Someone please answer my question .

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
No, I am right. You are wrong. Using big fonts with color in a juvenile manner does not make you any more right either.

As Dr. Daniel Wallace (PhD from and professor of New Testament Studies at Dallas Theological Seminary) states in 'The Conspiracy Behind New Bible Translations', the 1611 edition of the KJV relied on a critically edited Greek text that was “for the most part based on about half a dozen very late manuscripts (none earlier than the 12th century AD).”

These late manuscripts include editions of the Greek New Testament by Erasmus, as well as Robert Estienne’s (a.k.a. ‘Stephanus’) edition (1550), and Theodore Beza’s edition (1598).

It is true that these few manuscripts came from a larger pool two of which can be dated back to the fourth century; however, the Alexandrian text-type predates them all in the earliest surviving New Testament manuscripts.

You obviously have no idea what you're talking about and have lied about being a PhD in this field.


That's Not True The N.T. manuscripts of the AV 1611 KJV Holy Bible predate the existing 45 Alexandrian manuscripts and the reconstructed Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus. Be sincere, have you examined the Codex Vaticanus ? I'm just asking .
 

blue_ladybug

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2014
70,869
9,601
113
No, I am right. You are wrong. Using big fonts with color in a juvenile manner does not make you any more right either.

As Dr. Daniel Wallace (PhD from and professor of New Testament Studies at Dallas Theological Seminary) states in 'The Conspiracy Behind New Bible Translations', the 1611 edition of the KJV relied on a critically edited Greek text that was “for the most part based on about half a dozen very late manuscripts (none earlier than the 12th century AD).”

These late manuscripts include editions of the Greek New Testament by Erasmus, as well as Robert Estienne’s (a.k.a. ‘Stephanus’) edition (1550), and Theodore Beza’s edition (1598).

It is true that these few manuscripts came from a larger pool two of which can be dated back to the fourth century; however, the Alexandrian text-type predates them all in the earliest surviving New Testament manuscripts.

You obviously have no idea what you're talking about and have lied about being a PhD in this field.

he was banned.. ;)
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
I love CC moderators. These genuine Christians do a difficult and often thankless job as ministry. Bless them for doing it. I don't want to think what CC would be like without moderators. The trolls and wolves, false teachers and false prophets, liars and con artists would run free *shudder*. Perish that thought because we have moderators :).

 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
And seriously, if you're going to misrepresent yourself as a PhD, don't choose anything relating to history because it's easy to qualify and you'll be rapidly routed and outed for the fraud you are.

Pick something like thermochemistry. It won't save you from me, but you can babble incessantly for perhaps up to two months before being banned as a fraud. I mean seriously, history? Dude, you're a rank amateur at trolling. You didn't even make it through the week.