to be filled
g. (Hithpael) to mass themselves against
- Origin: a primitive root
- TWOT entry: 1195
- Part(s) of speech: Verb

As we can see the word basically means fill. Below Is an excerpt from a web site that has took the time to compile information on the Old English understanding of the word replenish. Here is a LINK so you can see it yourself.

1. An examination of the Oxford English Dictionary (OED) shows that the word was used to mean ‘fill’ from the thirteenth to the seventeenth centuries. In no case quoted in these five centuries does it unambiguously mean ‘re-fill’. The OED defines ‘replenish’ as having 10 meanings throughout its history:
  1. Replenished (adjective):
    1. fully stocked; provided, supplied;
    2. filled, pervaded;
    3. physically or materially filled;
    4. full, made full.
  2. To replenish:
    1. make full, fill, stock with, as in: ‘This man made the Newe Forest, and replenyshed it with wylde bestes’ (AD1494);
    2. inhabit, settle, occupy the whole of;
    3. fill with food, satiate;
    4. fill (space) with; fill (heart) with (a feeling);
    5. fill up again; fill up (a vacant office) (AD1632);
    6. become full, attain to fullness.



 
Last edited:

Lucy-Pevensie

Senior Member
Dec 20, 2017
9,267
5,626
113
That verse is not saying one of GOD's days is a thousand years. That verse if taken in context to the chapter is relating to the LORD's patience.
I agree, it seems many jump to the wrong conclusion over that verse and view it as a formula like this:

With the Lord a day IS a thousand years, and a thousand years IS a day.

It isn't a formula with which to measure the actual length of God's days.

It reads:
With the Lord a day IS LIKE a thousand years, and a thousand years ARE LIKE a day.

LIKE a thousand Not IS a thousand.


 

lightbearer

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
2,375
504
113
58
HBG. Pa. USA
I agree, it seems many jump to the wrong conclusion over that verse and view it as a formula like this:

With the Lord a day IS a thousand years, and a thousand years IS a day.

It isn't a formula with which to measure the actual length of God's days.

It reads:
With the Lord a day IS LIKE a thousand years, and a thousand years ARE LIKE a day.

LIKE a thousand Not IS a thousand.


Well said! BTW that is a awesome avatar Lucy!
 

Lucy-Pevensie

Senior Member
Dec 20, 2017
9,267
5,626
113
WHAT BIBLE VERSION(S) are you talking about? There are more than 20 that I know about.
You seem to be on a mission to disprove the Bible by constantly banging on about there being several English translations.
People are aware there are there are many translations. We use them and find it useful to compare one to the other in study.
I don't see a problem. I have faith that God can preserve his word.
 

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,248
6,541
113

The following was written prior to the Bible being compiled. What do you make of it?

But ye have an unction from the Holy One, and ye know all things. The anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
(1Jn 2:20,27)
The words you have quoted are a reminder to me of the knowledge and certainty that entered into me when the Holy Spirit first came into me, to my heart..

It gave me knowledge that Elohanu is everything and all. He told me Jesus Christ, Yeshua, had been abused by dnominational doctrines which all differ from the Word.

I believe this experience is the same for all who believe Jesus Christ....

I was indignant for Jesus Christ, Yeshua, not that He needs the defense of His children, yet I was, and am to this day.

Finally the message specific that came into me iw simple, though not in words, understood, "Everything is going to be fine."

I walked about three feet above the ground for sometime after this experience, and even since it overwhelms me in a most living and positive manner.

Forgive my wordiness.
 

DiscipleDave

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2012
3,095
69
48
Originally Posted by DiscipleDave

Scriptures interprets Scriptures.

Gen 1:8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.

Gen 1:20 And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.

So then according to Scriptures the Firmament is our Atmosphere.

