I'm not sure why you keep saying this. I have said at least twice that it is not out of the scope of God's ability. This makes the third time I am saying that sure, if God had WANTED to, God could absolutely have created the world in six 24-hour days. What I have been saying is that God chose not to do this. If God had done this, the creation would indicate that age, because the God in whom I believe, in whom I put my trust, does not lie.
I would ask, "Can you show me one reason why God would lie," except that I know you've already said you don't believe he does.
Of course, your insistence on a literal interpretation of Genesis requires a lying god. I've explained it several times, but maybe you haven't understood yet, so I'll try it again.
The creation says it is billions of years old. You believe that it is not, because you insist on a literal interpretation of Genesis. Unfortunately, if creation is NOT billions of years old, that means that whoever created the world planted lies in that creation making it appear older than it was. If you believe that God created the world, planting lies in it, you believe that God is a liar. There's no getting around it, if you insist on a literal interpretation of Genesis.
The odd thing is, even before humans knew that the world was billions of years old, they read Genesis figuratively. They thought the world was much younger than it is, because they had no evidence to the contrary, but they did understand that Genesis 1:1-2:4a was clearly intended to be taken figuratively, and that, while God may have only taken six days (or six minutes, or six billions years ... they didn't know or particularly care) to create the universe, the descriptions given in Genesis were clearly poetic and symbolic, not literal.
Again, I have stated several times that I believe God DID write the Bible. I will ask you again, nicely, please do not lie about what I have said. If you don't remember what I said, that is one thing, but it seems you are more forgetful than someone of your advanced intellect should be.
God wrote the Bible. God chooses many different genres in his communication with us. Jesus spoke in parables as often as (if not more than) not. I believe that Jesus was and is God. Therefore, it makes sense that God would use parables as well.
I know there are some branches of Christianity that do not believe that Jesus is/was the same as God, but I think I remember you saying you did not belong to one of those sects.
I have given you several over the past several days, several more in this post, and will continue to give you more. I understand that you need to pretend like I'm not giving you actual explanations, because otherwise you might be forced to question your faith, and that can be scary. But it doesn't have to be. Please know that millions of devout Christians have been able to keep their faith completely intact while rejecting outmoded or even harmful ideas that have been taught to them. It's all up to you. I will continue to work on you, because I think you are intelligent, and it's worth trying to get you to understand. Call me stubborn, or maybe the Spirit has moved me to work on you, I don't know. For whatever reason, I seem to be compelled to keep on keeping on, long after most would have thrown in the towel.