KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLES
- Thread starter KingJamesVersionBibleOnly
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I don't think you're getting my point but that's ok.... I'm getting tired of this. 
The goal of Luke was to tell us when that event happened. With word "Easter" we cannot identify it, because modern Easter is not at that time and ancient Easter was a pagan holiday celebrated in a totally different time.
So, for a correct reading, the word "Pascha" needs to be used, as also Luke uses.
The KJV uses anachronism, the same as with "candle", "brass" or lets say "computer" instead of pergamen.
Last edited:
Have you any idea how silly this sounds!
The word and the concept of easter (it was a pagan festival) did not exist for the people who wrote the New testament.
You need to accept that the word "Easter" does NOT belong in any translation of the Bible in ANY language at ANY time!
There is just no getting away from the fact that the word translated "Easter" in the KJV is "πάσχα " which means "Passover".
No amount of sophistry can change this.
This is an error of translation and there is no denying it!
It is likely that the word "Easter" in the KJV actually did not come from a Greek language manuscript but from the Latin Vulgate.
If I dug deep enough I could probably confirm it, but its source is immaterial - it is an error....
The word and the concept of easter (it was a pagan festival) did not exist for the people who wrote the New testament.
You need to accept that the word "Easter" does NOT belong in any translation of the Bible in ANY language at ANY time!
There is just no getting away from the fact that the word translated "Easter" in the KJV is "πάσχα " which means "Passover".
No amount of sophistry can change this.
This is an error of translation and there is no denying it!
It is likely that the word "Easter" in the KJV actually did not come from a Greek language manuscript but from the Latin Vulgate.
If I dug deep enough I could probably confirm it, but its source is immaterial - it is an error....
No. Easter is the spring festival devoted to the worship of the goddess Astoreth.
Astoreth (Northwest Semitic), a form of Ishtar (East Semitic), worshipped from the Bronze Age through classical antiquity. The name is particularly associated with her worship in the ancient Levant among the Canaanites and Phoenicians. She was also celebrated in Egypt following the importation of Levantine cults there. The name Astarte is sometimes also applied to her cults in Mesopotamian cultures like Assyria and Babylonia. Astarte (Greek: Ἀστάρτη, Astártē) is the Hellenized form of the Middle Eastern goddess
So, Easter and the German mythology are proven unrelated.
For the German myth is related to the equinox of the sun, but Easter is related to Passover by use of the moon, as it should be.
I can tell you critics are trying language experts by the way you present language as if it is designed to allow communication devoid of context.
For the German myth is related to the equinox of the sun, but Easter is related to Passover by use of the moon, as it should be.
I can tell you critics are trying language experts by the way you present language as if it is designed to allow communication devoid of context.
I note that the time denoting “after Easter” occurs later in time than does, “after Passover.”
So, again, quite notably, they aren’t really the same in the context of the persecution of Peter as a Christian.
The use of Easter avoids the Jewish view because the Jews weren’t in the context, and it also reveals how rapidly Christianity distinguished itself as not being of Mosaic law and Jewish religion.
So, again, quite notably, they aren’t really the same in the context of the persecution of Peter as a Christian.
The use of Easter avoids the Jewish view because the Jews weren’t in the context, and it also reveals how rapidly Christianity distinguished itself as not being of Mosaic law and Jewish religion.
This occurs often because the Devil hates true Christianity and always tries to associate his pagan things with Christianity.
That’s why you end up with people thinking that The King James Bible is the title of the Holy Bible.
And why the Appocrypha was inserted as if it should be thought related to the Holy Bible.
And why a phony book called the Septuagint was invented.
And what happens?
Uneducated followers of heathen scholars blindly accept flies in their flavorite corrupted ointment.
That’s why you end up with people thinking that The King James Bible is the title of the Holy Bible.
And why the Appocrypha was inserted as if it should be thought related to the Holy Bible.
And why a phony book called the Septuagint was invented.
And what happens?
Uneducated followers of heathen scholars blindly accept flies in their flavorite corrupted ointment.