A technically correct translation of Genesis 1:20 reads:

Genesis 1:20 And God said, “Let the waters bring forth swarms of living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the dome of the sky.” (NRSV)


So the last days generation who came up with that version is the one you choose to believe is the correct translation? But the version that has existed for over 400 years is no longer a correct version, which version by the way satan tried to destroy but God protected. This God protected version YOU THINK is no longer correct. And why, because you choose to believe one of hundreds of versions the last day generation comes up with. Strange, the version God protected and had His children believe for over 400 years is not a correct translation. Really? Wow. You see God would not, nor yet allowing, satan to get rid of the KJV, so what does satan do if he can't get rid of it? He has people come up with hundreds of other watered down versions to take people away from the version that God has protected and still is protecting. And the last days generation swallow it whole.


God gave us the Old Testament in Hebrew, and a very careful analysis of the Hebrew text of Genesis makes it very clear that the Old Testament does not say that birds fly “in the open firmament of heaven.” On pages 237-238 of his article (THE FIRMAMENT AND THE WATER ABOVE; Part I: The Meaning of raqia[SUP]c[/SUP] in Gen 1:6-8) in the Westminster Theological Journal (WTJ 53 (1991) 227-240), PAUL H. SEELY writes,
Does any statement or phrase appear in the OT which clearly states or implies that the raqia[SUP]c[/SUP] is not solid? Does anything in Genesis 1 state or imply the raqia[SUP]c[/SUP] was not (or was) solid? The fact that it was named "heaven(s)" in Gen 1:8 and birds fly in the heaven(s) (Deut 4: 17) seems to imply the raqia[SUP]c[/SUP] was not solid. But the word samayim (heaven) is broader in meaning than raqia[SUP]c[/SUP]. It encompasses not only the raqia[SUP]c[/SUP] (v. 8; Ps 19:6; 148:4) but the space above the raqia[SUP]c[/SUP] (Ps 2:4; 11:4; 139:8) as well as the space below (Ps 8:8; 79:2). Hence birds fly in the heavens, but never in the raqia[SUP]c[/SUP]. Rather, birds fly upon the face or in front of the raqia[SUP]c[/SUP] (Gen 1:20).

This phrase upon the face (surface) or in front of the raqia[SUP]c[/SUP] is important in that it implies the raqia[SUP]c[/SUP] was neither space nor atmosphere. For birds do not fly upon the surface or in front of space or air, but rather in space or air. This distinction is illustrated in the case of fish, which no one would say swim upon the surface or in front of the water (Gen 7: 18) but rather in the water (cr. Exod 7: 18, 21).

Gen 1:17 also testifies that the raqia[SUP]c[/SUP] is not air or atmosphere for it says that God placed the stars (and probably the sun and moon) "in the raqia[SUP]c[/SUP] or the heavens." But the stars are not located in the air or atmosphere. So we know the raqia[SUP]c[/SUP] (in which 1:17 locates them) cannot be air or atmosphere. Even if 1:17 is construed as phenomenal language, the raqia[SUP]c[/SUP] still cannot be air or atmosphere. For the stars do not look like they are located in the air or atmosphere. Rather (as anyone can tell on a clear night away from city lights) they look like they are embedded in a solid vault which is exactly why scientifically naive peoples believe in a solid vault, and why 1:17, in accordance with that belief, says God placed the stars in the raqia[SUP]c[/SUP]. Gen 1:14-17 is such a clear proof that the raqia[SUP]c[/SUP] is not air or atmosphere that some conservatives have tried to dissociate the raqia[SUP]c[/SUP] in vv. 14-17 from the raqia[SUP]c[/SUP] in vv. 6-8. But the statement in v. 14, "Let there be lights in the firmament or heaven," immediately raises the question, What "firmament of heaven"? To which the context immediately replies, the firmament of vv. 6-8 which was called heaven. The contextual identity of the two firmaments is really beyond question. Taken in context it is impossible to say the raqia[SUP]c[/SUP] of vv. 6-8 was just air or atmosphere.

