KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLES
- Thread starter KingJamesVersionBibleOnly
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Don't you all know that everything in Scripture is ultimately about bible versions, exalting the king jimmy, and damning mv's? Get your act together, join them, then give a token comment about our LORD once in a blue moon. 
#kingjimmyandme #corrupt #pure #doyouhavethewordofgod? #preserves #smuckers
#kingjimmyandme #corrupt #pure #doyouhavethewordofgod? #preserves #smuckers
Passionate? No, you're obsessed and thoroughly hoodwinked.
You have, hold, teach and share much wrong doctrine. That's a well known fact.
But you won't let facts get in your way.
In your perpetual quest to exalt a version you rarely give Christ any praise unless prompted or reminded. Your version is of more importance. The self-deception is witnessed when you make a comeback with the kjv and Christ are the same thing. You've done this on multiple occasions.
It's not your bible version that has led you astray into much heresy. It's summed up in 1 Corinthians 2:14 along with a failure to heed 2 Timothy 2:15. It's saddening to see you've learned absolutely nothing after being refuted multiple times on here.
Basically it's haughtiness and shows that you're unteachable.
You have, hold, teach and share much wrong doctrine. That's a well known fact.
But you won't let facts get in your way.
In your perpetual quest to exalt a version you rarely give Christ any praise unless prompted or reminded. Your version is of more importance. The self-deception is witnessed when you make a comeback with the kjv and Christ are the same thing. You've done this on multiple occasions.
It's not your bible version that has led you astray into much heresy. It's summed up in 1 Corinthians 2:14 along with a failure to heed 2 Timothy 2:15. It's saddening to see you've learned absolutely nothing after being refuted multiple times on here.
Basically it's haughtiness and shows that you're unteachable.
Without prejudice eh? Thank you. You have given me a good laugh this afternoon.
" Don't take this the wrong way or anything but your Bible was written by Satan"
" Don't take this the wrong way or anything but your Bible was written by Satan"
I know nothing about Christ but through the Scriptures. When I trusted Christ, I was trusting in what Scripture says about Christ. Faith come by hearing and hearing by the word of God.
I worship Jesus because of what Scriptures says about Jesus. I pray to Jesus because Scripture commands me to. I want to please Jesus with my life because Scripture commands me to. I want to know Jesus more through the Scriptures.
I worship Jesus because of what Scriptures says about Jesus. I pray to Jesus because Scripture commands me to. I want to please Jesus with my life because Scripture commands me to. I want to know Jesus more through the Scriptures.
This passage is talking about the man of lawlessness and the delusion that will come on persistent unbelievers at the end of the age. It is not talking about "skeptics" who simply don't accept the truth at first glance but take more to become convinced.
Lee Strobel was a skeptic. Did God lead him to believe a lie? C.S. Lewis was a skeptic. Did God lead him to believe a lie?
Using loose synonyms such as "skeptic" and "unbeliever" in the same way is not sound application of Scripture.
Lee Strobel was a skeptic. Did God lead him to believe a lie? C.S. Lewis was a skeptic. Did God lead him to believe a lie?
Using loose synonyms such as "skeptic" and "unbeliever" in the same way is not sound application of Scripture.
Show us any "different truth" or "different doctrine" that is actually taught by someone not using a KJV. Alleged doctrines made up by KJV-onlyists don't stand as evidence.
Further, your exalted KJV has been shown faulty in numerous places. That you don't accept that reality makes you a rejector of the truth, and subject to the same judgment you cast so blithely on others.
Further, your exalted KJV has been shown faulty in numerous places. That you don't accept that reality makes you a rejector of the truth, and subject to the same judgment you cast so blithely on others.
I must disagree.
I do not think that he (or anybody else) trusted in all Bible in the moment of belief/conversion.
We all accepted or trusted some core Christianity, Apostolic Creed and some more details about salvation by faith.
Age of Azariah, days of creation, global flood etc were totally irrelevant to that conversion and still is... So his idea is not perfectly valid. Its overkill.
I do not think that he (or anybody else) trusted in all Bible in the moment of belief/conversion.
We all accepted or trusted some core Christianity, Apostolic Creed and some more details about salvation by faith.
Age of Azariah, days of creation, global flood etc were totally irrelevant to that conversion and still is... So his idea is not perfectly valid. Its overkill.
But in my opinion, He is saying that his salvation is dependent on precisely perfect Bible, in every detail of it. He is not able to separate it from Christ. Thats why so cruel and evil attacks against any other translation, against any word change, against every uncertainity.
Christ is not locked in a book. If 80% of Bible is preserved or 60% or even only some basic messages, it still does not have any impact on God, on Christ, on our salvation, on the Holy Spirit leading the church and preserving her by various gifts and tools. If we would lost whole the Bible, He can always give us new one or other ways of learning.
Thats the difference between believing in God vs believing in a specific book. IMHO.
Christ is not locked in a book. If 80% of Bible is preserved or 60% or even only some basic messages, it still does not have any impact on God, on Christ, on our salvation, on the Holy Spirit leading the church and preserving her by various gifts and tools. If we would lost whole the Bible, He can always give us new one or other ways of learning.
Thats the difference between believing in God vs believing in a specific book. IMHO.
Last edited:
You never do, why would you start now???? You're haughty and unteachable.
Exactly my point: you equate the king jimmy with Christ, top you they're one in the same and others are becoming aware of this fact with. I guarantee this didn't take place at your conversion (assuming you're a believer) but you were indoctrinated and spoiled with this ideology later on. Someone got a hold of you, and you're reeling in error to date.
God put the gift of faith in me and that faith is in Christ not a dead tree. Now, I learn more about Christ via very good translations such as the NASB, ESV, NKJV, YLT. I rarely, if ever, use the KJV as there is no need, it's antiquated, inaccurate in places and clumsy in language. It also brings with it the stigma of the cultic KJVO's around here who cause more division, sow more discord, and show more disdain toward others than well known cultic groups.
Bottom line: You've put your trust in a version which is the same as the person of Christ to you.
Exactly my point: you equate the king jimmy with Christ, top you they're one in the same and others are becoming aware of this fact with. I guarantee this didn't take place at your conversion (assuming you're a believer) but you were indoctrinated and spoiled with this ideology later on. Someone got a hold of you, and you're reeling in error to date.
God put the gift of faith in me and that faith is in Christ not a dead tree. Now, I learn more about Christ via very good translations such as the NASB, ESV, NKJV, YLT. I rarely, if ever, use the KJV as there is no need, it's antiquated, inaccurate in places and clumsy in language. It also brings with it the stigma of the cultic KJVO's around here who cause more division, sow more discord, and show more disdain toward others than well known cultic groups.
Bottom line: You've put your trust in a version which is the same as the person of Christ to you.