On the contrary. For when God divided the light from the darkness (two intangibles) nothing was made. But in order to divide the tangible upper ocean from the lower ocean the raqia[SUP]c[/SUP] was made (hWf). The combination or dividing two tangibles (as opposed to intangibles) with something that was made (hWf), a verb which often means "manufacture," implies a tangible, i.e., solid divider. It would be unnatural to use hWf to say that God made space. Nor is it a particularly apt word for saying God made air. If a nonsolid divider had been in mind for separating the primeval ocean, the idea could have been communicated in a much more natural way. It could have been simply said that God put room (Mvqm) or space (Hvr ) as in Gen. 32:16 (17), or space (qvHr) as in Josh 3:4, between the two bodies of water. If air (a word never appearing in the OT) had been in mind as the divider, Hvr ("wind") could have been used, as in Exod 14:21, or hmwn ("breath") as in Gen 2:7; Ps 150:6.



Children can understand the Truths of God before the learned will ever grasp it. All that is written above is from learned men who have taken the simple plain Word of God and dissected it to fit into their own doctrines that they hold on to. i can change verses using this method also that makes homosexual marriages OK. Woe to those who take part in the last days generation method of interpreting the Word of God, They read a verse that they do not agree with is when they will take that verse to the Hebrew or Greek, in an attempt to change the simplicity in what the verse says to fit into what they believe the verse should say, thereby creating a false doctrine that they teach to others as well. They do not know, nor understand that interpretation DO NOT, nor ever will, belong to men. Interpretation belong to God. So as long as men try to interpret the Word of God, they will go to Hebrew / Greek / Aramaic / Latin / Lost Books and any number of other methods, to try to interpret the Word of God via the intellect of men.

^i^

††† In His Holy and Precious Name, Jesus Christ †††

DiscipleDave
 

DiscipleDave

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2012
3,095
69
48
Originally Posted by DiscipleDave

lol. believe 3,000,000 humans over God's Word. wow.
There is no conflict whatsoever between the word of God in the Bible and the truths that God, in His sovereignty, has taught us through men whom He has blessed with an excellent education.
i have studied Hebrew and Greek, all of it dung. If God reveals something to someone, then believe that. If a person reveals something that He has learned via his/her own intellect, Always question that. What God tells a person is always TRUE. What men tells a person based on their own intellect, is always subject to the sway of satan.

God reveals His secrets to His servants. If than a person reveals what God has told Him/her to others, that is TRUTH. But if man reveals to others what they have come up with via their own interpretations, their own studies, their own intellect. Always question what they are saying as TRUTH.

For example, scholars and learned people can all come up with intelligent assumption what the locusts are in Revelations, using their advanced education, their superior intellect, their countless hours of Hebrew and Greek application, their cross referencing this with that, and then they come up with an assumption what the locusts are.
And God reveals this secret to His servant. Who do you believe? Well this generation doesn't beleive God speaks to people anymore, so guess who this generation will believe, they will believe the men with, what did you call them?, Oh yeah excellent education. Lol as if men could actually interpret the Word of God.

Interpretations belong to God not to men. PERIOD!!! Any person who tries to interpret the Word of God via their own intellect, their own excellent education will be and usually are under the sway of satan. Why? because they are trying to interpret the Word of God as if they actually could do such a thing. Interpretation belong to God not to men.

According to the old Roman Catholic tradition that Genesis 1-11 should be interpreted as an accurate account of historic events, God did “create the Earth out of thin air in 6 days.” However, I refuse to be in bondage to old Roman Catholic traditions over and above the inspired word of God! Moreover, God did not die, retire, or fall asleep nearly 2,000 years ago! Indeed, God is still blessing us with information that helps us to better and better understand his awesome creation of the earth, and the most noble of all of his creatures, man!
And how does God bless us with information? Are you not saying by excellent education? Are you not saying via our own intellect, our own studies?

Amo_3:7 Surely the Lord GOD will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets.

So God reveals to whom God will reveal. So then anyone who tries to get those secrets some other way (ie, their own studies, Hebrew, Greek, their own intellect, their own minds, etc... ) will be swayed by satan to believe a false doctrine.

i have studied Hebrew and Greek. i have devoted to study living in a monastery, i have read the entire Bible over 80 times in my life. All of it dung compared to what God has told me concerning His Word, and what is to come.
What i teach is what God has told me, i rarely if ever teach anything at all that i have learned via my own studies of Scriptures. But what i have done quite a bit though, is remember Scriptures that confirms all that He told me in conversation. For example God told me that He is coming with the New City Jerusalem, to take up the Church during the middle of the Tribulation Period. Now when i read the Bible, i see all the verses that confirm that what He told me is actually TRUE. NOT that i used my intellect, but only believing what He told me, and seeing the verses that confirms it.
This generation believe so many false doctrines it is mind blowing, and all because of what? Men's interpretations.
Interpretations belong to God, woe to those who try to interpret the Word of God, as if they actually had the authority to do so. i use to be one of those who tried to interpret the Word of God to. Until God told me Interpretations do not belong to men, but He will reveal to whom He will reveal.
Anyone who tries to reveal a certain thing using the Hebrew/Greek most certainly has not been revealed to by God. If God told them a certain thing, they would not be saying "If you take this word or that word to the Hebrew it means _______" This interpretation is most certainly from a man's perspective and NOT something that God has revealed to them.

^i^

††† In His Holy and Precious Name, Jesus Christ †††

DiscipleDave
 

DiscipleDave

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2012
3,095
69
48
Originally Posted by DiscipleDave

And this is a comment from a person who is full of Love One for another?
Matt. 23:13. But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye shut the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye enter not in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering in to enter.
14. [Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hyprcrites! for ye devour widows' houses, even while for a pretence ye make long prayers: therefore ye shall receive greater condemnation.]
15. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte; and when he is become so, ye make him twofold more a son of hell than yourselves.
16. Woe unto you, ye blind guides, that say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor.
17. Ye fools and blind: for which is greater, the gold, or the temple that hath sanctified the gold? (ASV)

Love tells the truth!
Amen. So True.

Originally Posted by DiscipleDave


Sounds to me like you are one of those learned people, who believe things they can see, touch, taste, feel, and hear. And believes in PROOF, But lacks Faith.
My faith is in God and His word, rather than in interpretations of the Bible by men who lack the ability to read it.
Tell me, would you say someone who uses Hebrew and Greek to back up their own interpretations is in fact an interpretation of the Bible by men?

You say above that you do not believe in interpretation of the Bible by men, if this were True, then you would not believe your own self. For you reveal an interpretation then go about to reveal all the Hebrew and Greek that supports your interpretation. How is that not believing in an interpretation of the Bible by men?

^i^

††† In His Holy and Precious Name, Jesus Christ †††

DiscipleDave
 

DiscipleDave

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2012
3,095
69
48
No, you say that there was a flood—but the flood described in Genesis is biblically dependent upon the earth being flat and covered with a dome.

Genesis 1:6. And God said, “Let there be a dome in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters.”
7. So God made the dome and separated the waters that were under the dome from the waters that were above the dome. And it was so.
8. God called the dome Sky. And there was evening and there was morning, the second day.
9. And God said, “Let the waters under the sky be gathered together into one place, and let the dry land appear.” And it was so.
10. God called the dry land Earth, and the waters that were gathered together he called Seas. And God saw that it was good.

14. And God said, “Let there be lights in the dome of the sky to separate the day from the night; and let them be for signs and for seasons and for days and years,
15. and let them be lights in the dome of the sky to give light upon the earth.” And it was so.
16. God made the two great lights—the greater light to rule the day and the lesser light to rule the night—and the stars.
17. God set them in the dome of the sky to give light upon the earth,
18. to rule over the day and over the night, and to separate the light from the darkness. And God saw that it was good. (NRSV)

“One cannot take part of scriptures to believe without taking all”—that is, except for the earth being flat and covered with a dome.
Fret not, someone will soon come up with another version that will call the firmament "Cloud". We are in the last days why wouldn't there be a version of the Word of God that calls it "dome"?

^i^

††† In His Holy and Precious Name, Jesus Christ †††

DiscipleDave